Daniel McGowan, Another "War on Terrorism" Victim
April 6, 2009
According to this article just released, the US Supreme Court announced that they will not give further consideration to Mumia's appeal for a new guilt-phase trial (in legalese, they won't grant his "Petition for a Writ of Certiorari")
However, it also says that the US Supreme Court may still consider the DA's appeal to re-instate the death penalty without a new sentencing hearing!
This is another terribly dark day for justice in this country!
Hans Bennett
Abu-Jamal-News.com
Supreme Court lets Mumia Abu-Jamal's conviction stand
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/06/mumia.supreme.court/
By Bill Mears
CNN Supreme Court Producer
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court has let stand the conviction of former Black Panther Mumia Abu-Jamal, who was sent to death row for gunning down a Philadelphia police officer 28 years ago.
He contends blacks were unfairly excluded from the jury, and has been an outspoken activist from behind bars. The justices made their announcement Monday.
A separate appeal over whether Abu-Jamal deserves a new sentencing hearing has not been taken up by the high court. Prosecutors are appealing a federal appeals court ruling in Abu-Jamal's favor last year on the sentencing issue.
The case has attracted international attention amid charges of prosecutorial misconduct and the inmate's outspoken personality.
Abu-Jamal, a former radio reporter and cab driver has been a divisive figure, with many prominent supporters arguing that racism pervaded his trial. Others countered Abu-Jamal is using his skin color to escape responsibility for his actions. They say he has divided the community for years with his provocative writing and activism.
He was convicted for the December 9, 1981, murder of Officer Daniel Faulkner, 25, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Faulkner had pulled over Abu-Jamal's brother in a late-night traffic stop.
Witnesses said Abu-Jamal, who was nearby, ran over and shot the policeman in the back and in the head. Abu-Jamal, once known as Wesley Cook, was also wounded in the encounter and later
confessed to the killing, according to other witnesses testimony.
Abu-Jamal is black and the police officer was white. Incarcerated for nearly three decades, Abu-Jamal has been an active critic of the criminal justice system.
On a Web site created by friends to promote the release this month of his new book, the prisoner-turned-author writes about his fight. "This is the story of law learned, not in the ivory towers of multi-billion dollar endowed universities but in the bowels of the slave-ship, in the hidden, dank dungeons of America."
His chief defense attorney, Robert Bryan, had urged the justices to grant a new criminal trial, but the high court offered no explanation for its refusal to intervene.
"The central issue in this case is racism in jury selection," Bryan wrote to supporters last month. Ten whites and two blacks made up the original jury panel that sentenced Abu-Jamal to death.
A three-judge panel of the 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a year ago kept the murder conviction in place, but ordered a new capital sentencing hearing. That court ultimately concluded the jury was improperly instructed on how to weigh "mitigating factors" offered by the defense that might have kept Abu-Jamal off death row.
Pennsylvania law at the time said jurors did not have to unanimously agree on a mitigating circumstance, such as the fact that Abu-Jamal had no prior criminal record. Months before that ruling, oral arguments on the issue were contentious.
Faulkner's widow and Abu-Jamal's brother attended, and demonstrations on both sides were held
outside the courtroom in downtown Philadelphia.
Many prominent groups and individuals, including singer Harry Belafonte, the NAACP and the European Parliament, are cited on his Web site as supporters.
Prosecutors have insisted Abu-Jamal pay the price for his crimes, and have aggressively resisted
efforts to take him of death row for Faulkner's murder.
"This assassination has been made a circus by those people in the world and this city who believe falsely that Mumia Abu-Jamal is some kind of a folk hero," said
Philadelphia District Attorney Lynne Abraham last year, when the federal appeals court upheld the conviction. "He is nothing short of an assassin."
By J. Patrick O’Connor
Since his conviction in 1982 for the murder of Philadelphia Police Officer Daniel Faulkner, Mumia Abu-Jamal, through his numerous books, essays and radio commentaries, has become the face of the anti-death penalty movement in the United States and an international cause célèbre. Paris, for example, made him an honorary citizen in 2003, bestowing the honor for the first time since Pablo Picasso received it in 1971.
Abu-Jamal’s case has been politically charged from the beginning. As Amnesty International established in its 2000 pamphlet entitled "The Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal: A Life in the Balance," his tortuous appeal process has been fraught with "judicial machinations." Claims that won the day in other cases were repeatedly denied him, first by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 1989 and subsequently by a Federal District Court in 2001 where the judge overturned his death sentence but left in place in his conviction – and Abu-Jamal on death row – pending further appeals.
The latest example of what has become known as "the Mumia exception" occurred in March of 2008 when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in a sharply divided 2-1 decision, turned down Abu-Jamal’s appeal for a new trial based on the claim that the prosecutor – through his use of peremptory challenges – purged otherwise qualified blacks from his jury. In 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark Batson decision, ruling that racial discrimination in jury selection is unconstitutional and merits the harmed defendant a new trial.
In a nutshell, the Third Circuit majority denied Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim on a technicality of its own invention, not on its merits, ruling that his claim failed because he was not able to establish the racial composition of the entire jury pool at his 1982 trial. In issuing its ruling, the court, incredibly, ignored its own previous opposite rulings in the Holloway v. Horn in 2004 and Brinson v. Vaughn in 2005 where it specifically ruled it was not required for the defendants in those cases to establish such data.
Abu-Jamal’s final opportunity for judicial relief is now before the U.S. Supreme Court in the form of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. On February 4, the high court docketed and accepted that filing. According to Abu-Jamal’s lead attorney, Robert Bryan of San Francisco, "The central issue in this case is racism in jury selection. The prosecution systematically removed people from sitting on the trial jury purely because of the color of their skin, that is, being black."
Joseph McGill, the prosecutor at Abu-Jamal’s trial, has stipulated in previous appeal proceedings that he used 10 of the 15 peremptory challenges he exercised to exclude blacks from the jury – a strike rate of 66.67 percent against potential black jurors. Such a high strike rate is in itself an extremely strong inference of discrimination. The result was that – in a city with a black population of over 40 percent in 1982 – only three of the 12 jurors impaneled were black. As Third Circuit Judge Thomas Ambro pointedly stated in his dissent, "It is my belief that the 66.67 percent strike rate, without reference to the total venire [jury pool], can stand on its own for the purpose of raising an inference of discrimination."
