Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Christian Sümmermann, antifa prisoner, moved

ELP Information Bulletin (27th of February 2008)

Dear friends

ELP has just learnt that the well known German antifa prisoner, Christian Sümmermann, has been moved. His new address is:

Christian Sümmermann
Bnr: 441/08/5
JVA Plötzensee
Lehrterstr. 61
10557 Berlin
Germany

Also ELP has to admit an error in our prisoner lists!!! We reported that German antifa prisoner Andrea Neff is serving 4 months for anti-fascist activity. Andrea is actually serving 14 months imprisonment. Sorry for our mistake. So please do continue to support Andrea by writing to her at:

Andrea Neff, Bnr: 746/07/2,
Justizvollzugsanstalt fur Frauen in Berlin,
Arkonastrasse 56
13189 Berlin
Germany

Many thanks to the Berlin Anarchist Black Cross for this information.

++++++++++++++

Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Jerome White-Bey Letter Appeal – Enough Is Enough!

The Missouri Prison Labor Union is an anarchist driven prison initiative that was organized by prisoners and supporters in the hope of bettering the living and working conditions in the State of Missouri prison system. One of their goals is to establish minimum wages for prisoners and to stop all prison abuse. They were lawfully given recognition by the Secretary of State in Missouri on August 3rd of 1998. The MPLU is an organization that fights against oppression, repression, torture, brutality, rape, corruption and exploitation of prisoners both male and female. In this struggle they seek to regain their human dignity.

Jerome White-Bey is the founder and president of the MPLU and is now asking for help with a letter campaign. He has been in prison for over 30 years and is scheduled for his next parole hearing in December 2009 and is hoping that if people write to the Governor in support of him it would help his chances of getting a parole date.

A sample letter is below. You can write to Jerome at:

Jerome White-Bey, MDOC#37479,
S.E.C.C., 2B-211,
300 East Pedro Simmons Drive,
Charleston, MO. 63834

All letters in support of Jerome White-Bey being granted parole are to be mailed to:


Mr.Steven Long - Chairman

Division of the Board of Probation and Parole
1511 Christy Dr.
PO Box 267
Jefferson City Mo.65102
USA
Phone number (573) 751-8488

Subject: Parole Jerome White-Bey #37479


Dear Mr Steven Long,


I am writing this letter in support of Jerome White-Bey's application to the Missouri Parole Board to grant him parole in his forthcoming hearing, scheduled for December 2009.

Mr.White-Bey was arrested on June 26 1978 and charged with four counts of First Degree Robbery; Second Degree Murder; and two counts of Armed Criminal Action, which he pleaded guilty to and was subsequently sentenced to a 50 year term of imprisonment. On 10/11/1979 Mr.White-Bey entered Missouri State Prison in Jefferson City. Under previous sentencing guidelines he was initially given a release date of June 2007. However following changes in penal procedures his release date has been put back to 12/25/2015.

I would like to make some points about Mr White-Bey in support of his parole application. His early admission of guilt demonstrates that he took responsibility for his actions and accepted his punishment. He entered prison a young man and over his 30 years of imprisonment Mr White-Bey has matured and developed as a person. His work with the book program and other prisoner support is evidence that Mr White-Bey will be able to adapt to life and make a fruitful contribution to society should he be released. I strongly believe Mr White-Bey is a very different person now to the young man that entered prison in 1978. I ask that you consider the progress he has made and also consider the fact that he has already passed one release date due to changes in sentencing guidelines.



Sincerely

KEXP Radio Interview with Paul Wright on Prison Profiteers on YouTube

This is the video of the interview I did with KEXP radio in Seattle last month about my new book, Prison profiteers: Who Makes Money from Mass Incarceration. They also video taped it and it aired on community access TV in Seattle. It has now been posted on Youtube. It is 30 minutes long.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b03t_Zc5yVY



If you would like to check out the book, more information and ordering information is available at: https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/104_ProductDetails.aspx

Paul Wright, Editor
Prison Legal News
972 Putney Rd. # 251
Brattleboro, VT 05301
802-257-1342
pwright@prisonlegalnews.org
www.prisonlegalnews.org


Seattle Office:
Prison Legal News
2400 NW 80th St. # 148
Seattle, WA 98117
206-246-1022

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Support Vaggelis Botzatzis

Urgent ELP! Bulletin (26th of February 2008)

Dear friends

ELP has learnt of a new eco-prisoner in Greece.

Vaggelis Botzatzis has been remanded into custody accused of setting fire to two company cars owned by a energy/power company. It is believed that the person or persons unknown who carried out the arson did so in protest at the destruction of the natural environment and in support of two workers who died at the power plant.

Vaggelis is also accused of setting fire to a bank and starting a fire inside a car yard.

Vaggelis denies all the allagations against him and maintains his innocence.

Please send letters of support to:

Vaggelis Botzatzis
Komotini Juridical Prison ("Dikastikes Fylakes Komotinis")
T.K. 69100
GREECE

Vaggelis can receive short messages of support written in English.

When writing to Vaggelis please remember the authorities do censor his mail so please do not write anything that could be regarded by the authorities as "dangerous". Also the exact charges against Vaggelis, due to a lack of evidence, have not been filed. Therefore do not write anything which could influence the setting of charges.

For more information about Vaggelis or the Greek legal system please contact Greek Earth Liberation Prisoners Support! greekelp@yahoo.gr http://greekelp.blogspot.com

+++++++++

Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Greek eco-prisoner news

From: greekelp@yahoo.gr

A Solidarity March was organised in Thessaloniki, on Vaggelis Botzatzis' case. He is detained in Komotini juridicial prison accused for: burning two power company cars protesting the pillage against the nature, and the workers that died in the workplace, a bank arson against capitalism and in favor of anarchists detained for bank robbery, and an arson at a french brand car yard, that is said to be in solidarity to the youth revolts, but no communique was sent. Vaggelis was arrested in his house on day after the last arson under the "anti"terrorist law, since a security guard claims he recognised his car. Vaggelis doesn't accept the accusations and states he was framed up. Some more info on the march at: http://directactiongr.blogspot.com/2008/02/few-actions-during-solidarity-march.html

if anyone needs any further information on this case, send me an email.

