Friday, August 31, 2007

New from Germany

Hey all

here's a text we wrote about the last repression wave here in Germany.
Please spread it around and translate at will:)

The text is also available in italian (request at will).

anarchist greetings

abc berlin


----------------

What's going on in Germany?

- A short overlook about the last operations aimed to bring down the militant
resistance -

Once again within a few months we are forced to witness the dirty movements of
the BAW (General Federal Attorney): on the 31st of July, three comrades got
arrested near Berlin, allegedely after having placed some incendiary devices
under a few military trucks. A forth person has been arrested in his
apartment,
accused of being one of the people who wrote the communqués of the
group. Three
other comrades are (at the moment) with free feet, but under
investigation. For
what exactly? Paragraph 129a, terrorist association: all of them are
accused of
belonging to the Militante Gruppe, a clandestine group active since 2001.
We borrow some words from the anti repression website Gipfelsoli in order to
clarify the happenings of the last three months.

This is the third of such operations within the last three months in Germany.
As of May 2007 there have been several raids following four investigative
procedures based on paragraph 129a in Hamburg, Berlin, Bremen, Strausberg and
Bad Oldesloe:
* On 9 May based on allegations of "forming a terrorist organisation for the
purposes of stopping the G8 summit" (under various group names, 18 persons) as
well as "membership in a terrorist organisation (militante gruppe, 3 persons,
based on attacks which took place since 2001).
* On 13 -19 June based on allegations of "forming a terrorist organisation
(under several group names, e.g. AK Origami). The allegations focus on arson
attacks on vehicles belonging to the military and to a company
involved in arms
manufacturing in Glinde (2002), Bad Oldesloe and Berlin (2004 and 2006).
* On 31 July based on allegations of "forming a terrorist organisation"
(Militante Gruppe, 4 persons arrested, 3 others searched and under
investigation).
The federal criminal bureau explained several times to the press that the
following house searches had neither anything to do with the raids on
9 May nor
with the anti-G8 movement. However, as previous experience in 129-related
investigations and trials has shown, search warrants can be obtained based on
construed "research findings". This allows the authorities to gather
additional
information on the radical left movement. In this way, these "findings"
contribute to investigative procedures in respect to future attacks; "facts"
which are supposedly "linked" with G8. Only 2% 129a cases lead to conviction.
The investigative files on the 9 May raids alone add up to about 80,000 pages,
about 200 notebooks. Apart from the raids, dozens of phone-tapping
permits have
been issued, as well as bugging cars and meetings. A witness who supposedly
identified a "suspicious person" after the arson attack on Thomas Straubhaar's
car turned 80 photos in to the federal criminal bureau.
Some of the persons concerned are accused of initiating a "militant group"
against the G8 2007. These allegations are based on telephone conversations
where members of the "Global Agriculture" working group spoke of "stepping up"
the campaign. The accused became suspects after visiting the web sites of the
companies they are criticising or having spoken on the phone about the
locations of the companies. This campaign would necessitate IT experts who
specialise in setting up mailing lists, servers and managing web sites.
A large part of the files consist of analyse of "self-incriminating writings."
This entails comparing how sentences are formulated, punctuation, grammatical
errors such as "weakness in the genitive case," or whether letters are
capitalized. Additional factors looked at are where the date is placed (right
or left of the page), written with or without zeros, use of words such as
"imperialism" or "precarity", references made by the author to particular
campaigns and left groups, whether the spelling is "dissent!", "dissent" or
"Dissent" (G8 or G-8 ) etc. Comparisons are also made between texts
for similar
expressions such as "raking in the money", "IWF", etc.
After every analysis a profile is drafted of potential authors of the
text: city
of origin, political affiliations, educational background, and position of the
author within their political spectrum. Some of the texts are subsequently
attributed to specific persons.
Data is compiled on the accused house mates, with whom s/he has phoned, phone
and internet service providers, at which demonstrations the accused was
detained, or which collaborative projects the person is working on.
Much of the data is not intended for exclusive use in the investigation of a
particular case. On the contrary, it appears that inquiries for further
information collection regardless of context were placed by the BKA at the
Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Verfassungsschutz),
political "crime unit" of the BKA. In any case, the circumstances clearly
indicate that the authorities have probed extensive information on the radical
left and anti-G8 movements since the beginning. Surveillance permits for the
radio cells in and around Mehringhof (autonomous left center in
Berlin) and the
HWP high school were requested for at least the first two "dissent!" network
meetings in Hamburg and Berlin, both of which were attended 250 persons. In
this vein, the authorities probably have logged every mobile phone which
registered with the local network there. The presence of informants at the
meeting itself also comes as no surprise.
All in all, after being lost in the darkness for long time, while the
"Militant
campaign against the G8" (a 2 year long militant campaign spreaded all over
Germany, carried on from different automous groups, involving hundreds of
arsons and property destruction attacks) was striking hard especially in
northern Germany, repressive forces did try to put an end to this organising
these frame ups, before and after the G8 summit.
It was their attempt to intimidate militant and uncompromised
resistance, but it
did not really succeeded, neither in undermining the solidarity inside the
different areas of the autonoumous movement, nor in stopping the militant
attacks.

So far a short summary of some facts.
What interestes us even more, is to spend few words about solidarity.
A positive thing to be noticed, is the good solidarity which developed
immediately after the first raids in May.
On the same night, demonstration took place everywhere, in Germany
but not only,
with Hamburg and Berlin on top of the cake.
Hamburg saw a spontaneous demonstration with more than 2000 people, with some
clashes afterwards, and Berlin brought up to 5000 people on the streets, all
under the motto ?We are all 129a!, ?We are all Militante Gruppe?.
As well, many direct actions followed the days after, among them one by the
Militante Gruppe which torched two police vans.
The goal of repression forces, to intimidate any radical resistance against G8
and capitalism, did not worked out as planned.
Above all, very few voices (mostly heads of Attac and such, but not
their basis)
were distancing themselves from the people under investigation or the militant
resistance. Also a very positive sign.

As well, some comrades in northern Germany have been already ?invited? from
the Federal General Attorney (BAW) to make declarations about their comrades
under investigation for the 13 ? 19 June operation.
The first person who received this ?invitation? went with other 40 solidal
comrades to the cops, declaring she refuses to declare anything, and ready to
face its consequences.
In Germany if you are called as witness and you refuse to testify, you can be
held up to 6 months in detention. The last case happened with the infamous
Magdeburg trial, where several people refuse to testify against their comrades
and one of them sat almost 6 months in prison following his refusal to
cooperate.

Back to this last strike against the alleged Militante Gruppe, it is
a fact that
three comrades are now sitting in jail under the usual heavy conditions. From
the very beginning on, many expressions of solidarity have been spoken
especially in regard to one of the prisoners. He was not arrested within an
alleged arson attack, and he works at the university, so he has a certain kind
of status in the eyes of many people. It does not seem like a difficult thing
for most people to give him solidarity as a criminalized teacher, victim of
some dodgey police frame up. And we, of course give him all our solidarity as
well!
In the meanwhile, as we are writing this text, we are able to welcome this
comrade out of prison!
He came out after paying a caution (bail), but it is yet unclear if he will be
able to remain outside until the possible beginning of a trial.
The federal criminal attorney declared already that they will fight
against the
decision of letting him out.
On the other side, for a large number of people, such as the normal citizens,
university teachers and wannabe politicians within our movement, it is a way
more an undefendable thing to show support for those who perhaps
enterprised an
arson attack against some death machines of the German army.
Some people fear to be categorized as MG supporters or simply as ?ready to use
violence? from State forces, others condemn absolutely any form of violence,
even the one against mere things.
Generally some prefere to pay the price of not talking too much about
the three
comrades, because then it would result a difficulty to keep all the
aforementioned different supporters on the same boat.

We want to join the (many) voices out of the chorus and reclaim the
need to show
open support for the ones who might even found ?guilty? of some illegal
action.
We do not distinguish between innocents and guilties: this category do not
belong to our anarchist background, neither we think should belong to any
sincere left radical and similars.
We must be capable of expressing our full support for anyone who is fighting
with his/her favourite means against this present society, let them feel they
are not alone and that we stand with them and for their eventual actions; of
course, this solidarity would not exclude a permanent, critical
debate with our
comrades.
Therefore it is extremely important to not let ourselves be split between the
usual ?good? and ?bad?, the normal game played by the State and
Capital. It is important to show a clear and critical support to all our
imprisoned comrades, without any distinction.
And we are happy to see that there are several voices screaming the same, to
tell the truth well more than expected, a good sign, as well as
witnessing many
solidarity actions within the last couple of days.
Indeed, two rallies have been held in front of the prison where the
comrades are
being held, just as soon as they got transferred there, both were quite well
attended with an average of 300 comrades; but, even before this, one night
following the arrests, a car of the federal constitutional court got
torched in
Berlin.
A few days later an attempted arson against a justice building, in
Berlin again,
threw the cops and media into a panic.
Last weekend several cars belonging to companies involved within the nuclear
transport got burned, and among them a car property of the German army.
Meanwhile, a well attended solidarity meeting took place, many calls to
solidarity have been spread, leaflets distributed, banners dropped and money
organised.
To make it clear again: we do not let ourselves be frighten, but rather we
choose to struggle further than sitting home merely writing postcards to the
prisoners (although this is a very important part of our struggle as well).
It is also worh noting that the participation of reformists groups
such as Attac
bases and large part of the university world are also within the solidarity
campaign.
At the Attac summer camp, 400 people made a spontaneous demonstration
following
the arrests, chanting ?we are all terrorists? (!).
This is probably just a papertiger origined by the fact that one of the
defendant is a sociologue, it is well worth to notice that perhaps some other
people around began to ask themselves a few more radical questions about the
actual state of things.

However, this occasion has been used to propose a general campaign for the
abolition of the paragraph 129a and b, and to go on the offensive generally
against social control: a large demonstration, planned also from reformists
groups for the 22nd of september, will see the appearance of a large,
autonomous block against social control and the abolition of the
aforementioned
infamous paragraph.
The extended usage of this paragraph seeks the criminalization of our
resistance, and in countries like Spain and especially Italy, where it is used
virtually every two months, it has become a scary normality.
Are we heading in the same direction?
As we wrote once in our brochure ?Repression against Italian anarchists?, it
is just a matter of time until every friendship will be catalogued under this
paragraph.

We repeat it again, for us there is only one terrorist organization,
and that is
the State.
Therefore it seems a big contradiction how people who actively oppose it are
compared to one of the main organization of death and terrorism, such as the
army, are being now called terrorists!
Something everybody can reflect on.

In closing, we do not have to forget that the problem is not only
represented by
the imprisonment of the ones close to us, but even more by the
existence of the
prison itself.
The existence of those grey walls, is a threat to us all and we must fight for
its destruction, day by day.

Freedom for Axel, Florian, and Oli!
For the suspension of all paragraph 129a and b inquiries!
Freedom for all!
Destroy all prisons!

Adresses of the imprisoned comrades (the third prisoner wishes his
adress not to
appear on public list for now):

Oliver Rast
Buchnummer 2355/07
c/o Ermittlungsrichter Hebenstreit
Herrenstraße 45
76133 Karlsruhe
Germany

Florian Ludwig
Buchnummer 2356/07
c/o Ermittlungsrichter Hebenstreit
Herrenstraße 45
76133 Karlsruhe
Germany

someuseful links:

www.abc-berlin.net
www.einstellung.so36.net
soli.blogsport.de
delete129a.blogsport.de
www.gipfelsoli.org

ABC Berlin

Eric McDavid Alert - Less than 2 weeks to trial!

From: sacprisonersupport@riseup.net

Dear friends and supporters,

Eric's trial is less than two weeks away and we want to make sure you are
up to date on everything that is happening.

On Thursday, August 23, Eric had his trial confirmation hearing. Trial is
on for September 10, but the first day will just be jury selection.
Opening arguments will start either the 11th or 12th. They are telling us
that trial will probably last three weeks, but we'll probably only be in
court Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays. We MIGHT be in court on some
Thursdays and Fridays, but probably not. Also, Judge England will be out
of town the entire week of the 17th, so we will not be in court at all
that week. Essentially what this means is that trial will probably run
into the first week of October. Please keep these dates in mind if you are
planning on attending any of the trial. Again, please let us know if you
are planning on being here for trial, and make sure you come dressed
appropriately for court. We'll keep you posted as more information becomes
available.