During last year’s term, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded its 1986 Batson ruling to warrant a new trial if a minority defendant could show the inference of racial bias in the prosecutor’s peremptory exclusion of one juror. Under Batson, the defense needed to show an inference – i.e., a pattern – of racial bias in the overall jury selection process. Ironically, the Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision strengthening and expanding Batson’s reach was written by Justice Samuel Alito, most recently of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
As a result, there is something more than a remote possibility that the Supreme Court will agree to grant Abu-Jamal’s writ. In denying Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim, the Third Circuit’s ruling created new law by placing new restrictions on a defendant’s ability to file a Batson claim. The Third Circuit, in effect, tampered with and undermined a long-established Supreme Court ruling.
A Writ of Certiorari is a decision by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court. Supreme Court justices rarely give a reason why they accept or deny Cert. Although all nine justices are involved in considering Cert Petitions, it takes only four justices to grant a Writ of Certiorari, even if five justices are against it. This is known as "the rule of four."
If the Supreme Court were to grant Cert on Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim, one clean, simple option for it would be to remand the case to federal district court for the Batson hearing both the Federal District Court in 2001 and the Third Circuit in 2008 should have ordered. Such a hearing would, in all probability except for "the Mumia exception," lead to a new trial for Abu-Jamal. A new trial, considering the utter travesty of justice his original trial represented, would set him free. If Certiorari is denied, Abu-Jamal – now 54 – will, barring the most unlikely intervention by a future governor of Pennsylvania, spend the rest of his life in prison.
—J. Patrick O’Connor is the editor of Crime Magazine (www.crimemagazine.com) and the author of The Framing of Mumia Abu-Jamal, published by Lawrence Hill Books in 2008.
-------------------
ARTICLE FROM 2008:
Analysis of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal
By J. Patrick O’Connor
(2008)
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s ruling in the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal continues a long and tortured denial of Abu-Jamal’s right to a fair trial. Just as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed its own precedent to deny Abu-Jamal a new trial based on the prosecutor’s improper summation to the jury during the guilt phase of his trial, the Third Circuit’s March 27 decision has now followed suit by going against its own well-established precedent regarding Abu-Jamal’s well founded Batson claim. Instead of remanding the case to federal district court for consideration of Abu-Jamal’s claim that his trial prosecutor purged blacks from the jury by using peremptory challenges in a discriminatory manner at his 1982 trial, a 2-1 majority of judges ruled to uphold the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s denying his Batson claim.
On Abu-Jamal’s other two claims before the Third Circuit, the three-judge panel was unanimous in its rulings. It denied Abu-Jamal’s claim that the prosecutor’s summation to the jury during the guilt phase of the trial infringed his constitutional right to a fair trial, finding that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s denying of this claim was not "unreasonable." Abu-Jamal’s claim that Judge Sabo was biased against him during his Post Conviction Relief Act hearing was denied because "alleged errors in collateral proceedings are not a proper basis for habeas relief...It is the original trial that is the ‘main event’ for habeas purposes."
The panel upheld Federal District Court Yohn’s 2001 ruling overturning Abu-Jamal’s death sentence, ordering the Philadelphia D.A.’s Office to hold a new sentencing hearing within 180 days or to sentence Abu-Jamal to life in prison without parole.
The chances of the D.A.’s Office holding a new sentencing hearing are about as non-existent as its chances for getting a new jury to reinstate the death penalty for Abu-Jamal. For one thing it would be the sentencing hearing of all sentencing hearings. The hearing would take weeks to conduct and would be guaranteed to attract hundreds, if not thousands, of Abu-Jamal’s ardent supporters to Philadelphia’s landmark City Hall. A new jury would be impaneled to hear the facts of the case, many of which could be challenged and probably debunked by Abu-Jamal’s attorneys. And unlike at Abu-Jamal’s last sentencing hearing where his defense attorney called no character witnesses to testify on his behalf, a who’s who of witnesses would be placed under oath before the jury to attest to his admirable character. A much more likely course is for the D.A.’s Office to appeal the overturning of the death sentence to the overall Third Circuit, requesting an en banc hearing, or, if that is denied, a direct appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Philadelphia D.A. Lynne Abraham will appeal out of spite, in keeping with her long running vendetta against Abu-Jamal, not because she holds out any hope of a higher court reinstating the death penalty.
The Abu-Jamal case has been racially charged and politicized from the outset, from the time of his arrest when Police Inspector Alfonzo Giordano set the framing of the former Black Panther in motion by enticing prostitute Cynthia White to perjure herself about Officer Daniel Faulkner’s shooting. The Third Circuit Court’s ruling continues the injustice. Is it a coincidence that the two judges in the majority were both appointed by President Reagan and the lone Democrat-appointed judge on the three-judge panel was the dissenter? It seems not. As the U.S. Supreme Court itself demonstrates time and time again in its decisions, not even its justices are free of partisan and ideological biases.
In Chief Judge Anthony Scirica’s summation of the case for the Third Circuit majority, he makes no attempt to demonstrate that he actually sifted through the pages of conflicting trial testimony to prove that he even read that testimony or gave it any meaningful analysis. He simply buys into the prosecution’s entire scenario of how Officer Faulkner came to die despite the ballistics and medical evidence presented at trial showing otherwise. Scirica has Abu-Jamal running toward Faulkner and shooting him in the back. As Faulkner falls to the ground, he was able to turn around, reach for his own firearm, and fire at Abu-Jamal, striking him in the chest. He then has Abu-Jamal standing over Faulkner and firing four shots at close range. One of the shots strikes Faulkner between the eyes and enters his brain.
Scirica mistakenly has Robert Chobert – instead of taxi driver Robert Harkins – stopping Officers Shoemaker and Forbes to inform them of Faulkner’s shooting.
He has Shoemaker giving Abu-Jamal "repeated orders to freeze, but Abu-Jamal reaching for an object – a revolver – near his hand, prompting Shoemaker to kick Abu-Jamal in the chest to move him away from the gun." Abu-Jamal was blacked out at the time of Shoemaker’s arrival.
