Thursday, September 20, 2007

Eric McDavid Court Report, Days 4 and 5, Sept. 17th and 18th

Day 4: September 17

Testimony of FBI Special Agent Krause

The day began with testimony from FBI Special Agent (SA) Richard Krause.
He testified on his background, his training and the search of the Cabin
that Eric, Zach, Lauren and “Anna” occupied. SA Krause said that he has
been in the FBI 4 ½ years and is currently posted in Houston. In January
of 2006 he was posted in Sacramento and participated in the search of the
Dutch Flat Cabin on January 14. He stated that he learned how to properly
execute a search warrant from a class at the FBI academy and that he had
participated in roughly a dozen prior searches. He testified that the
cabin was secured by a highway patrol office monitoring it on video from
the time the trio were arrested on January 13 and the time of the search
on January 14. He described the protocol for executing a search warrant
and explained the role of the custodian of evidence. SA Krause was the
custodian of evidence in this search and he stated that his job was to
look at evidence in the location in which it was discovered in order to be
able to testify about it later. United States Attorney (USA) Ellen
Endrezzi presented SA Krause with a variety of photographs labeled
government exhibits 35A-35BB. These photos were of various items found in
the cabin. The items included mason jars, bleach, car battery, spray
paint, sugar, Vaseline, shotgun shells, laptop, chemistry set, sifter,
salt substitute, nimbus fish hatchery brochure, an article about Ryan
Lewis, IDs and Zines. SA Krause indicated that over 100 photos had been
taken but that not all evidence was photographed. On his cross examination
SA Krause indicated that many of the photographs shown in court were not
of photographs of objects in the locations in which they were found.
Different items were grouped together and photographed by the FBI agents
conducting the search.