There were also some environmental actions on 24/2 (http://directactiongr.blogspot.com/2008/02/environmental-actions-athens-patras.html)
In spite of some police attention, no one was arrested. Today though, a candidate for the municipal board in Pefkonas, Athens, was attacked by truck drivers, while taking photos of the privatization works against the Pefkonas forest.



Earth Liberation Prisoners Support! - Greece
http://greekelp.blogspot.com

Monday, February 25, 2008

Notes from Briana Waters Trial 2/20

1) AM Session, 2/20
2) PM Session, 2/20

***

A.M. SESSION, 2/20


Wednesday Morning Feb 20, 2008 Briana Waters Vs. USA Robert Corrina
(Briana's cousin) continues testimony & is being cross examined by the
defense. We revist the chronological events between 2006 - Feb 2007, when
he was providing the government with testimony Defense revisits jan 19,
2007 meeting where Friedman and Agent Halla visit Kara (his wife) at her
office. Corrina says he was angry hearing about that meeting, where Agent
Friedman was yelling at her. Defense begins to ask questions regarding
the rental car & the primary use of the car. Who was in the car when the
car arrived back at his house? When was the first memory of the rental?
The defense states that you used the car. You and Kara told the feds that
the principal use of the car was for YOUR Family. The prosecutors
objected, because of hearsay. You, Kara, and your lawyer spoke that Kara
spoke to Friedman. Witness responds, YES. You and Kara swapped notes
about the questions asked to you by the GOVT. He says YES. Kara informed
the government that the car was for the family. He say's he doesn’t know
what Kara told the government in her interview. Kara informed the witness
that she told the government that nobody else used the car. Another
Objection by USA based on hearsay. The judge says hearsay, and that if
the defense wants to call Kara as a witness, they should call her. The
defense begins asking the witness about his car usage, when where, how
long, where did you go? Exhibit shown that has Robert's credit card
transactions for May 19 & 20th, 2001. The defense makes the strong point
after these points that he used the rental car for his purposes Sat.
afternoon. Witness agrees. Defense suggests later on Sat. May 19 Briana
has severe abdominal pains. Witness says that was Sunday. The defense
says that in an interview with MR. Friedman (USA), you stated that Briana
had abdominal pains Sat afternoon. The point is that it was the same day
after your personal car use on Saturday that Ms. Waters had sharp
abdominal pains. And in order to keep yourself and Kara out of jail, you
have to say it was Sunday. The witness denies this, and he says he
wouldn't cooperate but he's telling the truth that it was Sunday. Defense
suggests that Briana didn't return with the car on Saturday night. The
witness says' that he was waiting for Briana to return the car on Monday.
He was worried that the rental may be returned late. The defense says
that that was a lie. You were working Monday. Witness stated he was at
home. Defense re-suggests that he is fixating on this point to keep him
and his wife out of jail... Defense starts asking about the witness's car
usage on Sunday. The witness has a hard time recalling details, like
where he went and what time of day it was. The defense went over some
credit card transactions for Sunday to track witness's activities. They
also view credit card transactions for the following day, Monday, May 21,
2001. Defense suggests that the witness was taken to work by his wife,
Kara on Monday. That he was at work on Monday. Objection by the feds,
argumentative. Defense asked witness whether he remembers his testimony
with Mr. Friedman yesterday. He asked you questions leading you to say
that Briana returned on Monday, when in fact you testified earlier that
she appeared late Sunday. The witness says it was the slip of the tongue
and insists that it was Monday. Do you remember that Friedman lead you to
say that it was Monday? The witness says YES, I remember. More questions
are asked about the car and the drop off of the rental. You said you
looked for damages. Did you say that to anyone before yesterday's
testimony? I remember mentioning it to Agent Halla and his lawyer
previous to yesterday's testimony. That’s why I made a note on the
calendar to call Budget to check if there was any damage or extra fees.
Meeting with Kara, his lawyer and Friedman in Seattle on Feb 1, 2007. You
told the FEDS that you couldn't recall why you had to call Budget the week
after the rental. The witness responds, Yes. The prosecutors objects to
him viewing the document. The defense suggests that he is seeing these
documents, and then these documents are triggering his memory, but then it
becomes the memory of the document, and not the facts. 2 different
things. Return to discussion about Monday evening. Did the car smell
like gasoline? Nope. Did you see any damages or touch up paint, or any
dents to the rental car? No. They discuss Briana's arrangement for
rental car usage and the claim by the government that this rental car was
used in the UW arson. Don’t you find it odd, that Briana didn't even show
up Friday when she was supposed to get the car? The witness states that
was "typical Briana." The defense says, “she doesn't show up the day she
was supposed to get this car.”
Defense and witness talk about how the witness trusted Briana with his
precious child, his treasure. At Feb 1, 2007, meeting with the feds, do
you remember telling them that it was because your bikes were in the shop,
that you rented the car? "That's an over simplification." You said,
after reviewing your calendar, it suggested that your bikes were being
repaired, you work 9 miles away, and wouldn't a rental car be convenient?
The witness states that he was reasoning why the rental would be helpful.
The transcript is accurate but out of context. Defense states that the
witness used the car for his use Sat., Sun, and Monday, and that he wanted
Briana to move her possessions out of this basement. The witness states
that he was doing Briana a favor, and he was also finding his own reasons
for using the rental car. On Feb 1, 2002, Briana moved to California.
Defense recalls a telephone
conversation between Robert and Briana, taking about the move and that she
was looking for something she left at his place. The witness finds it odd
when she shows up the next day, as he thought she was in
California. Jan 21, 2002, Briana lived with you, & got sick & went to
the St. Peter's Emergency Room. Do you recall her stomach pains? "No
memory; she was sick a lot." The defense says Jan 2002 or May 2001? Think
back, are you remembering this wrong? Are you confusing these two events?
The witness refers to the gov’t transcript that Briana used the car on
Sat and not Sunday. The witness states that that transcript was correct.
The defense questions Corrina about the $200 cash deposit from Briana.
The defense asks do you remember Feb. 1st, with Agent Halla you said that
Briana gave you $100 for car rental, phone usage, and storage fees for her
stuff in the basement. But you didn't tell them anything about the $200
from Briana 3 days after the car rental. You didn't tell them any of this
Feb 2007? Your memory gets better as time goes on. Robert says his memory
was triggered by a handwritten document. The defense sarcastically says,
7years ago May 2001? That’s what you
remember? The defense revisits that Corrina is afraid being accused of
purgery, lying, federal offenses, and that is what is driving your
testimony. Defense states again that he is being cohearsed by Agent Halla
that the car was used in the UW arson. Corrina decided to get a lawyer
with his wife, when he knew that this case was not going away. In Feb 1,
2007, in the interview with the feds, Robert told them that Briana had
called to tell him that he'd be questioned by authorities, that she was in
trouble, and that everyone that she knew would be questioned. She also
told you other things; she didn't say to lie. He agrees to all of this.
In the Feb. 1, 2007, meeting with Special Agent Halla and the FBI, you
mentioned a meeting that Briana had in your house, in which she asked you
and your family to leave. Did you tell anyone that before yesterday?
Robert replies, "I'm saying it now; it’s the truth. The defense
suggests that the meeting was about protecting old-growth forests. They
question Robert about whether or not Briana asked him to leave his home.
The defense asks who was there, whether the folks at the meeting were
threatening, did they hide themselves, did they run outside? Robert says
No. He also says that he doesn't know what the meeting was about. This
case is about arson. Robert says, YES. You knew Briana, you trusted her,
she stayed at your home. Robert responds Yes. You knew that Briana did
the Watch Mtn. documentary. Witness says YES. You saw it, you liked it,
Robert responds Yes. That’s Briana Waters, isn't it? Robert says that’s
True. Feb 1, 2007 in your meeting with Agent Halla, your wife believed
that the rental car was predominately for your family. Did you tell them
that on that day? Witness says YES. Defense closed.