After a quick surge of incoming funds, we were able to meet the newest
matching funds in less than 24 hours! Thanks to everyone who helped make
that happen. However, things seem to have leveled off again and we now
only have two weeks to raise the remaining $1300 to meet our goal of
$15,000. This is necessary to ensure that all of Eric's legal fees are
paid. Again, if everyone receiving this alert would donate just $20 we
could easily reach our goal. Please visit www.supporteric.org and donate
today. Time is running short!

Also, if you are considering coming to trial in September and you need a
place to stay, we need to know when you will be here ASAP so we can begin
making arrangements.

Thanks to all of you. Your support and love has been invaluable over
these last 19 1/2 months.

Yours,
SPS

Friday 31: Benefit movie showing for “Green Scare” defendant Briana Waters

Portland, OR: Benefit for Green Scare Defendant Briana Waters - video
showing of forest defense documentary

Support green scare defendant Briana Waters by coming to see WATCH, the
inspiring documentary of the first successful tree sit in America which
was produced by Briana Waters.
August 31st 2007
7:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Red and Black Cafe - 2138 SE Division
Sliding scale entry fee. No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

Hosted by Stumptown Earth First!

**

About Briana Waters:
Briana Waters is a devoted, loving mother and partner, a dedicated
musician and violin teacher, and a caring friend to many. It has come as
quite a shock to everyone who knows her that she has been wrongly accused
of participating in a politically motivated arson at the University of
Washington. These charges carry a draconian mandatory minimum sentence of
35 years in prison should she be convicted. Briana pled not guilty to the
charges, first brought on March 15, 2006, and was released pending trial.
Her trial is currently scheduled to begin on February 4, 2008. For more
information, see: supportbriana.org

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Kenneth Foster's Sentence Commuted!

In Rare Move, Texas Gov. Commutes Inmate's Death Sentence

Foster Was to Die Today for Murder, Even Though He Never Pulled the Trigger

By WILLIAM MARRA ABC News Aug. 30, 2007

Kenneth Foster, the man sentenced to die this evening even though he did not pull the trigger that killed Michael LaHood Jr. in 1996, was spared today by Texas Gov. Rick Perry.

"After carefully considering the facts of this case, along with the recommendations from the Board of Pardons and Paroles, I believe the right and just decision is to commute Foster's sentence from the death penalty to life imprisonment," Perry said in a statement. "I am concerned about Texas law that allows capital murder defendants to be tried simultaneously, and it is an issue I think the legislature should examine."

Foster will now only serve a life sentence. A spokeswoman for the Governor said that Foster will be eligible for parole beginning in 2036. He had been tried for the murder alongside Mauriceo Brown, who shot LaHood after attempting to rob him. Brown was executed for the murder last year.

Perry's decision came about an hour after the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles voted 6-1 to recommend that Perry commute the sentence.

Foster was set to be executed for LaHood's murder. He did not actually pull the trigger that killed the man, but was convicted under a Texas law that makes an accomplice to murder subject to the death penalty.

Hampton had told ABCNEWS.com earlier this month that he was not hopeful that Foster's appeal would be granted. "The odds are extremely low," he said then.

Foster's wife, Tasha Narez-Foster, was breathless and ecstatic after she heard news that clemency was granted.

"As soon as I realized what was happening I was crying&.I just just crying and now everything is going to be fine," Narez-Foster told ABCNEWS.com. "Right now we're just going to buy a bottle of champagne, open it up, and celebrate."

Though she has not talked to Foster since news of Perry's clemency was handed down, she was with him when he heard that the Board of Pardons and Paroles had recommended clemency.

"Kenneth, his head fell to the table, he was hiding his head in his hands. It was just, oh I cannot begin to express what we're feeling right now," she exclaimed.

Foster was on death row today stemming from an incident in the early morning of Aug. 15, 1996. Foster, who was 19 at the time, had been driving around drunk and high on marijuana with three friends, committing armed robberies. At about 2 a.m., Foster's passenger, Mauriceo Brown, jumped out of the car, approached LaHood as he stood with his girlfriend, and tried to rob him. With Foster sitting in the car about 80 feet away, Brown shot and killed LaHood.

Foster has testified that he did not know that Brown -- who was executed last year -- was going to kill LaHood. Foster and Brown were tried together, and prosecutors charged that Foster, as an accomplice, could be held capitally liable under Texas' "law of parties."

"He was guilty. He was driving that car, he helped set that up, he was reaping the rewards. It was all of them working together on it," Susan Reed, the district attorney of Bexar County, where the case was prosecuted, told ABCNEWS.com earlier this month.

Hampton agrees that Foster should be held liable for the crimes he did commit that evening. But he maintains that executing someone who was at the scene of a murder based on what they were thinking -- specifically, whether Foster knew a murder was going to occur -- is a miscarriage of justice.

Texas is the only state in the country where a person may be executed if a murder he or she did not anticipate or plan occurs during the course of another crime they committed, Hampton said.

Foster's wife, Narez-Foster, said this morning, before the pardon had been handed down, that her husband is "in very high spirits." She said she would see Kenneth in the afternoon, and that they were hopeful he would win his appeal.

"He said that he is very hopeful. He's thinking that everything is looking good. He is absolutely not sad. He's doing alright so far," Narez-Foster, sounding calm and composed, said today.

In an interview with The Associated Press before the pardon was handed down today, Foster -- who has become a poet and activist since entering prison, in addition to getting married earlier this year -- said that his actions that night were reprehensible. But Foster has maintained that he does not deserve to die for his actions.

"It was wrong," Foster told the AP. "I don't want to downplay that. I was wrong for that. I was too much of a follower. I'm straight up about that."

Governor Perry's Statement

Aug. 30, 2007
Perry Commutes Death Sentence

AUSTIN - Gov. Rick Perry today commuted the death sentence of Kenneth Eugene Foster of San Antonio to life imprisonment after the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles (TBPP) recommended such action.

On May 6, 1997, Foster was sentenced to death for his role in the 1996 capital murder of Michael LaHood. Foster sought to have his death sentence commuted to a life sentence arguing that he did not shoot the victim, but merely drove the car in which that the actual killer was riding. In addition, Foster was tried along side the actual killer, Maurecio Brown, and the jury that convicted Foster also considered punishment for both him and his co-defendant in the same proceeding.

"After carefully considering the facts of this case, along with the recommendations from the Board of Pardons and Paroles, I believe the right and just decision is to commute Foster?s sentence from the death penalty to life imprisonment," Gov. Perry said. "I am concerned about Texas law that allows capital murder defendants to be tried simultaneously, and it is an issue I think the legislature should examine."

The TBPP voted 6-1 to recommend commutation, and the governor signed the commutation papers Thursday morning.

The governor's action means Foster's sentence will be commuted to life imprisonment as soon as the Texas Department of Criminal Justice can process this change.

Not Guilty fur farm verdict

ELP Information Bulletin (30th August 2007)

Dear friends

ELP has just received good news about an Austrian animal rights
activist being found Not Guilty by a Finnish Court after the activist
was caught filming inside a fur farm.

Below is a press release about the case:

Austrian activist found not guilty in fur farm trial in Finland

Verdict puts a stop to the criminalisation of legitimate animal
rights activism,
the activist says

In autumn 2003, 3 Austrian animal rights activists went to film fur farms in
Finland in order to inform the public on the conditions in these facilities.
The activists were attacked by fur farmers and arrested by police, held 3 days
in police custody and questioned. A Finnish activist suspected of
aiding the 3 had his home raided by police. Media and authorities brandished
the activistsas dangerous terrorists and the arrests as an important victory
to prevent a threat to national security. Eventually, two men were charged
with intrusion and spying on fur farms.

On 20th August 2007 the appeal court convened in Vaasa. The 3 judges heard
all the evidence of the activist explaining how he filmed on the fur farms and
delivered their verdict today: not guilty!

Dr. Martin Balluch, the Austrian activist found not guilty today, comments:
„For the democratic process in society to reach a decision on the
issue of fur farming, it is vital that the public is fully informed on what
fur farming means for the animals involved. In Austria, in 1998 Parliament
banned fur farming and all farms were closed down. For a similar democratic
decision in Finland and elsewhere, film footage of the conditions on fur farms
must be made public. We did nothing but provide this service to the community
– and were attacked by fur farmers, arrested by police and slandered by media and
authorities. The strategy of criminalising legitimate protest and investigative
work to make the conditions on fur farms public, is truly undemocratic and
should worry anyone believing in the freedom of speech and in the democratic
process. This verdict should now put a stop to this vendetta against people
being concerned about how society treats animals in their name.”

And he continues: “The Finnish tax payer will have put about 30.000 Euro into
this case. And that for no other reason than to stop pictures of Finnish fur
farms going public, i.e. for preventing the public to see the truth. This
verdict should send a clear message to the authorities and to fur farmers: it
is not just necessary and legitimate to investigate and publisize the
conditions on fur farms, it is fully legal as well. Those concerned citizens,
who sacrifice their valuable time and resources on behalf of society, to get
the evidence to trigger the democratic decision process on whether
certain ways of treating animals should be banned or not, must be applauded, not
harassed and threatened. Their actions are important contributions for our
society to develop more compassionate, caring and respecting forms of relationships
with animals. I should hope that the police have learned their lesson and change
their prejudices against animal rights activists.”

========

Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Criminal justice England

It's time for politicians to take a radical approach to criminal justice

By Robert Verkaik, Law Editor, THE INDEPENDENT

Published: 30 August 2007

Britain's prison system is on the verge of collapse. Our crumbling jails have reached breaking point, prisoners are being released early and now, for the first time in their history, the men and women paid to guard the inmates have left their posts.
It's a desperate situation made worse by the grim truth that prison has failed to stop inmates re-offending. And suicide rates remain alarmingly high, a fact brought home by the death of another inmate yesterday.
How long can politicians continue to tell us that the only way to avert this crisis is by building more prisons? Britain already imprisons more people per capita than any other country in Western Europe and if the trend continues the number of inmates will pass 100,000 in the next decade.
Labour's response is to pledge 10,000 more prison places by 2012. The Tories have committed to using prison ships and disused army camps so that all inmates see out their sentences.
For many years Britain's penal reformers have been warning of where these increasingly draconian policies will lead.
Frances Crook, director of the Howard League for Penal Reform, says we are using a Victorian invention to tackle a 21st-century problem: "Prison does nothing to deter offending. Yet our obsession with placing punishment... over cutting crime has led to gross overcrowding."
Justice, the human rights group, says it is impossible to have a sensible debate about penal reform because it has been become bogged down in "electioneering rhetoric and swamped by legislative hyperactivity".
This week an ICM poll showed that only 40 per cent of the public thought the government should aim to send more criminals to prison, against 57 per cent who want to see other, non-custodial forms of punishment.
Now that politicians can see that radical alternatives to prison may no longer alienate the electorate they have little excuse for not trying something different.
An impossible task for a beleaguered institution

Published: 30 August 2007

Yesterday saw the first national walkout by members of the Prison Officers' Association in its 68-year history. The strike was, on the face of it, about pay. But there is more to it than that. The dispute is an alarming barometer of the state of the nation's prisons where staff morale is at rock-bottom.
As ever with the issue of prisons, the fact of low morale and the reasons for it should take no one by surprise. Earlier this month a national ballot among prison officers revealed 87 per cent ready to take industrial action. This time last year a strike was only narrowly averted. And statistics on stress, sickness and staff turnover have long revealed a dispirited workforce. That is because they are asked to do an impossible task in conditions of under-funding, overcrowding, and in a system which has never resolved whether it is about punishment or rehabilitation.
David Cameron yesterday emphasised the punishment agenda, in launching what the party's right wing heralded as his most significant policy pledges yet. He promised that a Conservative government would build or create more prisons, using prison ships and disused army camps. It would also abolish early release and make convicts serve their full sentences.
But the grim fact is that there are already too many people in the nation's jails. And in 10 years of government Labour has offered no new solutions, despite Tony Blair's pledge to address the causes of crime. Large numbers of people are imprisoned for comparatively trivial offences. Many prisoners are addicted to drugs or mentally ill and would be better treated elsewhere.
Building more prisons cannot be the answer. In the past decade 12 new jails have opened and most are already overcrowded. A result is that record numbers of inmates are committing suicide, staff sickness is higher than ever, drug use is widespread and purposeful activity such as education, employment or exercise for each prisoner is declining. Many prisoners are locked up idle for most of the day. Some prisons have even had to re-introduce slopping out.
We need to send fewer people to prison. The Sentencing Guidelines Council should gear its work towards reducing sentence lengths, cutting the number of short-term prisoners and countering the sentence-inflation built into the present system. The police and Crown Prosecution Service must divert more low-risk offenders from prosecution. Magistrates should cut the numbers on remand. Politicians must seek alternatives to prison for the large numbers of offenders who are no real danger to the community. The prison service must seek a new flexibility in mixing prison and community punishment in a single sentence – with halfway houses, weekend prisons, individual curfews, exclusion orders and other innovations.
Inside jails we need better education and drug rehabilitation programmes. Half of all burglary, vehicle crime and shoplifting is committed by drug-users, yet very few prisoners ever receive help with their drug problems, despite a host of government pledges. Half of all prisoners have the reading age of an 11-year-old or below. Yet although it famously costs £38,000 a year to keep someone in prison – sending them to Eton would be cheaper – less than 3 per cent of that goes on education. Small wonder that 58 per cent of all prisoners are reconvicted of a further offence within two years of leaving prison.
There is more to justice than locking people up. Prisoners are often multiply disadvantaged, in education, moral training and lack of family support. Addressing this would go a long way to reducing re-offending. And we would need to send far fewer people to prison in the first place.