Testimony of Lauren Weiner

Lauren’s direct examination was done by United States Attorney (USA) Steve
Lapham. The USA asked her if she was getting anything in exchange for her
testimony and she said that she was getting a deal with a 5 year maximum.
She testified that she planned using explosives on different sites and
that she conspired with Eric and Zach to do so. She discussed how she met
Zach and Eric at a biotech protest in Philadelphia in June of 2005. She
stated that she wanted to start a house, do banner drops and graffiti. She
stated that at the time she felt protesting was not working but she wanted
to make change. She testified that Eric told her that he and Anna
discussed direct action and that she should contact Anna. Lauren stated
that she and Anna talked a lot and that she was a “good friend”. She said
that when she talked with Zach and Eric they discussed “boom”. The USA
asked her what “boom” was and she said it was explosives. The USA asked
her why she didn’t use the word explosives and she said “it’s a scary
word”. The USA asked her if she knew Eric and Zach’s real names and she
said that she did not know Eric’s but that she did know Zach’s. Lauren
stated that when she told Anna about meeting with Eric and Zach to discuss
their ideas Anna acted surprised and excited. She testified that Zach and
Eric had left town at the end of the summer but that she kept in contact
with them through myspace and e-mail respectively. She said she was having
trouble with her roommate, hated art school and wanted out of
Philadelphia. She testified that she missed “the boys” and hoped to go out
west to see them because “I wanted to continue traveling like we were last
summer”. She said that she asked Anna for a ride “because I had no other
way out there”. Lauren testified that Anna called her and said she had an
extra plane ticket and “that it was a free plane ride to California and I
missed the guys” and “I didn’t see what I had to lose”. Lauren stated that
when they all met in November they were excited to see each other and
catch up. She said that Eric and Anna slept in the living room together.
She stated that the next night they hung out and talked about ideas for
direct actions, justification for them, the ELF and various possible
targets. Later in her testimony, Lauren claimed that Anna purchased wine
for the group that weekend and that she thinks everyone drank some (she
was not 21 at the time). Lauren stated that Eric quoted something Derrick
Jensen said and she asked him for the interview. Lauren said she recalled
Eric saying what they were talking about was illegal and that they could
go to jail. When asked by the USA what she thought of that she said “at
that point in my mind, everything seemed illegal”. Lauren said they talked
about scouting out cell phone towers as targets and that she had some
photos of cell phone towers in New York. The USA asked Lauren about who
brought up the “tree factory” or the Institute of Forestry Genetics (IFG)
as a topic. She stated that Eric and Anna had discussed it. At that point
the USA asked her if it was Eric’s idea and she said she did not know. The
USA showed her a government exhibit which was an article about genetically
modified trees and asked her if she remembered it. He asked her who
brought it and she said she didn’t know. The USA pressed her further on it
and she said they had all brought zines and she didn’t know whose zines
were whose. The USA asked Lauren about Eric’s explosive recipe. She said
that it sounded “more like a heresay recipe than anything concrete” and so
she decided to look for recipes herself. The USA asked Lauren about “going
underground”. She stated that a loose discussion took place on this issue,
but that “nothing was really decided upon”. She said that she and Eric
both discussed how they were dealing with difficult family issues and
would have a hard time not having contact with their families. The USA
asked Lauren to explain “security culture” to the jury and she described
it as not talking about illegal activity. The USA asked her about the
discussion about claiming their actions for the ELF and she said it never
came to any conclusion. He asked Lauren if it was clear to her that
everyone knew the ELF guidelines and she said “I don’t know”. She said
that their attitude about that was: we’ll see when we get there. The USA
asked her what her plan was for their next meeting and she said it was to
start planning. She testified that after their meeting in California in
November of 2005 she bought “The Poor Man’s James Bond” and “The Survival
Chemist” with her credit card online. Lauren stated that Anna came to pick
her and Zach up in DC so they could come out to California in January. She
testified that she believed Eric really loved Anna and thought for a long
time that they were in a relationship. Later she testified that it always
seemed like they had secrets with each other. She said that they had all
talked about not getting together since they would be living in close
quarters. The USA asked Lauren how the burn book was created. She said
Anna showed up with the “burn book” and had written six explosives
recipes. She said that she was surprised and disturbed because she didn’t
want to write things down. Lauren stated that Anna replied they would burn
the book when they were done with it. She said Eric immediately agreed
with Anna even though he had opposed writing things down on an earlier
occasion. The USA then asked Lauren about if they all discussed the death
of civilians. She said yes, that “it scared the shit out of me to think
about it”. He asked what Eric’s feeling about it were and she said “to
take all necessary precautions to avoid it”. He asked her what actions
they discussed and she said the following: unspecified action against
world bank, going into a bank and burning all the money, going to a bank
and gluing the locks and ATMs, cause a blackout in the bay area, IFG,
Huntington Life Sciences action, gas stations, getting rid of dams by the
ocean so salmon can spawn and hijacking a truck full of jam and spilling
it all over the road to jam up traffic. She stated repeatedly throughout
her testimony that they never came to any agreement on a target(s) at
anytime. She said that government buildings were not really discussed. She
stated that they went to the Nimbus fish hatchery and discussed blowing
the gates off the fish ladders “somehow”. Lauren testified that they
looked at the dam from the bike trail and she said they should go out in
the desert and try pouring concrete and testing an explosive on that.
Lauren also said that she went with Anna, Eric and Zach to the Institute
of Forestry Genetics (IFG) and presented themselves as students at
American River College. She said that the person who gave tours was not
available and so they did a self guided tour until they ran into the tour
guide. She states that she was looking at the positions of the cameras and
Eric was sketching the layout of the place. Lauren stated that they all
went to San Francisco together to visit friends, to go to the library to
do research and to look for supplies. She said they weren’t able to find
what they were looking for and so they had to go to a Walmart along the
way, but still couldn’t find everything. She stated that due to these
circumstances one more shopping trip was required.
Lauren testified that she met Zach and Eric at a bike space in
Philadelphia and that they later introduced her to Anna at a really really
really really free market in a park. She stated that she let Eric, Zach
and Anna stay with her and talked to them about how/why they traveled. She
testified that Zach, Eric and herself all had very little money and
dumpster dived, begged, hopped trains, hitch hiked and ate at soups
kitchens at various points in time. She further testified that Anna bought
them meals and groceries whenever she saw them, that she drove them from
West Virginia and to Bloomington for the 2005 crimethinc convergence and
that once they were there she bought them tents. She also loaned Lauren
money at that point and stated that she had lots of money because she was
a stripper. Lauren testified that when Anna stayed at her house during the
biotech protest of June 2005 she bought them all goggles and vinegar and
said they should use it if they got tear gassed. Lauren testified that
Zach and Eric were good, gentle people who always shared and were honest.
Eric’s attorney Mark Reichel asked Lauren how she felt about flying and
she stated that it was painful for her because she had inner ear problems
and had panic attacks in places like airports. Mark asked her about about
her time in jail and her agreement to testify. She said that she was in
solitary confinement and that she was miserable. She stated that she was
granted bail but began cooperating before she left jail. She said she
agreed to cooperate to get a sentence reduction. She acknowledged that the
government keeps postponing her sentencing until after Eric's trial, and
that she doesn't want them to be unhappy during her sentencing. She
testified again that there was not agreement on targets, on claiming the
action for the ELF or on a definite time to meet again. She stated that
after the November meeting Eric was reluctant to meet, that Anna was
trying to get in touch with him and that he was difficult to keep in touch
with. Lauren testified that the night before their arrest Anna got angry
at them and left because of “lack of plans”. Lauren testified that she
worked with Zach and Eric on a schedule to prepare for an action in order
to appease Anna. She also testified that she and Eric were extremely high
at the time that this document was written in the “burn book”. She said
“It was very good marijuana and I was not in a good state of mind so I
don’t remember much”. Lauren stated that they never reached an agreement
on a recipe that they should use. She was also upset that the group had no
fixed goals and no target agreed upon. She said that Zach was hesitating
and reluctant to move faster, which also upset Anna.
Lauren testified that “Anna paid for most group things” including the
items they tried unsuccessfully to make explosives with. Lauren said “She
had lots of $100” and would give them to Eric to go in and buy things, so
that he would be paying for stuff but it would be her money. Lauren stated
that Anna also brought a big chemistry set to the cabin, though no one
asked her too. Lauren testified that Anna taught Eric how to make fuses
with gun powder and trick candles. Lauren also testified that she felt
Eric was unsophisticated when it came to explosives and that his “heresay”
recipe sounded unworkable. Lauren testified that Anna wanted everyone to
identify targets and that she was the main person interested in this.
Lauren said “she kept saying everyone needs to be a part of this” in
reference to mixing explosives and “I remember Zach having a panic
attack”. At this point Eric told Anna to “chill out.” Lauren testified
that Eric paid for no groceries while in Dutch Flat and that no one gave
Anna money for the cabin. Lauren stated that she had no other place to
stay, no transportation, no plane fare and too much stuff to carry hitch
hiking, so it would be very difficult for her to survive without Anna’s
patronage. Lauren testified that they gave up on the Nimbus Dam as a
target and did not agree on the IFG as a target. When Mark asked her who
their leader was she said “there was no leader.” When Mark asked her about
the sleeping arrangements in the cabin, she said that she and Eric were
sleeping in the master room together because she got scared alone at
night, and that there was no sexual content at all. She claimed that Eric
slept next to the wall and she slept near the door. She says she does not
remember Eric crawling over her on the night of the 12th to get out of
bed.
Lauren stated that the reason they did not set a date for their meeting in
January is that “we didn’t even know if we had a place to stay, how we
would get out there or when we would leave”. The USA said “so there were
some variables” and Lauren responded “There were tons of unknowns”. All of
these problems were solved by Anna. Lauren said “I had thoughts about
quitting but I wanted to slow down and think about it more”. Lauren also
said “Anna was like a big sister to me”. Mark asked her “were you acting
to make Anna happy” and Lauren said “Yes”. Lauren said she wanted “to
impress” Anna and that she wanted Anna to think that she was dedicated.
Lauren said “She wanted me to come outside and mix explosives and I really
didn’t want to” In regards to targets Lauren testified “we never picked
one, we couldn’t decide” “that became a conflict as well”.

