Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Pittsburgh Benefit for the RNC8 on Sat. 5/9

Infoshop News April 28, 2009

We will be heard! RNC8 fundraiser in Pittsburgh on Saturday May 9th with music, food, and info about how this case could affect you and the projects you work on.


The Friends of RNC8 will be having a fundraiser on Saturday, May 9 from 7:00 PM until 10:00 PM at the Friends Meeting House, 4836 Ellsworth Avenue in Shadyside/Oakland. We will have an exhibit of photos and footage of the events of the RNC protests, speakers who will talk about what happened and the latest developments in the case, and live music by the Breakaway Marching Band, Pittsburgh's radical marching band. We will also have food and drink. One reason for the event is to raise funds for the RNC 8 legal defense so we are asking for whatever donation you can afford. But an equally important purpose is to publicize the events of the protests and to highlight how this case could affect us all. Because it's easier to keep them out than to get them out!


The RNC8 are the eight activists who were arrested in the days leading up to the Republican National Convention and are now being charged with conspiracy to commit riot and conspiracy to commit criminal damage to property damage . These 8 people have been targeted with these baseless charges because of their anti-authoritarian politics and their involvement RNC 2008 resistance group, the Welcoming Committee. For much more information on the case or to make a donation go to www.RNC8.org

Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act Four (AETA4) Update

Infoshop News April 28, 2009

http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20090428002117753

The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act Four (AETA4) are four individuals
arrested on February 20, 2009 and currently facing terrorism charges
for allegedly attending home demonstrations, wearing bandannas at
protests, and chalking sidewalks. They each face a maximum of ten
years in prison for their "crimes."
Donations are still needed for legal funds to fight these ridiculous
charges, as the FBI has stated that they wish to make an example out
of the defendants.

There is a support fund set up. To learn more or to donate, visit
www.aeta4.org

We also request that supporters attend court in solidarity. The next
appearance is:

Monday, June 8
9:30AM
San Jose Federal District Court
280 South 1st St.
Judge Whyte Courtroom 6 (4th Floor)
San Jose, CA 95113

Source: www.aeta4.org

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

THIS WEEK ONLY!- Matching Funds for POW Robert Seth Hayes!!!

REPOST!
SPREAD THE WORD!

In his words, New Afrikan Prisoner of War Robert Seth Hayes is in the
process of reinventing his strategy for release. To these ends, he
has procured the counsel of an excellent attorney to assist with his
efforts toward release on parole. He is calling on movement support
communities to provide financial assistance. (letter from Seth Hayes
below)

Thanks to our wealthy benefactor, NYC Anarchist Black Cross (ABCF) is
able to offer an amazing proposition. . .

THIS WEEK ONLY, funds up to $500.00 for Seth Hayes' legal defense,
received in the NYC ABCF PO box or in person to a member of the ABC,
between Tuesday April 28th and Tuesday May 5th 2009, will be *
MATCHED * by our wealthy benefactor!

That's right. Seth will get double the money that you contribute.

If NYC ABC exceeds our fundraising goal of $500.00, money above that
will still go to Seth Hayes' legal fund. If the money coming in
exceeds Seth Hayes' total financial needs for legal costs, excess
money will go toward the ABCF Warchest Program for the commissary
needs of political prisoners and prisoners of war. (http://
www.abcf.net/abcf.asp?page=warchest)

Make your check payable to "123 Community Space LLC" and in the memo
of your check be sure to include "Robert Seth Hayes." Contributions
received in this manner will be tax deductable!

Mail check or money order to

NYC ABCF
PO Box 110034
Brooklyn NY, 11211

between Tuesday April 28th and Sunday May 5th, 2009.

In Solidarity for Freedom,
NYC Anarchist Black Cross
(NYC chapter of the Anarchist Black Cross Federation)
---------
March 24, 2009

Open Letter To:

Anarchist Black Cross Federation, NYC
Resistance N Brooklyn
New York Task Force
Jericho NYC
Malcolm X Grassroots Movement

From Robert Seth Hayes

Re: Request for Economic Assistance in Lieu of Parole Litigation

Comrades,

I have retained the services of Attorney Cheryl Kates to address my
parole appeal. I believe her skills are both fundamentally sound and
needed, and having this opportunity before me is nothing short of a
blessing. We spoke and though it's not etched in stone, the cost
appears to hover around $2,500.00 outside of unforeseen expenses. I
am therefore requesting assistance from you to establish this funding
so that the operation of appeal can begin. Anything you can offer,
in whatever amount will be greatly appreciated.

So that there is no doubt of my sincerity to leave any stones
unturned, be advised that I am also pursuing Buffalo Community
Activist as well as Canada to help secure the completion of this
economic contract. Please feel free to pledge your commitment to me
in whatever form, as soon as possible so that I can assess how far a
field I may have to travel henceforth.

Thank you for your consideration of my request and thank you for
whatever commitment/pledge you render.

Sincerely,
Seth
Robert Seth Hayes

cc: All of the Above
—————————

Exerpts from Seth Hayes' autobiographical piece at http://
www.abcf.net/prisoners/seth.htm

My name is Robert Seth' Hayes. I was captured and convicted in New
York City in 1973 under a host of charges, attributed to my
membership in the Black Liberation Army (BLA). Through my conviction,
I received a sentence of 25 years to life. In 1994-95 I began my
22nd-23rdyear in confinement. . .

. . . I have no optimism that I will be released, but I will
nevertheless struggle to become released.

If in the event I am not released, I will maintain a Revolutionary
Commitment to Struggle til Liberation comes or life ends. So I say to
you, one and all, the Struggle is arduous, therefore, so must your
commitment to changing society, humanity, be arduous. HARAMBEE (Let's
Pull Together). A Luta Continua'.

We Resist,
We Resist
We Resist!
Robert Seth' Hayes
BLACK LIBERATION ARMY AFRIKAN FREEDOM FIGHTER




-- *Get Involved at the 1-2-3 Community Space!
123 Tompkins Ave btw Myrtle and Vernon, Bedstuy BK
123communityspace.org

NYC ABCF
Post Office Box 110034
Brooklyn, New York 11211

nycabc[at]riseup[dot]net
myspace.com/nycanarchistblackcross
http://www.abcf.net/

Free all Political Prisoners and Prisoners of War!
For the Abolition of State Repression and Domination!

UPDATE: Freedom For Palestine! Seventh Annual International Al-Awda Convention

Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition
FREEDOM FOR PALESTINE!
Growing our Global Movement
Seventh Annual International Al-Awda Convention

Embassy Suites Hotel
Anaheim South
11767 Harbor Boulevard
Garden Grove, California 92840
May 22-24, 2009
Among the featured speakers:
  • George Galloway, British Member of Parliament
  • William Ramsey Clark, Former US Attorney General
  • Ghassan Ben Jeddo, Al-Jazeera Beirut Burea Chief and Talk Show Host
  • Yvonne Ridley, Viva Palestina UK, Respect Party, Press TV and Free Gaza Movement
  • Khaled Dawoud, Al-Jazeera Arabic NY-based Correspondent
  • Ron Kovic, author of Born on the 4th of July and joint leader of Viva Palestina USA
  • Cindy Sheehan, anti-war activist
  • Fernando Suarez del Solar, anti-war activist
  • Dr. Jamal Nassar, Specialist in Middle East Politics and Dean of the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences at CSUSB
  • Dr. Hatim Kanaaneh, Galilee Society and Ittijah founder and author of 'A Doctor in Galilee'
Strategy & tactics discussions: Activist panels will include experts in the following campaigns: Viva Palestina USA; Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions; Refugee Support; Student/Youth Activism; Al-Awda Educational Resources; Chapter building and registration among others.
Youth program includes educational sessions such as Palestine 101 and learning Dabke.
Film screenings to include the widely-acclaimed award-winning "Salt of This Sea" by Annemarie Jacir, starring Suheir Hammad and Saleh Bakri and "Amreeka" by Cherien Dabis, starring Nisreen Faour.
Dinner Banquet with Keynote address, Fundraising, plus Dabke Contest!

Convention Information

This year's convention is hosted by twenty seven local and national organizations. For a listing, see http://www.al-awda.org/convention7/hosts.html
For other information, visit: http://al-awda.org/convention7/index.html and keep revisiting that page as it is being updated regularly
JOIN US to work together to bring the days of RETURN closer!

DON'T DELAY! RESERVE YOUR PLACE TODAY!
Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition
PO Box 131352
Carlsbad, CA 92013, USA
Tel: 760-918-9441
Fax: 760-918-9442
E-mail: info@al-awda.org
WWW: http://al-awda.org

Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition (PRRC) is the largest network of grassroots activists and students dedicated to Palestinian human rights. We are a not for profit tax-exempt educational and charitable 501(c)(3) organization as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of the United States of America. Under IRS guidelines, your donations to PRRC are tax-deductible.

Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition | PO Box 131352 | Carlsbad | CA | 92013

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Angela Y. Davis speaks in support of Mumia Abu-Jamal

Contributed by HansBennett on Sun, 2009-04-26 Mostly Water



On April 24, in Oakland, CA, former political prisoner Angela Y. Davis spoke in support of death-row journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal, at an event marking Abu-Jamal's 55th birthday and the release of his new book Jailhouse Lawyers: Prisoners Defending Prisoners v. The USA. Recently interviewed by The SF Bay View Newspaper, Davis wrote an introduction for Jailhouse Lawyers (read the full introduction below) and she is also the author of Are Prisons Obsolete?.

On April 6, 2009, the US Supreme Court rejected Mumia Abu-Jamal's appeal for a new guilt-phase trial. In response, Abu-Jamal will be filing a "petition for re-hearing" by the end of April. The Supreme Court has not yet decided whether to consider the Philadelphia DA's separate appeal, through which, the DA wants to execute Mumia WITHOUT a new sentencing hearing.

Please read the SF Bay View Newspaper report for more information, and be sure to sign the ONLINE PETITION.

As reported by The Philadelphia Inquirer and UPI, supporters are calling for intervention by the US Justice Department. Please contact the White House online, by phone: (202) 456-1111, and at FreeMumia.com.

Introduction to Mumia Abu-Jamal's new book: Jailhouse Lawyers: Prisoners Defending Prisoners v. The USA

By Angela Y. Davis

Published by City Lights Books | http://www.citylights.com

One of the most important public intellectuals of our time, Mumia Abu-Jamal has spent more than twenty-five years behind bars, the majority of that time on death row. He is supported by millions all over the planet, not only because of the egregious repression he has suffered at the hands of the state of Pennsylvania, but because he has used his abundant talents as a thinker and writer to expand our knowledge of the hidden world of jails, prisons, and death houses in which he has spent the last decades of his life. As a transformative thinker, he has always taken care to emphasize the connections between incarcerated lives and lives that unfold in the putative arenas of freedom.

As Mumia has repeatedly pointed out, those of us who live in the "free world" are not unaffected by the system of state violence that relies on imprisonment and capital punishment as pivotal strategies for ordering society. While those behind bars suffer the most direct effects of this system, its raced, gendered, and sexualized modes of violence bolster the institutions and ideologies that inform our lives on the outside. In all of his previous books, Mumia has urged us to reflect on this dialectic of freedom and unfreedom. He has asked us to think deeply about the racial and class disproportions in the application of capital punishment, rarely taking advantage of the opportunity to call upon people to save his own life, but rather using his writing to speak for the more than 3,000 people who inhabit the state and federal death rows. Over the years, I have been especially impressed by the way his ideas have helped to link critiques of the death penalty with broader challenges to the expanding prison-industrial-complex. He has been particularly helpful to those of us­activists and scholars alike­who seek to associate death penalty abolitionism with prison abolitionism.

In this book, Jailhouse Lawyers: Prisoners Defending Prisoners v. the U.S.A., Mumia Abu-Jamal introduces us to the valuable but exceedingly underappreciated contributions of prisoners who have learned how to use the law in defense of human rights. Jailhouse lawyers have challenged inhumane prison conditions, and even when they themselves have been unaware of this connection, they have implicitly followed the standards of such human rights instruments as the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (1955), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), and the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984). Mumia argues that the passage of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) is a violation of the Convention Against Torture, for in ruling out psychological or mental injury as a basis through which to recover damages, such sexual coercion as that represented in the Abu Ghraib photographs, if perpetrated inside a U.S. prison, would not have constituted evidence for a lawsuit. If jailhouse lawyers are concerned with broader human rights issues, they also defend their fellow prisoners who face the wrath of the federal and state governments and the administrative apparatus of the prison. Mumia Abu-Jamal's reach in this remarkable book is broadly historical and analytical on the one hand and intimate and specific on the other.

We are fortunate to be offered this history of jailhouse lawyers and this analysis of their legacies by one who can count himself among their ranks. Mumia's words in the opening section of the book about the general conditions that create trajectories leading prisoners to jailhouse law are compelling. He writes of a "deep, abiding disenchantment with lawyers that forces some people to become their own, and also to assist others. In every penitentiary, in every state of the U.S., there are men and women who have learned, through study and experience, and trial and error, the principles of the law."

Many of the jailhouse lawyers evoked in the pages of this book­including the author himself­were well educated before they entered prison. Studying the law was more a question of focusing their intellectual skills on a different object than of familiarizing themselves and becoming comfortable with the discipline of learning. But there are also those jailhouse lawyers who literally had to teach themselves to read and write before they set about learning the law. Mumia points to what was for me a startling revelation: jailhouse lawyers comprise the group most likely to be punished by the prison administration­more so than political prisoners, black people, gang members, and gay prisoners. Whereas jailhouse lawyers are now punished by what Mumia calls "cover charges," historically they could be charged with internal violations for no other reason than that they used the law to challenge prison guards, prison regimes, and prison conditions.

The passage of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) ­understood by many to have saved the court from frivolous lawsuits by prisoners­was a pointed attack on the jailhouse lawyers Mumia sets out to defend in these pages. He successfully argues that many significant reforms in the prison system resulted directly from the intervention of jailhouse lawyers. Some readers may remember the scandals surrounding conditions in the Texas prison system. But they will not have known that the first decisive challenges to those conditions came from jailhouse lawyers. Mumia refers, for example, to David Ruiz, whose 1971 handwritten civil rights complaint against Texas prison conditions was initially thrown away by the prison administrator charged with having it notarized. As we learn, Ruiz rewrote the complaint and bypassed the prison administration by giving it to a lawyer, who handed it over to a federal judge. This case, Ruiz v. Estelle, was eventually merged with seven other cases originating with prisoners. They challenged double- and triple-celling and work regimes that incorporated the violence of plantation slavery.

Moreover, Texas, along with other southern prison systems, relied on what were known as "building tenders," i.e., armed prisoners acting as assistants to guards, for the governance of the institution. The largely white guards and building tenders poised against the majority Mexican- and African-American prisoners led to "abuse, corruption and officially sanctioned injustice." For those who assume that charitable legal organizations in the "free world" were always responsible for the prison lawsuits that led to significant change, Mumia reminds us that what is now known as "prison law" was pioneered by prisoners themselves. These lawyers behind bars practiced at the risk of punishment and even death. Ruiz himself was placed in the hole after filing this lawsuit against the warden. But, as Mumia points out, the state of Texas was eventually compelled to disestablish the building tender system and to curtail its overcrowding and the overt violence of its regimes. Such contemporary suits as the recent one brought in part by the Prison Law Office against the State of California, which focuses on overcrowded conditions and the lack of health care in California prisons, have been precisely enabled by the work of jailhouse lawyers­those who risked violence and even death in order to make their voices heard.

In light of the major transformations that have historically resulted from the work of jailhouse lawyers, it is not surprising that Mumia argues strenuously against the Prison Litigation Reform Act, whose proponents largely relied on the notion that litigation by prisoners needed to be curtailed because of their proclivity to submit frivolous lawsuits. One of the cases most often evoked as justification for the passage of the PLRA was mischaracterized as claiming cruel and unusual punishment because the prisoners received creamy instead of chunky peanut butter. This was not the entire story, which Mumia offers us as a powerful refutation of the underlying logic of the PLRA. Popular representations of prisoners as intrinsically litigious were linked, he points out, to representations of poor people as more eager to receive welfare payments than they were to work. Thus he connects the 1996 passage of the PRLA under the Clinton administration to the disestablishment of the welfare system, locating both of these developments within the context of rising neoliberalism.