Scirica has Abu-Jamal resisting arrest while officers moved him to a police van, without referencing the fact that – as police testimony at trial showed – Abu-Jamal was too weak to stand and had to be carried to the van and en route the police rammed his head into a pole and dropped him to the ground.
He reprises security guard Priscilla Dunham’s claim about Abu-Jamal defiantly shouting out a confession, which he quotes verbatim.
The chief judge has Cynthia White seeing Abu-Jamal shoot Faulkner in the back, then "hover" over Faulkner, prior to shooting him a few more times and then Abu-Jamal sitting down on the curb. The judge does not reference the fact that not one witness at trial could recall seeing her at the scene, that she had 38 arrests for prostitution in Philadelphia, and that she so altered her original statement to the police about the shooting that she had no credibility.
Next Scirica took up Robert Chobert. He said Chobert heard a shot, looked up and saw Faulkner fall to the ground, and then saw Abu-Jamal fire a few shots into Faulkner. At trail, Chobert had claimed to have been parked directly behind Faulkner’s patrol car. No witnesses, not even Cynthia White, noticed a taxi cab behind the patrol car and none was there when police arrived within two minutes of the shooting. In his trial testimony, Chobert, like White, backed away in numerous important details from his original statement to the police given shortly after the shooting.
Scirica has eye-witness Michael Scanlan saying he saw an assailant shoot Faulkner from behind, then watched as Faulkner fell, and saw the assailant stand over Faulkner and shoot him in the face. Scirica does not mention that Scanlan identified the shooter as having an Afro and wearing a black knit cap or that Scanlan testified he never saw the man running from the parking lot [Abu-Jamal] shoot the officer.
Scirica credits Anthony Jackson with "spending the last five months preparing for trial," when, in fact, once Judge Ribner agreed at a pre-trial hearing to allow Abu-Jamal to represent himself pro se that Jackson virtually stopped preparing for trial and had not pre-interviewed one witness prior to trial.
More absurdly, Scirica states that Jackson kept Abu-Jamal "fully informed throughout the proceedings" during the time that Abu-Jamal was banished from the courtroom, which was over half his trial. In reality, Abu-Jamal and Jackson hardly conferred at all during the trial.
Judge Scirica’s cavalier disregard for the trial record would underpin the majority’s view of the merits of Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim.
In its ruling on the Batson claim, the majority stated that it believed Abu-Jamal had "forfeited his Batson claim by failing to make a timely objection. But even assuming Abu-Jamal’s failure to object is not fatal to his claim, Abu-Jamal has failed to meet his burden in providing a prima facie case." The majority wrote that he failed because his attorneys at his PCRA evidentiary hearing failed to elicit the prosecutor’s reasons for removing 10 otherwise qualified blacks by means of peremptory strikes during jury selection.
"Abu-Jamal had the opportunity to develop this evidence at the PCRA evidentiary hearing, but failed to do so. There may be instances where a prima facie case can be made without evidence of the strike rate and exclusion rate. But in this case, we cannot find the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling [denying Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim] unreasonable based on this incomplete record," the majority wrote. In a nutshell, the majority denied Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim on a technicality of its own invention, not on its merits. It also ignored its own previous opposite ruling in the Holloway v. Horn case in 2004.
Judge Thomas Ambro’s dissent was sharp: "...I do not agree with them [the majority] that Mumia Abu-Jamal fails to meet the low bar for making a prima facie case under Batson. In holding otherwise, they raise the standard necessary to make out a prima facie case beyond what Batson calls for."
In other words, the majority, in this case alone, has upped the ante required for making a Batson claim beyond what the United States Supreme Court stipulated. When ruling in Batson in 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court imposed no timeliness restrictions as to when a Batson claim may be raised, nor has the court done so in the intervening 22 years. Neither did it require that the racial composition of the entire jury pool be known before a Batson claim could be raised. (In fact, the Supreme Court recently added heft to its Batson ruling, ruling in Synder that the purging of only one black juror on the basis of racial discrimination was grounds for a new trial.) In addition, the Supreme Court ruled in 1986 that to establish a prima facie case for a Batson claim, the defendant must show only "an inference" of prosecutorial discrimination in purging potential jurors. Even the Third Circuit has never previously allowed the timing of a Batson claim to be material, nor had it ever ruled previously that not knowing the racial composition of the entire jury pool was a fatal flaw in lodging a Batson claim.
The fact that the prosecutor in Abu-Jamal’s case used 10 of the 15 peremptory challenges to exclude blacks from the jury – a strike rate of 66.67 percent against potential black jurors – is in itself an extremely strong inference of discrimination. The result was that only three of the 12 jurors impaneled were black. As Judge Ambro correctly stated in his dissent, "It is my belief that the 66.67 percent strike rate, without reference to the total venire [jury pool], can stand on its own for the purpose of raising an inference of discrimination."
Ambro followed that assertion by writing, "My colleagues attempt to downplay the strike rate by saying it is essentially meaningless without reference to the racial makeup of the venire as a whole. They claim it is impossible to understand such a high strike rate without ‘contextual markers’ about the entire jury venire. While such ‘markers’ would be helpful, the lack of a record containing that information should not serve as an absolute bar to Abu-Jamal’s claim. Simply put, the failure to develop a record of the entire venire pool or all black members in that pool (against which to compare the prosecutor’s use of peremptory strikes) does not defeat a prima facie Batson claim. This is because Batson does not place the burden on the petitioner to develop a full statistical accounting in order to clear the low prima facie hurdle of the Batson analysis."
In commenting on Holloway v. Horn, a case with striking similarities to Abu-Jamal Batson’s claim, Ambro demonstrated just how disingenuous the panel’s ruling against Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim was. "In Holloway, we emphasized that ‘requiring the presentation of [a record detailing the race of the venire] simply to move past the first [prima facie] stage in the Batson analysis places an undue burden upon the defendant. There we found the strike rate – 11 of 12 peremptory strikes against black persons – satisfied the prima facie burden despite the lack of contextual markers my colleagues now seek here." In Holloway, the Third Circuit ruled that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision denying Holloway’s Batson claim was "contrary to" and an "unreasonable application of" the Batson standard.