(Bob destroyed the credibility of this witness on cross examination. It
seemed obvious the guy was lying to save himself and wife from the threat
of federal criminal charges based on his earliest lies to the FBI. THIS
IS WHY YOU SHOULD ALWAYS ASSERT YOUR RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT UNTIL YOU HAVE
AN ATTYS ADVICE AND ASSISTANCE. This man feels forced to lie to a jury
that holds the rest of his cousin Briana's life in its hands because he
told the FBI he didn't know who Briana was, instead of simply saying "I
don't wish to speak with you without an attorney present. Please leave me
your card and I will have my atty contact you if needed." ) Prosecuting
attorney had a few more questions. Why do you believe your wife said that?
Robert states he felt he had to spin the truth to his wife, that she had
tension with Briana and that if she believed it was a rental for them it
would be easier.
The defense chimes in. So you lied? You tricked your wife? Robert states,
no, that he just convinced her. You said your wife believed the rental was
for you. Robert gets flustered, he says, i dont know, maybe left out
details, , I dont remember. The defense ends with. The good thing about
telling the truth is that you don.t have to remember anything. robert
says, "i think i see what your saying." The witness steps down. The
prosecution then calls 2 nurses. (seperately but I will consolidate since
he asked and received very similar answers) Jackie Brown of St. Peters
hospital, emergency room. and Donna Kravis of Capitol Medical. Both women
work in the Emergency room and are questioned about the policies regarding
logging documentation of new patients and if people are turned away due to
lack of funds. Both nurses state that a patient is triaged to access their
need, never turned away because of lack of money, and that if anyone had
visited the emergency room desk, and started the registration process,
even if they didn’t stay, they still got their name logged. Jackie Brown
stated that the evening of May 19/20 were not busy but not slow either.
Both also stated that there was no record of Brianna waters visiting May
19/20 2001. Jackie Brown did say that there was a record of Briana being
there Jan 2002, but didn’t have the exact date. The witnesses were cross
examined by the defense who said IF there was a fabricated story that
someone was in the emergency room, that person would not show up on your
log, correct? Both agreed. The witness also asked Donna if the emergency
desk was visible from the waiting room. She said yes. He asked if it was
really busy, if someone who didn’t want to wait, might walk out without
being logged or noticed. She agreed. Defense ends.
Witnesses leave the stand.
***