Mumia Abu-Jamal's Jailhouse Lawyers is a persuasive refutation of the ideological underpinnings of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The way he situates the PLRA historically­as an inheritance of the Black Codes, which were themselves descended from the slave codes­allows us to recognize the extent to which historical memories of slavery and racism are inscribed in the very structures of the prison system and have helped to produce the prison-industrial-complex. If slavery denied African and African-descended people the right to full legal personality and the practices of racialized second-tier citizenship institutionalized the inheritance of slavery, so in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, prisoners find that the curtailment of their capacity to seek redress through the legal system preserves and reaffirms that inheritance.

Mumia's profiles include both men and women, both people of color and white people, with disparate motivations and often very different ways of identifying or not identifying themselves as jailhouse lawyers. Prisoners have challenged the law on its own terms in ways that recapitulate the grassroots organizing by ordinary people in the South that led eventually to the overturning of laws authorizing racial inferiority.

As Mumia points out, if there is increasing respect for the religious rights and practices of people behind bars, then it is largely due to the work of jailhouse lawyers. In the state of Pennsylvania, where Mumia himself is imprisoned, one extremely active jailhouse lawyer profiled in the book is Richard Mayberry, who initiated many important lawsuits, including the case known as I.C.U. (Imprisoned Citizens' Union) v. Shapp, which broadly addressed health, overcrowding, and other conditions of confinement in Pennsylvania prisons.

The I.C.U. case ended in a settlement, which required an agreement by all parties. Mayberry served as class representative and signed on behalf of thousands of state prisoners, and a court-agreed settlement went into force, creating new rules that covered the entire state system. The I.C.U. provisions became the foundation for every subsequent regulation that governed the entire state, and they lasted for decades, until the passage of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. (82)

Mumia not only offers accounts of cases and profiles of prison litigators who have had a lasting impact on the prison system in the United States, he also reveals the extent to which jailhouse lawyers provide legal assistance to their peers, both with respect to their cases and with respect to institution violations. In relation to the latter, outside lawyers are often actually prohibited from representing prisoners, whereas jailhouse lawyers are permitted to assist prisoners in their defense of institutional charges.

Whether the lawsuits generated by jailhouse lawyers are expansive in their reach, potentially affecting the lives of large numbers of prisoners, or whether they are specifically focused on the case of a single individual, they have indeed made an enormous difference. Mumia Abu-Jamal has once more enlightened us, he has once more offered us new ways of thinking about law, democracy, and power. He allows us to reflect upon the fact that transformational possibilities often emerge where we least expect them.

Free Mumia!

ANGELA YVONNE DAVIS is Professor Emerita of History of Consciousness at the University of California and author of eight books. In recent years a persistent theme of her work has been the range of social problems associated with incarceration and the generalized criminalization of those communities that are most affected by poverty and racial discrimination. She draws upon her own experiences in the early 1970s as a person who spent eighteen months in jail and on trial, after being placed on the FBI's "Ten Most Wanted List." She has also conducted extensive research on numerous issues related to race, gender and imprisonment.

She is a member of the executive board of the Women of Color Resource Center, a San Francisco Bay Area organization that emphasizes popular education of and about women who live in conditions of poverty. Having helped to popularize the notion of a "prison industrial complex," she now urges her audiences to think seriously about the future possibility of a world without prisons and to help forge a twenty-first century abolitionist movement. Her most recent books are Abolition Democracy and Are Prisons Obsolete?, both published in the Open Media Series. Her forthcoming books, The Meaning of Freedom and Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself A New Critical Edition will also be in the Open Media Series, published by City Lights Books.

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Vandalism Arrests Amid IMF and World Bank Meetings

Protesters March, Clash With Police; Larger Rally Planned for Sunday

By Aaron C. Davis, Hamil R. Harris and Michael Alison Chandler
Washington Post Staff Writers April 25, 2009

Six people were arrested this morning for smashing the windows
of bank branches and spray painting cars near Logan Circle, vandalism
thought to be connected to protests against the International Monetary
Fund and World Bank's annual meetings in Washington, D.C. police said.

"We believe that they are linked; it's a logical conclusion,"
said Cmdr. James Crane, head of the department's Special Operations
Division. "Some of the individuals were from out of town."

The arrests came before a rally this morning near the World
Bank headquarters in which about 150 protesters tried to surge through
a police line, Crane said. Police had beefed up patrols in advance of
the protests, and after the arrests this morning they stationed
additional officers around the protesters.

An off-duty D.C. police officer working security at a drug
store this morning spotted the six breaking windows of a Wachovia Bank
branch and a PNC bank branch in the 1400 block of P St NW, Crane said.
The officer arrested two of the suspects. Other officers arrested the
remaining four as they fled the area, Crane said.

The group had also spray painted cars parked near the Whole Foods across the street, Crane said.

They were charged with felony counts of destruction of property
and rioting, a charge that police said they brought because the group
was larger than five people.

Crane said the vandalism appeared to be an isolated incident.
There was no similar damage reported anywhere else in the District
overnight, he said.

The D.C.-based group Global Justice Action sponsored peaceful
demonstrations Friday with about 75 people participating in a "speak
out" at Edward R. Murrow park. Speakers accused the IMF, the private
organization that oversees global finance, of contributing to the
worldwide economic downturn and creating policies that are harmful to
people in impoverished countries.

The weekend of protests included a scheduled "confrontational street protest" as well as a larger rally tomorrow.

Organizers said the protests were planned to coincide with the
IMF and World Bank meetings and as a reaction to the G-20 economic
leaders' decision this month to earmark $1.1 trillion for a combined
IMF-World Bank rescue fund. Some participants also were rallying
against insufficient aid to Africa and the closing of the Franklin
homeless shelter in Northwest Washington.

Near Logan Circle, the banks are cordoned off with police tape.
More than a dozen windows were smashed; glass was scattered on the
sidewalk.

"There is no connection between the local banks and the IMF,"
said Jeff Walpole, who was having breakfast at an outdoor table at the
restaurant the Commissary. "But these are angry people who don't
understand that."

One person was taken to the hospital for an injured leg and
dozens more were treated for burns from pepper spray, including one
police officer, when police clashed with protesters near the site of
the IMF World Bank.

A 22-year-old, accused of kicking a member of law enforcement, has been arrested and charged with assault on a police officer.

After marching for nearly two hours through District streets,
about 200 people carrying signs that said "Capitalism--Do Not
Resuscitate" and shouting "Feed the Poor! Eat the Rich!" were stopped
by police as they tried to make a U- turn at the corner of Pennsylvania
and 20th around 9:45 a.m.

Jeffrey Herold, a Metropolitan Police Department captain said
the police were put in danger when they were surrounded as the crowd
turned around so they ordered protesters to move to the sidewalk. They
resisted. Some pounded their hands on the hood of a police car.

The police formed a line and began pushing the group back with
batons. The demonstrators organized through a coalition known as Global
Justice Action, did not have permits to march in the street.

In the tussle, some protesters fell to the ground. One officer
from a federal agency used pepper spray to disperse the crowd. Police
said at least one protester also used pepper spray on police. One
officer who was sprayed in the eye was treated at the scene.

The protesters had intended to block delegates from entering
the meetings this morning, but they arrived late. They have another
march planned tomorrow.

Friday, April 24, 2009

I-69 Resister Arrested in Southern Indiana-jail support needed!

Friday, April 24 2009 infoshop news

Another attack to those in resistance to I-69 has been perpetrated by
the hands of the Indiana State Police. Tiga, a long time Indiana
resident, was arrested earlier today as she appeared in Gibson county
court on charges stemming from anti-I-69 actions this past summer.
The arrest was made by the Indiana State Police, including Officer
Brad Chandler, a particularly slimy scumbag whose full time job it is
to harass environmental activists. Tiga is being held on $10,000 cash
bond by the state police on five charge: 2 counts of intimidation, 2
counts of conversion (all misdemeanors) and 1 count of corrupt
business influence (a class D felony). She is currently being held in
the Pike county jail (812) 354-6024), though it possible she’ll be
moved around. Folks in Indiana are actively fundraising to get Tiga
out of the hands of her fascist captors, but we need help…please
email unrebelde@riseup.net for information on how to support our
efforts at raising bail money.

This arrest is an obvious continuance and escalation of the
harassment of anti-I-69 activities in southern Indiana. People in
both Evansville and Bloomington have been systematically targeted and
repressed by myriad law enforcement agencies from throughout the
state as well as by federal agencies. Nearly 20 folks are still held
captive by the court system, facing both criminal and civil legal
pressures stemming from last summer.

The Indiana State Police and its cohorts must know that this affront
and escalation will not go un-noticed. We must respond fiercely,
showing them the meaning of the phrase “repression breeds
resistance”. Help us free Tiga… email unrebelde@riseup.net to donate
bail money.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

4/30: Father Barrios/PRican PP Vigil

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign

For more information on The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign, contact us at ProLibertad@Hotmail.com or at the ProLibertad Hotline718-601-4751. Visit our website: www.ProLibertadWeb.com

A Special April Freedom Month Picket

Vigil in Solidarity with Rev. Luis Barrios, the SOAW 6, and the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners! Close the School of the Americas!

Join the ProLibertad Freedom Campaign and La Iglesia San Romero de Las Americas/UCC as we protest the incarceration of Prisoner of Conscious Rev. Luis Barrios, the SOA 6 and the 29th anniversary of the arrest of the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners!

The U.S. government is responsible for the creation of the School of the Americas, an institute that has trained genocidal despots throughout the world, for the invasion of Puerto Rico in 1898, and the incarceration of peace activists and revolutionaries like the SOA 6 and the Puerto Rican Political prisoners. Same struggle, Same Fight!

Thursday April 30, 2009 at 5pm

Metropolitan Correctional Center

150 Park Row Take the 4, 5 J, M, Z Train to City Hall

The SOA 6: The "SOA 6," ranging in age from 21 to 68, were found "guilty" of carrying the protest against the School of the Americas (SOA/WHINSEC) onto the Fort Benning military base. The six were among the thousands who gathered on November 22 and 23, 2008 outside the gates of Fort Benning, Georgia to demand a change in U.S. policy towards Latin America and the closure of the SOA/WHINSEC. The "SOA 6" spoke out clearly and powerful in court. They made a compelling case for the closure of the school and creation of a culture of justice and peace, where there is no place for the SOA mindset that promotes military "solutions" to social and economic problems. The six stood up for all of us working for a more just world.

The Puerto Rican Political Prisoners: The Puerto Rican Political Prisoners are freedom fighters who found Puerto Rico’s colonial reality unacceptable. They joined the Puerto Rican Independence movement and confronted the United States government directly. When they rose up and fought against colonialism they were branded as terrorists and placed in some of the worst prisons in the U.S. Their only “crime” is their love for Puerto Rico!! The majority of the Political Prisone rs have spent nearly 27 years in federal prisons for their political activities.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Open Letter to Political Prisoners Around the World

April 16, 2009

Comrades:
From the CEA-LA (centro de estudios abolicionistas por la liberación
animal) (center of abolitionist studies for animal liberation) and
the “Red Libertaria Popular Mateo Kramer” (Libertarian people’s
network Mateo Kramer) receive a warm salute full of affection and
rebelliousness.

Tomorrow, April 17 we will celebrate the international day of
political prisoners, with the aim to generate and ambient of
solidarity with all the fighters and revolutionaries around the
globe, unveiling all the injustices and estate’s crimes, that in the
frame of the actual socio-economic system we all have witnessed.

Today there’s thousands of our comrades retain in the walls of
prisons, locked up for defending social justice, others for their
militancy on behalf of the Earth and some others for their fight
against slavery of non-human animals.

In Colombia there’s more than 7000 woman and men imprisoned for
political reasons, maintained in precarious physical and
psychological conditions and exposed to bad treatments. With the
objective of terrify all who defend Human Rights, the Colombian
government in the head of president Uribe criminalized all people who
decide to give their life for the oppressed.

At the same time we are in solidarity, with all political prisoners
who have give their lives in defense of the Earth and the liberation
of non-human animals. For us there’s no difference in the different
movements, we believe that total liberation in ONE build it from our
differences.

That’s why we have to unite all our efforts and support all
resistance around the globe… so each and every heart burns and light
up the hopes and dreams shared for FREEDOM

In the name of CEA-LA (center of abolitionist studies for animal
liberation) and the “Libertarian people’s network Mateo Kramer” we
are in solidarity with all political prisoners around the globe, and
we invite you to participate and get active in all initiatives for
the International Day of Political Prisoners.

FREEDOM FOR ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS AROUND THE GLOBE NOW!!!

In Solidarity:

CEA-LA
RED LIBERTARIA POPULAR MATEO KRAMER

http://redlibertariapopularmk.entodaspartes.net/

Updated Mumia Appeal; Honk 4/24 on his birthday!

Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009

Attention: On Friday, April 24, Mumia's 55th birthday, International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal are calling for worldwide "Honk for Mumia" celebrations of resistance. Pick as many sites as you can in your local area at 12 noon or after work with signs and banners at intersections saying "Honk for Mumia"!


UPDATED!

PLEASE POST WIDELY!

International Campaign for
Justice for Mumia Abu-Jamal

Free Mumia Coalition

Write to Attorney General Eric Holder demanding that he immediately initiate a civil rights investigation addressing a 27-year history of prosecutorial and judicial violations of Mumia Abu-Jamal’s constitutional and international rights. If the Justice Department can guarantee justice for Senator Ted Stevens, it should do the same for noted journalist and multiple-award recipient, and international honoree Mumia Abu-Jamal. Demand that your elected officials endorse this campaign!

Initiated by the Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition (NYC)
SIGN THE ONLINE PETITION AT http://www.iacenter.org/mumiapetition

On April 6, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear Mumia’s appeal for a new trial based on evidence of racist jury selection on the part of the prosecutor during the original 1982 trial in Philadelphia. This appeal was based on the 1986 U.S. Supreme Court “Batson decision”, a legal decision that says that prospective jurors cannot be selected based on their race.

This issue was considered the strongest basis for overturning Mumia’s conviction, though certainly not the only one.
According to Amnesty International’s detailed review of the case, Mumia was denied at his trial in 1982 the right to a fair judge and unbiased jury, the right to represent himself and the right to adequate resources to prepare his defense. In addition, the prosecution withheld critical evidence from the defense, judge and jury; suborned the perjury of its chief witness; and intimidated at least one other witness to perjure herself. Since the AI report, more evidence has emerged of an ongoing conspiracy by the prosecution and members of the judiciary to keep out of the legal record evidence that points to Mumia’s innocence. At the very least, this evidence indicates serious misconduct on the part of the prosecution and judiciary. It was precisely this kind of misconduct that led to the overturning, just two weeks ago, of the conviction of Senator Ted Stevens.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals’ rejection of Mumia’s appeal on the basis of the “Batson decision” shocked many legal observers, as the court set new and higher standards of appeal in complete violation of its own precedents. One of the members of the three-judge panel that arrived at this decision wrote a scathing 41-page dissent pointing to how Mumia was not granted the same rights that previous appellants were given by this very same court.

Please take a few minutes to read, sign and circulate widely the important letter below to Attorney General Eric Holder. Send copies to other officials demanding that they, too, demand a civil rights investigation. Only a powerful, international campaign can win long-overdue freedom for this outspoken, award-winning journalist and stop a 27-year-old conspiracy to silence him with legal lynching or life in prison without parole. Both options are outrageous violations of Mumia’s human and constitutional rights, and we will not allow them to stand. Mumia needs our movement and our movement needs Mumia.