In fact, in rendering its Holloway decision, the Third Circuit specifically rejected the requirement that a petitioner develop a complete record of the jury venire. In making its ruling in Abu-Jamal’s appeal, it reversed itself to make the pretext of an incomplete jury record his fatal misstep.
The Third Circuit – if it had followed its own precedent – would have found the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling denying Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim "unreasonable" and remanded the case back to Federal District Court Judge Yohn – the judge who ruled on Abu-Jamal’s habeas corpus petition in 2001 – to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the prosecutors’s reasons for excluding the 10 potential black jurors he struck. If that hearing satisfied Judge Yohn that all of the prosecutor’s reasons for striking potential black jurors were race neutral, Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim would fail. If, conversely, that hearing revealed racial discrimination on the part of the prosecutor during jury selection – even if only concerning one potential juror – Yohn would be compelled to order a new trial for Abu-Jamal.
Abu-Jamal is left with only two remedies to correct the flawed Third Circuit ruling. His first option is to request the Third Circuit to review its decision en banc where the entire panel of judges sitting on the Third Circuit would conduct oral arguments anew. On April 9, the Third Circuit granted Abu-Jamal’s petition for Extension of Time to File for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, allowing Abu-Jamal’s attorneys until May 27 to file.
According to Abu-Jamal’s lead attorney, Robert R. Bryan, the basis of the petition he will file is that the Third Circuit’s "decision conflicts with a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court or of the court [Third Circuit] to which petition is addressed and consideration of the full court is therefore necessary to secure uniformity of the court’s decisions," and "the proceeding involves one or more questions of exceptional importance."
There is some likelihood that the Third Circuit might agree to meet en banc because the panel’s decision to deny Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim went against that court’s own well-established precedents in granting similar Batson claims in the past. However, the barrier to en banc deliberations is that a majority of the sitting judges must vote to sit. In the case of the Third Circuit, there are 12 judges eligible to vote, but four have already recused themselves from this particular case, meaning five of the remaining eight judges would be needed to go forward en banc. Abu-Jamal has most probably had his one day before the Third Circuit.
Barring an en banc hearing by the Third Circuit, Abu-Jamal’s final option is to appeal the Third Circuit’s ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has on three previous occasions denied to take up his case. This time, though, there is a remote possibility that the high court may take the case up because the Third Circuit’s ruling created new law by placing new restrictions on a defendant’s ability to file a Batson claim.
Spirit of Freedom
(April 2009)
Produced by
EARTH LIBERATION PRISONERS SUPPORT NETWORK
"The whole experience has been tough, but all the kind and strengthening
words and wise thoughts from strangers made it much easier!"
(Former Swedish Animal Rights Prisoner)
Welcome to the April 2009 edition of Spirit of Freedom. Last month Urgent
ELP! reported the jailing of the British anti-hunt campaigner/gyrocopter
pilot, Bryan Griffiths, following a tragic accident where a hunt supporter
was hit by Bryan's gyrocopter. Despite the death being an obvious and clear
accident, Bryan has been wrongly charged with murder. ELP urges everyone to
support Bryan and to send him letters of support. But we would remind
everyone that regardless of your opinion of the illegal blood sport of fox
hunting, please remember Bryan is facing very serious charges so please,
keep your opinions about fox hunters to yourself.
As well as supporting Bryan with letters, ELP is also encouraging anyone who
is a member of Amnesty International to write to Amnesty and encourage them
to support Bryan. The jailing of Bryan is a miscarriage of justice. It was
a clear and obvious accident and Bryan never meant to kill anyone. So
please, if you are a member of Amnesty, please encourage them to also
support Bryan.
Besides Bryan, as you will see ELP has a number of new prisoners listed and
following the anti-G20 protests in London, England, we are expecting a few
more very soon. We obviously encourage everyone to support the new
prisoners, but please don't forget those who have been inside for a while
now. All the prisoners listed in this newsletter welcome letters of
support. So please, regardless of where you are in the world, regardless of
what language you speak, please do support the eco-prisoners. Even if it's
just a few words on a card, your letters and kind words really do make a
difference.
ECO-DEFENCE PRISONERS
Tre Arrow, #70936065, FCI Herlong, Federal Correctional Institution, PO Box
800, Herlong, CA 96113, USA. Serving 78 months for his involvement in two
ELF arsons. 1) an arson on logging trucks 2) an arson on vehicles owned by
a sand & gravel company. (Tre is a raw energy vegan - He has asked that his
letters of support are written on scrap paper or tree-free paper).
Grant Barnes #137563, San Carlos Correctional Facility, PO Box 3, Pueblo, CO
81002, USA. Serving 12 years for setting fire to a number of SUV vehicles.
The letters ELF were spray painted onto all of the vehicles. (Grant is a
vegan).
Nathan Block, #36359-086, FCI Lompoc, Federal Correctional Institution, 3600
Guard Road, Lompoc, CA 93436, USA. Serving 7 years & 8 months for an ELF
arson against a Poplar Tree Farm and an ELF arson against an SUV dealership.
Also admitted his role in an ELF/ALF conspiracy. (Diet unknown).
Julien COUPAT, N° d'écrou 290173, 42 rue de la santé, 75014 Paris, France.
On remand accused of sabotaging railway lines to protest against the nuclear
power industry (which carries waste by railway lines). (Diet unknown).
Marco Camenisch, Postfach 3143, CH-8105 Regensdorf, Switzerland. Serving 18
years. 1) Ten years for using explosives to destroy electricity pylons
leading from nuclear power stations. 2) Eight years for the murder of a
Swiss Boarder Guard whilst on the run. In '02 Marco completed a 12-year
sentence in Italy for destroying electricity pylons in Italy. (Marco is a
meat eater who encourages organic living).
Daniele Casalini, Casa Circondariale, Via Burla 59, 43100 Parma, Italy. Il
Silvestre activist awaiting trial accused of using explosives to damage an
electricity pylon in protest at nuclear energy. (Daniele is a vegan).