Daniel McGowan has moved!

From: Family + Friends of Daniel McG <friendsofdanielmcg@yahoo.com>
Date: August 30, 2007 9:27:06 AM EDT

I found out today that Daniel is no longer at MDC Brooklyn. I feel relieved that he is FINALLY moving on (it's been 88 days since sentencing, NOT 30 like probation had suggested in court) but it's also bittersweet, as today was visiting day and his niece was going to visit for the first time. Such is life, I suppose.

So, as of this morning he is at FTC Oklahoma City.

You can write to him at this address now:
DANIEL McGOWAN
#63794-053
FTC OKLAHOMA CITY
FEDERAL TRANSFER CENTER
P.O. BOX 898801
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73189

Here's hoping his travels are as short and painless as possible.

Thanks for your support,
Jenny

Daniel McGowan is an environmental and social justice activist. He was charged in federal court on many counts of arson, property destruction and conspiracy, all relating to two incidents in Oregon in 2001. Until recently, Daniel was offered two choices by the government: cooperate by informing on other people, or go to trial and face life in prison. His only real option was to plead not guilty until he could reach a resolution of the case that permitted him to honor his principles. As a result of months of litigation and negotiation, Daniel was able to admit to his role in these two incidents, while not implicating or identifying any other people who might have been involved. He was sentenced to 7 years in prison on June 4, 2007 and began serving his time on July 2, 2007.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Sept. 23rd-El Grito de Lares March NYC

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign
ProLibertad@hotmail.com and ProLibertad.Campaign@gmail.com
http://www.ProLibertadWeb.com
ProLibertad Hotline: 718-601-4751
_______________________________________________________________________________

Join us Sunday, September 23rd in a march and rally for Puerto Rican
independence and self-determination.

Puerto Rico is the oldest colony on the planet, first invaded by
Spain in 1493, then in 1898 by the United States. After 109 years, it
continues under U.S. colonial rule.

Within those 500 plus years of invasion and occupation, the Puerto
Rican people have been engaged in anti-imperialist/ anti-colonial
resistance that continues to this day.

The Significance of the September 23rd date
September 23rd, 1868 is traditionally celebrated and commemorated as
the birth of the Puerto Rican nation, when Puerto Ricans rose up
against Spanish colonial rule in a revolt known as El Grito de Lares.
By 1898, Puerto Rico had achieved a form of autonomous self-rule,
which came to an end later that year with the United States invasion
of the island during the Spanish- American War. Puerto Rico has been
under the political rule of the United States ever since and has
continued to struggle throughout that time for its independence and
self-determination.

Well aware of this date's significance to the independence movement,
on September 23rd, 2005, U.S. FBI agents assassinated Filiberto Ojeda
Rios. Comandante Filiberto, who founded el Ejercito Popular Boricua
(the Puerto Rican People’s Army) – Los Macheteros, was a revered
revolutionary leader of the Puerto Rican liberation struggle. The
assassination of Filiberto on this date was a clear attempt to kill
the spirit of the ongoing Puerto Rican liberation struggle.

Why the UN location?
In spite of their attempt to kill our spirit, the FBI assassination
of Ojeda Rios served to rally additional support for the independence
movement. Since his death, the United Nations Special Committee on
Decolonization voted unanimously on a resolution calling for the
Decolonization of Puerto Rico. This resolution, in addition to
several declarations made on the colonial situation of the island
reiterates: “the Puerto Rican people constitute a Latin American and
Caribbean nation that has its own unequivocal national identity.” If
picked up by the UN General Assembly the Puerto Rican status question
will be addressed in September of 2008. This historical decision
would put Puerto Rico’s status issue on the UN agenda for the first
time since 1953. The September 23rd march will rally national and
international support so that the United Nations will make it a
priority to resolve the colonial situation in Puerto Rico once and
for all, through its natural right to be a free nation.

What, when and where?:
On Sunday, September 23rd of 2007:

12PM Begin gathering at Times Square (Broadway between 41st & 42nd)
1PM: Begin marching towards the United Nations
2PM: Rally at the UN- Dag Hammarskjold Plaza featuring speakers from
Puerto Rican and ally communities and live hip hop and bomba
performances.

For more information and march route/ program details visit:
www.September23.org

(212)696-6804

Monday, August 27, 2007

Three Finnish Animal Rights Prisoners

Urgent ELP! Bulletin (27th of August 2007)

Dear friends

Today two Finnish activists were remanded into prison today on animal
rights related charges. A third person, who went to the police
station to see if they were okay, was also arrested although no one
knows on what grounds this third arrest happened. This third person
may also be remanded into custody!

All three people wish to remain anonymous, but would welcome messages
of support. Therefore please send urgent messages of support to:

Anonymous Prisoner A
Anonymous Prisoner B
Anonymous Prisoner C

Via the e-mail address vankituki@rbgi.net

ELP will bring you more news on this breaking story as we receive it.

============

Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Belgium ELP Support Network
elp_bel@hotmail.com

North American ELP Support Network
www.ecoprisoners.org

New Itoiz Dam prisoner

Urgent ELP! Bulletin (27th August 2007)

Dear friends

Long term supporters of ELP will be aware of the Itoiz dam action in
Spain, where back in the late 1990s anonymous eco-activists sabotaged
the construction site of the controversial Itoiz dam causing so much
damage the construction was delayed by over a year. One of the
things the activists did was cut the cabbles of the machines which
took the dam wall blocks to the top of the dam.

As ELP reported at the time, following the action, eight men, who
were all linked to a lawful campaign against the construction, were
accused of involvement in this action. Despite being innocent all
eight feared they wouldn't get a fair trial so all eight went
underground. However despite not having their suspects in detention
that didn't stop the Spanish police who held a trial for the eight
men in their abscense. And surprisingly enough, as the eight weren't
there to explain their innocence, all eight were found guilty and
sentenced to four years and 10 months imprisonment.

As ELP supporters will be aware, over the following years a small
number of the Itoiz Dam suspects have been caught by the police and
thrown into prison.

The latest Itoiz Dam suspect to be captured is JULIO VILLANUEVA. He
was arrested ten days ago on the 17th of August 2007.

Please send urgent letters of support to:

JULIO VILLANUEVA
C.P. PRISION DE PAMPLONA
31080 IRUNA (NAVARRA)
SPAIN

============

British Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Belgium ELP Support Network
elp_bel@hotmail.com

North American ELP Support Network
www.ecoprisoners.org

Katrina messages from political prisoners


The International Tribunal on Hurricanes Katrina and Rita will take place in New Orleans from 8/29-9/2 sponsored by the Peoples Hurricane Relief Fund, The Malcolm X Grassroots Movement, the National Conference of Black Laywers, the U.S. Human Rights Network and Common Ground Relief. Malik Rahim of Common Ground would like to provide a venue for comments from political prisoners about the victimization and criminalization of marginalized residents of New Orleans as well as any message of support they may want to share. If you're visiting or talking to prisoners that may want to be part of this historic tribunal, ask them to call Prison Radio at (415) 648-4505 and they will tape their message of solidarity"

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Anarchist linked to local property crimes


http://www.kxly.com/news/?sect_rank=1§ion_id=559&story_id=13801

Jeff Humphrey
Jeff Humphrey / KXLY4 Reporter
Last updated: Friday, August 24th, 2007 07:06:38 PM

Anarchy grafitti
KXLY 4
The FBI has accused Travis Riehl of vandalizing a pair of recruiting stations, including spraypainting this window with the words "Leave us alone" and an anarchy symbol.

Related Videos:

FBI targets self-proclaimed anarchist for allegedly damaging federal property
SPOKANE -- In one of the first property crimes connected to Spokane’s growing anarchist movement, a grand jury indicted a Spokane man for vandalizing a pair of military recruiting stations in the city.
In October of 2005, someone threw a rock through the Air National Guard’s window and spraypainted the words “leave us alone” and an anarchy symbol on another window at the North Washington recruiting station.
Though the vandalism occurred in the middle of the night with no witnesses around, police recovered a paint can at the scene and were able to trace fingerprints on it to self-proclaimed anarchist Travis Riehl.
Riehl is a member of Spokane Lack of Action Collective (SLAC), a group that believes some non-violent property crimes are an acceptable form of getting people’s attention.
“We feel that corporations and logos and things like that that we are bombarded with, and ideologies and traditions, are all entrapping us and keeping us stagnant as a society,” Riehl states. “And we fell that atypical actions kind of break the spell that holds on people; we're trying to wake people up.”
Predictably, however, the FBI doesn’t share the same sentiments, and attempting to find the person responsible for breaking the law, they found plenty of evidence linking Riehl to the vandalism.
Court documents show that, in the days after the recruiting center was vandalized, early morning photos of the damage appeared on SLAC’s myspace page, with the date stamp on the photos matching the date an army recruiting center on the South Hill was also vandalized.
The FBI also determined that the pictures were taken by a Fuji Film Finepix 2600 digital camera and, after obtaining a federal warrant, agents recovered the same model camera from Riehl's North Spokane home.
As part of their investigation, the FBI – who handled the case since the Recruiting Station is considered federal property – secretly recorded Riehl inside his home. On the tapes, he could be found admitting responsibility for posting the pictures of the damaged recruiting stations.
Riehl also said he knows the people who set a Humvee on fire at a Liberty Lake car dealership back in 2004.
The Earth Liberation Front later claimed responsibility for the attack, but anarchists say a pro-environment, anti authoritarian philosophy is an important part of their platform.
"You can say a lot of the ideas would be anti-government," Riehl says, "But we would probably prefer that the idea is portrayed as pro self-government. We think people have the right and ability to govern themselves."
On advice from his attorney, Riehl would not discuss his upcoming trial, which gets underway in October.

Thursday, August 23, 2007

WBAI Interview on Prison Legal News Public Records Litigation and more

This is an interview I did recently on WBAI in New York about PLN’s public records litigation on the Law and Disorder show, it is fairly wideranging and also touches on some topics like prison privatization, lack of accountability and transparency, etc. you can click on the link and listen to the show as well as download it. It aired on August 20, 2007.

http://lawanddisorder.org/2007/08/19/law-and-disorder-august-20-2007/

Paul Wright, Editor

Prison Legal News

972 Putney Rd. # 251

Brattleboro, VT 05301

802-257-1342

pwright@prisonlegalnews.org

www.prisonlegalnews.org

Seattle Office:

Prison Legal News

2400 NW 80th St. # 148

Seattle, WA 98117

206-246-1022

Jailing Nation: How Did Our Prison System Become Such a Nightmare?