SIGN THE ONLINE PETITION AT http://www.iacenter.org/mumiapetition

The petition text follows:

To: U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, U.S. Department of Justice

cc: President Obama, Vice President Biden, Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano, Secretary of State Clinton, the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, Congressional Leaders, the Congressional Black Caucus, U.N. Secy Gen Ban, and members of the media

I write to you with a sense of grave concern and outrage about the U.S. Supreme Court's denial of a hearing to Mumia Abu-Jamal on the issue of racial bias in jury selection, that is, the "Batson issue". Inasmuch as there is no other court to which Abu-Jamal can appeal for justice, I turn to you for remedy of a 27-year history of gross violations of U.S. constitutional law and international standards of justice as documented by Amnesty International and many other legal groups around the world.

I call on you and the Justice Department to immediately commence a civil rights investigation to examine the many examples of egregious and racist prosecutorial and judicial misconduct dating back to the original trial in 1982 and continuing through to the current inaction of the U.S. Supreme Court. The statute of limitations should not be a factor in this case as there is very strong evidence of an ongoing conspiracy to deny Abu-Jamal his constitutional rights.

I am aware of the many differences that exist between the case of former Senator Ted Stevens and Mumia Abu-Jamal. Still, I note with great interest the actions you have taken with regard to Senator Stevens' conviction to assure that he not be denied his constitutional rights. You were specifically outraged by the fact that the prosecution withheld information critical to the defense's argument for acquittal, a violation clearly committed by the prosecution in Abu-Jamal's case. Mumia Abu-Jamal, though not a U.S. senator of great wealth and power, is a Black man revered around the world for his courage, clarity, and commitment and deserves no less than Senator Stevens.

Cordially,
(Your signature will be appended here based on the contact information you enter in the online form)

SIGN THE ONLINE PETITION AT http://www.iacenter.org/mumiapetition

International Campaign for Justice for Mumia Abu-Jamal

Sponsored by:

Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition (NYC)
P.O. Box 16, College Station
New York, N.Y. 10030

(212) 330-8029
www.freemumia.com

International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal
Philadelphia, PA
www.freemumia.com
(215) 476-8812

Millions for Mumia
www.millions4mumia.org

International Action Center
www.iacenter.org
c/o Solidarity Center
55 West 17th St 5C
New York, NY 10011
For further information call: (212) 633-6646

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Two animal rights activists jailed in America

Urgent ELP! Bulletin (18th April 2009)

Dear friends

ELP has just learnt that two American animal rights activists have been remanded accused of stalking. At the moment information is very sketchy, but more info will follow. In the mean time please send letters of support to:

Linda Greene, #1300927
Century Regional Detention Facility
11705 S.
Alameda Street
Lynwood, CA 90262
USA

Kevin Olliff, #1300931
Terminal Annex
P.O.
Box 86164
Los Angeles, CA 90086-0164
USA

+++++++

Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Mumia Supporters Arrested! -- Please Contact 6 ABC for fairness


Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:27 AM
Subject: Mumia Supporters Arrested! -- Please Contact 6 ABC for fairness

On Saturday, April 11th at 7:20 pm MOVE/Mumia supporters Kevin Price and Maiga Milbourne were arrested at 10th and South St. (Philadelphia) for putting up posters advertising the release of Mumia’s new book, “Jailhouse Lawyers”, with scotch tape.
-------------------------------

http://www.phillyimc.org/en/update-arrested-mumia-supporters-please-contact-channel-6abc-fairness

-------------------------------



Please call/write to 6abc demanding equal time re: last Sunday's "Inside Story" program, which promoted the lies of the FOP with no one there to refute them!
If you want to send an email to 6abc to make a complaint, click on the following url:

If you call, please ask to be transferred to the newsroom. WPVI-TV/DT
4100 City Avenue
Philadelphia, PA 19131
[P] (215) 878 -9700
[F} (215) 581-4530
Ona MOVE!
Kevin and I were arraigned in court today. The prosecutor had to explain the charges to judge. He said, “they were hanging posters,” which we weren’t charged with. We represented ourselves and plead not guilty, and were given a trial date of Friday, May 29 at 8:30 am, at 1401 Arch St., second floor. Again, outsiders are not allowed in the courtroom but we welcome anyone who wants to flyer outside. During the arraignment MOVE members flyered outside the courtroom and used the time to do outreach.
We do find it ironic that in publicizing Mumia’s most recent book, “Jailhouse Lawyer’s,” a history of self-representation and self-defense, we were arrested and are now in a position to represent ourselves! It is an opportunity to hone our skills and further expose the court’s injustice.
We do want to reiterate that it’s important that Mumia supporters be very vigilant and aware right now. There is no coincidence that prison guards told Janet Africa that Mumia was dead, activists were arrested, and Channel 6 ran a hit piece on Mumia. This government is very jumpy right now. We need to keep pushing forward with an eye on one another’s backs! Thank you all so much for the support! We also just want to briefly shout out Orie Ross. We were never given a phone call, and if he hadn’t been so vigilant in making calls on our behalf we could have found ourselves in a much uglier situation. We’re truly grateful for our brother’s work. This movement is strong, full of love, and powerful! There is nowhere I’d rather be, and no people I’d rather march alongside.
Ona MOVE!
Maiga

Background:
On Saturday, April 11th at 7:20 pm MOVE/Mumia supporters Kevin Price and Maiga Milbourne were arrested at 10th and South St. ( Philadelphia ) for putting up posters advertising the release ofMumia’s new book, “Jailhouse Lawyers”, with scotch tape. While in the act of taping a poster to a metal pole three police officers came from behind without warning and forced their arms behind their backs. They were tightly handcuffed and led to the South St. mini-station very nearby. Upon entering the building another officer asked why they were arrested. One of the arresting officers replied “they had Mumia signs.” From there they were taken to the 3rd district (11th and Federal) at 7:55 . The y stood facing a wall for 15 minutes and then were processed and released.
Their hearing is this Monday, 4/13 at 8:30 am . The charges are “improper distribution of handbills” (CO 10-723) and “Nails and other hard substances attached to utility poles” (CO 6905). These charges would be ridiculous enough if they were true but tape (no t hard substances) was used and the flyers were not being passed out.
At this point we are just writing to make folks aware. We will let you know if any action of support is requested. It is clear that after Mondays’(4/6) Supreme Court denial that the atmosphere surrounding Mumia’s case is very tense.
***For the record:
The arresting officers were Gress and Cole and the transporting officers were Polini and Jones (they were transported in squad car 38).***
----------------------------------
a24philaflyer.jpg


Featured speakers at the April 24 event in Philadelphia will include:
-- Paul Wright, editor of Prison Legal News
-- Amin, formerly "Harold Wilson," the 122nd person freed from death row in the US.
-- Ramona Africa, Minister of Communication for the MOVE Organization.
--Steven Hawkins, Executive Vice President of the NAACP, formerly with the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.
--Linn Washington Jr., Philadelphia Tribune Columnist, Temple University Professor of Journalism, author of Black Judges on Justice: Perspectives from the Bench
--I Abdul Jon, longtime supporter of MOVE and Mumia, featured in "Prison Lawyers."
--Sonia Sanchez, poet and poltiical activist.
--Fred Hampton Jr,, Chairman of the Prisoners of Conscience Committee, and son of assassinated Chicago Black Panther leader Fred Hampton Sr.
The week surrounding the big April 24 event for Mumia will feature many other events relating to issues of police brutality and political prisoners.
fw2009.jpg

The 2 flyers can also be downloaded here:

http://abu-jamal-news.com/docs/a24philaflyer.jpg
http://abu-jamal-news.com/docs/fw2009.pdf

Revolutionary Week: We Who Believe in Freedom Cannot Wait—We Educate!
Saturday 4/18, Uhuru Earthday Celebration
Where: Clark Park, 43rd at Baltimore Ave, West Philadelphia, PA 19104
When: 9-5, Come and visit the ICFFMAJ table, help us flyer, and hear one of the keynote speakers: Pam Africa
Contact: Uhuru Solidarity Movement, philly@uhurusolidarity.org, 215-387-0919
Sunday 4/19, Black and Blue Film Showing and Q & A
Where: The A-Space Anarchist Community Space
4722
Baltimore Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19143
When: 5:30 pm
Contact: 215-727-0882 leave msg
a-space@defenestrator.org
www.the-aspace.org
Monday 4/20, Retro on the Black Panther Party with members of the original
Philadelphia BPP
Where: Treehouse Books, 1430 Susquehanna Ave.
When: 6-8 pm
Tuesday 4/21, “We Will Return in the Whirlwind: Black Radical Organizations from
1960-1975” by Muhammad Ahmad (Maxwell Stanford Jr.) book release party.
Where: Black & Noble Bookstore, 2nd Floor
1436 Erie Ave.
When: 6-8 pm
Wednesday 4/22, Robert Hillary King of the Angola 3 speaks
Where: University of Pennsylvania (exact location TBA)
When: 7 pm
Contact: 770-845-6179 / g.grigoriev036@gmail.com
Thursday 4/23, Diane Block presents, “On the Spirit: A Woman’s Journey
Underground and Back”
Where: Wooden Shoe Bookstore, 508 S. 5th Street
When: Time TBA
Contact: sabot@woodenshoebooks.com • (215) 413-0999
Friday 4/24, MORE THAN A BOOK RELEASE! A CELEBRATION OF JAILHOUSE
LAWYERS! Featuring all the authors from throughout the week as well as
Paul Wright, editor of Prison Legal News, Amin, formerly "Harold Wilson," - freed from death row in the US, Ramona Africa of the MOVE Organization, Steven Hawkins, Executive Vice President of the NAACP, Linn Washington Jr., Philadelphia Tribune Columnist, Temple U Professor of Journalism, I Abdul Jon, longtime supporter of MOVE and Mumia, featured in "Prison Lawyers," Sonia Sanchez, renowned poet and activist, Goldi, daughter of Wadiya and Mumia, Seeds of Wisdom, MOVE’s Revolutionary hip hop group, and many more!
Where: Church of the Advocate, 1801 W. Diamond St.
When: 6 pm
Saturday 4/25, Philadelphia: Adolfo Matos, keynote speaker of the National Boricua
Human Rights Network
Where: 6th & Diamond Sts
When: TBA
NYC, More Than a Book Party: A Tribute to Jailhouse Lawyers
Where: Riverside Church, 120th St. & Claremont Ave.
Room 411, MLK Wing
When: 4 pm
Contact: 212 330 8029 or www.freemumia.com
Sunday, 4/26, NYC, CEMOTAP 5th Great Debate on “The Death Penalty and Mumia
Abu Jamal”
Where: Salem United Methodist Church, 129th and Adam Clayton Powell
Jr. Blvd.
When: 3 pm
VERY IMPORTANT EVENT COMING UP:
Saturday, 5/16, Philadelphia: RALLY TO FREE THE MOVE 9!
Where: 11th & Market St.
When: 12-3
Contact: onamovellja@aol.com, 215 387 4107

Thai police charge 14 leaders in violent protests


BANGKOK – Police issued arrest warrants Tuesday for 14 leaders of an anti-government movement, including ousted Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, as protesters abruptly ended violent demonstrations in Thailand's capital.

A day after red-shirted protesters burned buses and seized intersections in clashes with police and soldiers that left two people dead and 123 injured, their leaders called it quits, urging a group of 2,000 die-hard demonstrators to go home.

The swift and unexpected resolution headed off the possibility of a confrontation with heavily armed troops massing around the demonstrators' encampment near the seat of government. Dispirited protesters quietly boarded government buses watched over by soldiers.

But few expected it was the end of a rural-based movement that has shown the ability to mobilize 100,000 protesters and cause the cancellation of a regional summit in its campaign seeking to force out a government dominated by urban elements and hold new elections.

Charnvit Kasetsiri, one of Thailand's most prominent historians, said the "political convulsion" may be over for now, but the underlying tensions between the rural poor and urban elite highlighted during the demonstrations remain.

"The government has underestimated the wrath of rural and marginalized people and that is partly why they have not made enough effort to reach out to heal the rift. Without addressing that, this is not going to be the last riot," he said.

The demonstrations were a mirror of mass protests by urban groups last year that snarled Bangkok until the courts removed a government led by Thaksin's allies who were elected on the strength of rural voters.

The appointment of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva further angered many rural people, who were already upset by a 2006 coup that ousted Thaksin, and their disenchantment blew up into their own protest movement.

Three of the 14 protest leaders were in police custody, metropolitan police spokesman Suporn Pansua said, and the Bangkok Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for 11 others, including Thaksin, who went into self-imposed exile last year before a court convicted him of violating a conflict of interest law.

The warrants accuse the protest leaders of creating a public disturbance and engaging in illegal assembly, which carry prison terms of up to seven and three years, respectively.

"This is not a victory or a loss of any particular group," Abhisit said in a televised address. "If it is victory, it is victory of society that peace and order has returned."

But he warned that the threat from the red-clad protesters was not over.

"The operation under the state of emergency is not completed. There are still things to do," he said. "There are still protesters in some areas. The only difference is they aren't wearing red anymore."

The government announced it was adding two more days to the three-day Thai New Year holiday, which began Monday, to ensure safety and allow time for repairing damage from the violence.

Some protesters threatened to regroup after the arrest warrants were issued. About 200 protesters took off their red shirts but gathered in a field near Government House late Tuesday. They were closely monitored by soldiers patrolling the area but no clash was reported.

Jakrapob Penkair, a protest leader who had not turned himself in, said the movement "will continue fighting." He did not specify what action they would take next.

Thaksin, considered by most protesters to be their leader, had addressed the demonstrators via video nearly every evening.

Siri Kadmai, a 45-year-old protester who was wearing buttons and a T-shirt expressing love for the former prime minister, insisted the movement had not lost the fight but was making a strategic withdrawal in the face of the power of security forces.

"We were only in a disadvantageous position," Siri said as she waited to board a bus. "We only have hearts. We don't have weapons."

Still, many protesters looked broken, almost in shock that their dreams of revolution unraveled so quickly. Their leaders called off the demonstrations Tuesday morning following warnings that the army was ready to move against them.

Most of the demonstrators, anxious about their safety, packed their bags and began leaving. Crowds lined up for soldiers, showed their identification cards and were led to buses waiting to take them home. There were no confrontations with the troops nor any visible anger. The buses were gone by 2 p.m.

The protests were only the latest in a long-simmering conflict — set off by Thaksin's removal from power in a 2006 coup — that has split many Thais into two groups.

The "red shirts" are mostly Thaksin supporters drawn largely from the impoverished countryside where he is popular for his populist policies.

On the other side are the "yellow shirts," who brought the country to a halt last year by occupying Government House and Bangkok's airports. Those demonstrations, led by a mix of royalists, academics, professionals and retired military who think the poor aren't educated enough to vote, only broke up after court rulings removed Thaksin's allies from power.

The pro-Thaksin protesters have made their voices heard and their presence felt, said Pavin Chachavalpongpun, a research fellow at the Institute for Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore.

"Now, no one would ever underestimate the power of the red-shirt protesters," he said. "They may say, 'We give up,' but we don't know when they will regroup and strike again."

Monday, April 13, 2009

Mumia Abu-Jamal book events in Seattle (April 24) and Olympia (April 26)

author: Abu-Jamal-News.com
Apr 13, 2009 00:20

Events marking death row journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal's birthday and new book release will be held in Seattle and Olympia.

These events follow the April 6 denial by the US Supreme Court of a new guilt phase trial for Mumia.

Book Cover
Book Cover

SEATTLE, APRIL 24:

Hidmo Eritrean Restaurant
2000 South Jackson (northeast corner of 20th and Jackson)
6:30 PM to 8:30 PM
--For more information, contact KL Shannon
(206) 854-5462 or shannon@defender.org

Please download Seattle event flyer here:

http://abu-jamal-news.com/docs/seattle.pdf


OLYMPIA, APRIL 26:

Orca Books
509 4th Avenue, East
(Downtown Olympia)
6 PM to 8 PM
--Sponsored by Olympia SDS
contact: olympiasds@riseup.net or (360) 878-1879

Please download Olympia event flyer here:

http://abu-jamal-news.com/docs/olympia.pdf


On April 6, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Mumia Abu-Jamal’s appeal for a new guilt-phase trial. The Supreme Court has not yet decided whether to consider the Philadelphia DA’s separate appeal, which is attempting to execute Abu-Jamal WITHOUT a new sentencing hearing.