Francesco Gioia, Casa Penale, Via Lamaccio 1, 67039 Sulmona (Aq), Italy.
Il Silvestre activist awaiting trial accused of using explosives to damage
an electricity pylon in protest at nuclear energy. (Francesco is a
vegetarian and Straight Edge).
Jonatan. E-mail messages of support to freejonatan@yahoo.se A 20-year old
Swedish man sentenced to 15 months imprisonment after admitting damaging a
communication tower used by the Department of Defence, cutting the cables on
a crane used in creating urban sprawl, and damaging a vehicle used in the
logging industry. Jonatan is currently on bail as he appeals his sentence
(Jonatan is a vegan).
Jeffrey Luers, # 13797671, CRCI, 9111 NE Sunderland Ave, Portland, OR
97211-1708, USA. Serving 10 years for arson on a SUV dealership & the
attempted arson of an oil truck. The original sentence was 22 years & 8
months, but was reduced on appeal. (Diet unknown).
Marie Jeanette Mason, #04672-061, FCI Waseca, Federal Correctional
Institution, PO Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093, USA. Serving 21 years and 10
months for her involvement in an ELF arson against a University building
carrying out Genetically Modified crop tests. Marie also pleaded guilty to
conspiring to carry out ELF actions and admitted involvement in 12 other ELF
actions. (Marie is a vegan).
Eric McDavid, 16209-097, FCI Victorville, Medium II, Federal Correctional
Institution, PO Box 5300, Adelanto, CA 92301, USA. Serving 19 years & 7
months for planning to destroy the property of the U.S. Forestry Service,
mobile phone masts and power plants. At the point of his arrest no criminal
damage has actually occurred. (Eric is a vegan).
Daniel McGowan, 63794-053, USP Marion, US Penitentiary, PO Box 1000, Marion,
IL 62959, USA. Serving 7 years for an ELF arson against a Poplar Tree Farm
and an ELF arson against an old growth logging corporation. Also admitted
his role in an ELF/ALF conspiracy. (Daniel is a vegetarian).
Jonathan Paul - See details in Animal Liberation Prisoners List.
Michael Sykes 696693, Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, 1728
Bluewater Highway, Ionia, MI 48846, USA. Serving four to ten years for
anti-sprawl arsons, criminal damage to a utility pole, spray-painting
political graffiti and burning the American flag. (Diet unknown)
Briana Waters 36432-086, FCI Danbury, Federal Correctional Institution,
Route 37, Danbury, CT 06811, USA. Serving six years for involvement in an
ELF arson on a University. (Diet unknown).
Joyanna Zacher, #36360-086, FCI Dublin, 5700 8th St.- Camp Parks- Unit F,
Dublin, CA 94568, USA. Serving 7 years & 8 months for an ELF arson against
a Poplar Tree Farm and an ELF arson against an SUV dealership. Also
admitted her role in an ELF/ALF conspiracy. (Diet unknown).
ANIMAL LIBERATION PRISONERS
(All Animal Liberation Prisoners follow a minimum vegetarian diet and most
are vegan).
Jonny Ablewhite TB4885, HMP Ranby, Retford, Notts, DN22 8EU, England.
Serving 12 years for attempting to blackmail a farmer who supplied guinea
pigs for vivisection. (Jon is a vegan).
Dan Amos VN7818, HMP Winchester, Romsey Road, Winchester SO22 5DF, England.
Serving 4 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon Life Sciences. (Dan
is a vegan)
Gregg Avery TA7450, HMP Coldingley, Shaftesbury Road, Bisley, Woking, Surrey
GU24 9EX, England. Serving 9 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon
Life Sciences. (Gregg is a vegan).
Natasha Avery NR8987, HMP Send, Ripley Road, Woking, Surrey, GU23 7LJ,
England. Serving 9 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon Life
Sciences. (Nat is a vegan).
Mel Broughton TN9138, HMP Woodhill, Tattenhoe Street, Milton Keynes, Bucks
MK4 4DA, England. Serving 10 years for "conspiracy to commit arson" against
Oxford University vivisection department. (Mel is a vegan).
Dean Cain, WJ4309, HMP Lincoln, Greetwell Road, LN2 4BD, England. On remand
for allegedly trespassing at a rabbit farm. The charges include interfering
with a contractual relationship so as to harm an animal research
organisation, conspiracy to interfere with a contractual relationship so as
to harm an animal research organisation, and conspiracy to commit criminal
damage. (Dean is a vegan).
Jacob Conroy #93501-011, FCI Terminal Island, Federal Correctional
Institution, P.O. Box 3007, San Pedro, CA 90731, USA. Serving 48 months
imprisonment for helping organise the SHAC-USA campaign. (Jake is a vegan).
Donald Currie A3660AA, HMP Parkhurst, Newport, Isle of Wight, PO30 5NX,
England. Serving an Indeterminate Sentence, of not less than six actual
years, for carrying out arsons against targets associated the vivisection
industry including HLS. (Don is a vegan).
Lauren Gazzola #93497-011, FCI Danbury, Federal Correctional Institution,
Route #37Danbury, CT 06811, USA. Serving 54 months imprisonment for helping
organise the SHAC-USA campaign. (Lauren is a vegan).
Bryan Griffiths XW8892, HMP Hewell, Hewell Lane, Redditch B97 6QS, England.
A Hunt Monitor on remand who is falsely accused of murdering a hunt
supporter following a tragic accident. Bryan was monitoring a fox hunt by
flying a gyrocopter literally giving him a birds-eye view of the hunt and
their activities. When he landed for fuel a hunt supporter went to
challenge him. The hunt supporter was hit by the gyrocopter and died.
However despite this being a clear accident, Bryan has been charged with
murder. (Bryan is a vegetarian).
Joshua Harper #29429-086, FCI Sheridan Federal Correctional Institution,
P.O. Box 5000, Sheridan, OR 97378 USA. Serving 36 months imprisonment for
helping organise the SHAC-USA campaign. (Josh is a vegan).
Jordan Halliday, Inmate #24836, 1225 West Valley View Highway, Suite 100,
Logan, UT 84321, USA. Jailed for contempt of court for refusing to testify
before a Grand Jury investigating animal rights actions in Utah. (Jordan is
a vegan).