By Daniel Lazare, The Nation

Posted on August 20, 2007, Printed on August 22, 2007
http://www.alternet.org/story/60065/

How can you tell when a democracy is dead? When concentration camps spring up and everyone shivers in fear? Or is it when concentration camps spring up and no one shivers in fear because everyone knows they're not for "people like us" (in Woody Allen's marvelous phrase) but for the others, the troublemakers, the ones you can tell are guilty merely by the color of their skin, the shape of their nose or their social class?

Questions like these are unavoidable in the face of America's homegrown gulag archipelago, a vast network of jails, prisons and "supermax" tombs for the living dead that, without anyone quite noticing, has metastasized into the largest detention system in the advanced industrial world. The proportion of the US population languishing in such facilities now stands at 737 per 100,000, the highest rate on earth and some five to twelve times that of Britain, France and other Western European countries or Japan. With 5 percent of the world's population, the United States has close to a quarter of the world's prisoners, which, curiously enough, is the same as its annual contribution to global warming.

With 2.2 million people behind bars and another 5 million on probation or parole, it has approximately 3.2 percent of the adult population under some form of criminal-justice supervision, which is to say one person in thirty-two. For African-Americans, the numbers are even more astonishing. By the mid-1990s, 7 percent of black males were behind bars, while the rate of imprisonment for black males between the ages of 25 and 29 now stands at one in eight.

While conservatives have spent the past three or four decades bemoaning the growth of single-parent families, there is a very simple reason some 1.5 million American children are fatherless or (less often) motherless: Their parents are locked up. Because they are confined for the most part in distant rural prisons, moreover, only about one child in five gets to visit them as often as once a month.

What's that you say? Who cares whether a bunch of "rapists, murderers, robbers, and even terrorists and spies," as Republican Senator Mitch McConnell once characterized America's prison population, get to see their kids? In fact, surprisingly few denizens of the American gulag have been sent away for violent crimes. In 2002 just 19 percent of the felony sentences handed down at the state level were for violent offenses, and of those only about 5 percent were for murder. Nonviolent drug offenses involving trafficking or possession (the modern equivalent of rum-running or getting caught with a bottle of bathtub gin) accounted for 31 percent of the total, while purely economic crimes such as burglary and fraud made up an additional 32 percent. If the incarceration rate continues to rise and violent crime continues to drop, we can expect the nonviolent sector of the prison population to expand accordingly.

A normal society might lighten up in such circumstances. After all, if violence is under control, isn't it time to come up with a more humane way of dealing with a dwindling number of miscreants? But America is not a normal country and only grows more punitive.

It has also been extremely reluctant to face up to the cancer in its midst. Several of the leading Democratic candidates, for example, have recently come out against the infamous 100-to-1 ratio that subjects someone carrying ten grams of crack to the same penalty as someone caught with a kilo of powdered cocaine. Senator Joe Biden has actually introduced legislation to eliminate the disparity -- without, however, acknowledging his role as a leading drug warrior back in the 1980s, when he sponsored the bill that set it in stone in the first place. At a recent forum at Howard University, Hillary Clinton promised to "deal" with the disparity as well, although it would have been nice if she had done so back in the '90s, when, during the first Clinton Administration, the prison population was soaring by some 50 percent.

Although he is not running this time around, Jesse Jackson recently castigated Dems for their hesitancy in addressing "failed, wasteful, and unfair drug policies" that have sent "so many young African-Americans" to jail. Yet Jackson forgot to mention his own drug-war past when, as a leading hardliner, he specifically called for "stiffer prison sentences" for black drug users and "wartime consequences" for smugglers. "Since the flow of drugs into the US is an act of terrorism, antiterrorist policies must be applied," he declared in a 1989 interview, a textbook example of how the antidrug rhetoric of the late twentieth century helped pave the way for the "global war on terror" of the early twenty-first.

In other words, cowardice and hypocrisy abound. Fortunately, a small number of academics and at least one journalist have begun training an eye on America's growing prison crisis. Since there is more than enough injustice to go around, each has zeroed in on different aspects of the phenomenon -- on the political and economic consequences of stigmatizing so many young people for life, on the racial consequences of disproportionately punishing young black males and on the sheer moral horror of needlessly locking away real, live human beings in supermax prisons that are little more than high-tech dungeons. Their findings, to make a long story short, are that the damage cannot be reduced to a simple matter of so many person-years of lost time. To the contrary, the effects promise to multiply for years to come.

In American Furies Sasha Abramsky, a Sacramento-based journalist and longtime Nation contributor, convincingly argues that the best way to understand US prison policies is to think of them as a GI Bill in reverse. Just as the original GI Bill laid the basis for a major social advance by making college available to millions of veterans, mass incarceration is laying the basis for an enormous social regression by stigmatizing and brutalizing millions of young people and "de-skilling" them by removing them from the workforce. America will be feeling the effects for generations.

Bruce Western, a Princeton sociologist, offers the best overview. He notes in his new study, Punishment and Inequality in America, that mass imprisonment is actually a novel development. For much of the twentieth century, the US incarceration rate held steady at around 100 per 100,000, which would put it in the same ballpark as Western Europe today. But after a slight dip following the liberal reforms of the 1960s, the curve reversed direction in the mid-'70s and then rose more steeply in the '80s and '90s. Considering that Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Austria succeeded in reducing or holding their incarceration rates steady during this period, the US pattern was highly exceptional. But so are US crime rates. Between 1980 and 1991, US homicides hovered at between 7.9 and 10.2 per 100,000, as much as ten times the European average. (The rate has since fallen to around 5.7.) Combined with the crack wave that also exploded in the 1980s, the result was a deepening sense of panic that peaked in mid-1986 with the death of basketball star Len Bias from a cocaine overdose.

Although there was no evidence that crack had anything to do with Bias's death -- police found only powdered cocaine in his car -- the incident somehow confirmed crack as the new devil substance, "the most addictive drug known to man," in the words of Newsweek, and a threat comparable to the "medieval plagues," in the considered opinion of U.S. News and World Report (which would have meant that the country was facing an imminent population loss of up to 33 percent). Within a matter of months, Joe Biden had helped shepherd through to victory the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, an unusually horrendous piece of legislation that etched in stone the 100-to-1 penalty ratio for crack.

Still, it is always interesting to consider which deaths fill people with horror and which ones don't. The year before Bias's death not only saw 19,000 homicides in the United States but nearly 46,000 highway fatalities too, and yet Congress somehow refrained from criminalizing motor vehicles. Crack's status as the drug du jour of a certain class of inner-city blacks should have been the giveaway. What had Congress in a tizzy was not cocaine consumption so much as black cocaine consumption, which is why the subsequent repression was bound to be far harder on African-Americans than on whites. Although there is no evidence that blacks use drugs more than whites and indeed some evidence that they use them less, Western notes that black users are now twice as likely to be arrested for drugs and, once arrested, more likely to go to prison or jail. None of this is necessarily racist, at least not in the crudely explicit way we associate with men in white sheets.

The reason the police concentrate their efforts in black inner-city neighborhoods, Western notes, is that users congregate there in large numbers, and buying, selling and using tend to take place in public. (It's harder to make arrests behind the closed doors of some suburban McMansion.) If a judge is more inclined to send a poor black defendant to prison, similarly, it is not necessarily because he or she enjoys punishing someone with dark skin but because the judge, according to Western, may "see poor defendants as having fewer prospects and social supports, thus as having less potential for rehabilitation." If your weeping parents can afford to send you to private rehab, you're excused. If not, it's off to the state pen.

Racial and class biases are thus built into the very structure of the drug war. Western is particularly effective on the economic consequences of such grossly disproportionate policies. The standard account of American economic development since the 1970s, told and retold in countless undergraduate classrooms, is that economic deregulation and growth have done much to narrow the once-yawning wage gap between white and black workers. To quote the New York Times: "Unemployment rates among blacks and Hispanic people...are at or near record lows. Joblessness among high school dropouts has fallen to about half the rate in 1992. And wages for the lowest paid are rising faster than inflation for the first time in decades."

A rising tide lifts all boats, whereas all that labor-market rigidity has done for "Old Europe" is to saddle it with persistently high levels of unemployment, an alienated underclass and riots in the banlieues. But as Punishment and Inequality in America points out, if US economic policies look good, it is only because the country's enormous prison population is not factored into the equation. If workers behind bars are counted, then it quickly becomes apparent "that young black men have experienced virtually no real economic gains on young whites" and that the real black unemployment rate is up to 20 percent greater than official statistics indicate. Rather than freeing up the markets, Western writes, the United States has "adopted policies that massively and coercively regulated the poor." Where the Danes provide their unemployed with up to 80 percent of their previous salary and the Germans provide them with 60 percent, America has deregulated the rich while throwing a growing portion of its working class in jail.

In Marked, Devah Pager, who also teaches sociology at Princeton, uses a simple technique to show how mass incarceration has undone the small amount of racial progress achieved in the 1960s and '70s. Working with two pairs of male college students in Milwaukee, one white and the other black, she drilled them on how to present themselves and answer questions. Then, arming them with phony résumés, she sent them out to apply for entry-level jobs. The résumés were identical in all respects but one. Where one member of each team had nothing indicating a criminal record, the other's résumé showed an eighteen-month sentence for drugs. To help insure that the results were uniform, the résumés were then rotated back and forth among the testers.

The results? The white applicant with a prison record was half as likely to be called back for a second interview as the white applicant without. But the black applicant without a criminal record was no more likely to be called back than the white applicant with a record, while the black applicant with a record was two-thirds less likely to be called back than the black applicant without. The black applicant with a record therefore wound up doubly penalized -- as a black man and as an ex-con. With the chances of a call-back reduced to just 5 percent, the overall effect, Pager writes, was "almost total exclusion from this labor market." Considering that there are as many as 12 million ex-felons in the United States, a major portion of them black, the result has been to create a huge pool of the semipermanently unemployed where one might otherwise not exist. This is not to disprove sociologist William Julius Wilson, whose study The Declining Significance of Race caused an uproar when it was published in 1978. Wilson may have been right: The significance of race may well have been declining by the late '70s. But thanks to a government policy of mass stigmatization, it has come roaring back.

This is not only bad news for those arrested but bad news for those who have to foot the bill for their incarceration and for dealing with the social problems that labor-market exclusion on this scale helps generate. But there are other costs too. In Locked Out, Jeff Manza and Christopher Uggen, professors of sociology at Northwestern and the University of Minnesota, respectively, point out that only two states, Maine and Vermont, permit felons to vote while incarcerated, that most limit felons' voting rights after they complete their terms and that, even if not legally disenfranchised, some 600,000 jail inmates and pretrial detainees are effectively prevented from voting as well. All told, this means that 6 million Americans were unable to vote on election day in 2004. This is not peanuts. Nationwide, one black man in seven has been disenfranchised as a consequence, while in Florida, the state with the most sweeping disenfranchisement laws, the number of those prevented from voting now exceeds 1.1 million.

From a right-wing perspective, this is nothing short of brilliant. After all, what could be better than disenfranchising an unfriendly racial group while persuading the rest of the nation that the group deserves it because its ranks are filled with violent criminals? Since felons and ex-felons tend to be poor and members of oppressed racial minorities, they tend to vote Democratic. Even though the poor are less likely to vote than those higher up on the socioeconomic ladder, Manza and Uggen say there is little doubt that, had the disenfranchisement laws not existed in Florida in November 2000, the extra votes would have provided Al Gore with a margin of victory so comfortable that not even the Republican state legislature could have taken it away. If the ranks of prison inmates and hence of disenfranchised ex-inmates had not multiplied since the '70s, much of the wind would also have been taken out of the sails of the great GOP offensive. Americans have not gone right, in other words. Rather, by taking control of the criminal-justice issue, the right wing has winnowed down the electorate so as to artificially boost the power of the conservative minority.

But how did the right gain control of this all-important issue in the first place? This is the problem that Marie Gottschalk, a professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania, wrestles with in The Prison and the Gallows, an eccentric but compelling study of mass incarceration's ideological origins. While taking aim at the usual right-wing villains, The Prison and the Gallows also goes after various liberals and radicals who, inadvertently or not, also contributed to the construction of "the carceral state." Bill Clinton, for example, not only embraced the drug war and capital punishment -- he interrupted his 1992 presidential campaign to fly back to Arkansas and sign the death warrant for a mentally disabled prisoner named Rickey Ray Rector -- but also endorsed what Gottschalk calls "a virulently punitive victims' rights movement," going so far as to call for a constitutional amendment in 1996 as "the only way to give victims equal and due consideration."