P.M. SESSION, 2/20

Wednesday 20th Feb. 2008. Without jury present, before trial, defense and
prosecutors squabble over who's testifying today. The defense asked the
witness list be given to them a day ahead of time. The judge said,
should've been happening already. The jury enters. The Prosecution
calls Witness David Edwin Peterson Born 1973 moved to Washington moved to
Oly. Lived there from '78 to the present. Real-estate broker. Owner of
1510 5th Ave in Oly. Recognized a photo of William Rogers as renter, knew
him as Todd Hager. Paid rent in cashier’s checks as shown in document.
Avalon as a name was not recognized by witness. Witness did not know him
to grow marijuana on site. Did not know of visitors. Witness owned a
number of properties, some were students. Didn’t want lots of people
renting or parties. He said William Rogers was a good renter, had his rent
on time No cross-examination. Excused. Jen Kolar enters and takes oath.
Prosecution addresses witness. Born and raised in Spokane WA. Attended
Shadle Pk high, graduated 1991. Went to U of Boulder, Applied Math and
Engineering degree. This is where she first met other activists and became
involved in above ground activism. Dad lives in Spokane, mom in Eugene.
Didn't know Lacey Phillabaum, who also went to school at Shadle Park High
(coincidence?). Met her later. Graduated college 1995, applied
mathematics. Got another degree '97 astro-physics. Said she moved to
Colorado worked for COPIRG summer canvasing, where she met activists.
After college she was hired as general manager for computers, computer
consultant, software engineering and eventually moved to Seattle 1999.
Started to date Joe Dibee. Worked for Internet search engine acquisition
software. Prosecution asked about plea agreement, and if she had one with
them to which she said "yes." 2 plea agreements. first of which had 4
charges from WA. She signed agreements on July 31, 2007. The subject of
the agreements was that she tell the truth, and provide testimony in
exchange for a reduced sentence of 5-7 years compared to the previous
sentence she faced of 35years to life. First charge=conspiracy Second
charge= attempt to commit arson in CO at the Ray Gun Club 3rd charge= help
commit UW arson at center for Urban Horticulture, Seattle. 4th= use of
destructive device for UW center. She admitted to a second plea agreement
with the state of WA for the Cavel West arson, July 97. The prosecutors
asked, who will decide your fate? She said "Judge Burgess" whom she sat
before today. Is this any easy decision? "No, these were my friends,
Brianna is my friend, we made a committment to each other to not talk
about the action." May 6, 2004, officer Quimby, special agent, FBI came to
her door to talk about events in Colorado. She did not want to talk, and
when asked, said she wasn’t hiding anything and they left. She then
contacted Kenny Clark to get agents info to her boyfriend Joe Dibee and
summarized this meeting for him. Witness knew Joe Dibee told Kenny about
the FBI visit, and Joe said "we'll spend alot of time in jail, and that he
was scared.”
Prosecution mentions Dec. 10, 2006 (but really they meant 05) Quimby
called Jen’s cell, and pleads her to listen and not hang up. Says that
they know kolar has a great deal of involvement and they want to talk to
her. Prosecutor asked, how did you find out about the 6 arrests of Dec
7, 2005? Witness said, kenny called her and told her to look at the news.
She then was asked and positively Identified Brianna in the courtroom. She
was asked if there was bad blood between them. She said no. She said she
liked Brianna, and really cared about her. Her first activism was in CO
with the environmental center, the Peace center, and Rocky Mt Animal
Defense. Witness describes Rocky Mt animal defense actions were accepted
above-ground activism. She attended meeting in MN in 96, a radical animal
rights conference. Met Jonathan Paul (JP). Discussions at conference
included fur release, Arson as tactic, schematics on devices they also
gave out the addresses of all the fur farms in the US. Prosecutor.
exhibits photo of Jonathan Paul, whom she identified as a leader,
weathly, influencial, handsome, and she soon started dating him. She had a
7-month-long long distance relationship with him. Upon return from MN, JP
asked her to spend time in 97 for 2-4 weeks at his home in Williams, OR.
She flew to Seattle, then to Williams, OR. Prosecutor asked anything
interesting about 97? She replyed that she was sick with e.coli blood
infection and hospitalized. while in williams, He (JP) asked her if she
wanted to join ELF and ALF. She said yes. July 97 they wanted to stop the
slaughter at the facility of Cavel West of wild horses, and she and JP
mixed glycerine soap, with gas and diesel. It took them a few days. They
met up with kevin tubbs (photo recognized), jo dibee and jake (photo of
jake ferguson, jake recognized) They reacted strongly that JP brought a
new unrecognized person, but they agreed to continue the action anyways.
On the night of the action Kevin drove a van and drove to Redmond, OR,
after they parked in the desert they walked down railroad tracks at approx
11 at night. There was a small shed on the side, they made sure no one was
in there. joe drilled the walls, set the devices. poured fuel into the
holes and buturic acid into the ventilation. They finshed and returned to
williams. her travel expenses were covered by JP. There was a communique
put out for ELF, to give attention to the action and make sure it wasn’t
seen as a random act. She didn’t help write it. Prosecution noted the
communique contained information that would only be known by someone
involved in the action. She remained in school till 98. there was an
action 98, attempted arson at Ray Gun Club. action was to stop contest
killing by "local varment militia." Greg Litus also did the action.
Decided to use the same technique as Cavel West for arson, but the
building did not burn down. 1999 developed personal relations with Joe
Dibee in Seattle. The Makah whale hunting issue was an issue both he and
josh harper, Jake Conroy and JP were involved in. summer 99 moved to
Fremont got a job doing software. Prosectors ask a question about Neah
Bay protest. Joe and JP filed suits against each other over the ownership
of the Sea Defense Alliance and its boats. Eventually Joe and her broke
up.
She met Bill Rodgers (Avalon) in 2000 and trained on how to do arsons. She
described him as gentle. Incubator meetings began in 2000 in Oly.
Incubator meetings teach about committing arson. Jan. 2001 santa cruz.
Copy of calendar shows 3 meetings. 1st meeting Santa cruz jan 5-7 held at
hotel, 12 to 15 people. She said her job there was to teach PGP
encryption, Internet security. She explained how nicknames worked and who
had which ones from the list she had. Diver was her. Peaches was Al
Decker. Ishi was Susan Savoie, Sabina was Joyanna Zacker, Jamie was Daniel
McGowan, Leroy (don’t know who that was) Reba was Lacey, Micheal was Rod
Coronado, Puck was Jeff Hogg, Zon(?) was Nathan Block. She helped make
discs for PGP. Handed out disks and directions for them. Oly meeting 5-7
jan., 2001. Rogers borrowed a house. Meeting topic: did Bill Rodgers
molest young women? Asked how folks got to the meeting. Discussion about
Jen’s non activist boyfriend. Approached about genetic engineering by Al
Decker and about doing the UW arson. Al Decker talked to her about
research projects and Tobi Bradshaw and his work. She was approached by
Bill Rogers or someone about participating to cut glass at the UW arson.
Note: she had stain glass cutting experience. May 12th sat. 2001 on Oly