Sean Kirtley WC 6977, HMP Stafford, 54 Gaol Road, Stafford, ST16 3AW,
England. Serving four and a half years for running an anti-vivisection
campaign website. (Sean is a vegan).
Kevin Kjonaas #93502-011, FCI Sandstone, PO Box 1000, Sandstone, MN 55072
USA. Serving 72 months imprisonment for helping organise the SHAC-USA
campaign. (Kevin is a vegan).
Daniel McGowan - See details in Eco Defence Prisoners List.
Gavin Medd-Hall WV9475, HMP Coldingley, Shaftesbury Road, Bisley, Woking,
Surrey GU24 9EX, England. Serving 8 years for conspiracy to blackmail
Huntingdon Life Sciences. (Gavin is a vegan).
Heather Nicholson VM4859, HMP Bronzefield, Woodthorpe Road, Ashford, Middx.
TW15 3JZ, England. Serving 11 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon
Life Sciences. (Heather is a vegan).
Jonathan Paul, #07167-085, FCI Phoenix, Federal Correctional Institution,
37910 N 45th Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85086, USA. Sentenced to 51 months for an
ALF arson on a horse meat plant. Also admitted his role in an ELF/ALF
conspiracy. (Jonathan is a vegan).
John Smith, TB4887, HMP Lindholme, Bawtry Road, Hatfield Woodhouse,
Doncaster, DN7 6EE, England. Serving 12 years for attempting to blackmail a
farmer who supplied guinea pigs for vivisection. (John is a vegan).
Luke Steele, WJ4308, HMP Lincoln, Greetwell Road, LN2 4BD, England. On
remand for allegedly trespassing at a rabbit farm. The charges include
interfering with a contractual relationship so as to harm an animal research
organisation, conspiracy to interfere with a contractual relationship so as
to harm an animal research organisation, and conspiracy to commit criminal
damage. (Luke is a vegan).
Swedish Prisoner 1. E-mail messages of support to orebro2@gmail.com 18
year old Swedish man held on remand accused of an arson against a fur and
leather store. (Swedish Prisoner 1 is a vegan)
Nicole Vosper VM9385, HMP Bronzefield, Woodhthorpe Road, Ashford, Middx,
TW15 3JZ, England. On remand accused of blackmailing Huntingdon Life
Sciences. (Nicole is a vegan).
Dan Wadham, A5705AA,HMP Camp Hill, Newport, Isle of Wight, PO30 5PB,
England. Serving 5 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon Life
Sciences. (Dan is a vegan).
Kerry Whitburn TB4886, HMP Lowdham Grange, Lowdham, Nottingham, NG14 7DA,
England. Serving 12 years for attempting to blackmail a farmer who supplied
guinea pigs for vivisection. (Kerry is a vegan).
Sarah Whitehead, VM7684, HMP Bronzefield, Woodthorpe Road, Ashford, Middx,
TW15 3JZ, England. Serving two years for: 1) rescuing a puppy from horrific
conditions. 2) rescuing over 100 animals from a pet breeder who was later
prosecuted for animal abuse. Also awaiting trial for SHAC activity. (Sarah
is a vegan)
PARTY & PROTEST PRISONERS
Justizvollzugsanstalt Aichach, Natalja Liebich, Postfach 1380, 86544
Aichach, Germany. Jailed until June 2009 for taking part in anti-G8 and
anti-NATO protests. (Diet unknown).
PLOUGHSHARES PRISONERS
Helen Woodson, 03231-045, FMC Carswell - Admin. Max. Unit, POB 27137, Ft.
Worth, TX 76127, USA. Serving 8 years 10 months for actions that focused
on the interrelationship of war & the destruction of the natural world. The
actions included pouring red paint over the security desk of a federal court
and making threatening communications. Previously Helen had served 20½
years for: 1) Using a hammer to disarm a nuclear missile silo. 2) Burning
$25,000 on the floor of a bank whilst denouncing war, environmental
destruction & economic injustice. 3) Mailing warning letters with bullets
attached to Government & corporate officials. (Diet unknown).
OTHER ANTI-WAR PRISONERS
Robert Alford VP 7552 HMP Lewes, 1 Brighton Rd, Lewes, Sussex, BN7 1EA,
England. On remand accused of disarming a weapons factory, which, amongst
other things, makes Hellfire Missiles. The action was in protest at Israel
military action against Gaza. (Diet unknown).
Elija Smith VP 7551 HMP Bristol, 19 Cambridge Rd, Bristol, BS7 8PS, England.
On remand accused of disarming a weapons factory, which, amongst other
things, makes Hellfire Missiles. The action was in protest at Israel
military action against Gaza. (Diet unknown).
THE LECCE DEFENDANTS
The Lecce Defendants have been charged with "subversive association" accused
of damaging Esso petrol pumps to oppose the War on Iraq; sabotaging the cash
machines of a bank which funds an immigration centre; and targeting the
multinational company Benetton in support of Mapuche land rights activists
in Chile. All of the defendants are currently either under house arrest or
released on bail.
ANTIFA PRISONERS
Aleksey Bychin, SIZO 47/2, ul. Akademika Lebedeva, dom. 39, 195005 St.
Peterburg, Russia. On remand for fighting with neo-nazis. (Diet unknown).
Andrei Mergenov, FGU IZ 64/1 OKB 2 komn. 73, Up. Kutyakova 107, 410601
Saratov, Russia. Serving 3 years for fighting with neo-nazis. (Diet
unknown)
Fabio Milan, C.C. via Pianezza 300, 10151 Torino, Italy. On remand accused
of fighting with the police after an anti-fascist protest. (Diet unknown).
Christian Sümmermann, Bnr: 441/08/5, JVA Plötzensee, Lehrterstr. 61, 10557
Berlin, Germany. Serving 40 months for breaching the peace whilst serving a
suspended sentence issued for anti-fascist activities. (Diet unknown).
Tomasz Wiloszewski, Zaklad Karny, Orzechowa 5, 98-200 Sieradz, Poland.