This was important because the victims' rights movement represented an effort to inject a dose of vengeance into the judicial process and thereby blur the distinction between the private interest of the victim and the public's interest in maintaining order and justice. In Europe, reformers were also concerned with victims' rights. But "extending a hand to victims was seen from the start as primarily an extension of the welfare state," Gottschalk observes, whereas in America, where welfare is a dirty word, it was seen as a way of steering criminal justice in a more punitive direction.

Gottschalk's assault on '70s feminism is sure to raise the most eyebrows. She argues that the women's movement helped facilitate the carceral state by promoting a punitive approach to sexual violence that was unmitigated by any larger political considerations. This single-minded focus led to what The Prison and the Gallows describes as unsavory coalitions with tough-on-crime types. In the State of Washington, women's groups successfully marketed rape reform as a law-and-order issue so that, when the measure finally passed in 1975, it was "in part by riding on the coattails of a new death penalty statute."

In California a new rape shield became known as the Robbins Rape Evidence Law, in honor of one of its legislative sponsors, a conservative Republican named Alan Robbins. In pressing for limits on the cross-examination of alleged rape victims, feminists "generally did not consider what effect such measures would have on a defendant's right to due process," Gottschalk adds, even though due process at the time was under assault from a growing war on crime.

More radical elements, meanwhile, strayed into outright vigilantism. In Berkeley, antirape activists picketed an accused rapist's home. In East Lansing in 1973, they "reportedly scrawled Rapist on a suspect's car, spray-painted the word across a front porch and made warning telephone calls late at night." In Los Angeles, a self-styled "antirape squad" vowed to shave rapists' heads, cover them with dye and then photograph them for posters reading, This Man Rapes Women. A feminist publication called Aegis ran a notorious cover showing a gun with the warning, "You can't rape a .38; we will defend ourselves."

The National Rifle Association was no doubt delighted. Gottschalk contends that such activists wound up "profoundly co-opted," since "by framing the rape issue around 'horror stories,' they fed into the victims' movement's compelling image of a society held hostage to a growing number of depraved, marauding criminals." She notes that feminists threw themselves into the battle for the Violence Against Women Act, which passed in 1994 as part of an omnibus anticrime bill that "allocated nearly $10 billion for new prison construction, expanded the death penalty to cover more than fifty federal crimes, and added a 'three strikes and you're out' provision mandating life imprisonment for federal offenders convicted of three violent offenses."

Yet feminists' involvement was relatively modest two years later when a few liberals tried to rally opposition to Clinton's plan to abolish Aid to Families With Dependent Children, which heavily benefited poor women. Like their nineteenth-century forebears, who advocated bringing back the whipping post to deal with wife beaters, late-twentieth-century feminists got more excited about punishment than defending the welfare state.

Gottschalk is more than a bit brave in pointing this out. Still, her choice of historical examples to explain the growth of an increasingly vindictive national mood seems incomplete. As much damage as radical feminists may have done in undermining due process, they seem less important than certain antidrug activists -- in particular, certain black Democratic antidrug activists -- whose efforts ran on parallel tracks.

This means not just Jesse Jackson, who backed vigilante-style antidrug patrols by the Nation of Islam ("As long as this type of solution is within the law, it should be encouraged") but also Congressman Charles Rangel, the Manhattan Democrat who, as head of the House Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse, spent much of the '80s baiting Reagan for being soft on drugs. "I haven't seen a national drug policy since Nixon was in office," Rangel lamented at one point. "So far, the Administration hasn't given it any priority." This is as clear a case of an ostensible liberal cheering on the forces of right-wing reaction as one could hope to find. US prisons are not bulging with rapists and wife beaters, but they are filled with drug offenders, some 458,000 as of 2000, which makes the brief space that Gottschalk allots to the drug war somewhat hard to fathom. It's like discussing Al Capone without mentioning Prohibition.

Sasha Abramsky is less interested in the ideological currents that helped pave the way for mass incarceration, although in American Furies he does spotlight the fascinating role played by a Berkeley-educated sociologist named Robert Martinson, who, after several years investigating the cornucopia of rehabilitation programs offered at the time by the New York State prison system, summed up his findings in a sensational 1974 article titled "What Works?" His answer: nothing. Martinson's frustration is understandable to anyone who has ever suffered through an encounter group. Yet his conclusions, published in the neoconservative journal Public Interest, were grossly one-sided: While many programs do not work, some clearly have a positive effect.

In short order, Martinson's article became the bible of the vengeance-and-punishment set, which seized on it as proof that rehabilitation was a lost cause and that the only purpose of prison was to penalize wrongdoers. Once this ideological impediment was removed, the criminal-justice system slid downhill with remarkable speed. If punishment was good, then more punishment was better. In short order, Massachusetts Governor William Weld was declaring that life in prison should be "akin to a walk through hell," while right-wing Senator Phil Gramm was promising "to string barbed wire on every military base in America" to contain all the criminals he wanted to round up. In Maricopa County, Arizona, which includes Phoenix, a colorful local character named Joe Arpaio got himself re-elected sheriff time and again by parading his inmates about on chain gangs, dressing the men among them in fluorescent pink underwear and serving prisoners food that, as he cheerfully admits, costs less than what he gives to his cats and dogs. "Voters like it everywhere," Abramsky quotes Arpaio as saying of such policies.

"I'm on thousands of talk shows. I never get a negative. I get letters from all over the world -- and I answer every one. They say, 'Come up here and be our sheriff.'" What makes this all the more repellent is that the people subjected to such humiliation and abuse are rarely killers or rapists but alcoholics, vagrants and other small fry doing time for such misdemeanors as possession and shoplifting.

Amazing how much damage a single article can do, eh? Yet when a conscience-stricken Martinson published a mea culpa in the Hofstra Law Review five years later ("contrary to my previous position, some treatment programs do have an appreciable effect on recidivism"), the media yawned. No big shots interviewed him on TV, and no politicians called to solicit his views. No one wanted to hear that rehabilitation programs work, only that they don't. Beset by personal troubles, professional setbacks and perhaps the realization of how grievously he had allowed himself to be misused, Martinson committed suicide by throwing himself out of a ninth-floor Manhattan apartment in 1980.

American Furies provides us with a vivid account of the horrors that have followed -- the low-level pot dealers and shoplifters sentenced to life in prison in California, Oklahoma, Alabama and other states where various "three strikes" or other habitual-offender laws pertain; the supermax prisoners condemned to spend twenty-three hours a day in barren concrete cells the size of walk-in closets; the epidemics of suicide and self-mutilation; and the stubbornly high levels of violence between and among prisoners and guards -- which law-and-order advocates seize upon as reason to build yet more supermax facilities. US prison policy is like a computer program that is designed to spit out the same answers no matter what data are fed into it: Arrest more people, put more of them in prison, build more cells to accommodate them.

Where will it end? As Martinson's story shows, American mass incarceration is not what social scientists call "evidence based." It is not a policy designed to achieve certain practical, utilitarian ends that can then be weighed and evaluated from time to time to determine if it is performing as intended. Rather, it is a moral policy whose purpose is to satisfy certain passions that have grown more and more brutal over the years. The important thing about moralism of this sort is that it is its own justification. For true believers, it is something that everyone should endorse regardless of the consequences. As right-wing political scientist James Q. Wilson once remarked, "Drug use is wrong because it is immoral," a comment that not only sums up the tautological nature of US drug policies but also shows how they are structured to render irrelevant questions about wasted dollars and blighted lives.

Moralism of this sort is neither rational nor democratic, and the fact that it has triumphed so completely is an indication of how deeply the United States has sunk into authoritarianism since the 1980s. With the prison population continuing to rise at a 2.7 percent annual clip, there is no reason to think there will be a turnaround soon. Indeed, Gottschalk writes that mass incarceration is so taken for granted nowadays that "it seems almost unimaginable that the country will veer off in a new direction and begin to empty and board up its prisons."

Still, she ends on a quasi-optimistic note by quoting Norwegian sociologist Thomas Mathiesen to the effect that "major repressive systems have succeeded in looking extremely stable almost until the day they have collapsed." Indeed, repression is itself often a sign of instability bubbling up from below. This is not much to pin one's hopes on, but it will have to do.

Daniel Lazare is the author of, most recently, The Velvet Coup: The Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the Decline of American Democracy (Verso). He is currently at work on a book about the politics of Christianity, Judaism and Islam for Pantheon.

© 2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/60065/

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Leeds ABC - Annual Report

Leeds ABC are a small, but active group. We are not an 'open' group, but can rely to some extent on the support of others outside the group who cannot commit to membership on a ‘full-time’ basis.

We have held a number of fund-raising activities over the past year, and as funds have allowed we have sent money to prisoners and/or the campaigns in support of them, for example we recently sent over 350 Euros to support an imprisoned Anarchist in Krasnador, Russia. We have also sent numerous International Reply Coupons and stamps to prisoners, as well as books and pamphlets.

Beyond financial solidarity, we have been involved in helping to support prison struggles in many parts of the world, and were particularly involved in the campaign to free Ruben and Ignasi, 2 Anarchists imprisoned in Barcelona, as well as in the campaign to support the Aachen 4 in Germany. We also do our best to support recently released prisoners as best we can.

We have held various talks and info nights to raise awareness of prison struggle, for example we organised 2 talks by Basque ex-prisoner Laudelino Iglesias Martinez (the second being a launch event for the pamphlet we had produced 'Down With The Prison Walls!' - A transcript of Laude's talk at Bradford '1 in 12' club.)

We have over the past couple of years managed to get together an impressive bookstall, stocking a wide selection of books and pamphlets on prison-related issues (as well as some other Anarchist and antifascist material.) We also stock DVDs, spoken word CDs, some music (prisoner benefits), T-shirts, badges, and our 'antifascist donor cards'! We have done stalls all over central and northern England at appropriate events such as prisoner info nights and benefits, the first national British Antifa conference, the Projectile Anarchist film festival, etc.

We have produced a range of publications in the past year, as well as working on a number of ongoing projects. In addition to Laudelino's pamphlet (mentioned above), we have printed an English version of a Salakheta pamphlet 'Women in Prison', 2 pressings of an interview given by Mark Barnsley in Germany a few years ago (published under the title 'With A Smile And A Twinkle In My Eye'), and we commissioned and published John Bowden's pamphlet 'Tear Down The Walls!' We have also published a new 4 page guide to writing to prisoners (available to download as a PDF) and a general ABC leaflet. Additionally, we've produced a series of badges and a new generic ABC T-shirt. Various other things have been produced, such as a DVD and spoken word CD.

We are working on a number of other publishing projects: an English translation of the talk given by the mothers of Xose Tarrio and Gabriel Pombo Da Silva has been a lengthy undertaking, but we are very pleased with the final result. We hope to release it soon as a DVD, but also as a pamphlet, which will include additional material on the Aachen arrests and translated extracts from Xose's book. Members of the group have also translated Gabriel's book into English, and are in the process of translating Xose's. We also hope to help translate John Bowden's book into other European languages.

Over the past months though, our main focus has been in supporting John Bowden and defending the ABC against smears of 'terrorism'. We have published a huge amount of material on the internet (in English and other languages) and sent it out by e-mail. We have organised 2 solidarity days, taking a good number of people to Edinburgh to picket the Scottish Parliament on the first, and helping organise events in Scotland, London, and Leeds for the second. We produced thousands of leaflets, did several banner drops, and picketed the Scottish Prison Service HQ. In Leeds we held a support event where people could use the phone to complain to the SPS, etc, send e-mails, and write letters, as well as sign our extra large postcard. Banners in Leeds are still in place and we will be hanging more. We have now produced thousands of 'Free John Bowden' stickers, which we will be distributing, and we are printing a series of postcards to further spread the word about the campaign. We initiated a 'Hands Off John Bowden!' postcard campaign to the SPS, which has resulted in them receiving thousands of cards. We have also been pursuing a number of complaints. While John Bowden remains in closed conditions, we know that the campaign has had a very positive effect in terms of his day to day treatment.