In response to today’s rejection, Abu-Jamal’s lead attorney Robert R. Bryan will be filing a “petition for re-hearing” at the U.S. Supreme Court.

Fore more information, please visit:

http://www.sfbayview.com/2009/us-supreme-court-rejects-mumia-abu-jamal%E2%80%99s-appeal-for-a-new-trial/

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Dutch anti-fur prisoner

Urgent ELP! Bulletin (12th of April 2009)

Dear friends

As some people will be aware, last week a Dutch animal rights activist, Peter Janssen, was arrested accused of releasing mink from a fur farm. ELP has just learnt that following a recent court appearance, Peter has been remanded into custody.

Please send urgent letters of support to:

PI Noordsingel
Peter Janssen 5102880
Postbus 37066
3005 LB Rotterdam
Holland

Below is a mailout from his support campaign...

At this moment Peter is still in custody on suspicion of setting free of minks on a furfarm last month in Stavenisse. His arrest is remanded for another 2 weeks and he is being brought to a prison in Rotterdam.

This morning Peter has contacted us, with this circumstances he is doing fine. Animal Rights Media is giving Peter support as a supportersgroup. It would be very nice if all our visitors could write a letter of support to Peter. It isn't nice to stay inside the prison, so a small card or letter would make his stay there a little more pleasant. We urge everyone to send him a letter (see details below). You can also support Peter financial by transfering money to the bankaccount of Animal Rights Media. We'll take care that the money will be transfer to his 'prisoner bankaccount' so he can get something from the prisonershop, like phonecards.
If you are writing a letter to Peter, please include also envelopes and (dutch) poststamps so he can write back to the outside world. Please take notice that letters can be read by employees of the prison. Don't write things what might be harming you, others or Peter. By our website (www.AnimalRights.nl) we keep you all up to date.