Testimony of Stephen Fowler

Officer Fowler testified that he has worked for the Vallejo police
department since 1995 and is a member of the Joint Terrorism Task Force.
He conducted the computer forensic exam on the laptop that the four used
in the Dutch Flat cabin. Officer Fowler indicated in his testimony that
the training he received in computer forensics was a 30 minute
conversation with an FBI computer specialist named Art Dorell. He
described the process as imaging the hard drive of the computer and then
using software to look at all the different pathways on the hard drive to
indicate what internet searches had been done on the computer. Officer
Fowler testified that there were various internet searches done on
scientific supply stores, potassium chloride and hydrometers. When asked
by Eric’s attorney whether there were any searches done regarding the ALF
and the ELF he said he couldn’t remember. When Mark tried to ask him about
what he did remember he replied “I just recall what was put in front of
me” indicating the papers the USA gave him. He said there was no way for
them to know who was using the computer at the time of the searches.

Testimony of Zach Jensen

Zach stated that he was arrested at the G8 in Brunswick, Georgia and that
he started using the nickname Ollie. He stated that he has been cited for
marijuana possession several times and used to smoke marijuana heavily. He
testified about the conditions of his pretrial release and his job as a
pizza delivery boy in Washington. He also claimed that he has been allowed
the use of a computer (without internet access) so he can work on a book
he is writing about his travels. He testified that he is no longer an
anarchist “because anarchist politics pales in comparison to the higher
experiences of life”. He stated that he ran into Anna on the way to court
and has no harsh feelings towards her. That the terms of his plea
agreement require him to testify and that if he is not truthful he can
have his original charges reinstated, be charged with perjury or
obstruction of justice and all the information he gave the government can
be used against him. He said that he hopes the government gives him a good
recommendation when it is time for sentencing. Zach testified that he met
with the USA four times for three hour sessions to prepare for his
testimony. When the government attorney asked Zach what the Number 1 rule
of testifying was he replied “Tell the truth.” He stated that the four of
them talked about burning buildings and creating explosives. He said he
met Anna at G8 and Eric at the crimethinc convergence in Des Moines in
2004. He described Eric at that time as “pretty friendly,” “good energy,”
“charismatic,” and “magnetic.” At this point the government attorney began
questioning Zach about Eric's current partner, who was also in attendance
at the Crimethinc convergence and the RNC. Zach claimed that the two
stayed in touch during this time and that she had a way of contacting Eric
that he did not (cell phone). This is a curious statement in light of the
fact that Eric's lack of a cell phone seemed to be of serious concern to
the judge during Eric's bail hearing. Zach said that later he met up with
Eric at the Republican National Convention protest and that they discussed
Molotov cocktails. She asked him who’s idea it was and he said he didn’t
remember. At that point the court adjourned for the day.