We have helped to establish a Scottish ABC group, and members of the group will be going to Scotland again shortly to give talks in Edinburgh and Glasgow, and try to organise other actions in support of John Bowden. We have also given advice and assistance to people in Belfast, where an ABC group has been recently re-established.

While none of the group possess the skills to set up a proper website, we have a Leeds ABC site on MySpace, which functions well enough, as well as having set up a 'Friends of John Bowden' page. In addition to sending out regular MySpace bulletins we have a large e-mail list to which we regularly send information and prisoner support bulletins.

Leeds ABC maintains good contact with other ABC groups throughout the world, and with prisoner support organisations outside of the ABC. Recently members of the group travelled to Europe to visit comrades and galvanise support for John Bowden, visiting groups and individuals in London, Lille (France), Gent and Antwerp (Belgium), Amsterdam, and Norwich, as well as a number of former Anarchist prisoners. They attended a prisoner support afternoon in Amsterdam at which dozens of letters and cards were written, and a card for John Bowden was signed by supporters in all the towns and cities visited. John Bowden’s pamphlet ‘Tear Down The Walls!’ has also now been translated into Dutch by Gent ABC, and we hope that a French version will soon follow.

All money raised by Leeds ABC is used for the direct support of Anarchist and class struggle prisoners. We pay ourselves no wages under any guise, have no bureaucratic costs or hidden ‘expense accounts’, and we fund our personal prisoner support activities out of our own pockets. We are however only ordinary working-class people, like the prisoners we support, and of limited means, therefore financial donations are always needed (the campaign in support of John Bowden for example has been a very costly one) as well as stamps to send to prisoners. Thank you to those who have made donations or organised benefit events in the past year.

Leeds ABC

BENEFIT FOR THE NON-COOPERATING DEFENDENTS - 9/07/07


All proceeds of this event to be split between the four non-cooperating
defendants.

Filastine/ DJ Fukumup/ Ork. Zirkonium/ Tremel * 9-07-07 * $5-8
@The Manium * 10pm-? * Olympia, WA

Its really not to be missed!!!


Filastine {soot, shockout, jarring effects,..}
cascadia export-product laptopista returns carrying transnational
soundclash of incendiary beats in his shopping cart

Orkestar Zirkonium
12 piece Balkan-style brass marching band featuring musicians from Circus
Contraption and the Infernal Noise Brigade

Superjar Dj Fukumup
comes all the way from Amsterdam to spin us the finest cuts of neoanalcore
and thrashouse!

Tremel
your emissary trajects digitally saturadted 4-track tape loops



see fancy flyer:

John Bowden - Latest News

In April of this year, following an allegation by a right-wing American social worker at Castle Huntly open prison that I was in contact with a ‘terrorist group’, I was returned to a high-security prison and my chances of release on parole after 25 years in jail effectively sabotaged.

So apparently grave were the allegations made by the social worker, Matt Stillman, that the Scottish Prison Service decided to instigate a ‘psychological risk assessment’ of me in order, they claimed, to ascertain the extent of my sudden and dramatically increased danger to the public. In fact, a simple two minute review of the ‘terrorist’ group’s website would have revealed it to be Anarchist Black Cross, a perfectly legitimate and legal prisoners’ support group. Instead a senior forensic psychologist based at Perth Prison, Dawn Harris, was commissioned to write a report on me for the Parole Board and to assess my suitability for a return to an open prison. The expectation on the part of those who asked Dawn Harris to prepare her report was that, like all compliant prison psychologists and social workers, she would focus her attention on what was considered the pathology of my character and personality, and add some intellectual muscle to Stillman’s ridiculous claims regarding my politics.

Unfortunately for them, Dawn Harris began her assessment of me by investigating Stillman’s claim that ABC was a ‘terrorist group’. A quick search of the internet, as well as the elicited views of senior police officers, established Stillman’s claim to be a complete falsehood, and Harris later included in her report a verbatim description of the origins and principles of the ABC group and reported its claim that my release from prison was being hindered by a straightforward intention on the part of prison officialdom to punish and victimise me for campaigning for prisoners’ rights over two decades. She then wrote of my relationship with ABC in the following way: “As such, Mr Bowden’s connection with the ABC group could be viewed as a legitimate way of him trying to express his frustration about his situation in prison. Although he still has the same political views that he once expressed through violent means within the prison system, he now seems to try and raise awareness of these issues using non-violent strategies, including writing for the organization ABC.” Stillman’s evocation of ABC as a dangerous gang of ‘eco-terrorists and paramilitary members’ was exposed for what it was and had always been, a blatant lie motivated by an intention to prejudice and destroy any chance I might have of release on parole.

Harris concluded her report by recommending my immediate return to an open prison, which naturally irked the administration at Castle Huntly open jail who had hired Stillman to do a hatchet job on me and had expected Harris to do likewise. In fact, Harris’ report caused embarrassment and discomfort, and I remain in a high-security prison because the governor of Castle Huntly has now decided that a ‘risk management group meeting’ should take place in order to formulate a strategy of control over me. No date for the meeting has been given.

So a senior psychologist of the system’s choice dispels completely the fantasies and lies of an idiotic and dubiously motivated prison social worker, and yet I remain locked up in maximum security because the people responsible for my treatment since April won’t concede that victimisation lay at the very heart of their motives and actions.

Of course what really galls the Scottish Prison Service is that the protests and complaints organised on my behalf by ABC and others, and their claim that Stillman had lied about the nature of ABC’s politics have now been validated by someone working at the very heart of the system, supposedly one of their own.

It is now established beyond doubt that Stillman’s professional integrity is irreparably compromised and his motives deeply suspect. In relation to this matter, he is now the subject of two separate investigations, one by the Social Services Care Commission, and the other by the Scottish Prisons Ombudsman.

At the end of the day, however, Stillman was little more than a willing instrument of people holding management positions at Castle Huntly prison, people who deliberately and calculatedly engineered my removal from the prison and tried their damnedest to prevent my release from prison indefinitely.

John Bowden

6729
HMP Glenochil

“Green Scare”: Minnesota Grand Jury Subpoenas Served in Seattle and Chicago

This morning, grand jury subpoenas were delivered to an individual in Seattle, WA and an individual in Chicago, IL. Both have been subpoenaed to appear at a grand jury in Minneapolis, MN on September the sixth.

When Anthony Wong was subpoenaed in Seattle, the object of the investigation was not made clear by Erik Swanson of the Minnesota police and Joint Terrorism Task Force. Wong's account may be found here:
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/08/363764.shtml

In the case of the person subpoenaed in Chicago, Brandon, it was made clear that the grand jury is investigating “acts of arson and vandalism that happened a several years ago in Minnesota state.” Brandon's account may be found here:
http://chicago.indymedia.org/newswire/display/79085/index.php

Neither of the two people receiving subpoenas today have been charged with any crime.

In both instances, Ian Wallace was named as cooperating with the investigation.

Grand Juries are secret government investigative bodies that strip witnesses of their basic constitutional rights. Once you have been subpoenaed to a Grand Jury, you lose the right to remain silent, the right to hear evidence presented against you, and even the right to an attorney in the Grand Jury room. A Grand Jury can jail you without convicting you of a crime or giving you a proper trial!

Please keep your eyes open for further updates in the coming days, and be ready to assist in whatever ways these individuals request. It is vital that we support those subpoenaed by what appear to be politically-driven grand juries. In the meantime, please be careful about public speculation concerning this grand jury investigation.

Monday, August 20, 2007

Urgent - Eric McDavid's Trial Quickly Approaching!

From: sacprisonersupport@riseup.net

Dear friends and supporters,

Time is running short. After spending more than 19 months in jail without
having been convicted of any crime, Eric's trial is now less than a month
away, and we still have much work to do. Please read on to find out how
you can help...

Fundraising
We are still in dire need of funds to pay for Eric's legal defense. As we
creep towards our original goal of $15,000, we need everyone's financial
support if we're going to make it before trial begins on September 10. We
are currently at $12,149, which means we still have to raise $2,851.
Thanks to everyone who took advantage of the matching funds - the $500
mark was reached today, which means those funds have been completely
matched! But fear not, we just learned that $500 MORE in matching funds
will be donated. That means now is the time for everyone to step up and
do whatever they can to contribute. IF the most recent matching funds get
donated, THEN we could reach our goal if everyone receiving this email
donated just $20. Please don't hesitate on this one - it is urgent that
Eric get all of his legal fees paid before trial to ensure that he gets
the best possible representation. Time is of the essence here! And our
hugest, most heartfelt thanks to everyone who has donated matching funds.
We couldn't have done this without you!

September in Sacramento
Trial is quickly approaching, and a few people have started asking about
housing during Eric's trial. We would love for the courtroom to be full
of Eric's supporters during his trial and are committed to doing
everything possible to make that happen. To that end, we are asking for
folks in the Sacramento area to consider housing out-of-towners during the
trial. If you live in the area and think this might be something you
could do, please contact us ASAP and we can hammer out the details. While
we realize this is a fairly large ask to make of people, it is also THE
most important thing we can do for Eric during trial. And if you are
out-of-town and are considering coming to trial but need a place to stay,
please let us know ASAP so we can start making plans. Please keep in mind
when making plans that Eric's trial is slated to last at least 2 1/2
weeks, and could possibly run as long as 3 weeks. While it would be great
to have people there throughout trial, obviously the most important time
for Eric will be the last few days, as the jury begins deliberations and
comes to a verdict. If you have time limitations (we realize most people
can't commit to 3 weeks!), please consider trying to be here for the
latter part of trial.

Trial Confirmation Hearing, August 23
Eric has a Trial Confirmation Hearing this Thursday, August 23rd at 9 am.
As the name implies, the hearing is mostly a check-in to confirm that
trial is indeed happening, as scheduled, on September 10, and that
everything is on track for the process leading up to trial. The hearing
will be very brief, and we don't expect any surprises. If something
unexpected happens we'll let you know!

Please stay tuned for updates as trial approaches. And keep those letters
coming to Eric! Your continued support is felt and needed now more than
ever.

Yours,
SPS
> www.supporteric.org

The Politics of Promises

By Mumia Abu-Jamal
The Politics of Promises
[col.writ. 8/12/07] (c) '07 Mumia Abu-Jamal
Have you watched a political debate lately?
After all is said and done, does it leave you with hope -- or despair?
Can you really believe anything a presidential candidate says? Or is s/he saying what they think you want to hear?
Do you feel like you're being lied to? Or hustled?
Does the media coverage leave you feeling slightly nauseous?
Several years ago, I took the time to watch the Bush-Kerry so-called debates. When I look back at those and other debates, I hear the tinny, almost ghostly echoes of promises past; like Bush's 2003 take on how the US should behave in the world.
Bush said, "If we're an arrogant nation, they'll resent us." He added, "If we're a humble nation but strong, they'll welcome us."
This administration has been many things, but "humble?" I don't think so.
Bush is about as 'humble' (or"umble", in his words) as a French prince.
But, this ain't a Red/Blue, or Republican/Democrat thing. It ain't even a black-white thing. It's a political thing.
At a recently televised debate, Illinois Senator Barack Obama, the son of a Kenyan immigrant, told a YouTube caller that he didn't support reparations for millions of descendants of African slaves. He drew a cheap applause line, with a call for more education. (By the way, one wonders how many Kenyans, or Kenyan-Americans, for that matter, support reparations for the ruinous years of British exploitation and colonialism?)
It was left to an Ohio congressman, the former 'boy-Mayor', Dennis Kucinich to proudly endorse the idea. Kucinich is a white guy.
Most presidential candidates are going out of their way to sound tough and warlike, often by rattling sabers at Iran. Ironically, the same posturing that forced many politicians to go against their better judgments and inner convictions to grant a mad president war powers in the first place, now go out of their way to beat the drums of war again. And, for the same reason: to not appear 'soft'.
For millions of people, the hunger for an end to the Bush regime is gnawing at their innards.
But are they hungry for a Democratic warmonger, in the place of a Republican one?
Is that change -- or the same old madness, in another wrapper?
Who, in their right mind, would now vote for more war?
--(c) '07maj

Saturday, August 18, 2007

Scottish Peace Prisoner

Urgent ELP! Bulletin (18th of August 2007)

Dear friends

According to this weeks SchNews (Britains leading weekly activist
newsletter) a peace protester, Marcus Armstrong, has been given a
28-day sentence for refusing to pay a £750 fine for his involvement
in peace activities at Prestwick Airport, in Scotland, last year.

