The Murder of Our Mother, Anna Mae Pictou Aquash
It has been over 31 years since our mother's body was discovered in the Badlands of South Dakota in the United States. Over the course of 31 years, there seems to have been very few people, other than her family who have considered her constitutional rights, or her right to life as a key issue. Her name has been used by many for their own personal agendas, and to redirect attention away from those responsible for her death.
There have been no offers of assistance by those institutions allegedly designated to protect victims of injustice. Our family has been left in Canada, to our own resources, while we have waited, and continue to wait patiently for this case to work its way through the justice system.
Through 31 years of delays, our family has held fast to the understanding that these delays provide every opportunity for those accused, those indicted and those under investigation to have each and every step of the case handled with the greatest scrutiny, to ensure that "their rights" are considered. Annie Mae did not have that opportunity before she was delivered a death sentence. It is ironic, that those rights that our mother sought to be applied to all citizens whether in the United States or Canada, have been used by those accused of killing our mother to avoid, and delay justice for years.
We have tried not to judge her case based upon the court of public opinion. And, an opinion, in our estimation, that has been formulated, and managed by some, who have sought to point fingers at anybody but those responsible for her murder. We continue to make judgments based on testimony, documents and information we feel has been vetted, from those who have no reason to avoid the truth.
We are still in a time of discovery as those who have been indicted are brought to justice. The facts surrounding her case are becoming clearly evident. Annie Mae Pictou Aquash, a Canadian First Nations women was viciously beaten, raped and murdered with multiple witnessed involved in different parts of her kidnapping, interrogation, and murder. Many of these witnessed did nothing for many years, and her murder sat un-addressed for over 25 years. Mr. Graham has publicly admitted on the record, several times, to several people, that he was with Annie Mae Pictou Aquash during this time period, and even those moments, leading up to our mother's murder.
Arlo Looking Cloud has now been tried and sentenced to life in prison for our mother's murder. Twenty-three sworn witnesses, including former members of the American Indian Movement gave testimony, a video of Looking Cloud's confession was shown naming Mr. John Graham a.k.a. John Boy Patton as the man who shot my mother. This was all reviewed by a jury before they voted to find Mr Looking Cloud guilty. Additional evidence and witnesses will no doubt be presented during a trial for Mr. Graham. We look forward to scrutinizing that evidence as well, in the pursuit of justice.
The federal investigation to discover who else was involved in our mother's murder continues. We look forward to the eventual release of any, and all documents to the public in the future, either through the indictment of others, trial evidence, or a determination that the investigation has been completed.
While we recognize that our mother's case presents an opportunity of solidarity for those who feel they have been unjustly processed in the justice system, have been denied their treaty rights, or oppose uranium mining, there is no correlation to any other trial, cause or issue, past or present. A human being was murdered, there are witnesses, there is evidence, her murderers are known, and some of them are still free to walk around. They need to be held accountable for their actions.
There is no injustice in allowing Mr. Graham every opportunity to exercise his constitutional rights. It has now been almost four years since he was indicted on the charge of 1st Degree Murder. If extradited, Mr Graham has a right to defend himself, he has a right to tell his side of the story, in a court of law, in the United States. Justice can prevail, when evidence is allowed to be publicly vetted. It is time for Mr. Graham to allow the process to go forward.
Annie Mae Pictou Aquash was committed to, and driven by the call for justice for Indigenous people and those who could not help themselves. Our family and friends honor her spirit and name, and her right to obtain justice for those who so unjustly ended her life.
In the Spirit of Our Mother and Sister
1 comment:
Break the chains? Or tighten the chains? Denise Maloney’s article supports the imprisonment of several indigenous people by the United States government.
Contrary to Denise Maloney’s claims, Anna Mae didn’t consider herself a ward of the Canadian state. She was a Native sovereigntist and warrior of the Mi’kmaq Nation and the American Indian Movement. She considered the FBI her enemy and said they are “most certainly racist”. They arrested her and threatened her. Denise Maloney makes no reference in her article to US government agencies' many attacks on Anna Mae.
There was no physical evidence presented at Arlo Looking Cloud’s trial that Anna Mae was “viciously beaten” or “raped”. There were no witnesses presented at Arlo’s trial who testified to witnessing him or John Graham having any part in murdering Anna Mae. There was no physical evidence presented at all, even though members of several law enforcement agencies attended the scene where Anna Mae’s body was found and supposedly investigated the area.
At Arlo’s trial, former cop Robert Ecoffey testified about what Arlo had said to him in a video-taped interview in jail:
“The one occasion there when he said when they crossed to the fence, he said when we crossed the fence, he said I think she knew then what was going to happen.”
At the beginning of the same trial, Roger Amiotte, who found the body, said there was no fence there at the time:
“This is basically, it was unfenced for probably a stretch of a half to three quarter mile,” he said. Later on he said, “No, that was entirely open to the highway at that time.”
How could they think that Anna Mae knew what was going to happen based on a fence that didn’t even exist at the time? Maybe because Ecoffey made it up. He did take part in the attack on Leonard Peltier and other Natives at the Jumping Bull ranch at Pine Ridge in 1975. And he did also testify against Leonard Peltier at his trial for the murder of the two FBI agents. Ecoffey testified that he had accompanied the same agents to the ranch the day before the shoot-out. He said he was fired on during the shoot-out and fired back.
In 1999, Leonard Peltier put out a public statement saying he didn’t want to be involved in Ecoffey’s investigation of Anna Mae’s murder because “Ecoffey was responsible for much of the terror and corruption that existed on Pine Ridge in the early 70’s”.
Denise’s sister Debbie, Anna Mae’s other daughter, is a cop with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Jim Jake Maloney, their father, and Anna Mae’s ex, has worked extensively in training police officers. Cops and FBI agents at Pine Ridge in 1976 tried to cover up Anna Mae’s death. Maybe because they were involved in killing more than 60 Lakota traditionalists and AIM members during the 1970s.
You can read Peltier’s many statements on the case here:
http://ourfreedom.wordpress.com/leonard-peltier-regarding-anna-mae/
Post a Comment