Day 5

Upon arriving in court this morning, Eric's lawyer, Mark Reichel announced
that he had injured his back this morning and needed to go see a doctor,
as he was having trouble breathing. Because of this, court was in recess
for the morning session. As of right now (1:00), it appears that we will
not be in court again until tomorrow morning (Wednesday, September 19) at
9 am (501 “I” Street, 15th floor, room 3). If you are planning on
attending trial, please come dressed appropriately for court. No food or
drinks are allowed in the courtroom, and please make sure you turn off
your cell phones and other electronic devices. Also, it is in the best
interest of Eric's case that no one speak with the media.

Vegan Food
Eric is still being denied vegan meals! Please keep calling the jail and
request that Eric be provided with food he can eat. When you call be
prepared to sit through lots of transfers and ringing. The person who made
the decision to deny Eric food is Lt. Ilg. You can also request to speak
with his superior, Scott Jones. Make sure you have Eric's X-ref number
handy: x-2972521.

Jail administration: 916-874-6905

You can also try writing:
Captain Scott Jones
651 I St.
Sacramento, CA 95814

http://www.supporteric.org

Sign Petition for Chip Fitzgerald

Below is a online petition for political prisoner,
Chip Fitzgerald. Thirty-eight years in prison is
reason enough for you to sign it. The fact that he is
innocent of the crime that put him in prison gives you
no excuse not to.

http://www.petitiononline.com/freechip/petition.html

Free Chip,
LA ABCF

Support Ethiopian PP Daniel Bekele

From: merone <labella929@yahoo.com>
Date: September 12, 2007 10:34:38 AM EDT

Dear friends,

On October 8 2007, less than a month from today, my cousin Daniel Bekele will be judged by an Ethiopian court on charges of treason. As you know, Daniel has been a political prisoner for the past two years. If he is found guilty, he could receive the death penalty or life imprisonment.

We want to thank you for all of the support, hard work and incredible attention that you have helped to bring to Daniel's case! We have come this far and we want to ask you once again to help us to ensure that on October 8th, justice prevails and Daniel is released from prison.

Let us honor the resilience and the courage of the 80 million Ethiopians, including Daniel, who suffer daily under the current regime by calling for the respect of human rights and the release of all political prisoners.

Attached and enclosed is a letter about Daniel and his case. Please read it, forward it to your contacts and ask people to get involved!

This past June, 38 other political prisoners were released. It is imperative to understand that it was the constant attention on the gross human rights violations committed by Meles Zenawi and pressure from the Diaspora, from the Continent and from people just like you from around the world that compelled the regime in Ethiopia to release the opposition members.

Let us do the same for Daniel! Write, call and fax and demand that Daniel be released!
Below is some contact information.

His Excellency Prime Minister of Ethiopia Meles Zenawi
P.O. Box 1031, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,
Tel. 251 11 552044 or 251 11 113241
Fax. 251 11 552020

cc: Hon. Ato. Assefa Kessito Minister of Justice,
P.O. Box 1370, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,
Tel. 251 51 515099/ 251 51 157950,
Fax: 251 51 517755,
E-mail: justice@ethionet.et

His Excellency Seyoum Mesfin,
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ethiopia
Email: mfa.press@ethionet.et

His Excellency Kemal Bedri,
President of the Federal Supreme Court and Chairman of the National
Election Board
Email: nebe@ethionet.et

Be sure to also contact your representative in congress! Meles Zenawi's regime receives billions in aid from the U.S. and they should be held accountable for supporting his atrocities.

Go to www.justforeignpolicy.org or
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/justforeignpolicy.org/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=11855

Join Daniel's family and friends as we call for the end of political incarceration and to a new millennium where human rights and freedoms are respected in Ethiopia.