Address:
PI Noordsingel
Peter Janssen 5102880
Postbus 37066
3005 LB Rotterdam

More information or if you have any qeustions, please contact Supportgroup Peter at redactie@animalrights.nl starting the subject with 'Steungroep Peter'!

~~~~~~~~

Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

FREE Leonard Peltier Radio Program (Sunday)

The Leonard Peltier Defense Offense Committee (LP-DOC) is the center of communication between Leonard Peltier and his program coordinators, the general public, government officials, political and tribal leaders, the media, and his supporters worldwide.


FREE Leonard PeltierFREE Leonard Peltier

FREE Leonard Peltier Radio Program carried on http://www.therealpublicradio.net/. David Hill, Ben Carnes, Kari Ann and Wanbli will all be on the show to discuss the plan and take calls about the plan.

Pass the word on this so everyone can get questions in if they want. Also you may email Ben at mountainkat_47@yahoo.com and Wanbli at wanbli@gvtc.com during the show with questions you may have on the plan and we will answer your questions on the air. To call in with a question or comment use 712-432-8773 and then pin 179441."

Show times: 7 PM Eastern, 6 PM Central, 5 PM Mountain and 4 PM Pacific

It's 2009!
FREE PELTIER!
33 YEARS - IT'S TIME!

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Mexican animal rights activists arrested

ELP Information Bulletin (10th of April 2009)

Dear friends

ELP has learnt that a number of Mexican animal rights activists were arrested in February and are in need of support with their case.

Below is a mailout from their supporters explaining their situation.


SOLIDARITY
NEEDED FOR MEXICAN ANIMAL LIBERATION ACTIVISTS

Thirteen activists
arrested during an anti-bullfighting protest in
Mexico City in February 2009
need help with their legal costs.


On Thursday 5 February at around
3.30pm thirteen comrades were arrested
in an annual anti-bullfighting
protest in Mexico City. During the
protest there was a confrontation with
the police and some vehicles were
damaged.

Among those arrested were
young anti-authoritarians, punks, and students.


The names we have at
the moment are:

Emmanuel Miranda
Mario Antonio Lopez
Vilchis
Gonzales
Juan Carlos Palafox
Jair Parras
Ulises Pazaran Vargas
Diego
Tellez
Calos Quintana Torrecilla
Israel Canek Perez
Juan Antonio
Villa
Adrian Caballero Morales

Juan Carlos Palafox has the heaviest
charges as another of the arrestees
denounced him as the "ringleader" in
order to get their charges dropped.

It appears that all those arrested
have now been released on bail.
However bail costs varied and most of the
arrestees had to organise
loans, which now need to be paid back.

For
example: Four of the arrestees had to borrow a total of 53,000 pesos
(approx
$6,640 NZD) to cover their bail costs and now need help to repay

this.

Meanwhile another arrestee owes 700 pesos (about $100 NZD) that
he
borrowed to pay his bail.


Many of the charges have since been
dropped but there is the possiblity
that new charges may now be laid. Those
arrested are still awaiting
trial so also have legal fees to pay and
possible fines if convicted.

I hope to have more information to hand
soon. I don't have an official
contact email for this group of people but
emails sent to
rechazo_autonomo@riseup.net should
be passed on to the right people. Any
emails to this address should ideally
be in spanish, however the person
checking the mail does also speak some
english.

IN SOLIDARITY WITH FREEDOM FIGHTERS EVERYWHERE!

======

Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Thursday, April 09, 2009

Terrorism charges against RNC Eight dropped

GAERTNER DROPS TERRORISM ENHANCEMENTS, CONTINUES CRIMINALIZATION OF DISSENT

RNC 8, FRIENDS OF THE RNC 8 SPEAK ABOUT POLITICAL MANEUVERING

UPDATE: View the amended complaint (PDF)

April 9, 2009 Contact: Celia Kutz, press@rnc8.org, 612-886-4565

In the surest sign yet of the power of post-RNC court solidarity, Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner has dropped two of four unfounded charges against the RNC 8. Caving to months and months of public pressure, Gaertner dropped one count of Conspiracy to Commit Riot in Furtherance of Terrorism, and one count of Conspiracy to Commit Criminal Damage to Property in Furtherance of Terrorism.

“We are heartened by the fact that our supporters have won this concession,” said defendant Nathanael Secor. “It’s taken a tremendous show of strength and solidarity over the past seven months.”

Originally facing a single charge–Conspiracy to Riot in Furtherance of Terrorism–Gaertner’s office added three additional charges against the eight defendants in December of last year. Now, two of those charges have been dropped, clearly demonstrating that all the charges are a matter of political maneuvering, not a reasoned look at the evidence.

On March 28, supporters delivered to Susan Gaertner’s office a stack of over 3,000 petitions urging her to drop all four charges. Among other statements, a resolution from the 17,000-member Duluth Central Labor Body in support of the RNC 8 was also delivered. National media attention, including an appearance on MSNBC on Wednesday morning, has drawn significant attention to the case at the same time as Gaertner is accelerating her campaign for Governor–having just hired full-time staffers, opened an office on University Avenue, and planned appearances at several DFL events in the next month. Additionally, the broad-based RNC 8 Defense Committee has succeeded in calling widespread attention to the Minnesota PATRIOT Act, and played an instrumental role in applying the pressure that led to this reduction of charges.

In removing the controversial MN PATRIOT Act from the debate at this moment, Susan Gaertner obviously hopes to defray the costs of this unprecedented prosecution on her campaign for Governor, and to mitigate the overwhelmingly negative public opinion of Ramsey County’s repressive behavior during and since the RNC.

“Make no mistake,” said defendant Luce Guillen-Givins, “This change to the complaint against us is a token gesture meant to placate our supporters and bolster a floundering political prosecution.”

As defendant Eryn Trimmer pointed out, “This move only focuses attention more acutely on the outrageous nature of the two remaining charges, Conspiracy to Commit Riot and Conspiracy to Commit Criminal Damage to Property.”

In the months leading up to the RNC, the defendants were involved in open, public organizing with a broad coalition of Twin Cities activists and community members. We continue to assert that the only “conspiracy” committed by the RNC 8 was to provide basic and necessary infrastructure for people who wished to engage in their fundamental right to dissent.

“We’re relieved and gratified that the most sensational part of the charges has been dropped,” said St. Paul peace and justice activist Betsy Raasch-Gilman, member of Friends of the RNC 8. She continued, “We hope that the conspiracy charges will also be dropped. If planning a protest can be called conspiracy, the right to free speech is in real danger.”

Friends of the RNC 8 asks Susan Gaertner to continue in the direction of justice by dropping all the remaining charges, thereby saving enormous financial resources for the people of Minnesota in this time of rampant foreclosures, unemployment and economic turmoil. We also remind supporters that while we should rightly celebrate this small victory, the time for increased action to defend the RNC 8 is now. Political organizing is not conspiracy. Dissent is not a crime.

Why Anarchists, Freedom Fighters, and Supporters of Political Prisoners Should Support the Good Time Bill

Those of us who believe absolutely in the power of peoples' organizing for empowerment and self-determination--- those of us who believe in direct action, democracy, and revolutionary struggle, we cannot support endeavors to reform state institutions with a clear heart. We know that, by themselves, reforms ultimately serve the ruling class by creating an illusion of progress or compassion so that the apparatus of state repression and poverty can continue its work. Prisons are no exception. Nor are the campaigns to free our political prisoners and to build on the legacies of the revolutionary movements they represent.

This said, anarchists and other revolutionaries must use any and all of the tools at our disposal. We cannot rely on the state to fight our battles or save our world, but we can and must be realistic about our options and utilize opportunities.

A congressman is about to re-introduce a bill that would allow federal prisoners a chance to earn credits toward a more substantial early release. It's H.R. 1457, the Federal Work Incentive Act of 2009. It's nicknamed, the Good Time Bill. Unless this bill passes, this chance will not exist.

From Their perspective:
The US government is a financial disaster, federal prisons are an overcrowded colossal drain of money with no end in sight. Why not let some of them out earlier?

From Our perspective:
As we continue to organize and struggle for revolutionary aims, we must admit that, at this moment, we don't have many sure-fire ways to free our political prisoners any earlier. They sit in prison for daring to dream and act on revolutionary ideals. We owe it to them to use any tool we can get our hands on to get them home. The Good Time Bill could potentially affect many of the Earth Liberation Front prisoners, Animal Liberation Front prisoners, and Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty prisoners. It could potentially affect anti-war political prisoner Helen Woodson, indigenous/pro-zapatista political prisoner Oso Blanco (Byron Chubbuck), and possibly even the Cuban Five Political Prisoners. While we continue to do everything we can to support and hope for some victories in court, the state continues to attack our movemements. If any of the recent arrests, from the Green Scare to the Republican National Convention resistance, end in conviction, the Good Time Bill will benefit those targeted activists. (more on political prisoners and prisoners of war at abcf.net)

Of course, the Green Scare and political prisoners are only a tiny minority of the prisoners and families who could benefit. Thousands of non-violent, low-level drug offenders are caged in the federal system with no hope for early release. Many communities and families have lost someone to the system. While the Black Liberation Prisoners of War would not be directly affected by this bill, if we can work toward passing the Good Time Bill as we continue to build toward revolution, we will make a small contribution in keeping with the Black Panther Party legacy of Survival Programs pending revolution. It could serve to reunite families torn apart by the so-called "war on drugs" or "war on terrorism" or any other rhetorical excuse for increased policing and prison-building at the expense of peoples' freedom, autonomy, and survival. While we continue to organize toward the aboliton of the state, including an end to police and prisons, surely we can take advantage of a progressive-leaning administration in an economic crisis by helping to give struggling families and communities a break.

So this is calling on all anarchists, activists, and revolutionaries, to keep organizing for revolution and to also support the Good Time Bill. Information below. Extend this or your own call to your own communities.

In Solidarity for Freedom,
ANARCHIST BLACK CROSS FEDERATION
abcf.net
goodtimebill contact- nycabc[at]riseup.net
——————————————————————————————————————

Support the Good Time Bill!

On March 12th, 2009, Representative Danny Davis (D-IL) introduced H.R. 1457, to restore the former system of good time allowances toward service of Federal prison terms, and for other purposes, otherwise known as The Good Time Bill. He introduced a similar bill towards the end of the 2008 session. This bill would reduce the sentences of people in federal prisons by increasing the "good time" credit they could receive and save US tax-payers more than 2 billion dollars per year. The reduction would apply to all federal prisoners except the ones serving life sentences.

Join the Yahoo group
to learn more, share information, help with the campaign. Send an email to:goodtimebill-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Email, Write or Call Your Own Congressional Representative!

Become an advocate for the Good Time bill!
Talking Points on Why America Needs the Good Time Bill (H.R. 1457)
* It costs tax-payers over $40,000 per year to keep each federal prisoner behind bars.
* Total cost to US taxpayers for federal incarceration is over 7.64 billion annually.
* The Federal Bureau of Prisons is over 40% overcrowded and many facilities are operating at 100% capacity with no plan for relief.
* Nearly three-fourths (72.1%) of federal prisoners are serving time for a non-violent offense and have no history of violence.
* It will cost the federal government over $700,000 to incarcerate a person over 50 years of age for the rest of his or her life.
* Especially given the strain on the federal budget as well as the hardship faced by many American tax-payers during this economic recession, we cannot afford to incarcerate so many ageing people in the federal system.
* African American drug offenders have a 20% greater chance of being sentenced to prison than white drug offenders, and Hispanics a 40% greater chance. (One in fifteen African American men are incarcerated and one in thirty-six Hispanic men are incarcerated.)
* In the last 30 years, the United States prison population has quadrupled. 1 in every 99 American adults is now behind bars.
* People in federal prison deserve a second chance to make positive contributions to society.


Support the Good Time Bill!—
goodtimebill.info

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

Strike for Climate Action - prison dispatch from Jeffrey Free Luers

Strike for Climate Action - prison dispatch from Jeffrey Free

March 20, 2009

Twenty years ago governments of the world met for the first ever
climate talks. The talks, then, focused largely on the growing hole
in the world’s ozone layer (a hole that still exists today) and the
need to eliminate CFC emissions (which also still exist today though
in much smaller amounts). The other climate item on the agenda was
global warming. Scientists warned that there was growing evidence
that the world was warming, possibly due to human activity much like
the root cause of the ozone hole.

Unfortunately, in 1988 it was decided that global warming did not
pose a significant threat to warrant action. The problem could wait
to be addressed.

Nearly a decade later, in 1997, the governments of the world met for
their annual climate talks in Kyoto, Japan. The United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a panel of the
world’s leading scientists from countries around the globe, presented
growing evidence that the world faced a severe threat from climate
change. These scientists concluded that the single largest
contributor to climate change were human greenhouse gas emissions,
most notably carbon dioxide (CO2).

For the first time since the inception of the climate talks, world
leaders agreed action was needed to combat climate change. The world
took notice with a collective gasp as 180 governments pledged their
support to a worldwide climate treaty to reduce CO2 emissions in an
effort to conquer global warming.

In 2007, a decade after Kyoto and twenty years since the first
climate talks, the IPCC declared in its strongest language yet that
the world faced imminent global catastrophe unless immediate and
drastic action was taken to reduce and then eliminate greenhouse
emissions.

In the years following the Kyoto protocol, the United States – the
highest emitter of greenhouse gases per capita in the world – pulled
out of the treaty. CO2 emission around the world continued to rise.
Governments that had promised to reduce emissions failed to impose
strict limits, instead relying on voluntary cuts from industry. As
industries refused to limit their emissions and governments balked at
regulation, the Kyoto protocol collapsed.

The U.S. and numerous other countries with high greenhouse emissions
have steadfastly refused to cut CO2 emissions, claiming that doing so
would harm their ability remain economically competitive.

In the face of the largest economic collapse in world history,
brought about by the very same green, deceit and malfeasance of the
worlds most powerful multinational and government deregulation that
has allowed CO2 emissions to go unchecked. Government and corporate
claims that reducing emissions would create economic hard ring hollow.

People around the world put faith in our governments and institutions
to act on our behalf and in our best interests. Our governments have
had 20 years to act on global warming and climate change. 20 years to
act on a threat that the world’s leading scientists say is the
greatest threat to human kind the world has ever faced.

Climate change is the greatest threat to human kind the world has ever faced.

Not war or nuclear weapons, no a falling GNP or economic collapse,
but climate change. And our governments tell us they won’t reduce CO2
emissions because it could – not would, but could – hurt the economy.
In reality governments are being pressured by corporate interests
that don’t want to reduce emissions or switch to a non-carbon based
economy because they would have to invest money to do so – money that
would otherwise go into corporate coffers or executive bonuses.

This December, world leaders will again meet for climate talks in
Copenhagen, Denmark. While protests are sure to greet the conference,
we must not limit our influence on the climate discussions to
protesting them.

Climate change will impact the lives of every human being in the
world. The poorest will be hurt the most. Many are already suffering
its effects. We must send our leaders a message in the strongest of
languages. One which every nation understands. A message that cannot
be ignored.

On December 11, we must unite for a day of international solidarity;
we must demand immediate and real action on climate change, not more
false promises. We must strike for climate justice.

This is an urgent call to unions, workers and concerned citizens
around the world. Organize in your workplace, in your union halls, on
your streets. On December 11th, we must unite.

Failure of our governments to take immediate action to regulate and
reduce CO2 emissions will cost human lives and untold economic loss.
It is not companies or governments that will suffer, but ordinary
people in every town and city, in every nation.

It is in our hands to demand action. It is in our hands to show our
leaders the true cost of inaction. Workers unite. Demand action.
Strike for climate justice on December 11, 2009.

Jeffrey Free Luers
http://climatestrike.wordpress.com/
http://www.freejeffluers.org

write to Jeff:
Jeffrey Luers # 13797671
CRCI
9111 NE Sunderland Ave
Portland, OR 97211-1708

Daniel McGowan, Another "War on Terrorism" Victim

supportdaniel.org
supportdaniel.org/cmu


article attached and text pasted here:

Daniel McGowan, Another "War on Terrorism" Victim - by Stephen Lendman

Of so-called "eco-terrorism" in his case, a term believed coined by Ron Arnold, executive director of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise (CDFE), a radical right wing group established on July 4, 1976 "to continue (the) Revolution of liberty, free enterprise and individual initiative....without hindrance by government."

According to Sourcewatch:

"Arnold blurred the boundaries between nonviolent civil disobedience and more contentious tactics such as vandalism and sabotage," (mostly rejected by environmentalists) by equating property damage to "terrorism as a societal threat."

More recently, he linked up with self-styled "eco-terrorism" expert Barry Clausen and Nick Nichols, retired chairman of the PR firm Nichols-Dezenhall. They were instrumental in initiating the (stalled in committees) 2004 Ecoterrorism Prevention Act that led to the passage of the 2006 Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA). In broad and vague language, it criminalizes First Amendment activities advocating for animal rights like peaceful protests, leafleting, undercover investigations, whistleblowing and boycotts, and made it easier to call civil disobedience "eco-terrorism" with far stiffer penalties for comparable offenses under other laws.

In the late 1980s, Arnold also founded the so-called Wise Use movement - a pro-business funded anti-environmentalist group, mainly involved with western timber and mining issues.

In December 1991, he told New York Times reporter Tim Egan: "We want to destroy environmentalists by taking away their money and members." Days later, to Toronto Star writer Katherine Long, he said "Our goal is to destroy, to eradicate the environmental movement. We're mad as hell. We're not going to take it anymore. We're dead serious, we're going to destroy them. We want to be able to exploit the environment for private gain...."

Environmental studies professor Bron Taylor contends that "Radical environmentalism is best understood as a new religious movement that views environmental degradation as an assault on a sacred, natural world." Nonetheless, he concluded in a 1998 Terrorism and Political Violence journal paper that:

"there is, even after 18 years of radical environmental action, little evidence that radical environmentalists intend to maim and kill their adversaries or foster 'terror' among the general population."

Fronting for corporate America, right wing groups like the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, Wise Use, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and their lobbyists and PR flacks claim otherwise in their relentless war on the greens, backed by federal and state authorities calling saving the earth "eco-terrorism" and managing to get activists like Daniel McGowan sent to prison.

Some Brief Background on McGowan

Born in Queens, New York, he was active in sports in high school, then attended the State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo where he received a BA in business administration and Southeast Asian studies. After several months in Asia, he worked in New York as a paid and volunteer for various environmental and non-profit organizations, then in 1998 relocated to the Pacific Northwest to continue his environmental and social justice work.

Back home in 2002, he worked as a web and office administrator for Rainforest Foundation US and became active in projects for rainforest preservation, national forest protection, and biodiversity.