campus, Evergreen, in a sound proof music room. with Briana, Bill,
Chelsea, Stan, Nathan and Joyanna. Preparations for the UW and Oregon
actions. She met Briana thru Bill and saw her only a few times socially.
She tries not to talk about the arsons. Said her life changed soon after
the UW action. She said she didn’t see a positive effect and walked away
from "all this." No recollection of meeting prior to arson. May 20, 2001,
drove to Greenlake Bar and Grill in her car. Met people from Oly. 5 people
total: Jen, 2 females, 2 males, and bill (we know this doesn’t add up, but
she said this) She said one female was Briana. They drove together from
the bar in a rental and parked. Crossed field to the UW center, Briana
stayed as lookout, Jen proceeded to cut the glass. Some broke in a loud
manner. Briana radios about security car. They sat quiet and then
proceeded. They removed a small aquarium and papers from the office. they
placed fuel bags and left.
(court recess)
may 21 2001. Jen kolar id's backpack she used that night. recap'd setting
of devices. described driving back home and heard nothing on her police
scanner. Saw headlines the next day. exhibits shown pictures of the bar,
end of street at UW, close up/ place where brianna was lookout, the bush.
A 2nd action was done the same night for more impact, a sister action at
jefferson poplar. she didn’t draft the communique but she saw it. Oct
2001. Joe dibee approaches Jen about wild horses to be slaughtered. Said
he owed a funder an animal rights action. Oct 11, 2001, drove to nevada/CA
border to meet with group. Stan brought incendiary devices. She was
surprised it was an arson and not just a release. Suprised stan brought
the devices. They camped. Joe maced self in the eye. They got fuel in
Reno.Delayed the action a day due to Joe’s eye.
They had handsaws and Stan and her moved animals to the edge of corral,
away from where they'd set fire. They set 4 devices under a truck and by
buildings. The horses wouldn’t leave. They tried to force them, and then
they left the gate open for horses to leave. Joe and her returned to
seattle after. she wrote communique and sent oct 17, 2001 with Joe and
sent from a cafe in seattle. Sent to ELF press office. Moved in with non
activist boyfriend (still dating). lost touch with activists , saw briana
a few times. Dec. 2005, Quimby, FBI approaches her again, she decided to
hire lawyer, Mr. Martin a few days later. she met with gov’t agent Halla,
was "likely to get a reduced sentence in order to put this thing behind
her" Dec 16, 2005, with Feds, discussed book club meetings and Cavel
West and spent only a few minutes on the UW arson, Jen said the UW arson
was the foggiest in her memory. Asked if she remembered UW. She said bill,
herself, 2 females, capitol hill girl, crazy dan and a punk boyfriend. She
didnt remember briana’s involvement at this time. prior to next meeting,
her memory jars, she looked thru phone book and saw briana’s number, told
lawyer that she was involved. When asked if she knew lacey phillabaum
plead guilty to the UW action, she said she didn’t remember Lacey being
involved and then she provided briana’s name to the feds. Identified
papers from a crate she had and a folder given to her from briana. She
also had a daypack, laptop, zip discs from the horticulture center arson.
Folder contained anarchist newsletters. Jen said she never read the
information in the folder given to her by briana until this trial. Defense
attorney Fox objects and asks her questions..... He asked if she knew
who’s handwriting was in the file from briana. He also asked how could
she know for sure that the information was in fact the same info, after so
much time and so many moves. she said she knew it was always in the same
crate.
Exhibit shown to Jen, bill rodgers book on arson. asked where she got it.
she said she gave it to the feds. Bill had asked her to edit the book but
she never got to it. diagrams shown. Fox jumps in again. questions, had
you looked at the file briana gave you? no, not till the gov said to.
objects to evidence. Court overrules, it is submitted anyways.
prosecution has her read excerpts from willful disobedience, describing
activist philosophy including reference to UW horticulture and Jefferson
Poplar fires. She reads about the will of being and anarchist and
destroying industrial society thru well aimed revolt. The joy of vandalism
and sabotage, the release. Read excerpts from Craig Rosebraugh’s direct
action and economic sabatogue. Reads excerpt from what is ELF? Reads about
action protocol. Meeting with fed, discuss book club, Cavel West fire. Feb
4, 2006, drove with agents, to Oly to id where people lived. Id'd Bill
rodgers’ house and tried to find junk yard where folks (Joy and Nathan)
lived and were thwarted by new development. March 6, 2006. Meeting with
feds. They asked about briana and lacey. Did she know personality types of
briana and lacey? would they cooperate? she said briana was mild mannered
and believed she's cooperate. she had no doubt in her mind that briana was
involved in the UW fire.
prosecution is finished.
CROSS EXAMINATION BY NEIL FOX
Established she now lived near the UW. Neighbors could be affiliated with
UW. Established she used the facilities at UW. Talk about her work history
and her college career. Asks if she understands value of work, the large
impact when research is lost. she says yes. he mentions she lives a
double life. lives a lie, and that she doesn’t flaunt her
radicalism. she agrees. yes, yes, yes. establishes that not much is
different in her life since 2001, same job, same boyfriend. only now she's
not an activist. she holds several patents. her current job is
interesting, includes travel. she owns a house and a did own a sailboat (
the manta ray ) that she sold her half to her boyfriend Jonathan
Reichhold to pay her attorney costs. Neil has her admit though, that she
still has full access to the yacht. Nov 2006 ran for a 2-year term as
board member at the yacht club despite her guilty plea agreement a month
earlier in which she was facing 5-7 years in prison. She races yachts for
fun. she is a member of a yacht club (the corinthian). after pleading
guilty in Oct. 2006, don’t you find it strange that you would run for a
position as board member that would run for 2 years? she said no. Defense
asks if went to chicago, and then to hawaii with jonathan
riechold, her current boyfriend. she didn’t remember chicago but said yes
to hawaii. The day after the UW arson (the evening of the arson really
since it was after midnight), did you go to a sailing race? yes. casual
race 4-8pm. she didn’t mention the arson to anyone, including her
boyfirned, returns to normal life. At the susanville fire, when dibee
maced himself and their action was delayed. She contacted her friend Kenny
clark, or kenny cryst, the defense also listed him as going by Richard
Mcdermitt, (deisel mechanic from Makah campaign) to call into work for her
(make some excuse why she wouldn’t be at her work; and to reschedule a
massage she had. May 2004 Quimby comes by at current house in Seattle.
Wanted to talk about CO. She believed it was to talk about some actions or
activities in CO but denied she thought quimby had specifics. The Vail
arson was 2 weeks before Ray Gun Club attempted arson. Greg Litus and Jen
made devices for the Ray gun club action, and it was on the same property
as Nicole Rose Marino lived. Lived at same house as they were building the
devices, Marino was an above ground activist. Nicole never knew about the
activity on site—jeopardized her above ground work. court recesses for
the evening. witness will take the stand at 9:00 am thursday.