Serving 15 years for accidentally killing a neo-nazi whilst defending
himself. (Tomasz is a vegetarian).
OTHER PRISONERS
Pavel Delidon, ul. Timiryazeva-1, FGU IK-7, 309990 Valuyki Russia.
Anarchist/Animal Rights activist jailed for attempting to obtain wages owed
to him, but which had not been paid to him by his employer. (Diet unknown).
Richard Sills (Address Unknown, USA). Serving 15 months for bomb hoaxing a
University saying they would be targeted by the ALF if they didn't stop
their animal experiments. (Diet unknown).
Fran Thompson, #1090915 HU 1C, WERDCC, PO Box 300, Vandalia, MO 63382, USA.
Serving Life for killing, in self-defence, a stalker who had broken into her
home. Before her imprisonment Fran was an eco, animal & anti-nuke
campaigner. (Fran is a vegan).
MOVE
MOVE is an eco-revolutionary group who carried out protests in defence of
all life. All move prisoners describe themselves as vegetarians. There are
currently eight MOVE activists in prison each serving 100 years after been
framed for the murder of a cop in 1979. 9th defendant, Merle Africa, died
in prison in 1998.
Debbie Simms Africa (006307), Janet Holloway Africa (006308) and Janine
Philips Africa (006309) all at: SCI Cambridge Springs, 451 Fullerton Ave,
Cambridge Springs, PA 16403-1238, USA.
Michael Davis Africa (AM4973) and Charles Simms Africa (AM4975) both at SCI
Graterford, PO Box 244, Graterford, PA 19426-0244, USA.
Edward Goodman Africa (AM4974), SCI Mahanoy, 301 Morea Rd, Frackville, PA
17932, USA.
William Philips Africa (AM4984) and Delbert Orr Africa (AM4985) both at SCI
Dallas Drawer K, Dallas, PA 18612, USA.
Mumia Abu Jamal, (AM8335), SCI Greene, 175 Progress Drive, Waynesburg PA
15370, USA. In 1981 Mumia, former Black Panther and vocal supporter of
MOVE, was framed for the murder of a cop. He was originally sentenced to
death but is currently awaiting re-sentencing following a court hearing in
2001.
STATEMENT ON VIOLENCE
Some people listed in this newsletter have carried out violent actions
including assault and murder. 'Spirit of Freedom' does not condone
violence. But we are also against censorship & believe people can decide
for themselves who they wish to support.
ABOUT E.L.P. SUPPORT NETWORK
ELP is an international eco-prisoner support network founded, in Britain, in
1993 to support jailed eco-activists. We support the prisoners by producing
various regular prisoner lists:
Spirit of Freedom is ELP's international monthly prisoner listing which is
circulated by e-mail.
Urgent ELP! Bulletin is an e-mail service that distributes the names of any
new eco-prisoner as soon as ELP gets their details. For more info e-mail
ELP4321@hotmail.com
On-Line Newsletters - ELP has a number of websites that provide news,
prisoner lists and additional info about ELP & the prisoners.
English language ELP Website
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk
Greek language ELP Website
http://greekelp.blogspot.com
North American ELP Website
www.ecoprisoners.org
Turkish language ELP Website
www.geocities.com/yesilanarsi/elp.htm
ELP Extra is an e-mail group that circulates the details of political
prisoners, ELP learns about, who do not fall within the remit for support by
ELP. To subscribe to the list e-mail ELP4321@Hotmail.com
Australian ELP.SN is our Australian contact. For more info e-mail
elp4321@hotmail.com
Belgium ELP.SN is our Belgium contact. For more info e-mail
elp_bel@hotmail.com
German ELP.SN is a prisoner led initiative run by eco-prisoner Marco
Camenisch. For more info contact Marco Camenisch, Postfach 3143, CH-8105
Regensdorf, Switzerland.
Greek ELP.SN is our Greek contact. For more info e-mail greekelp@yahoo.gr
North American ELP is our North American contact. For more information
e-mail naelpsn@mutualaid.org
Turkey ELP.SN is our Turkish contact. For more info e-mail
yesilanarsi@yahoo.com
The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign APRIL IS FREEDOM MONTH FOR THE PUERTO RICAN POLITICAL PRISONERS! OSCAR LOPEZ RIVERA, CARLOS ALBERTO TORRES, AND AVELINO GONZALEZ CLAUDIO! This April marks the 29th anniversary of the capture of the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners! The Puerto Rican Political Prisoners were incarcerated for their actions in support of the Independence of Puerto Rico; a colony of the United States for 110 years. The Political Prisoners were never charged with any violent crimes, but were given unjust sentences and incarcerated in the worst prisons in the United States. The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign designates every April as Freedom Month; a period of time where to raise awareness about the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners and the Independence of Puerto Rico
Tuesday April 14, 2009: Political Prisoner Letter-Writing Dinner in Brooklyn 7pm (sharp!), 1-2-3 Community Space. Enjoy home-cooked food and information from NYC Anarchist Black Cross! Write to the Puerto Rican PP's and POW's! Everything is provided! Directions to 1-2-3 Community Space: 123 Tompkins Avenue, between Myrtle & Vernon Avenues, Brooklyn By Train: Take the G to the Myrtle-Willoughby stop. Walk east on Myrtle Avenue (toward Tompkins, away from Marcy), turn right on Tompkins Avenue and look for 123 on your left. Nycabc@riseup.com
Friday April 17, 2009: Party for Socialism and Liberation Forum on Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners at 7pm at 2295 Adam Clayton Powell Blvd. #1 New York, NY 10030 Phone: 212-694-8762
Sunday April 19, 2009: Join ProLibertad and La Iglesia San Romero De Las Americas for a special People’s mass for the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners at 12:30pm at La Iglesia San Romero de Las Americas/UCC at 2410 Amsterdam Avenue 4th Floor New York , NY 10040 Telephone #: 646-942-2444
Wednesday April 22, 2009– POLITICAL PRISONER EVENT AT Hunter College!! Making the community aware of the treatment towards those who fight for what they believe in! There will be FREE FOOD Come and join us!! 4pm @ Thomas Hunter Hall 105 (E68th St. and Lexington Ave.) Brought to you by: The Hostos Puerto Rican Club at Hunter College
Saturday April 25, 2009: ProLibertad Prisoner event in El Barrio. TBA
Thursday April 30, 2009: Vigil in Solidarity with Fr. Luis Barrios, the SOAW 6, and the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners Close the School of the Americas! Free the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners! Vigil at 5PM IN FRONT OF Metropolitan Correctional Center 150 Park Row.
from the Austin Informant Working Group
The Austin Informant Working Group is an ad hoc collective of
interested and affected individuals that formed to do research and
media and legal work around the exposure of an FBI informant in the
Austin radical community. The group is also helping to uncover the
lessons about community accountability and security that must be
learned from this debacle. It is not a prisoner support group and
does not speak for Brad Crowder or David McKay.