In 2005, he entered a Tri-State College of Acupuncture graduate program to become a healing practitioner, to be able to offer it free or at low cost to make it affordable for everyone. At the same time, he worked for Womenslaw.org, a non-profit organization helping battered women through legal recourse. His activism also included support for political prisoners, human rights, social justice, and involvement in numerous local events, dedicated to helping people.

Those who know him say he's one of "the most wonderful, expressive, caring, thoughtful and compassionate people in this world" - yet Bush prosecutors targeted, incarcerated, and made him a political prisoner through a gross miscarriage of justice.

The Support for Daniel McGowan Web Site - A Resource for Information on His Case

McGowan was victimized by "green scare," a term likely first used in 2002, referring to legal and extralegal government actions against animal liberation and environmental activists. The Spirit of Freedom prisoner support network defines it as "tactics the government and (their enforcement agencies use) to attack ELF/ALF (Earth Liberation Front and Animal Liberation Front members) and specifically those who publicly support them."

The term also refers to the 2005 arrests, indictments and convictions from the FBI's Operation Backfire (OB) against alleged ELF/ALF activists - charging them with damaging property, conspiracy, arson, and using destructive devices. The FBI included these organizations among their top domestic threats, calling them "eco-terrorists."

The 2001 USA Patriot Act created the federal crime of "domestic terrorism," broadening the definition and applying it to US citizens as well as aliens. It let OB target McGowan on December 7, 2005 when federal agents arrested him at the WomensLaw.org office, then imprison him in the "terror wing" of lower Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC).

On the same day, New York Indymedia reported:

"Federal marshals arrested six environmental activists (today) in a series of coordinated raids in four states in apparent response to a string of arsons in Oregon and Washington attributed to the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), including simultaneous attacks in 2001 at the University of Washington's Urban Horticulture Center and the Jefferson Poplar Farms in Clatskanie, Oregon. Daniel McGowan, 31, was arrested in New York City. Authorities also stated that there will be more arrests, with at least one indictment immediately outstanding."

McGowan was held pending his extradition to Eugene, OR for his arraignment. Without evidence, prosecutors alleged he was an ELF member, a group dedicated to saving the earth pro-actively. More recently it abandoned arson as "a dangerous and irrational strategy," and now works "within the system (to) "build consensus and public support (for) a better world and future." Its unofficial motto: "ELF Resistance Forever....Live on....No Evil."

The evening of his arrest, agents raided McGowan's apartment seizing computers, personal photographs, tax records, textbooks, school work, videotapes, DVDs and more. The next day, he appeared in US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, after which he endured a two week odyssey taking him to federal detention facilities in Oklahoma, California and Sheridan, Oregon.

After his January 25, 2006 hearing, he was released on $1.6 million bail, spent the next seven months under house arrest, on November 9 pled guilty to minor charges, then on June 4, 2007 was sentenced (without trial) to seven years in prison - for offenses warranting no more than a fine and suspended sentence.

Charges in "United States of America v. Daniel Gerard McGowan" and Twelve Other Defendants

After initially being charged on December 19, 2005, a superseding May 18, 2006 indictment (against him and 12 others) accused them of "willfully and knowingly conspir(ing) and agree(ing) to commit the following offenses against the United States:"

Count 1

-- "On or about January 2, 2001, at Glendale, Douglas County, Oregon," four of the defendants, including McGowan, "unlawfully and willfully caused and aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced, and procured the malicious damaging and destroying, by means of fire and an explosive, of a building and other real and personal property used in interstate commerce and used in activities affecting interstate commerce, namely, a building and its contents located at Superior Lumber Company (in) Glendale, Douglas County, Oregon;"

-- these same defendants "traveled in separate vehicles to a predetermined staging area....where they dressed in dark clothing and put on their radio earpieces and masks;"

-- they "traveled to Superior Lumber Company building, set up lookouts, positioned the 'pick-up' vehicle, placed the time-delayed incendiary devices, and returned to the staging area;"

-- there they disposed of their dark clothing; and

-- McGowan and seven others "unlawfully and willfully caused and aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced, and procured the malicious damaging and destroying, by means of fire and an explosive, of buildings, vehicles and other real and personal property used in interstate commerce....at Jefferson Poplar Farm (in) Clatskanie, Columbia County, Oregon.

Count 2

Said defendants, including McGowan, conspired "to commit arson and destruction of an energy facility" by the manner and means so outlined, "to influence and affect the conduct of government, commerce, private business and others in the civilian population by means of force, violence, sabotage, mass destruction, intimidation and coercion...." By so doing, they endangered "human life and property that constituted violations of the criminal laws of the United States and of individual states."

Counts 3 - 13

Excluded McGowan of charges for various other incidents.

Count 14 and 15

Pertained to the January 2001 Superior Lumber Company destruction.

Counts 16 - 52

Excluded McGowan.

Count 53

Charged him with "using and carrying a destructive device in relation to a crime of violence (pertaining to) Jefferson Poplar Farm."

Count 54

Charged him with arson at the Jefferson Poplar Farm Vehicle Shop.

Count 55

Charged him with arson at the Jefferson Poplar Farm shop and office.

Count 56

Charged him with arson of a Jefferson Poplar Farm vehicle.

Counts 57 - 65

Charged him in more detail for the vehicle arson.

Signed:

Kirk A. Engdall
Assistant United States Attorney

In total, McGowan was charged with two counts of conspiracy to commit arson, 14 counts of arson, and two counts of use or possession of a destructive device. If tried and convicted of the latter two, he faced a minimum 30 year sentence. For all counts, he faced a mandatory life sentence - even though he neither hurt or intended to hurt any person or animal and acted only to defend the earth against real environmental terrorists against whom no charges were brought.

Given the possibility of life in prison, McGowan pled guilty to minor arson offenses against Jefferson Poplar Farm and Superior Lumber in return for the Justice Department dropping the more serious charges, including using destructive devices.

He did so on condition that he wouldn't implicate or identify anyone but himself. Three other co-defendants did the same. In his statement to the judge he "accept(ed) full responsibility for (his) actions and at the same time remain(s) true to (his) strongly held beliefs."

He said his "actions were not those of (a) terrorist but of a concerned young man who was deeply troubled by the destruction of Oregon's beautiful old-growth forests and the dangers of genetically modified trees." Yet he realized after participating in two actions that "burning things down (violated his) visions or belief about how to create a better world. So (he) stopped committing these crimes."

He "never intended to hurt people (and expressed) great remorse....for the harm that (he) caused." He then thanked the court for letting him express his thoughts and feelings. His role was to be a lookout on one of the incidents. On the other, he helped set the fire.

His lawyers asked for a maximum 63 months imprisonment, or no more than 18 months higher than for another co-defendant. On June 4, 2007, McGowan was sentenced to seven years, and is now at the newest Communications Management Unit (CMU) at the US Penitentiary (USP), Marion, IL.

US Federal Prison Communication Management Units (CMUs)

Several times, this writer addressed the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI), Terre Haute, IN's CMU, most recently on March 18, and described it as a facility for so-called "high-security risk" Muslim and Middle Eastern prisoners in violation of federal law that prohibits severely limiting or cutting them off entirely from other inmates as well as outside contacts and communications.

US Prison Bureau regulations ban the practice, and so did the Supreme Court in Johnson v. California (February 2005). Nonetheless, it exists. The Bush Department of Justice established it. Obama's has done nothing to address it.

In early 2007, it was learned that FCI Terre Haute had a CMU. Now, so does US Penitentiary (USP), Marion, IL. Because they're illegal, they're kept secret so perhaps others also exist in federal and/or state facilities. And for cover, they include one or more non-Muslims like McGowan, briefly held at Terre Haute and since early February at Marion. He, like them, was investigated, arrested, prosecuted, and interned as a political prisoner. They for being Muslims at the wrong time in America. He as a victim of USA Patriot Act "justice" that established the crime of "domestic terrorism" and included "eco-terrorism" as an offense.

At Marion, like at Terre Haute, he's segregated from the general prison population and treated like a terrorist, which he is not, nor is he violent. He also comes under special rules for CMU prisoners that violate Federal Bureau of Prison regulations.

He's subjected to severe communication restrictions - with family, friends, and, at the discretion of prison authorities, other inmates, as follows:

-- all communications are monitored and copied;

-- outgoing and incoming mail and emails are delayed and censored;

-- visitations must be approved, are non-contact only through a glass partition, and restricted to twice monthly two hour sessions compared to other prisoners getting weekly or bi-weekly all-day visitations; according to McGowan, "The most depressing part of the CMU is not being able to hug and kiss your wife" and, of course, children and other loved ones;

-- other prisoners are allowed 300 phone minutes a month; CMU inmates only one 15 minute call a week on weekdays between 8AM - 2PM (when children are in school) with no exceptions made for holidays, birthdays or other special occasions;

-- communications must be in English;

-- prisoners sleep on thin mattresses atop concrete slabs; and

-- prison officials have ad hoc authority to bend rules as they please, be more or less lenient, but generally impose added hardships or punishment for any reason or none at all;

-- according to Eugene Weekly's Camilla Mortensen, McGowan was the first environmental activist in a "terrorist" unit where he was transferred for stating his beliefs at the low security FCI Sandstone, MN prison. Also for being the subject of a documentary film and appearing on a calendar featuring political prisoners; she also reported that media access to him was denied, including from the LA Times;

-- CMU conditions are harsh with regard to rules and punishment imposed, food quality and amount, medical care, and the ability of prison officials to do as they please in an environment conducive to toughness; and

-- according to McGowan, "I object to the way I was sent here (in the middle of the night with no notice); I object as well to the institution itself, as I find it to be either a Muslim unit and we are there to give them some credibility in denying it or it's just a plain old political prison." Correct on both counts and the reason these units are secret and illegal.

Readers are encouraged to visit the supportdaniel.org web site for photos and more information about him, his case, and how to help. US federal and state prisons are full of inmates like him, interned for their beliefs, activism, and commitment to social justice, not their supposed crimes.

Given the severe economic crisis, its toll on growing millions, and likely civil disobedience in response, the nation has been militarized with combat troop readiness and over 800 FEMA detention camps in every state. It means defending our rights or the earth is now hazardous and a crime at a time we're all Daniel McGowans.

A Personal Note and Related Comments

In October 2008, I wrote about Seyed Mousavi: Guilty of Being Muslim in Police State America. Until late March, he was incarcerated at Terre Haute federal prison's CMU. He's now in Marion's segregated facility along with other Muslims and McGowan. He's innocent, a "war on terror" victim, and my friend since we established regular contact and now exchange emails as prison officials allow.

Recently, a group of supporters came together in his behalf. Below are edited portions of his response:

"My dear friends and Justice Seekers

Thank you very much for coming together and supporting me and my family. This gives me hope and makes me believe the truth will come out and justice will take place.

Our message today is very clear.

The government must know:

-- You reject what they did to us and our families;

-- They must stop setting up plots and terrorizing people;

-- They must stop framing innocent people and destroying their families;

-- They must stop politicizing the justice system;

-- They must stop targeting the Muslim community and its organizations, centers and Mosques;

-- They must stop jailing peaceful family men for election propaganda;

-- They must stop wasting your tax money by following, watching and wiretapping law-abiding people.

There is no room in this country for secret courts and secret evidence.

It's the duty of government to protect citizens and legal residents; to protect the law and Constitution; protect peoples' rights, freedoms and property.

Muslims must have the right to practice their religion freely and not live in fear.

The courts must remain independent and protect people, not be government tools; they must correct their mistakes for the sake of justice.

We must renounce war; all nations must live together in peace; America must lead by example, not force.

Again, thank you very much for your time and support. Please stay committed for freedom and justice.

May Allah bless you all."

Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Monday - Friday at 10AM for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on world and national issues. All programs are archived for easy listening.

Monday, April 06, 2009

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Mumia's Appeal for a New Trial

April 6, 2009

According to this article just released, the US Supreme Court announced that they will not give further consideration to Mumia's appeal for a new guilt-phase trial (in legalese, they won't grant his "Petition for a Writ of Certiorari")

However, it also says that the US Supreme Court may still consider the DA's appeal to re-instate the death penalty without a new sentencing hearing!

This is another terribly dark day for justice in this country!

Hans Bennett

Abu-Jamal-News.com

Supreme Court lets Mumia Abu-Jamal's conviction stand

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/06/mumia.supreme.court/

By Bill Mears
CNN Supreme Court Producer

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court has let stand the conviction of former Black Panther Mumia Abu-Jamal, who was sent to death row for gunning down a Philadelphia police officer 28 years ago.

He contends blacks were unfairly excluded from the jury, and has been an outspoken activist from behind bars. The justices made their announcement Monday.

A separate appeal over whether Abu-Jamal deserves a new sentencing hearing has not been taken up by the high court. Prosecutors are appealing a federal appeals court ruling in Abu-Jamal's favor last year on the sentencing issue.

The case has attracted international attention amid charges of prosecutorial misconduct and the inmate's outspoken personality.

Abu-Jamal, a former radio reporter and cab driver has been a divisive figure, with many prominent supporters arguing that racism pervaded his trial. Others countered Abu-Jamal is using his skin color to escape responsibility for his actions. They say he has divided the community for years with his provocative writing and activism.

He was convicted for the December 9, 1981, murder of Officer Daniel Faulkner, 25, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Faulkner had pulled over Abu-Jamal's brother in a late-night traffic stop.

Witnesses said Abu-Jamal, who was nearby, ran over and shot the policeman in the back and in the head. Abu-Jamal, once known as Wesley Cook, was also wounded in the encounter and later
confessed to the killing, according to other witnesses testimony.

Abu-Jamal is black and the police officer was white. Incarcerated for nearly three decades, Abu-Jamal has been an active critic of the criminal justice system.

On a Web site created by friends to promote the release this month of his new book, the prisoner-turned-author writes about his fight. "This is the story of law learned, not in the ivory towers of multi-billion dollar endowed universities but in the bowels of the slave-ship, in the hidden, dank dungeons of America."

His chief defense attorney, Robert Bryan, had urged the justices to grant a new criminal trial, but the high court offered no explanation for its refusal to intervene.

"The central issue in this case is racism in jury selection," Bryan wrote to supporters last month. Ten whites and two blacks made up the original jury panel that sentenced Abu-Jamal to death.

A three-judge panel of the 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals a year ago kept the murder conviction in place, but ordered a new capital sentencing hearing. That court ultimately concluded the jury was improperly instructed on how to weigh "mitigating factors" offered by the defense that might have kept Abu-Jamal off death row.

Pennsylvania law at the time said jurors did not have to unanimously agree on a mitigating circumstance, such as the fact that Abu-Jamal had no prior criminal record. Months before that ruling, oral arguments on the issue were contentious.

Faulkner's widow and Abu-Jamal's brother attended, and demonstrations on both sides were held
outside the courtroom in downtown Philadelphia.

Many prominent groups and individuals, including singer Harry Belafonte, the NAACP and the European Parliament, are cited on his Web site as supporters.

Prosecutors have insisted Abu-Jamal pay the price for his crimes, and have aggressively resisted
efforts to take him of death row for Faulkner's murder.

"This assassination has been made a circus by those people in the world and this city who believe falsely that Mumia Abu-Jamal is some kind of a folk hero," said

Philadelphia District Attorney Lynne Abraham last year, when the federal appeals court upheld the conviction. "He is nothing short of an assassin."

Saturday, April 04, 2009

Mumia Abu-Jamal’s Last Chance for Justice

By J. Patrick O’Connor

Since his conviction in 1982 for the murder of Philadelphia Police Officer Daniel Faulkner, Mumia Abu-Jamal, through his numerous books, essays and radio commentaries, has become the face of the anti-death penalty movement in the United States and an international cause célèbre. Paris, for example, made him an honorary citizen in 2003, bestowing the honor for the first time since Pablo Picasso received it in 1971.

Abu-Jamal’s case has been politically charged from the beginning. As Amnesty International established in its 2000 pamphlet entitled "The Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal: A Life in the Balance," his tortuous appeal process has been fraught with "judicial machinations." Claims that won the day in other cases were repeatedly denied him, first by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 1989 and subsequently by a Federal District Court in 2001 where the judge overturned his death sentence but left in place in his conviction – and Abu-Jamal on death row – pending further appeals.

The latest example of what has become known as "the Mumia exception" occurred in March of 2008 when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in a sharply divided 2-1 decision, turned down Abu-Jamal’s appeal for a new trial based on the claim that the prosecutor – through his use of peremptory challenges – purged otherwise qualified blacks from his jury. In 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark Batson decision, ruling that racial discrimination in jury selection is unconstitutional and merits the harmed defendant a new trial.

In a nutshell, the Third Circuit majority denied Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim on a technicality of its own invention, not on its merits, ruling that his claim failed because he was not able to establish the racial composition of the entire jury pool at his 1982 trial. In issuing its ruling, the court, incredibly, ignored its own previous opposite rulings in the Holloway v. Horn in 2004 and Brinson v. Vaughn in 2005 where it specifically ruled it was not required for the defendants in those cases to establish such data.

Abu-Jamal’s final opportunity for judicial relief is now before the U.S. Supreme Court in the form of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. On February 4, the high court docketed and accepted that filing. According to Abu-Jamal’s lead attorney, Robert Bryan of San Francisco, "The central issue in this case is racism in jury selection. The prosecution systematically removed people from sitting on the trial jury purely because of the color of their skin, that is, being black."

Joseph McGill, the prosecutor at Abu-Jamal’s trial, has stipulated in previous appeal proceedings that he used 10 of the 15 peremptory challenges he exercised to exclude blacks from the jury – a strike rate of 66.67 percent against potential black jurors. Such a high strike rate is in itself an extremely strong inference of discrimination. The result was that – in a city with a black population of over 40 percent in 1982 – only three of the 12 jurors impaneled were black. As Third Circuit Judge Thomas Ambro pointedly stated in his dissent, "It is my belief that the 66.67 percent strike rate, without reference to the total venire [jury pool], can stand on its own for the purpose of raising an inference of discrimination."