Marcus was part of a group of eight Trident Ploughshares activists
arrested and charged with trespass at the airbase on August 6th 2006
during a night-time weapons inspection at the base, looking for US
weapons of mass destruction. At their trial earlier this month seven
of the protesters were acquitted, but Marcus was found guilty and
issued with a fine. When he refused to pay the fine, a four-week
sentence was handed down.

Please send letters of support to:

Marcus Armstrong
HMP Kilmarnock Bowhouse
Kilmarnock
KA1 5AA
Scotland

===========

British Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Invest in Justice, Stand for Freedom

What can you buy for a single US dollar these days?  Not much...

Except FREEDOM.



On June 8, 2007, the Peltier attorneys filed with the U.S. Court of

Appeals for the Eighth Circuit an appellate brief asking the Court to

review and release some 11,000 pages of documents related to the

investigation and prosecution of Leonard Peltier still being withheld

by the Minneapolis Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

(FBI). The FBI continues to withhold these and tens of thousands of

other documents, claiming that their release would violate promises of

confidentiality made to informants and, incredibly, endanger the

national security of the United States.



*********************************************

THE PELTIER EQUATION:



FBI Misconduct

+ A Politically Motivated Prosecution by US Attorneys

------------------------------------------------------

A Wrongful Conviction

*********************************************



Previously released documents showed repeated instances of FBI

misconduct and forced the government prosecutor to admit that the

government does not know who shot their agents over 30 years ago. The

remaining documents may contain new evidence that will exonerate Mr.

Peltier and reveal further proof of misconduct by the FBI and/or U.S.

Attorneys. Such information may allow Mr. Peltier's attorneys to file

additional appeals and may ultimately lead to Leonard's release from

prison.



Legal expenses will be incurred for this appeal and other legal

strategies currently underway. One such expense? Cost recovery fees.

As mandated by the "Reinventing Government" initiative of the 1990s,

all federal government agencies charge a reproduction fee - currently

$0.10 per page. Therefore, any of the tens of thousands of documents

released by the FBI by order of the courts will come at a cost.



Do the math. The following is a listing of the number of pages still

withheld by FBI field offices, by State:



Alabama - 600; Alaska - 80; Arizona - 1,268; Arkansas - 200;

California - 9,273; Colorado - 2,671; District of Columbia - 1,000;

Florida - 530; Georgia - 535; Hawaii - 410; Illinois - 2,899; Indiana

- 275; Kentucky - 20; Maryland - 30; Massachusetts - 1,088; Michigan -

40; Minnesota - 90,000 (Update: 77,149 pages were reviewed; 66,594

pages, in full or in part, were released and 10,555 pages are still

being withheld in their entirety; and nearly 11,000 pages of documents

are yet to be reviewed); Mississippi - 350; Missouri - 2,451; Nebraska

- 2,861; Nevada - 954; New Mexico - 3,550; New York - 64+ (the NYC

Field Office claims its file is "missing"); North Carolina - 50; Ohio

- 730; Oklahoma - 2,075; Oregon - 15,264; Pennsylvania - 865; Puerto

Rico - 200; South Carolina - 200; Tennessee - 621; Texas - 1,114; Utah

- 1,500; Virginia - 482; Washington - 3,200; and Wisconsin - 9,654.



Or a total of 91,249 (or more) documents @ $0.10 each for

reproduction. *$9,124.90 !!!*



And just think... with a donation of just $1, YOU can get 10 PAGES of

FBI documentation released to Mr. Peltier's attorneys.



Send just $1 to the Peltier Legal Team c/o the Leonard Peltier Defense

Committee (LPDC). Send your check or money order made payable to the

LPDC to the 3800 N Mesa, #A2, El Paso, TX 79902.



Alternatively, you may donate by credit or debit card by visiting

http://www.freedomwalk.com/.



Stand up and be counted. Help to free an innocent man. $1 = 1 Vote

for Justice. Vote today!



*Please widely distribute this appeal - to family, friends,

colleagues, and associates. Also post to lists, groups, blogs,

MySpace and other online communities, as well as independent media

sites.*



Thank you for all you do on Mr. Peltier's behalf and in support of

freedom for all people everywhere.



"Never cease in the fight for peace, justice, and equality for all

people. Be persistent in all that you do and don't allow anyone to

sway you from your conscience." - Leonard Peltier



Time to set him free... Because it is the RIGHT thing to do.



Friends of Peltier

http://www.FreePeltierNow.org

The FBI in Peace and War

Counterpunch
Weekend Edition
August 18 / 19, 2007

Still the Same

The FBI in Peace and War

By SAUL LANDAU
When I read a news story about the FBI "taking cues from the CIA to recruit thousands of covert informants in the United States as part of a sprawling effort to boost its intelligence capabilities," (ABCNews.com July 25) I had a déjà vu experience.
As a kid, I listened to the radio show "The FBI in Peace and War," in which the Bureau always got its man and whose Agents operated under strict codes of decency. In the 1960s, "The FBI" morphed to television. Toward the end of each episode, Inspector Erskine, the heroic FBI Agent, played by Efrem Zimbalist Jr., would show photos of "the most wanted criminals" and ask the TV public to become informers to help capture them ­ like America's Most Wanted today. Coincidentally, the TV FBI agents and the bad guys drove new Fords. Coincidentally, Ford sponsored the show. J. Edgar Hoover, who directed the FBI for 48 years until he died in 1972, approved the script for every episode.
My father corroborated the real messages of both programs: "Don't screw around with the FBI. They're powerful and hate Bolsheviks." (He referred to his own childhood in Kiev when the Tsarist secret police went after the Reds. His experiences in "the old country" led him to try to scare me away from activities that might bring me into conflict with any form of police.)
He was generally correct in his assessment. As a kid growing up in the Bronx, I recall the patrol car screeching to a halt during stickball games. The cops would jump from the car, grab our stick and break it in half. This proved more of a deterrent to continuing our game than the droppings of the fruit and vegetable man's horse, which inevitably fell on third base (a manhole cover).
In eighth grade I went into Manhattan to sell pennants and flags during a Thanksgiving Day parade. An oversized cop threw me into the paddy wagon along with two other hopeful vendors and my board full of supplies -- until the parade ended. I had neglected ­ I subsequently discovered ­ to pay the proper toll to the police that vendors had to cough up before the cops granted you their "license" to sell at the parade.
In 1952, we Stuyvesant high school students marched in sympathy with striking teachers. As we arrived at City Hall the Cossacks charged. The cops on horses swung clubs at students. One cop grabbed the school newspaper's photographer camera and tossed the Leica under his horse, which trod on it.
In 1954, I wrote a letter to the editor of the Daily Cardinal, the University of Wisconsin Student Newspaper. I argued the campus left youth group deserved the right to bring Communist speakers to campus. It got published and the Bureau opened a file on me. From then on, the FBI collected my public and private correspondence, tapped my phone and had informants writing reports about my activity. A typical phone intercept reported that "subject spoke with father" and detailed my plans to travel with my family from San Francisco to Santa Monica. Then, "subject appeared at father's house and was seen talking with father through window. Topic of conversation unknown."
How depressing to receive in 1974 1000 plus pages of my file after making a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Hundreds of blacked out pages stared at me along with public statements I'd made and articles I'd written ­ including transcripts from informants and telephone intercepts.
The CIA also collected files. In 1982, in response to an FOIA request, the Agency sent me copies of letters I had written to and received from friends in the Soviet Union and Cuba. From the 1950s on, the CIA spied on thousands of US citizens. In June 1970, President Nixon brought together Hoover, CIA Director Richard Helms and other intelligence heavies to expand and "coordinate efforts against domestic dissenters," (Verne Lyon, former CIA undercover operative, Covert Action Information Bulletin, Summer 1990.)
The FBI's COINTELPRO (1956-1971) became public thanks to a mysterious group that in August 1971 stole the files from the FBI Media, Pennsylvania office and circulated them. The archives provided a context for the Bureau's and its obsessed director's intentions: disrupting opposition within the United States. Proven non-violent civil rights leaders like Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. along with thousands of others became targets of FBI surveillance and harassment. Indeed, the COINTELPRO order directed FBI agents to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" actions of certain key leaders of anti-war and civil rights movements.
In 1971, I co-produced with Paul Jacobs a ten minute segment for "The Great American Dream Machine," a Public TV magazine show in which three former FBI informants spoke on camera that they had followed orders by their Special Agent handlers to commit crimes: burn down University of Alabama dormitories and bomb a Post Office and bridge in Seattle. The stolen documents verified our claim that FBI "informants" often served as "agent provocateurs."
We invited an FBI spokesperson to rebut our charges. The Bureau refused. Instead, a high FBI official visited the head of Public Broadcasting and told him our segment was communist inspired. The brave head of public television cut it from the show, which ran ten minutes shorter that week. Other producers, in solidarity with us, refused to offer a segment to fill it up. Subsequently, the New York public TV station aired the segment wrapped inside of a panel. (The Bureau got our show cut, but never found the burglars who stole the incriminating files.)
In a similar case, "The Camden 28," Catholic activists broke into a draft board in Camden, New Jersey in August, 1971 to destroy draft records. A recent film about the case showed the ineptitude of the Bureau to garner sufficient evidence ­ and sympathy from a jury ­ to convict the accused even though they were caught in the act.
After the Soviet Union collapsed, the Bureau turned to radical environmentalists and botched a California case against Judy Bari. The government paid millions of dollars to compensate victims of the FBI's unconstitutional acts.
In 1971, Robert Wall, an FBI Special Agent, quit. In a filmed interview, he told me that in the late 1960s his supervisor in the Washington DC Field Office ordered him to spy on the Institute for Policy Studies ­ where I have been a fellow for thirty plus years ­ and on Stokely Carmichael of SNCC and the Black Panthers. "Stokely hadn't committed a crime, nor did we have any evidence that he planned to commit any. But he couldn't take a shit without us looking in on him."
The late FBI Special Agent Robert Scherrer told me how humiliating it was in the late 1960s to visit elderly Jewish grandmothers. "They always served me tea and cookies. "I hoped my face didn't turn red from embarrassment." Scherrer, who played a key role in solving the 1976 Letelier-Moffitt assassinations, said "I joined to become part of a professional police organization, not to spy on old ladies. They may have believed in Marxism. Big Deal. They also invited me to their grandson's Bar Mitzvahs."
After years of scandals involving infringement on people's constitutional rights and unsolved high profile cases ­ remember the anthrax scare?" -- has the Bureau changed?
In its recent unclassified report to Congress, the FBI anticipates a new national ring of informants that will provide secrets about terrorists. Like COINTELPRO, this effort will aid in "intelligence and counterterrorism efforts."
Bureau officials also propose expanding the already massive collection of data on U.S. citizens, keeping old wire tape transcriptions, and doing more "black bag" jobs ­ break-ins. We know from news stories that the FBI failed to integrate its data about plans of the 9-11 fiends. It has no disclosed whether existing telephone taps have led to countering any terrorist plots. Why would Congress believe that more FBI intrusion into citizens' lives and more rat finks among the public would make us safer?
According to ABC's "The Blotter," a recent unclassified report told Congress that the FBI, driven by a 2004 directive from President Bush, wants to recruit more than 15,000 informants in the US, entailing a complete overhaul of its database systems at a cost of around $22 million. The FBI apparently wants to maximize the information provided by "more than 15,000" informants. Many of the new and old informants will apparently be U.S. citizens and residents, but the FBI also wants to go overseas.
As Yogi Berra would say: "it's déjà vu all over again." Bush's "new" initiatives under the guise of fighting terrorism repeat the Palmer Raids of 1920 ­ against Bolsheviks ­ and the Cold War COINTELPRO. The anti-Bolsheviks are at it again in the very post Bolshevik era. Hey, it's safer doing surveillance on law abiding citizens than it is trying to catch hardened criminals!
Saul Landau writes a regular column for CounterPunch and progresoweekly.com. His new Counterpunch Press book is A BUSH AND BOTOX WORLD. His new film, WE DON'T PLAY GOLF HERE (on globalization in Mexico) is available through roundworldproductions@gmail.com