On March 17, 2009 David McKay plead guilty to possession of
unregistered Molotov cocktails, charges stemming from his involvement
in the protests against the Republican National Convention last
September. Those of us following the case were shocked and saddened
to learn of this development.
The State and, in particular, the FBI reached into their bag of dirty
tricks to make examples of McKay and his co-defendant Brad Crowder.
It is also apparent to us that if this had gone to trial again, the
lies of the State's primary informant in the case, Brandon Darby,
would have embarrassed the FBI and the prosecution. This would have
ruined their case against David and called into question the
reliability of informants in past and future litigation. This is the
question the prosecution has feared all along.
Before David’s first trial in January the prosecution filed a motion
to change the definition of entrapment in the case. However the judge
refused to overturn years of legal precedents for the mere
convenience of the prosecution in this case. The first trial ended in
a hung jury. We have reliable information indicating that it was hung
6-6, with the crucial issue being the question of entrapment. A
couple weeks before the March 16 retrial, in another attempt to cover
for their informant’s misconduct, the prosecution filed a motion to
exclude information about Darby's violent tendencies and his history
of using firearms in inappropriate situations. This motion also
failed.
During the intermission in proceedings, David’s defense compiled
additional testimony that confirmed Darby’s history of problematic
and manipulative behavior. Through grassroots appeals, reliable
witnesses came out of the woodwork to attest to Darby's repeated
incitements to violence, his disruptive behavior and promotion of
illegal activities in every organization he infiltrated. As the case
of the defense solidified, so escalated the prosecution’s
intimidation of both David and Brad. The State was determined to
prevent both the exposure of its misconduct in utilizing and
supporting a violence-prone provocateur to entrap two young
activists, and the precedent of being called out and held accountable
for their repressive tactics. The State knew that Darby’s testimony
was questionable, if not completely lacking credibility.
The months since David and Brad’s arrest have been hard for both of
them, their families and the community. Days before the trial, the
prosecution subpoenaed Brad to testify. Brad had no interest in
testifying against David. The State then threatened to add two years
to Brad’s sentence if he failed to cooperate. The FBI has contacted
and intimidated others, including potential defense witnesses, over
the past few months in an attempt to disrupt David’s legal defense.
It is likely that David did not want Brad, his close friend, to be
forced to choose between testifying and enduring harsher sentencing.
Neither did he want his family and loved ones to have to go through
the turmoil of a second trial. David’s father has spent large amounts
of money, bankrupting his business, to pay David’s legal fees.
The State has never been above entrapping and manipulating activists.
As many of us well know, radical movements have long been the targets
of these tactics in an effort to criminalize and suppress our
dissent. Based on our interactions with Brad, David and the unabashed
snitch, Brandon Darby, and through a rigorous examination of the
court and FBI documents that emerged during this case, we believe
strongly that this is once again the situation.
The Austin Informant Working Group concludes that there is much more
to the story than any of us know. From what information we do have,
we stand by the statements we have previously made about the
entrapment of Brad and David. There are many reasons innocent people
plead guilty, including intimidation, fear and exhaustion. The
evidence suggests these factors, rather than the truth, controlled
the outcome in this case.
This battle has been a hard one. In the end, the State once again had
more resources and time than those of us who stood in solidarity with
the defendants. Rather than let this hinder our hopes and overwhelm
our movements we must learn from this experience and stick together
to build stronger and more just communities. We must also recognize
our continued resistance, solidarity, and resilience in the face of
the forces of misery as victories in and of themselves.
We respectfully submit this statement as a Call to Action to all
communities of conscience in support of the struggle against all
forms of government repression, and in opposition to all the
travesties (named and unnamed) carried out on a daily basis under the
guise of the “criminal justice system”.
In solidarity,
Austin Informant Working Group
Texas.solidarity@gmail.com
Albanian | Arabic | Bulgarian | Catalan | Chinese | Croatian | Czech | Danish | Dutch | Estonian | Filipino | Finnish | French | Galician | German | Greek | Hebrew | Hindi | Hungarian | Indonesian | Italian | Japanese | Korean | Latvian | Lithuanian | Maltese | Norwegian | Polish | Portuguese | Romanian | Russian | Serbian | Slovak | Slovenian | Spanish | Swedish | Thai | Turkish | Ukrainian | Vietnamese
is a news and discussion forum for supporters of political prisoners, prisoners of war, politicized social prisoners, and victims of police and state intimidation.
This blog is organized and updated autonomously of the disbanded Break the Chains Prisoner Support Network formerly based in
Break the Chains listserve
LA Anarchist Black Cross Federation
Prison Activist Resource Center
European Political Prisoners
Brighton Anarchist Black Cross
Earth Liberation Prisoner Support NetworkEarth/Animal Liberation Prisoners
Earth Liberation Prisoner Support Network
Civil Liberties Defense Center
Not-So-Long-Ago Domestic US Government Intimidation and Repression
COINTELPRO Resources
Puerto Rico Independence Movement
Resources for Prisoners
Prison Resources
Anarchist Black Cross Federation
North Amercan Prison Book Programs
Freedom Archives
Books to Prisoners
Chicago Books To Women In Prison
Prison Legal News
Prison Activist Resource Center
Massachusetts Statewide Harm Reduction Coalition
Surviving Prison Shnews DIY Guide
Writing to Prisoners
Zines
Zines about Prisons and Police