NOTES: Defense counsel established Kolar as a cold, rich woman who didn’t
have any remorse for the numerous crimes she committed. She appeared to
be very bright, heavily involved in major parts of planning, research etc.
Question: why would a woman like Kolar, who was in charge of teaching
computer security culture to the group and was heavily involved in lots of
illegal activities, then keep all the PGP disks, info, data, passwords,
old laptops, her old PDA info and other highly suspicious items for YEARS
in her personal belongings???? Could it have been an intentional
insurance policy for her in case she/they ever got busted??? Seems really
strange for a smart woman to be so stupid as to save all this stuff,
including scanners and gloves, and then willingly and voluntarily turn it
all over to the feds once she was caught???

Jose Perez Gonzalez Freedom Fund

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign
http://www.myspace.com/ProLibertad

ProLibertad@hotmail.com and ProlIbertad.campaign@gmail.com

ProLibertad Hotline: 718-601-4751

On January 18th, Vieques Political Prisoner Jose Perez Gonzalez finished his prison sentence and is now free!! The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign, its friends and supporters, welcomes José and shares his joy in once again sharing the warmth that comes from walking among our people and the pride we all feel for his heroic service.

But Jose still needs our support. He is facing a $10,000 dollar fine to be paid to the U.S. government. We need to help Jose Perez Gonzalez!!

We are asking all freedom-loving people to send a donation to the Jose Perez Freedom Fund to help him pay the fine!! Send any amount between $20-whatever you can to the following address:

IFCO/ProLibertad

418 W145th St.

New York, N.Y. 10031
Please endorse the check or money order to: IFCO/ProLibertad and write “Jose Perez Gonzalez Freedom Fund” in the memo section

Sunday, February 24, 2008

United In Opposition To City Wide Jail Plans

As we continue our struggles against those that seek to maintain our people
chained to it's oppressive, exploitative and enslaving mechanism. I can only
ask that solidarity be manifested in any manner possible inorder to stop these
plans for new jails.
There's gentrification going on throughout the entire city-which is leading to
mass homelessness, a leading cause to someone taking other measures for
survival which may lead to incarceration-I ask is this a mere coincidence?
There's new laws such as every individual who is now arrested will be subjected
to monetary punitive measures also-which will increase arrests for minor
quality of life crimes the likes of trespassing, disorderly conduct, amongst
others-i ask is these coincidences proof it's about money?
There's other hardships being caused by the state that'll cause further
displacement and mass incarceration and individuals need to pull together as
one all issues contributing to these hardships that'll lead to these
incarcerations.
Let's not stay silent till it affects you personally-let's arrange a massive
planning meeting and secure our communities, our freedom from imprisonment, our
housing, our rights.
Check out our video in opposition to some of their tools:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sBgpqH6rac
Correction Commissioner Pushes Against Critics
Read the article here: http://www.nysun.com/article/71076?access=900795
Here's another one below;

Is deal on jail in the wind?
City is negotiating with jail site's owner
By Joe Hirsch
Editor@huntspointexpress.com
The owner of the derelict Oak Point rail yard and city officials have been
negotiating in an effort to resolve the impasse that has stalled the cityís
plan to build a 2000-bed jail in Hunts Point.
Local advocates who oppose construction of the jail are worried that a sweeter
offer from the city will put the jail back on a fast track.
The owner of the property confirmed that a court hearing on his efforts to stop
the city from going forward with its plan has been postponed while the parties
try to strike a bargain.
"The case was postponed again so that we could hopefully reach some kind of
agreement," said owner Steven Smith in a telephone interview.
The case is now scheduled to return to federal bankruptcy court in Connecticut
on Feb. 26. Smith has asked the court to stop the city from taking title to the
land.
The industrially-zoned waterfront scrubland lot has been at the center of
controversy since April 2006 when Department of Corrections Commissioner Martin
Horn announced the city's intention to buy 28 acres of the former rail yard for
a jail that would replace deteriorating jail space on Rikers Island.
Arguing that the city's offering price was artificially low and that the threat
that the land would be taken by eminent domain had spooked other potential
buyers, Smith won a temporary order preventing the city from going forward.
At a status conference in bankruptcy court on Jan. 29, the sides appeared to be
coming closer together than in the past, Smith said.
While Department of Corrections officials contend that the new jail would offer
more humane conditions for inmates, and an easier commute for visitors, Hunts
Point residents and prisoners rights organizations have rallied against the
plan, and persuaded Bronx politicians to oppose it.
Charging that the city has stonewalled requests for information, Sustainable
South Bronx went to court in January and won an order from a state judge, who
told the Department of Corrections it must return to her court by March 21 to
explain why it refused to turn over documents about the plan to opponents of
the jail.