Free them all,

Meron Wondwosen

__________________________________________________________________________
THE DANIEL BEKELE PROJECT

October 8, 2007. To many, that day holds no particular meaning or
significance. On that day, many people will go on with their daily
lives. They will go to work and spend time with family and friends.
Some may celebrate a special event, such as a birthday or an
anniversary. However, in an Ethiopian court on October 8th, it will
be a somber day where judges will determine the future of Daniel
Bekele, a human rights attorney, activist, scholar and a Prisoner of
Conscience who has been incarcerated in an Ethiopian jail for two
years. We are writing to request your legal, social and political
intervention to secure his freedom so we may memorialize that date as
the day justice prevailed for not only Daniel and Prisoners of
Conscience throughout the world, but for a society that values human
rights for all.

At the University of Oxford, Daniel is a Ph.D. candidate with a
Masters Degree in Legal Research, in addition to a L.L.B. in Law and a
Masters Degree in Development Studies from Addis Ababa University. As
an attorney, Daniel's fields of expertise are in Public International
Law, Human Rights Law and Law in Development. Daniel actively
participated in the Global Call to Action Against Poverty and he
worked as a policy and advocate manager at ActionAid Ethiopia, the
South Africa-based international development organization, where he
pushed for civic engagement in Ethiopian society. He also published
papers with a focus on the freedom of _expression and the application
of international human rights law in his homeland of Ethiopia.
Daniel's contributions and his passion for peace illustrate dedication
to his belief in a peaceful and democratic change in Ethiopia.

In the May 2005 national election, although ninety percent of
Ethiopians voted for the opposition party, Prime Minister Meles
Zenawi's ruling party rigged the election in its favor. Leading
members of the opposition party, Coalition for Unity and Democracy,
protested the electoral fraud. Clashes with Zenawi's ruling party led
to the murder of 86 protesters and the wounding and illegal jailing of
tens of thousands of civilians in the June 8th and November 1st Addis
Ababa massacres. Ethiopians faced displacement and the
destabilization of the country at the hands of the Zenawi regime,
while it seemed that the international community turned a deaf ear to
Ethiopians' cries for help.

Those who are entrusted with the force of governmental power should
apply that power with justice and equity, not to silence those
individuals who express views contradictory of the government's
stance. Many Ethiopians chose to oppose the repression of the Zenawi
regime through political activism, peaceful protests and strikes. The
regime retaliated with the arrest of thousands. Ethiopian Security
Forces brutally pistol-whipped Daniel two weeks prior to his arrest.
His sole crime was allegedly making statements critical of the regime.
Daniel and others who did not participate in the demonstrations were
later arrested on the suspicion that they had fomented the alleged
civil unrest. On November 1st 2005, Daniel, with 128 people and four
organizations, was officially charged with the 'crime of outrage
against the Constitution and the constitutional order'.

Individuals, such as Daniel, should not be condemned to harassment,
intimidation, unlawful imprisonment and death for expressing their
beliefs in a lawful manner against the Zenawi regime. Amnesty
International believes that Daniel is a Prisoner of Conscience who
should not be facing charges carrying possible death sentences.
Capital punishment or the threat of death should not be used as
vengeance against the opposition and those unpopular with a
government.

The Zenawi regime proclaimed that Daniel and others have received a
fair trial. Yet they have denied Ethiopia's citizens the freedom of
assembly and _expression while simultaneously replacing human rights
with systematic murder, repression and brutality. Although the Zenawi
government claimed that all defendants were treated properly, Daniel
was subjected to continuous psychological and physical torture. He
faced sleep deprivation and officers forced him to sleep in a shipping
container. He was ultimately moved into a crowded cell with more than
250 inmates. As a result, it was exceptionally difficult for him to
adequately prepare for his trial.

On July 20, 2007, 38 prisoners were released only after they signed a
document asking for clemency for crimes they did not commit. The
Zenawi government came under strong international pressure to release
these prisoners. However, the prisoners were freed only after signing
an apology admitting to organizing violent election protests. Zenawi
stated that these pardons proved 'that the sorry saga was now fully
behind us". However, Daniel remains in prison due to his refusal to
sign the government's document because of his belief that justice
would prevail and that he will not be found guilty for crimes he did
not commit.

A fair and just government should correct social and political
injustices. It should advocate a humanitarian sensibility, not
degrade and undermine the humanity of an individual and society as a
whole. The Zenawi regime raises crucial questions of freedom, liberty
and justice. The injustices committed in Ethiopia should shock the
conscience of the global community so as to propel it into action to
end the massive violations of human rights by the Zenawi regime. We
must safeguard fundamental principles and human rights regardless of
an individual's nationality.

The internalization of human rights sets in motion a legal and moral
obligation not to disregard the gross human rights violations in
Ethiopia because these violations are outside our borders. We cannot
condone human atrocities in the mistaken belief that those actions
committed beyond our borders do not involve us because they do not
occur in our backyard. Democracy and the belief that every being has
the inalienable right to justice and freedom requires us to accept
that the world is our backyard and we must protect it against the
injustices and inhumanity perpetrated by any government against its
citizens.