During last year’s term, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded its 1986 Batson ruling to warrant a new trial if a minority defendant could show the inference of racial bias in the prosecutor’s peremptory exclusion of one juror. Under Batson, the defense needed to show an inference – i.e., a pattern – of racial bias in the overall jury selection process. Ironically, the Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision strengthening and expanding Batson’s reach was written by Justice Samuel Alito, most recently of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

As a result, there is something more than a remote possibility that the Supreme Court will agree to grant Abu-Jamal’s writ. In denying Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim, the Third Circuit’s ruling created new law by placing new restrictions on a defendant’s ability to file a Batson claim. The Third Circuit, in effect, tampered with and undermined a long-established Supreme Court ruling.

A Writ of Certiorari is a decision by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court. Supreme Court justices rarely give a reason why they accept or deny Cert. Although all nine justices are involved in considering Cert Petitions, it takes only four justices to grant a Writ of Certiorari, even if five justices are against it. This is known as "the rule of four."

If the Supreme Court were to grant Cert on Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim, one clean, simple option for it would be to remand the case to federal district court for the Batson hearing both the Federal District Court in 2001 and the Third Circuit in 2008 should have ordered. Such a hearing would, in all probability except for "the Mumia exception," lead to a new trial for Abu-Jamal. A new trial, considering the utter travesty of justice his original trial represented, would set him free. If Certiorari is denied, Abu-Jamal – now 54 – will, barring the most unlikely intervention by a future governor of Pennsylvania, spend the rest of his life in prison.

—J. Patrick O’Connor is the editor of Crime Magazine (www.crimemagazine.com) and the author of The Framing of Mumia Abu-Jamal, published by Lawrence Hill Books in 2008.

-------------------
ARTICLE FROM 2008:

Analysis of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal

By J. Patrick O’Connor
(2008)

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s ruling in the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal continues a long and tortured denial of Abu-Jamal’s right to a fair trial. Just as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed its own precedent to deny Abu-Jamal a new trial based on the prosecutor’s improper summation to the jury during the guilt phase of his trial, the Third Circuit’s March 27 decision has now followed suit by going against its own well-established precedent regarding Abu-Jamal’s well founded Batson claim. Instead of remanding the case to federal district court for consideration of Abu-Jamal’s claim that his trial prosecutor purged blacks from the jury by using peremptory challenges in a discriminatory manner at his 1982 trial, a 2-1 majority of judges ruled to uphold the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s denying his Batson claim.

On Abu-Jamal’s other two claims before the Third Circuit, the three-judge panel was unanimous in its rulings. It denied Abu-Jamal’s claim that the prosecutor’s summation to the jury during the guilt phase of the trial infringed his constitutional right to a fair trial, finding that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s denying of this claim was not "unreasonable." Abu-Jamal’s claim that Judge Sabo was biased against him during his Post Conviction Relief Act hearing was denied because "alleged errors in collateral proceedings are not a proper basis for habeas relief...It is the original trial that is the ‘main event’ for habeas purposes."

The panel upheld Federal District Court Yohn’s 2001 ruling overturning Abu-Jamal’s death sentence, ordering the Philadelphia D.A.’s Office to hold a new sentencing hearing within 180 days or to sentence Abu-Jamal to life in prison without parole.

The chances of the D.A.’s Office holding a new sentencing hearing are about as non-existent as its chances for getting a new jury to reinstate the death penalty for Abu-Jamal. For one thing it would be the sentencing hearing of all sentencing hearings. The hearing would take weeks to conduct and would be guaranteed to attract hundreds, if not thousands, of Abu-Jamal’s ardent supporters to Philadelphia’s landmark City Hall. A new jury would be impaneled to hear the facts of the case, many of which could be challenged and probably debunked by Abu-Jamal’s attorneys. And unlike at Abu-Jamal’s last sentencing hearing where his defense attorney called no character witnesses to testify on his behalf, a who’s who of witnesses would be placed under oath before the jury to attest to his admirable character. A much more likely course is for the D.A.’s Office to appeal the overturning of the death sentence to the overall Third Circuit, requesting an en banc hearing, or, if that is denied, a direct appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Philadelphia D.A. Lynne Abraham will appeal out of spite, in keeping with her long running vendetta against Abu-Jamal, not because she holds out any hope of a higher court reinstating the death penalty.

The Abu-Jamal case has been racially charged and politicized from the outset, from the time of his arrest when Police Inspector Alfonzo Giordano set the framing of the former Black Panther in motion by enticing prostitute Cynthia White to perjure herself about Officer Daniel Faulkner’s shooting. The Third Circuit Court’s ruling continues the injustice. Is it a coincidence that the two judges in the majority were both appointed by President Reagan and the lone Democrat-appointed judge on the three-judge panel was the dissenter? It seems not. As the U.S. Supreme Court itself demonstrates time and time again in its decisions, not even its justices are free of partisan and ideological biases.

In Chief Judge Anthony Scirica’s summation of the case for the Third Circuit majority, he makes no attempt to demonstrate that he actually sifted through the pages of conflicting trial testimony to prove that he even read that testimony or gave it any meaningful analysis. He simply buys into the prosecution’s entire scenario of how Officer Faulkner came to die despite the ballistics and medical evidence presented at trial showing otherwise. Scirica has Abu-Jamal running toward Faulkner and shooting him in the back. As Faulkner falls to the ground, he was able to turn around, reach for his own firearm, and fire at Abu-Jamal, striking him in the chest. He then has Abu-Jamal standing over Faulkner and firing four shots at close range. One of the shots strikes Faulkner between the eyes and enters his brain.

Scirica mistakenly has Robert Chobert – instead of taxi driver Robert Harkins – stopping Officers Shoemaker and Forbes to inform them of Faulkner’s shooting.

He has Shoemaker giving Abu-Jamal "repeated orders to freeze, but Abu-Jamal reaching for an object – a revolver – near his hand, prompting Shoemaker to kick Abu-Jamal in the chest to move him away from the gun." Abu-Jamal was blacked out at the time of Shoemaker’s arrival.

Scirica has Abu-Jamal resisting arrest while officers moved him to a police van, without referencing the fact that – as police testimony at trial showed – Abu-Jamal was too weak to stand and had to be carried to the van and en route the police rammed his head into a pole and dropped him to the ground.

He reprises security guard Priscilla Dunham’s claim about Abu-Jamal defiantly shouting out a confession, which he quotes verbatim.

The chief judge has Cynthia White seeing Abu-Jamal shoot Faulkner in the back, then "hover" over Faulkner, prior to shooting him a few more times and then Abu-Jamal sitting down on the curb. The judge does not reference the fact that not one witness at trial could recall seeing her at the scene, that she had 38 arrests for prostitution in Philadelphia, and that she so altered her original statement to the police about the shooting that she had no credibility.

Next Scirica took up Robert Chobert. He said Chobert heard a shot, looked up and saw Faulkner fall to the ground, and then saw Abu-Jamal fire a few shots into Faulkner. At trail, Chobert had claimed to have been parked directly behind Faulkner’s patrol car. No witnesses, not even Cynthia White, noticed a taxi cab behind the patrol car and none was there when police arrived within two minutes of the shooting. In his trial testimony, Chobert, like White, backed away in numerous important details from his original statement to the police given shortly after the shooting.

Scirica has eye-witness Michael Scanlan saying he saw an assailant shoot Faulkner from behind, then watched as Faulkner fell, and saw the assailant stand over Faulkner and shoot him in the face. Scirica does not mention that Scanlan identified the shooter as having an Afro and wearing a black knit cap or that Scanlan testified he never saw the man running from the parking lot [Abu-Jamal] shoot the officer.

Scirica credits Anthony Jackson with "spending the last five months preparing for trial," when, in fact, once Judge Ribner agreed at a pre-trial hearing to allow Abu-Jamal to represent himself pro se that Jackson virtually stopped preparing for trial and had not pre-interviewed one witness prior to trial.

More absurdly, Scirica states that Jackson kept Abu-Jamal "fully informed throughout the proceedings" during the time that Abu-Jamal was banished from the courtroom, which was over half his trial. In reality, Abu-Jamal and Jackson hardly conferred at all during the trial.

Judge Scirica’s cavalier disregard for the trial record would underpin the majority’s view of the merits of Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim.

In its ruling on the Batson claim, the majority stated that it believed Abu-Jamal had "forfeited his Batson claim by failing to make a timely objection. But even assuming Abu-Jamal’s failure to object is not fatal to his claim, Abu-Jamal has failed to meet his burden in providing a prima facie case." The majority wrote that he failed because his attorneys at his PCRA evidentiary hearing failed to elicit the prosecutor’s reasons for removing 10 otherwise qualified blacks by means of peremptory strikes during jury selection.

"Abu-Jamal had the opportunity to develop this evidence at the PCRA evidentiary hearing, but failed to do so. There may be instances where a prima facie case can be made without evidence of the strike rate and exclusion rate. But in this case, we cannot find the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling [denying Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim] unreasonable based on this incomplete record," the majority wrote. In a nutshell, the majority denied Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim on a technicality of its own invention, not on its merits. It also ignored its own previous opposite ruling in the Holloway v. Horn case in 2004.

Judge Thomas Ambro’s dissent was sharp: "...I do not agree with them [the majority] that Mumia Abu-Jamal fails to meet the low bar for making a prima facie case under Batson. In holding otherwise, they raise the standard necessary to make out a prima facie case beyond what Batson calls for."

In other words, the majority, in this case alone, has upped the ante required for making a Batson claim beyond what the United States Supreme Court stipulated. When ruling in Batson in 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court imposed no timeliness restrictions as to when a Batson claim may be raised, nor has the court done so in the intervening 22 years. Neither did it require that the racial composition of the entire jury pool be known before a Batson claim could be raised. (In fact, the Supreme Court recently added heft to its Batson ruling, ruling in Synder that the purging of only one black juror on the basis of racial discrimination was grounds for a new trial.) In addition, the Supreme Court ruled in 1986 that to establish a prima facie case for a Batson claim, the defendant must show only "an inference" of prosecutorial discrimination in purging potential jurors. Even the Third Circuit has never previously allowed the timing of a Batson claim to be material, nor had it ever ruled previously that not knowing the racial composition of the entire jury pool was a fatal flaw in lodging a Batson claim.

The fact that the prosecutor in Abu-Jamal’s case used 10 of the 15 peremptory challenges to exclude blacks from the jury – a strike rate of 66.67 percent against potential black jurors – is in itself an extremely strong inference of discrimination. The result was that only three of the 12 jurors impaneled were black. As Judge Ambro correctly stated in his dissent, "It is my belief that the 66.67 percent strike rate, without reference to the total venire [jury pool], can stand on its own for the purpose of raising an inference of discrimination."

Ambro followed that assertion by writing, "My colleagues attempt to downplay the strike rate by saying it is essentially meaningless without reference to the racial makeup of the venire as a whole. They claim it is impossible to understand such a high strike rate without ‘contextual markers’ about the entire jury venire. While such ‘markers’ would be helpful, the lack of a record containing that information should not serve as an absolute bar to Abu-Jamal’s claim. Simply put, the failure to develop a record of the entire venire pool or all black members in that pool (against which to compare the prosecutor’s use of peremptory strikes) does not defeat a prima facie Batson claim. This is because Batson does not place the burden on the petitioner to develop a full statistical accounting in order to clear the low prima facie hurdle of the Batson analysis."

In commenting on Holloway v. Horn, a case with striking similarities to Abu-Jamal Batson’s claim, Ambro demonstrated just how disingenuous the panel’s ruling against Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim was. "In Holloway, we emphasized that ‘requiring the presentation of [a record detailing the race of the venire] simply to move past the first [prima facie] stage in the Batson analysis places an undue burden upon the defendant. There we found the strike rate – 11 of 12 peremptory strikes against black persons – satisfied the prima facie burden despite the lack of contextual markers my colleagues now seek here." In Holloway, the Third Circuit ruled that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision denying Holloway’s Batson claim was "contrary to" and an "unreasonable application of" the Batson standard.

In fact, in rendering its Holloway decision, the Third Circuit specifically rejected the requirement that a petitioner develop a complete record of the jury venire. In making its ruling in Abu-Jamal’s appeal, it reversed itself to make the pretext of an incomplete jury record his fatal misstep.

The Third Circuit – if it had followed its own precedent – would have found the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling denying Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim "unreasonable" and remanded the case back to Federal District Court Judge Yohn – the judge who ruled on Abu-Jamal’s habeas corpus petition in 2001 – to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the prosecutors’s reasons for excluding the 10 potential black jurors he struck. If that hearing satisfied Judge Yohn that all of the prosecutor’s reasons for striking potential black jurors were race neutral, Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim would fail. If, conversely, that hearing revealed racial discrimination on the part of the prosecutor during jury selection – even if only concerning one potential juror – Yohn would be compelled to order a new trial for Abu-Jamal.

Abu-Jamal is left with only two remedies to correct the flawed Third Circuit ruling. His first option is to request the Third Circuit to review its decision en banc where the entire panel of judges sitting on the Third Circuit would conduct oral arguments anew. On April 9, the Third Circuit granted Abu-Jamal’s petition for Extension of Time to File for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, allowing Abu-Jamal’s attorneys until May 27 to file.

According to Abu-Jamal’s lead attorney, Robert R. Bryan, the basis of the petition he will file is that the Third Circuit’s "decision conflicts with a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court or of the court [Third Circuit] to which petition is addressed and consideration of the full court is therefore necessary to secure uniformity of the court’s decisions," and "the proceeding involves one or more questions of exceptional importance."

There is some likelihood that the Third Circuit might agree to meet en banc because the panel’s decision to deny Abu-Jamal’s Batson claim went against that court’s own well-established precedents in granting similar Batson claims in the past. However, the barrier to en banc deliberations is that a majority of the sitting judges must vote to sit. In the case of the Third Circuit, there are 12 judges eligible to vote, but four have already recused themselves from this particular case, meaning five of the remaining eight judges would be needed to go forward en banc. Abu-Jamal has most probably had his one day before the Third Circuit.

Barring an en banc hearing by the Third Circuit, Abu-Jamal’s final option is to appeal the Third Circuit’s ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has on three previous occasions denied to take up his case. This time, though, there is a remote possibility that the high court may take the case up because the Third Circuit’s ruling created new law by placing new restrictions on a defendant’s ability to file a Batson claim.

Friday, April 03, 2009

Support the Eco-Prisoners (April 2009)

Spirit of Freedom
(April 2009)
Produced by
EARTH LIBERATION PRISONERS SUPPORT NETWORK

"The whole experience has been tough, but all the kind and strengthening
words and wise thoughts from strangers made it much easier!"
(Former Swedish Animal Rights Prisoner)

Welcome to the April 2009 edition of Spirit of Freedom. Last month Urgent
ELP! reported the jailing of the British anti-hunt campaigner/gyrocopter
pilot, Bryan Griffiths, following a tragic accident where a hunt supporter
was hit by Bryan's gyrocopter. Despite the death being an obvious and clear
accident, Bryan has been wrongly charged with murder. ELP urges everyone to
support Bryan and to send him letters of support. But we would remind
everyone that regardless of your opinion of the illegal blood sport of fox
hunting, please remember Bryan is facing very serious charges so please,
keep your opinions about fox hunters to yourself.

As well as supporting Bryan with letters, ELP is also encouraging anyone who
is a member of Amnesty International to write to Amnesty and encourage them
to support Bryan. The jailing of Bryan is a miscarriage of justice. It was
a clear and obvious accident and Bryan never meant to kill anyone. So
please, if you are a member of Amnesty, please encourage them to also
support Bryan.

Besides Bryan, as you will see ELP has a number of new prisoners listed and
following the anti-G20 protests in London, England, we are expecting a few
more very soon. We obviously encourage everyone to support the new
prisoners, but please don't forget those who have been inside for a while
now. All the prisoners listed in this newsletter welcome letters of
support. So please, regardless of where you are in the world, regardless of
what language you speak, please do support the eco-prisoners. Even if it's
just a few words on a card, your letters and kind words really do make a
difference.


ECO-DEFENCE PRISONERS

Tre Arrow, #70936065, FCI Herlong, Federal Correctional Institution, PO Box
800, Herlong, CA 96113, USA. Serving 78 months for his involvement in two
ELF arsons. 1) an arson on logging trucks 2) an arson on vehicles owned by
a sand & gravel company. (Tre is a raw energy vegan - He has asked that his
letters of support are written on scrap paper or tree-free paper).

Grant Barnes #137563, San Carlos Correctional Facility, PO Box 3, Pueblo, CO
81002, USA. Serving 12 years for setting fire to a number of SUV vehicles.
The letters ELF were spray painted onto all of the vehicles. (Grant is a
vegan).

Nathan Block, #36359-086, FCI Lompoc, Federal Correctional Institution, 3600
Guard Road, Lompoc, CA 93436, USA. Serving 7 years & 8 months for an ELF
arson against a Poplar Tree Farm and an ELF arson against an SUV dealership.
Also admitted his role in an ELF/ALF conspiracy. (Diet unknown).

Julien COUPAT, N° d'écrou 290173, 42 rue de la santé, 75014 Paris, France.
On remand accused of sabotaging railway lines to protest against the nuclear
power industry (which carries waste by railway lines). (Diet unknown).

Marco Camenisch, Postfach 3143, CH-8105 Regensdorf, Switzerland. Serving 18
years. 1) Ten years for using explosives to destroy electricity pylons
leading from nuclear power stations. 2) Eight years for the murder of a
Swiss Boarder Guard whilst on the run. In '02 Marco completed a 12-year
sentence in Italy for destroying electricity pylons in Italy. (Marco is a
meat eater who encourages organic living).

Daniele Casalini, Casa Circondariale, Via Burla 59, 43100 Parma, Italy. Il
Silvestre activist awaiting trial accused of using explosives to damage an
electricity pylon in protest at nuclear energy. (Daniele is a vegan).

Francesco Gioia, Casa Penale, Via Lamaccio 1, 67039 Sulmona (Aq), Italy.
Il Silvestre activist awaiting trial accused of using explosives to damage
an electricity pylon in protest at nuclear energy. (Francesco is a
vegetarian and Straight Edge).

Jonatan. E-mail messages of support to freejonatan@yahoo.se A 20-year old
Swedish man sentenced to 15 months imprisonment after admitting damaging a
communication tower used by the Department of Defence, cutting the cables on
a crane used in creating urban sprawl, and damaging a vehicle used in the
logging industry. Jonatan is currently on bail as he appeals his sentence
(Jonatan is a vegan).

Jeffrey Luers, # 13797671, CRCI, 9111 NE Sunderland Ave, Portland, OR
97211-1708, USA. Serving 10 years for arson on a SUV dealership & the
attempted arson of an oil truck. The original sentence was 22 years & 8
months, but was reduced on appeal. (Diet unknown).

Marie Jeanette Mason, #04672-061, FCI Waseca, Federal Correctional