Solidarity Is Our Only Weapon

“The power of effective and dynamic prisoner support was, in my experience, never better illustrated than in the way a prison authority climbed down on this occasion, and it was an incredibly empowering experience to be a part of it.”John Bowden

There are important lessons to be learned from last year’s successful campaign in support of prisoner John Bowden, and in defence of the Anarchist Black Cross. When comrades are attacked, it is not a time for complacency, but a time for determined and decisive action. In our struggle against the State, our collective strength and solidarity is the only weapon we have.

Below, John Bowden gives an assessment of the campaign to defend himself and the ABC against the lies of prison social worker Matt Stillman, who in a crucial parole report, described the ABC as a “terrorist” and “paramilitary” organisation with whom John was in contact.

;">
The decision to mount a campaign against Stillman’s lies about the ABC was made some time before the system actually moved against me, and a view shared by some friends and comrades on the outside was that the decision was premature and would prove ultimately counter-productive by inviting repression against me and seriously prejudicing a parole hearing scheduled for that summer. As far as I was concerned, however, the decision to highlight Stillman’s lies was very much a strategic one and motivated by my concern that should I avoid confronting the prison authorities over Stillman’s report at the earliest possible stage then the report would have gone unchallenged before the parole board that summer. On the basis of his claim that I was linked to a terrorist group my release would have been denied almost indefinitely by the parole board, and no amount of protesting afterwards would have had the slightest effect on that. I knew that any campaign to expose Stillman as a liar had to be organised immediately, no matter what the short-term consequences to myself, and I was, therefore, absolutely clear in my appeal for immediate solidarity from the ABC. Fortunately ex-prisoner Mark Barnsley trusted my judgement implicitly and threw his support behind me right away.

The repression when it came was predictably vicious and cruel, but by then I’d already publicly exposed Stillman’s lies and given warning that I was under attack by the Scottish prison authorities. Their subsequent behaviour in moving me back to maximum-security conditions was therefore immediately seen for what it was – straightforward revenge. As a result, they were never particularly confident about the situation, especially as their treatment of me was now clearly seen as being motivated by the ludicrous claims of Stillman, as opposed to any serious allegation concerning my actual behaviour. By managing to organise a campaign against Stillman early on not only did I provoke the Scottish prison service into moving against me but also pre-empted their actions to a large extent and established the real context of the repression when it came. They were always resentful that I’d managed to do that and frequently accused me of creating a political context to their punishment of me, which eventually would weaken and destroy their attempts to justify and excuse their treatment of me in any other way.

In a very real sense the behaviour of the Scottish Prison Service authorities following my removal back to a maximum-security prison came to be largely dictated by the increasing pressure being applied on them by the campaign outside and the imperative they were now clearly feeling to “resolve” the problem. There was established early on a relationship between the growing intensity and determination of the campaign outside and the increasing involvement of more senior prison bureaucrats and professionals in attempts to deal with the situation – all responsibility for the system’s strategy was being removed from those who had initiated the chain of events, the administration at Castle Huntly Prison, and passed to those with a more direct input at H.Q. level. Had there been no visible campaign of solidarity and support then I’d have rotted away indefinitely in a maximum-security hell-hole while the system did nothing.

Apart from the obvious effect that the campaign was having on the Scottish prison authorities, its psychological effect on me was significant. Even during my lowest moments when I really struggled to make the re-adjustment to being back in conditions of maximum-security, the knowledge that on the outside good committed comrades were campaigning and fighting on my behalf sustained and strengthened me immeasurably. Isolation is a weapon used by the prison system to weaken and dis-empower prisoners, and my removal back to a high-security prison was clearly intended to demoralise and dispirit me, as well as sever my contact with friends and sources of emotional and psychological support on the outside. Leeds ABC, especially, were determined that wasn’t going to happen and so flooded the jail I was in with letters and cards of support every day, reassuring and encouraging me that no matter how deeply the system buried me in here I would not be forgotten, and in fact the longer I was held the more intense the campaign on my behalf would become. The volume of mail I was receiving at this time was also being monitored and handled by screws and administration of the prison holding me and it had an obvious effect on their treatment of me. They were clearly anxious to avoid confrontation with me and risk an escalation in the claims of victimisation being made by my supporters on the outside. This provided me with valuable psychological space in which to adapt to my surroundings and focus on exposing Stillman’s lies.

Soon after my return to maximum-security conditions at Glenochil Prison, the administration there decided to provide a link of communication between myself and senior governors at the prison by appointing Charlie Kelly, a Senior Psychologist, as that conduit. Initially, Kelly was instructed to try and persuade me that it could be in my interests to keep my head down and desist from rocking the boat. When knowledge of the campaign outside began to filter in to Scottish Prison Service H.Q. Kelly’s role changed from one of conveying warnings to one of seeking out negotiation and compromise. At one stage he admitted that the degree of obvious political support mobilised on my behalf had surprised and unnerved the Scottish prison authorities who were simply not accustomed to prisoners in Scotland having that sort and degree of political support. If unaccustomed to facing that degree of prisoner support, the Scottish prison authorities were also seriously hamstrung by the sheer ridiculousness of Stillman’s lies and their inability to defend them. In the usual course of events the prison system and those who administer it operate in the confident knowledge that there is no accountability to their actions and behaviour towards prisoners. Any lie, no matter how obvious, can be levelled against a prisoner, isolated from the outside world and powerless, and no restraint on the repression unleashed by that lie. When the Scottish prison authorities realised that Stillman’s lies were being publicly exposed and campaigned against by an organised political group on the outside it took fright and then began to try and distance itself from Stillman.