Silence is not golden. It is non-reactive, unproductive and inhumane.
We risk our humanity by allowing ourselves to close our eyes to the
atrocities that are committed by the Ethiopian regime. Moreover we
share in the complicity of a government's crimes against humanity if
we do not speak out on behalf of those who have fought for the human
rights of others. It is crucial, not only for Ethiopians, but for us
as an international community to recapture the moral authority that
vanished in the wake of the Zenawi regime. The evil is not that the
laws are wanting, but that they cannot or will not be enforced. We
must regain a commitment to redress the wrongs against humanity and
justice. To paraphrase Jean Jacques Rousseau, to renounce liberty is
to renounce one's humanity and such a renunciation is incompatible
with the nature of humankind.

Today, Daniel Bekele's future, and most importantly, his life hangs in
the balance. We can no longer dismiss or disregard the emotional and
mental violence that he has succumbed to during his imprisonment. We
can never erase the imprint of this violence on his life, but we can
end his suffering by making sure that justice prevails in his case.
We seek your help in addressing the human rights violations already
committed by the Zenawi regime. It is imperative, however, that
Daniel's future path is a freedom from imprisonment and not a path to
the death chambers of Ethiopia. We must not only save Daniel, but
save the principles of humanity and justice for all.
FREE 'EM ALL.
RISE ETHIOPIA RISE!!

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Endorse the Cuban 5 Month

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign is proud to forward this mesage in
solidarity with the Cuban 5 and the FRee the Five Month with the
Cuban 5...PLEASE FORWARD OUT FAR AND WIDE!!

The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5
http://www.freethecuban5.com
freethecubanfive@hotmail.com, freethecuban5@gmail.com
Free the Cuban 5 Hotline: 718-601-4751
_______________________________________________________________________________

Between Sept. 12th-Oct. 12th, The Popular Education Project to Free
theCuban 5 is building a calendar of events throughout New York
City/otherciities for the Cuban 5 and we wanted to know if we could
work together on an event for the 5 and endorse this calendar.

FREE THE CUBAN 5 MONTH SEPT. 12TH-OCT. 12TH, 2007

Initial Endorsers:
The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5
International Committee to Free the Cuban 5
The New York Free the Five Committee
The International Action Center
The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign
Frente Socialista-Comite de Nueva York
The Venceremos Brigade
Young Socialists
NYC Anarchist Black Cross
NYC FRee Mumia Coalition
Socialist Worker's Party
Rainbow Solidarity with the Cuban 5
The December 12th Movement

"Ours may be one of the most ridiculous accusations of espionage in
thehistory of this country"-Gerardo Hernandez Nordelo, The Cuban 5

THE FULL FREE THE FIVE MONTH CALENDAR IS COMING!!

This September 12th, 2007 will mark the 9th year anniversary of the
arrestof the Cuban 5; five US held Cuban political prisoners
incarcerated forprotecting Cuba from U.S. sponsored terrorist
actions. Last year, President Ricardo Alarcon, of the Cuban
Parliament, declared Sept. 12 th through October 6th to be a period
of time to raise awareness onthe case of the Cuban 5.

The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5took this
proclamation as a call to action. By publishing this callthrough
various list serves and community mediums, we were able to
motivateorganizations, individuals, teachers, clergy and students to
organize aseries of events throughout the U.S., Latin America and the
Caribbean.

The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5 is committed to
building an international movement for the Cuban 5 by making Sept. 12
th-October 12th"Free the Cuban 5 Month." We have extended the period
of time incommemoration of the 40th anniversary of Ernest "Che"
Guevara'sassassination by the Bolivian army, under the direction of
the CIA.

We are asking organizations in New York City to endorse "Free the
Cuban 5Month" and to organize an event dedicated to the Cuban 5
within yourcommunity or for your constituency. Our goal is to
organize a calendar ofevents throughout New York City and
internationally that can be circulatedthrough colleges, communities,
unions, and churches. O

ur goal is to educate, organize and mobilize as many people as
possible to support thework to free the Cuban 5. In order to endorse,
email the Project at: freethecubanfive@hotmail.com and let us know
which date within the month you will organize your event. Join us in
building the worldwide movement to free the Cuban 5. Cuba iscalling
for our support and solidarity; we cannot stand by and let thisperiod
of time go by without action, education and fund-raising.

Email us with your endorsement and your activity as soon as you possible.

FREE THE CUBAN 5!!
Benjamin Ramos,
Frank Velgara,
The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5

American Animal Rights Prisoner

Urgent ELP! Bulletin (18th September 2007)

Dear friends

An American, Joshua Rosenberg, has been arrested and remanded into
custody accused of damaging windows of a resturant selling foie gras.