Institution, PO Box 1731, Waseca, MN 56093, USA. Serving 21 years and 10
months for her involvement in an ELF arson against a University building
carrying out Genetically Modified crop tests. Marie also pleaded guilty to
conspiring to carry out ELF actions and admitted involvement in 12 other ELF
actions. (Marie is a vegan).

Eric McDavid, 16209-097, FCI Victorville, Medium II, Federal Correctional
Institution, PO Box 5300, Adelanto, CA 92301, USA. Serving 19 years & 7
months for planning to destroy the property of the U.S. Forestry Service,
mobile phone masts and power plants. At the point of his arrest no criminal
damage has actually occurred. (Eric is a vegan).

Daniel McGowan, 63794-053, USP Marion, US Penitentiary, PO Box 1000, Marion,
IL 62959, USA. Serving 7 years for an ELF arson against a Poplar Tree Farm
and an ELF arson against an old growth logging corporation. Also admitted
his role in an ELF/ALF conspiracy. (Daniel is a vegetarian).

Jonathan Paul - See details in Animal Liberation Prisoners List.

Michael Sykes 696693, Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, 1728
Bluewater Highway, Ionia, MI 48846, USA. Serving four to ten years for
anti-sprawl arsons, criminal damage to a utility pole, spray-painting
political graffiti and burning the American flag. (Diet unknown)

Briana Waters 36432-086, FCI Danbury, Federal Correctional Institution,
Route 37, Danbury, CT 06811, USA. Serving six years for involvement in an
ELF arson on a University. (Diet unknown).

Joyanna Zacher, #36360-086, FCI Dublin, 5700 8th St.- Camp Parks- Unit F,
Dublin, CA 94568, USA. Serving 7 years & 8 months for an ELF arson against
a Poplar Tree Farm and an ELF arson against an SUV dealership. Also
admitted her role in an ELF/ALF conspiracy. (Diet unknown).

ANIMAL LIBERATION PRISONERS
(All Animal Liberation Prisoners follow a minimum vegetarian diet and most
are vegan).

Jonny Ablewhite TB4885, HMP Ranby, Retford, Notts, DN22 8EU, England.
Serving 12 years for attempting to blackmail a farmer who supplied guinea
pigs for vivisection. (Jon is a vegan).

Dan Amos VN7818, HMP Winchester, Romsey Road, Winchester SO22 5DF, England.
Serving 4 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon Life Sciences. (Dan
is a vegan)

Gregg Avery TA7450, HMP Coldingley, Shaftesbury Road, Bisley, Woking, Surrey
GU24 9EX, England. Serving 9 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon
Life Sciences. (Gregg is a vegan).

Natasha Avery NR8987, HMP Send, Ripley Road, Woking, Surrey, GU23 7LJ,
England. Serving 9 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon Life
Sciences. (Nat is a vegan).

Mel Broughton TN9138, HMP Woodhill, Tattenhoe Street, Milton Keynes, Bucks
MK4 4DA, England. Serving 10 years for "conspiracy to commit arson" against
Oxford University vivisection department. (Mel is a vegan).

Dean Cain, WJ4309, HMP Lincoln, Greetwell Road, LN2 4BD, England. On remand
for allegedly trespassing at a rabbit farm. The charges include interfering
with a contractual relationship so as to harm an animal research
organisation, conspiracy to interfere with a contractual relationship so as
to harm an animal research organisation, and conspiracy to commit criminal
damage. (Dean is a vegan).

Jacob Conroy #93501-011, FCI Terminal Island, Federal Correctional
Institution, P.O. Box 3007, San Pedro, CA 90731, USA. Serving 48 months
imprisonment for helping organise the SHAC-USA campaign. (Jake is a vegan).

Donald Currie A3660AA, HMP Parkhurst, Newport, Isle of Wight, PO30 5NX,
England. Serving an Indeterminate Sentence, of not less than six actual
years, for carrying out arsons against targets associated the vivisection
industry including HLS. (Don is a vegan).

Lauren Gazzola #93497-011, FCI Danbury, Federal Correctional Institution,
Route #37Danbury, CT 06811, USA. Serving 54 months imprisonment for helping
organise the SHAC-USA campaign. (Lauren is a vegan).

Bryan Griffiths XW8892, HMP Hewell, Hewell Lane, Redditch B97 6QS, England.
A Hunt Monitor on remand who is falsely accused of murdering a hunt
supporter following a tragic accident. Bryan was monitoring a fox hunt by
flying a gyrocopter literally giving him a birds-eye view of the hunt and
their activities. When he landed for fuel a hunt supporter went to
challenge him. The hunt supporter was hit by the gyrocopter and died.
However despite this being a clear accident, Bryan has been charged with
murder. (Bryan is a vegetarian).

Joshua Harper #29429-086, FCI Sheridan Federal Correctional Institution,
P.O. Box 5000, Sheridan, OR 97378 USA. Serving 36 months imprisonment for
helping organise the SHAC-USA campaign. (Josh is a vegan).

Jordan Halliday, Inmate #24836, 1225 West Valley View Highway, Suite 100,
Logan, UT 84321, USA. Jailed for contempt of court for refusing to testify
before a Grand Jury investigating animal rights actions in Utah. (Jordan is
a vegan).

Sean Kirtley WC 6977, HMP Stafford, 54 Gaol Road, Stafford, ST16 3AW,
England. Serving four and a half years for running an anti-vivisection
campaign website. (Sean is a vegan).

Kevin Kjonaas #93502-011, FCI Sandstone, PO Box 1000, Sandstone, MN 55072
USA. Serving 72 months imprisonment for helping organise the SHAC-USA
campaign. (Kevin is a vegan).

Daniel McGowan - See details in Eco Defence Prisoners List.

Gavin Medd-Hall WV9475, HMP Coldingley, Shaftesbury Road, Bisley, Woking,
Surrey GU24 9EX, England. Serving 8 years for conspiracy to blackmail
Huntingdon Life Sciences. (Gavin is a vegan).

Heather Nicholson VM4859, HMP Bronzefield, Woodthorpe Road, Ashford, Middx.
TW15 3JZ, England. Serving 11 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon
Life Sciences. (Heather is a vegan).

Jonathan Paul, #07167-085, FCI Phoenix, Federal Correctional Institution,
37910 N 45th Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85086, USA. Sentenced to 51 months for an
ALF arson on a horse meat plant. Also admitted his role in an ELF/ALF
conspiracy. (Jonathan is a vegan).

John Smith, TB4887, HMP Lindholme, Bawtry Road, Hatfield Woodhouse,
Doncaster, DN7 6EE, England. Serving 12 years for attempting to blackmail a
farmer who supplied guinea pigs for vivisection. (John is a vegan).

Luke Steele, WJ4308, HMP Lincoln, Greetwell Road, LN2 4BD, England. On
remand for allegedly trespassing at a rabbit farm. The charges include
interfering with a contractual relationship so as to harm an animal research
organisation, conspiracy to interfere with a contractual relationship so as
to harm an animal research organisation, and conspiracy to commit criminal
damage. (Luke is a vegan).

Swedish Prisoner 1. E-mail messages of support to orebro2@gmail.com 18
year old Swedish man held on remand accused of an arson against a fur and
leather store. (Swedish Prisoner 1 is a vegan)

Nicole Vosper VM9385, HMP Bronzefield, Woodhthorpe Road, Ashford, Middx,
TW15 3JZ, England. On remand accused of blackmailing Huntingdon Life
Sciences. (Nicole is a vegan).

Dan Wadham, A5705AA,HMP Camp Hill, Newport, Isle of Wight, PO30 5PB,
England. Serving 5 years for conspiracy to blackmail Huntingdon Life
Sciences. (Dan is a vegan).

Kerry Whitburn TB4886, HMP Lowdham Grange, Lowdham, Nottingham, NG14 7DA,
England. Serving 12 years for attempting to blackmail a farmer who supplied
guinea pigs for vivisection. (Kerry is a vegan).

Sarah Whitehead, VM7684, HMP Bronzefield, Woodthorpe Road, Ashford, Middx,
TW15 3JZ, England. Serving two years for: 1) rescuing a puppy from horrific
conditions. 2) rescuing over 100 animals from a pet breeder who was later
prosecuted for animal abuse. Also awaiting trial for SHAC activity. (Sarah
is a vegan)

PARTY & PROTEST PRISONERS

Justizvollzugsanstalt Aichach, Natalja Liebich, Postfach 1380, 86544
Aichach, Germany. Jailed until June 2009 for taking part in anti-G8 and
anti-NATO protests. (Diet unknown).

PLOUGHSHARES PRISONERS

Helen Woodson, 03231-045, FMC Carswell - Admin. Max. Unit, POB 27137, Ft.
Worth, TX 76127, USA. Serving 8 years 10 months for actions that focused
on the interrelationship of war & the destruction of the natural world. The
actions included pouring red paint over the security desk of a federal court
and making threatening communications. Previously Helen had served 20½
years for: 1) Using a hammer to disarm a nuclear missile silo. 2) Burning
$25,000 on the floor of a bank whilst denouncing war, environmental
destruction & economic injustice. 3) Mailing warning letters with bullets
attached to Government & corporate officials. (Diet unknown).

OTHER ANTI-WAR PRISONERS

Robert Alford VP 7552 HMP Lewes, 1 Brighton Rd, Lewes, Sussex, BN7 1EA,
England. On remand accused of disarming a weapons factory, which, amongst
other things, makes Hellfire Missiles. The action was in protest at Israel
military action against Gaza. (Diet unknown).

Elija Smith VP 7551 HMP Bristol, 19 Cambridge Rd, Bristol, BS7 8PS, England.
On remand accused of disarming a weapons factory, which, amongst other
things, makes Hellfire Missiles. The action was in protest at Israel
military action against Gaza. (Diet unknown).

THE LECCE DEFENDANTS
The Lecce Defendants have been charged with "subversive association" accused
of damaging Esso petrol pumps to oppose the War on Iraq; sabotaging the cash
machines of a bank which funds an immigration centre; and targeting the
multinational company Benetton in support of Mapuche land rights activists
in Chile. All of the defendants are currently either under house arrest or
released on bail.

ANTIFA PRISONERS

Aleksey Bychin, SIZO 47/2, ul. Akademika Lebedeva, dom. 39, 195005 St.
Peterburg, Russia. On remand for fighting with neo-nazis. (Diet unknown).

Andrei Mergenov, FGU IZ 64/1 OKB 2 komn. 73, Up. Kutyakova 107, 410601
Saratov, Russia. Serving 3 years for fighting with neo-nazis. (Diet
unknown)

Fabio Milan, C.C. via Pianezza 300, 10151 Torino, Italy. On remand accused
of fighting with the police after an anti-fascist protest. (Diet unknown).

Christian Sümmermann, Bnr: 441/08/5, JVA Plötzensee, Lehrterstr. 61, 10557
Berlin, Germany. Serving 40 months for breaching the peace whilst serving a
suspended sentence issued for anti-fascist activities. (Diet unknown).

Tomasz Wiloszewski, Zaklad Karny, Orzechowa 5, 98-200 Sieradz, Poland.
Serving 15 years for accidentally killing a neo-nazi whilst defending
himself. (Tomasz is a vegetarian).

OTHER PRISONERS

Pavel Delidon, ul. Timiryazeva-1, FGU IK-7, 309990 Valuyki Russia.
Anarchist/Animal Rights activist jailed for attempting to obtain wages owed
to him, but which had not been paid to him by his employer. (Diet unknown).

Richard Sills (Address Unknown, USA). Serving 15 months for bomb hoaxing a
University saying they would be targeted by the ALF if they didn't stop
their animal experiments. (Diet unknown).

Fran Thompson, #1090915 HU 1C, WERDCC, PO Box 300, Vandalia, MO 63382, USA.
Serving Life for killing, in self-defence, a stalker who had broken into her
home. Before her imprisonment Fran was an eco, animal & anti-nuke
campaigner. (Fran is a vegan).

MOVE
MOVE is an eco-revolutionary group who carried out protests in defence of
all life. All move prisoners describe themselves as vegetarians. There are
currently eight MOVE activists in prison each serving 100 years after been
framed for the murder of a cop in 1979. 9th defendant, Merle Africa, died
in prison in 1998.

Debbie Simms Africa (006307), Janet Holloway Africa (006308) and Janine
Philips Africa (006309) all at: SCI Cambridge Springs, 451 Fullerton Ave,
Cambridge Springs, PA 16403-1238, USA.

Michael Davis Africa (AM4973) and Charles Simms Africa (AM4975) both at SCI
Graterford, PO Box 244, Graterford, PA 19426-0244, USA.

Edward Goodman Africa (AM4974), SCI Mahanoy, 301 Morea Rd, Frackville, PA
17932, USA.

William Philips Africa (AM4984) and Delbert Orr Africa (AM4985) both at SCI
Dallas Drawer K, Dallas, PA 18612, USA.

Mumia Abu Jamal, (AM8335), SCI Greene, 175 Progress Drive, Waynesburg PA
15370, USA. In 1981 Mumia, former Black Panther and vocal supporter of
MOVE, was framed for the murder of a cop. He was originally sentenced to
death but is currently awaiting re-sentencing following a court hearing in
2001.

STATEMENT ON VIOLENCE
Some people listed in this newsletter have carried out violent actions
including assault and murder. 'Spirit of Freedom' does not condone
violence. But we are also against censorship & believe people can decide
for themselves who they wish to support.

ABOUT E.L.P. SUPPORT NETWORK
ELP is an international eco-prisoner support network founded, in Britain, in
1993 to support jailed eco-activists. We support the prisoners by producing
various regular prisoner lists:

Spirit of Freedom is ELP's international monthly prisoner listing which is
circulated by e-mail.

Urgent ELP! Bulletin is an e-mail service that distributes the names of any
new eco-prisoner as soon as ELP gets their details. For more info e-mail
ELP4321@hotmail.com

On-Line Newsletters - ELP has a number of websites that provide news,
prisoner lists and additional info about ELP & the prisoners.

English language ELP Website
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Greek language ELP Website
http://greekelp.blogspot.com

North American ELP Website
www.ecoprisoners.org

Turkish language ELP Website
www.geocities.com/yesilanarsi/elp.htm

ELP Extra is an e-mail group that circulates the details of political
prisoners, ELP learns about, who do not fall within the remit for support by
ELP. To subscribe to the list e-mail ELP4321@Hotmail.com

Australian ELP.SN is our Australian contact. For more info e-mail
elp4321@hotmail.com

Belgium ELP.SN is our Belgium contact. For more info e-mail
elp_bel@hotmail.com

German ELP.SN is a prisoner led initiative run by eco-prisoner Marco
Camenisch. For more info contact Marco Camenisch, Postfach 3143, CH-8105
Regensdorf, Switzerland.

Greek ELP.SN is our Greek contact. For more info e-mail greekelp@yahoo.gr

North American ELP is our North American contact. For more information
e-mail naelpsn@mutualaid.org

Turkey ELP.SN is our Turkish contact. For more info e-mail
yesilanarsi@yahoo.com

Thursday, April 02, 2009

April Freedom Month

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign

For more information on The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign, contact us at ProLibertad@Hotmail.com or at the ProLibertad Hotline718-601-4751. Visit our website: www.ProLibertadWeb.com

APRIL IS FREEDOM MONTH FOR THE PUERTO RICAN POLITICAL PRISONERS!

OSCAR LOPEZ RIVERA, CARLOS ALBERTO TORRES, AND AVELINO GONZALEZ CLAUDIO!

This April marks the 29th anniversary of the capture of the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners! The Puerto Rican Political Prisoners were incarcerated for their actions in support of the Independence of Puerto Rico; a colony of the United States for 110 years. The Political Prisoners were never charged with any violent crimes, but were given unjust sentences and incarcerated in the worst prisons in the United States.

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign designates every April as Freedom Month; a period of time where to raise awareness about the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners and the Independence of Puerto Rico

Friday April 3, 2009: The Militant Labor Forum presents: Independence for Puerto Rico! Dinner: 7:00 pm v Program: 8:00 pm Donation: Dinner, $5 v Program, $5 307 W. 36th Street (near 8th Av.), 10th floor (use north set of elevators) MANHATTAN Information: (212) 629-6649 — There will be translation into Spanish Visit www.themilitant.com SPEAKERS: Frank Velgara, ProLibertad Campaign v Ben Joyce, Socialist Workers Party

Tuesday April 14, 2009: Political Prisoner Letter-Writing Dinner in Brooklyn 7pm (sharp!), 1-2-3 Community Space. Enjoy home-cooked food and information from NYC Anarchist Black Cross! Write to the Puerto Rican PP's and POW's! Everything is provided! Directions to 1-2-3 Community Space: 123 Tompkins Avenue, between Myrtle & Vernon Avenues, Brooklyn By Train: Take the G to the Myrtle-Willoughby stop. Walk east on Myrtle Avenue (toward Tompkins, away from Marcy), turn right on Tompkins Avenue and look for 123 on your left. Nycabc@riseup.com

Friday April 17, 2009: Party for Socialism and Liberation Forum on Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners at 7pm at 2295 Adam Clayton Powell Blvd. #1 New York, NY 10030 Phone: 212-694-8762

Sunday April 19, 2009: Join ProLibertad and La Iglesia San Romero De Las Americas for a special People’s mass for the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners at 12:30pm at La Iglesia San Romero de Las Americas/UCC at 2410 Amsterdam Avenue 4th Floor New York , NY 10040 Telephone #: 646-942-2444

Wednesday April 22, 2009– POLITICAL PRISONER EVENT AT Hunter College!! Making the community aware of the treatment towards those who fight for what they believe in! There will be FREE FOOD Come and join us!! 4pm @ Thomas Hunter Hall 105 (E68th St. and Lexington Ave.) Brought to you by: The Hostos Puerto Rican Club at Hunter College

Saturday April 25, 2009: ProLibertad Prisoner event in El Barrio. TBA

Thursday April 30, 2009: Vigil in Solidarity with Fr. Luis Barrios, the SOAW 6, and the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners Close the School of the Americas! Free the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners! Vigil at 5PM IN FRONT OF Metropolitan Correctional Center 150 Park Row.

Wednesday, April 01, 2009

Between the State and a Hard Place: Statement on David McKay's Plea

from the Austin Informant Working Group

The Austin Informant Working Group is an ad hoc collective of
interested and affected individuals that formed to do research and
media and legal work around the exposure of an FBI informant in the
Austin radical community. The group is also helping to uncover the
lessons about community accountability and security that must be
learned from this debacle. It is not a prisoner support group and
does not speak for Brad Crowder or David McKay.

On March 17, 2009 David McKay plead guilty to possession of
unregistered Molotov cocktails, charges stemming from his involvement
in the protests against the Republican National Convention last
September. Those of us following the case were shocked and saddened
to learn of this development.

The State and, in particular, the FBI reached into their bag of dirty
tricks to make examples of McKay and his co-defendant Brad Crowder.
It is also apparent to us that if this had gone to trial again, the
lies of the State's primary informant in the case, Brandon Darby,
would have embarrassed the FBI and the prosecution. This would have
ruined their case against David and called into question the
reliability of informants in past and future litigation. This is the
question the prosecution has feared all along.

Before David’s first trial in January the prosecution filed a motion
to change the definition of entrapment in the case. However the judge
refused to overturn years of legal precedents for the mere
convenience of the prosecution in this case. The first trial ended in
a hung jury. We have reliable information indicating that it was hung
6-6, with the crucial issue being the question of entrapment. A
couple weeks before the March 16 retrial, in another attempt to cover
for their informant’s misconduct, the prosecution filed a motion to
exclude information about Darby's violent tendencies and his history
of using firearms in inappropriate situations. This motion also
failed.

During the intermission in proceedings, David’s defense compiled
additional testimony that confirmed Darby’s history of problematic
and manipulative behavior. Through grassroots appeals, reliable
witnesses came out of the woodwork to attest to Darby's repeated
incitements to violence, his disruptive behavior and promotion of
illegal activities in every organization he infiltrated. As the case
of the defense solidified, so escalated the prosecution’s
intimidation of both David and Brad. The State was determined to
prevent both the exposure of its misconduct in utilizing and
supporting a violence-prone provocateur to entrap two young
activists, and the precedent of being called out and held accountable
for their repressive tactics. The State knew that Darby’s testimony
was questionable, if not completely lacking credibility.

The months since David and Brad’s arrest have been hard for both of
them, their families and the community. Days before the trial, the
prosecution subpoenaed Brad to testify. Brad had no interest in
testifying against David. The State then threatened to add two years
to Brad’s sentence if he failed to cooperate. The FBI has contacted
and intimidated others, including potential defense witnesses, over
the past few months in an attempt to disrupt David’s legal defense.

It is likely that David did not want Brad, his close friend, to be
forced to choose between testifying and enduring harsher sentencing.
Neither did he want his family and loved ones to have to go through
the turmoil of a second trial. David’s father has spent large amounts
of money, bankrupting his business, to pay David’s legal fees.

The State has never been above entrapping and manipulating activists.
As many of us well know, radical movements have long been the targets
of these tactics in an effort to criminalize and suppress our
dissent. Based on our interactions with Brad, David and the unabashed
snitch, Brandon Darby, and through a rigorous examination of the
court and FBI documents that emerged during this case, we believe
strongly that this is once again the situation.

The Austin Informant Working Group concludes that there is much more
to the story than any of us know. From what information we do have,
we stand by the statements we have previously made about the
entrapment of Brad and David. There are many reasons innocent people
plead guilty, including intimidation, fear and exhaustion. The
evidence suggests these factors, rather than the truth, controlled
the outcome in this case.

This battle has been a hard one. In the end, the State once again had
more resources and time than those of us who stood in solidarity with
the defendants. Rather than let this hinder our hopes and overwhelm
our movements we must learn from this experience and stick together
to build stronger and more just communities. We must also recognize
our continued resistance, solidarity, and resilience in the face of
the forces of misery as victories in and of themselves.

We respectfully submit this statement as a Call to Action to all
communities of conscience in support of the struggle against all
forms of government repression, and in opposition to all the
travesties (named and unnamed) carried out on a daily basis under the
guise of the “criminal justice system”.

In solidarity,
Austin Informant Working Group
Texas.solidarity@gmail.com