Six months after my transfer to Glenochil, the Scottish Prison Service commissioned an “updated psychological” risk assessment report on me, and the conclusions of its author, Senior Psychologist Dawn Harris, made a stark and bewildering contrast to Stillman’s earlier report on me. While Stillman had written of my contact with a dangerous paramilitary group fanatically dedicated to terrorism, Harris referred to the ABC as a perfectly legitimate and peaceful group committed to prisoners’ rights and in fact a very positive vehicle for my anger against the prison system! This was a complete volte-face on the part of the Scottish Prison authorities, who by now were desperate to nullify the campaign, even if it necessitated a climb-down and abandonment of Stillman. Harris recommended that I be returned to an open prison as soon as possible, and this represented a definitive gesture on the part of the system that it was anxious to call a truce and end the ABC campaign. The power of effective and dynamic prisoner support was, in my experience, never better illustrated than in the way a prison authority climbed down on this occasion, and it was an incredibly empowering experience to be a part of it.

Following the submission of Dawn Harris’ report she returned to Glenochil Prison to warn me about continuing the campaign and undermining the “corporate integrity” of the Scottish prison system by placing on the internet internal prison reports about myself, such as Stillman’s and her own. Her message was clear: the campaign had hurt the system and it wanted it stopped right now! By then I was in a position to suggest that the campaign was directly linked to my treatment in prison and would therefore remain active and vocal while I continued to be victimised. She was sent to offer a “deal” – call off the campaign and my situation would improve significantly. The reality was the ABC’s campaign had broken their will to continue the repression and now they were desperately looking for a way out.

By this time Stillman was completely abandoned by them, and three months after my return to an open jail Perth and Kinross Council officially upheld my complaint that Stillman had lied about the nature of the ABC.

The fighting spirit and commitment of Leeds ABC, especially, in defending me had succeeded and should represent a lesson to all prisoner support activists that victory against the prison system is possible providing they’re prepared and willing to actively fight on behalf of prisoners.

John Bowden

Which Prisoners Should Receive Support?

Chris Dirt McIntoshWhen environmental and animal rights advocates are sentenced to lengthy prison terms—many as “terrorists”—they depend on the support of friends, family and the larger activist community. They need money in their commissary account. They need books and magazines. They need visitors, phone calls, and perhaps above all else, according to many current and former prisoners I’ve interviewed, they need letters: sometimes mail call is the only thing to look forward to in prison. The support, or lack of support, of these activists also sends a message to the government and to other activists.
But doing all this prison support work can be time consuming and draining. Base-line decisions have to be made about what, at bare minimum, qualifies a prisoner for support from the wider activist community. And lately, many activists have been struggling with what disqualifies a prisoner from receiving support.
Chris “Dirt” McIntosh attempted to burn down a McDonalds in Seattle, in 2005, and is serving an eight-year prison sentence (his guilty plea dropped it down from a minimum of 30, as the government was pushing to use “terrorism” laws against him). The crime was claimed by both the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front.
The Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network just announced it is ending all support for McIntosh, and encouraging others to do the same, after investigating racist and sexist comments he has made. The support network says:
1) McIntosh has adopted White Supremacist views whilst in prison. A number of people have contacted ELP saying that McIntosh has started to associate with a racist gang and has even gone as far as to get a racist ‘white power’ tattoo. In a letter to one of his supporters McIntosh enclosed a photo of himself and referred to his tattoo which was not visible in the photo. He told another supporter how he would show off his tattoo upon his release from prison.
[As an aside, that’s quite a strikingly different prison experience than, for instance, http://www.myspace.com/andystepanian Andy Stepanian, who just sent a letter celebrating the work of the Black Panthers and urging animal rights advocates to support the San Francisco 8. “The Panther fed our mornings with free breakfasts and our hearts with power. The Panther took this love and handed it to our captors like Valentine’s flowers. The Panther stole the hearts of the ghetto and white privilege alike.”]
2) McIntosh, through his Social Darwinian beliefs, thinks that ‘might makes right’, or as he puts it in one of his letters “supremacy to the strongest”.
3) McIntosh has told at least one female supporter that it is okay for a man to rape a woman (under his ‘might makes right’ theme).
4) ELP has had it confirmed that since going into prison McIntosh has abandoned his vegetarian diet and has reverted to eating meat.
I have never spoken with McIntosh, but on his website there are some notes along those lines. In October, 2007, he wrote that he had asked to be removed from prisoner support lists because “I had become frustrated and disillusioned by the resistance to evolution within the struggle… Also, I don’t understand why the foremost natural law - might makes right - is not held paramount.” He then had a change of heart, saying “I need mental and emotional support.”
This isn’t the first time prisoner support networks have struggled with these issues. Resist.ca, an anarchist collective that hosts websites and provides technical support to activists, came under fire recently for hosting the website of Darren Thurston’s support group. Thurston, you’ll remember, is one of the cooperating defendants in the Operation Backfire cases, where activists were rounded up and charged with serious property crimes committed in the name of defending the environment. [Here’s a previous post on Thurston, “Cooperator, Snitch or Something Else?”]
A couple groups have refused to work with Resist.ca any longer. Here’s a statement from one:
Wii’nimkiikaa removed its site from resist.ca as an act of solidarity with those ‘Green Scare’ defendants who have chosen not to collaborate nor snitch on others. ‘Wolves Not Sheep’, the archive of the Vancouver Native Youth Movement also removed its site from resist.ca at the same time for the same reasons.
But as someone commented in a discussion on the Infoshop website:
I’ve read one irresponsible call for activist sites to boycott Resist. This takes criticism and differences of opinion to a puritanical level, which I can’t support. Our radical tech infrastructure, as well as much of our alternative media, are in a precarious situation already. Organizing a campaign to disrupt a radical ISP over a difference of opinion is in my opinion just as bad as snitching.
What do you think? What are the bare-minimum requirements for supporting “Green Scare” prisoners?