Please send letters of support to:

Joshua Rosenberg - 11/16/1977
Travis County Correctional Complex
3614 Bill Price Road
Del Valle, TX 78617
USA

Please note Josh's name and date of birth must be included on the
envelope. Unless he makes bail, it looks like he'll be held until at
least October 3 (see below article).

Hearing set for man charged in restaurant vandalism
Arrest made in foie gras case.

By Dale Rice
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

A court hearing has been set for Oct. 3 in the case of Joshua
Rosenberg, who was arrested last week and charged with criminal
mischief in connection with the vandalism of Restaurant Jezebel.

Bail for Rosenberg, 29, who remained in the Travis County Jail on
Monday, was set at $20,000 on the felony charge. He was arrested
Sept. 10 by Austin police.

The charges stem from an incident that occurred in late August,
when Rosenberg participated in an evening demonstration against the
serving of foie gras (the liver of force-fed ducks or geese) in
front of the restaurant. He is accused of returning about eight
hours later to deface the restaurant windows with acid after
cutting power to the building.

Video cameras on backup battery power captured the vandalism, and
Jezebel chef-owner Parind Vora turned over the information to
police.

That damage followed an earlier round of vandalism, when someone
spray-painted slogans on Jezebel and four other restaurants that
serve foie gras or veal: Aquarelle, Fleming's Prime Steakhouse,
Ruth's Chris Steak House and Spaghetti Warehouse. Under the name
"Vegangstar," someone put photos on the Internet and took credit
for that vandalism.

The vandalism occurred after Central Texas Animal Defense launched
a campaign against foie gras this summer in Austin, with Jezebel as
its primary target. Noah Cooper, coordinator of the campaign, said
Monday that it was unfortunate that the suspect was linked to his
organization.

"We tried all along to make it clear that's an approach we don't
want to take," he said. "We don't want to be associated with that."

Cooper said Rosenberg attended the Jezebel demonstrations
sporadically and never discussed any potential vandalism with other
members of the group, which intends to continue its protests
outside Jezebel, at 914 Congress Ave., every Tuesday and Friday
during dinner, Cooper said.

Although the campaign hasn't succeeded in removing the fare from
Jezebel's menu, it has had an educational value among those who
walked by the restaurant and learned about the process, he said.

Cooper said fear of a similar campaign may have prompted other
restaurants to take quick action. The effort against the serving of
foie gras recently expanded to San Antonio, he said, and two
restaurants there have removed the dish from the menu.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Closing Arguments in Coronado Free Speech Trial on Monday

From: Support for Rod Coronado <info@supportrod.org>

For immediate release – September 17, 2007

Contact: Karen Pickett on-site cell: 510-316-2722; message phone 510-548-3113

Case expected to go to jury by Monday afternoon

San Diego, CA- Attorney Tony Serra for the defense and the government’s attorney will
present closing arguments in activist Rod Coronado’s First Amendment trial at 9 a.m.
Monday morning in room 16, 5th floor of the Federal District Court, 940 Front St.,
San Diego, California. Preceding closing statements, the judge will issue jury
instructions. The case will then be in the hands of the jury.

On Thursday Sept. 13, testimony of a San Diego police officer present at the
speech at issue, was impeached, as a key piece of new evidence was introduced.
After undercover San Diego counter-intelligence cop Joseph Lehr insisted that
Coronado responded to a question about making a “bomb for an action,” a
recently-surfaced audio recording clearly established that the
question from the audience on August 1, 2003 did not include the words “bomb”
or “for an action.” The exact wording of the question following the environmental
speech is central to the case, since government charges are based on Coronado’s
answer.

The government is prosecuting Coronado under an obscure statute (18 USC § 842
(p)(2)(A)), which makes it a crime to demonstrate how to build a destructive
device with the intent that it be used in furtherance of a crime of violence.
They say he intended to foment criminal activity based on his answer, and that
his speech is not protected by the First Amendment. In order to deny that
protection, however, the government must prove his intent.

The Supreme Court has carved out three famous exceptions to free speech: the
“fighting words” exception (Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire), the obscenity
exception (Miller v. California), and the “clear and present danger” exception
(Brandenburg v. Ohio). However, each exception is extremely limited. The
Brandenburg decision states the incitement to violence must be
imminent—unlike, one assumes, the public call for assassination of Venezuelan
president Hugo Chavez by Christian fundamentalist and broadcaster Pat Robertson
in 2005.

After the audio recording played for the jury with a transcript on screen on
Thursday, the defense called as a witness Cari Shaw, the young woman who
actually posed the question. She corroborated the words on the recording as a
question about how an incendiary device is made, and testified that her
impression was that Rod’s explanation of incendiary devices was a recital of
his and others’ acts of the past, rather than a specific call to action. Two
subsequent witnesses, also present at the 2003 speech, both testified to an
absence of incitement to immediate action by Coronado’s words.

The jury seated in this case includes seven women and five men, with two
alternates, one Hispanic male and one Caucasian female. The jury includes one
African-American, one Hispanic, one Filipino; the remaining jurors
assumed to be Caucasian.

A press conference will be held in front of the courthouse after the
verdict is delivered. Press packets with background information are available
electronically and at the courthouse through Karen Pickett.

More info at http://supportrod.org

John Bowden & The Battle of Lewisham


On the 13th of August 1977 the fascist National Front attempted to march from New Cross in London to Lewisham. The march through an immigrant area was deliberately provocative, and protected by a huge police presence. Both the NF and the cops however bit off more than they could chew that day as thousands of antifascists and local people mobilised to confront the march. For the first time, riot shields were used by British police (who had previously only used them in the north of Ireland) and there was fierce hand to hand fighting, with more than a hundred antifascists arrested. But the march was utterly smashed, and the NF routed. It was a decisive event in British antifascist history, and one from which the NF never recovered.

One of the many antifascists arrested that day was John Bowden. In the weeks before the march, John had been involved in mobilising support for the counter-demo, and was arrested on the day for throwing a smoke flare at the NF as they lined-up to march from New Cross.
Last Saturday saw a commemorative event for the 30th anniversary of The Battle of Lewisham, with a walk along the route the fascists planned to take. As John Bowden was unable to attend the event himself, a supporter (also a veteran of the battle) spoke about John's role, and 'Free John Bowden' stickers lined the enitre route.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

New anarchist prisoner in Greece

The night of September 8th during the Thessaloniki "Helexpo"
international fair some 30-40 youths wearing masks and helmets
lifted a banner with a slogan against the upcoming elections in
Greece and the forest arsons marked with an A circled outside the
Helexpo area.

Then there were some clashes in this area close to the
universities between youths and undercover policemen that raid the
universities and arrested a 19 y.o. anarchist woman outside the
university library. 2 more persons under arrest were taken
back-liberated by other youths during the clashes, three cops got
beaten up and a police car damaged.

The anarchist's name is Christina Tonidou, and she has written a
letter on her arrest that can be found here:
http://athens.indymedia.org/front.php3?lang=en&article_id=763532

On the morning of 13.09.2007, Christina Tonidou was set in
pre-trial detention. According to greek law she can be held up to
18 months without a trial. She is charged with two felonies and
eight misdemeanours.

you can also find a report on the Sept 8th clashes here:
> http://directactiongr.blogspot.com/2007/09/clashes-at-helexpo-thessaloniki.html

Sadie and Exile Book Wishlists

Date: September 16, 2007 9:54:54 AM EDT

Sadie and Exile now have updated booklists on Amazon.com, albeit
rather short ones due to restrictions on the number of books the are
allowed to have. They are both always really grateful for the gift of
reading material. If you can, and do decide to send one, it would be
great if you could let us know so we can try to keep the lists updated
to avoid duplicates. Thanks!

Sadie:

Joyanna Zacher #36360-086
FCI Dublin
Federal Correctional Institution
5701 8th St - Camp Parks - Unit F
Dublin, CA 94568

Exile:

Nathan Block #36359-086
FCI Lompoc
Federal Correctional Institution
3600 Guard Road
Lompoc, CA 93436

Saturday, September 15, 2007

La. appeal court overturns conviction in `Jena Six' case


NEW ORLEANS -- A state appeals court Friday tossed out the aggravated battery conviction that could have sent a black teenager to prison for 15 years in last year's beating of a white classmate in the racially tense north Louisiana town of Jena.

Mychal Bell, who was 16 at the time of the December beating, should not have been tried as an adult on the battery charge, the state Third Circuit Court of Appeal in Lake Charles ruled late Friday.

Bell is one of six black Jena High School students charged in an attack on fellow student Justin Barker, and one of five originally charged as adults with attempted second-degree murder.

The charges brought widespread criticism that blacks were being treated more harshly than whites after racial altercations at their school.

He was to be sentenced this coming Thursday in a case that has brought international attention to Jena. Civil rights leaders, including the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, have been planning a rally in support of the teens that same day.

While teenagers can be tried as adults in Louisiana for some violent crimes, including attempted murder, aggravated battery is not one of those crimes. Defense lawyers had argued that the aggravated battery case should not have been tried in adult court once the attempted murder charge was reduced.

"The defendant was not tried on an offense which could have subjected him to the jurisdiction of the criminal court," the three-paragraph ruling said.

The case "remains exclusively in juvenile court," the Third Circuit ruled.