"Stink Tanks" By Mumia Abu-Jamal

"Stink Tanks"
By Mumia Abu-Jamal
"Stink Tanks"
[col. writ. 8/9/07] (c) '07 Mumia Abu-Jamal
Deep in the American heart is a bitter hatred of intellectuals, thinkers of high education, who are seen, in nativist eyes, as traitors to nationalistic aims of empire and domination.
While it is daily seen and heard here, it did not begin here.
In the first third of the 20th century, French writer Julian Banda penned his classic La Trahison des Clercs (The Treason of the Intellectuals). In his 1928 work, Banda critiqued the damning effect of nationalism upon French intellectuals, writing:
I shall be told that during the past fifty years...the attitude of foreigners to France was such
that the most violent national partiality was forced upon all Frenchmen who wished to
safeguard the nation, and that the only true patriots are those who have consented to this
fanaticism. I say nothing to the contrary: I only say that the intellectuals who indulged in this
fanaticism betrayed their duty, which is precisely to set up a corporation whose sole cult
is that of justice and truth......
Julian Banda wrote these words almost 80 years ago. Then, state power hadn't risen to its present pinnacles; nor had corporate power.
While today's intellectuals claim fidelity to nationalism, many are in fact corporatists, who swear fealty to transnational corporate power.
Today they hang their shingles in US think tanks, the well-paid agents of globalized corporate wealth.
They provided the ideological cover and punditry to propel the US into this grotesque quasi-war of invasion and occupation. They promised tossed flowers, and tributes to the American liberators.
They promised democratic transformation in the region.
(Yeah -- How's that coming along?).
And, as Christine Ahn showed in her article, "Democratizing American Philanthropy", included in the recently published, The Revolution Will Not Be Funded: Beyond the Non-Profit Industrial Complex (edited by Incite! Women of Color Against Violence [Cambridge, MA.: South End Press, April '07], the wealthy in the US have created and funded right-wing think tanks to further their deeply held, anti-state beliefs. Through grants and other funds they use these agencies to do their will, as Ahn notes, this is hardly an equal opportunity program:
In contrast, their liberal counterparts have received only one fourth as much support to build a political infrastructure such as the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute, the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation, the Cato Institute, and Citizens for a Sound Economy collectively had a revenue base of $77 million. In contrast, groups that might be considered their progressive counterparts -- the Institute for Policy Studies, the Economic Policy Institute, Citizens for Tax Justice, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Twentieth Century Fund, the Center for the Study of Social Policy, OMB Watch, and the Center for Community Change -- had on $18.6 million at their disposal. [pp.69-70]
This is a war brought to you by the Heritage Foundation, Cato, AEI, and the Project for a New American Century. It was conceived in greed, and nourished on nationalist arrogance.
The (so-called) war against terror has instead, strengthened the hand of jihadism, and further isolated despots throughout the region.
Is Pakistan's President (or is it President-General?) Pervez Musharraf stronger today, or measurably weaker?
Is Jordan's King Hussein in a better, or worse, position?
Are the sons of Sa'ud in Arabia more secure on their thrones, or less?
America threw a monkey wrench into the works of the Middle East, launching a campaign of chaos -- based on the empty promises of think tanks.
How then, can the US even really conceive of either peace, or 'victory?'
As bridges crumble, and schools become prisons, and a trillion dollars wing their way to the deserts of Iraq, who can be said to 'win'?
--(c) '07 maj


*******
Mumia Abu-Jamal is a political prisoner in the United States, with what could be the final decision on his legal appeals possibly coming down this summer. That decision could give Mumia his freedom, a new trial, life in prison, or execution. It is time to turn up the heat against this injustice.
Free Mumia!
For more on the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal read:
Top Ten “Fry Mumia” Myths Debunked
(Myth #1) “Five eyewitnesses saw Mumia shoot officer Faulkner.”

Friday, August 17, 2007

Important Trial Dates for Rod Coronado

From: Support for Rod Coronado <info@supportrod.org>

Here are two upcoming important dates for the San Diego Trial. We
encourage you to support Rod at these hearings by attending them in San Diego!!!!
It is very detrimental that we show the Judge that this is an important case, and we are
paying attention to issues that affect our First Amendment, the freedom of
speech. This certainly is about what we are allowed to say and what is
protected by law. Rod has been selectively prosecuted due to his strong voice
advocating a world view which stands up for the Earth and all life
that resides
here.

We need to remind the administration that we recognize the importance of this
case, and we will be there to stand beside those who are targets of government
repression. This is a new law that has only been used 5 times, and never been
tried in court. The outcome of Rod's trial will set a tone which will in turn
affect the greater community. Remember, if they silence those who have been
most outspoken, it is only a matter of time that they will use the law more
broadly.

With that in mind, please come and show your support!!!!!! Due to the
conservative presence in San Diego, we ask that you come to the court wearing
clean and unripped cloths. Bring a friend, or two, and learn some new facts
about how protected your speech is, or isn't.... You will also be able to see
some legendary lawyers in action. Tony Serra is has an outstanding history of
protecting those who are being attacked by the government.

We also request that there are no protests outside of the courthouse.
If there are protesters, it certainly is not at our request.... please don't join in to
fuel any conservative fires....

Ok, thanks for reading, and here are the dates:
InLims Hearing
August 31, Friday, 11 am
Judge Millers Courtroom, room 5, floor 3
940 Front Street, San Diego

Rod's Trial
September 10, 2007

We look forward to a large presence! It will let them know that they cannot
take away our rights while we remain silent! *

Report-back: "Bookin’ For Daniel" Marathon Fundraiser Breaks Finish Line

"Bookin’ For Daniel" Marathon Fundraiser Breaks Finish Line
Effort Raises Support for Eco-Defense Prisoner's Education Fund
SAN FRANCISCO — Of the thousands of runners who participated in the 2007 San Francisco Marathon on Sunday, July 29, many were running to raise funds for good causes. One runner in particular had a compelling cause propelling her towards the finish line: all of the pledges that had been made for eco-defense prisoner Daniel McGowan's education fund.
Esther, co-founder of Eberhardt Press, started taking donations and pledges for her 26.2-mile run on behalf of Daniel a month before the marathon, documenting her training and preparations on the "Bookin' for Daniel" blog (bookinfordaniel.eberhardtpress.org). Readers could use the website to make a donation or pledge their support on a per-mile basis. The funds will be used to help support Daniel's efforts to obtain a Master's Degree while serving a seven-year sentence for crimes committed in defense of the earth.

The long run was challenging, Esther wrote in a recent blog posting, "but knowing that I was raising awareness of the case and raising funds for Daniel's education helped get me through those last grueling miles."

McGowan is one of the so-called "Green Scare" defendants, who were rounded up in 2005 by Federal authorities in a nationwide sweep of activists called "Operation Backfire." Although the actions being prosecuted, which included arson, were intended to avoid the possibility of injury to human beings or animals, some of these defendants were sentenced with a "terrorist enhancement" for acts of property destruction alone.

"My goals in this project were to gather funds for Daniel's education while raising awareness of Daniel's Case and the Green Scare," Esther wrote. "I also wanted to show Daniel and his family that many, many people care about him, support him and plan on being around for the long run."

Daniel was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken on June 4, 2007, to 84 months, after taking a plea agreement which required only that he provide information about his own actions, and not the actions of his co-defendants or others. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he and three co-defendants were able to avoid participation in government investigations and prosecutions of political activists. Judge Aiken denied McGowan's request for a later report date after prosecutors informed her that Daniel's support website continued to be "operational," and that he had conducted a lengthy interview on journalist Amy Goodman's news program, Democracy Now.

Throughout his prosecution, a strong group of friends and family have supported Daniel, and they remain resolutely determined to stand by him as he begins serving his seven-year term as a political prisoner.

Thanks to the generosity of many supporters, the "Bookin' for Daniel" project succeeded in raising a significant sum for Daniel's education fund. Daniel has been accepted at Antioch College and is seeking his Master's Degree. Donations can still be made at www.supportdaniel.org or bookinfordaniel.eberhardtpress.org.

For more information, contact Eberhardt Press at info@eberhardtpress.org, or Friends and Family of Daniel McGowan at friendsofdanielmcg@yahoo.com.

update on Sadie and Exile

Date: August 17, 2007 10:10:33 AM EDT
Subject: update on Sadie and Exile

Greetings,
Finally, Sadie confirmed in a letter yesterday that she is now at
Dublin. She sounds in very good spirits; settling in, getting used to
yet another routine, and grateful for better food and surroundings,
including flowers, birds and warm winds. Phone and visiting
privileges have yet to get established and go through, but she is
anxious to be back in touch with friends as soon as possible via mail.
If you can, send her a note. Her address is:

JOYANNA ZACHER #36360-086
FCI DUBLIN
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
5701 8TH ST - CAMP PARKS- UNIT E
DUBLIN, CA 94568

Exile continues to be well and doing fine at Lompoc although he said
he hasn't received much mail lately. Neither of them needs books at
the moment (we will post a list later on when they've exhausted what
they have for reading now). If you've been thinking of doing so,
please write to him.

NATHAN BLOCK #36359-086
FCI LOMPOC
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
3600 GUARD RD.
LOMPOC, CA 93436

Their community of support has been wonderful and... they still have
years to go.
Thanks to all.

latest WA DOC tactic to block books to prisoners

When Did Used Books Become Contraband?

Thanks to a controversial “approved vendor system,” state prisons are slowing the flow of books behind bars.

By Karla Starr

Used books like this are considered contraband by the state’s Department of Corrections.

Earlier this year, Carla McLean, a librarian and volunteer for the organization Books to Prisoners (the group's function is self-evident), struck up a correspondence with a Buddhist pen pal at the Airway Heights Corrections Center west of Spokane. He was getting books sent to him from both BTP and the Zen Mountain Monastery. Then one day, the packages stopped arriving.

"Why did he not get those books?" she wonders. "It's not because of a three-item limit."

McLean is speaking from Books to Prisoners' headquarters, which occupy a dark, 500-square-foot basement in Seattle's International District. Here, BTP fulfills more than 800 requests per month from prisoners nationwide seeking reading material. The stacks around her reveal an unsurprising truth: Most books the nonprofit receives are donations from individuals looking to empty their homes of used books, which are considered contraband by the Washington State Department of Corrections. So whatever new books BTP manages to get hold of, it sends to prisoners in Washington state prisons.

"Offenders are clever, frankly," says DOC spokesperson Mary Christiansen, explaining the rationale behind such stringent policies. "People can hide things very well, and we always have to balance an offender's ability to get legitimate things with security. The balance for us is that offenders do need to read, but we have addressed that by allowing them to buy books from legitimate vendors, versus people just sending books in to somebody."

While Books to Prisoners had been sending its requested materials to inmates at Airway Heights for years, Andy Chan, who has been volunteering with BTP for more than 10 years, says, "Recently, they just started sending them back with a note: 'Not an approved vendor.'" Similarly, according to McLean, another pen pal at Airway Heights was expecting a package that never arrived. "His grandmother tried to send him books, and they rejected it, saying they didn't come from an approved vendor."

Turns out, grandmothers cannot send books to anyone in a Washington state prison. No one can, unless they're on an "approved vendor list." As of May, Airway Heights joined a growing number of corrections centers in Washington state that only accept books sent by vendors on such lists. (Airway Heights' approved list includes Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Borders, as well as smaller outfits like Lamp Specialties.)

While not mandated by the state, DOC spokesperson Chad Lewis states that "there are some facilities that only allow books to come from certain vendors." While official state policy says that "offenders may receive gift subscriptions and/or publications from any party other than another offender or the friends or family of another unrelated offender," the personal-property policy states that "offenders may acquire personal property only through the following sources: 1. Facility offender stores, 2. Approved vendors."

According to the DOC's Christiansen, "There is a line within the property policy stating that there is an approved vendor list, and it's up to each facility to establish each list of who's approved. That's based on safety and security. It kind of makes a difference based on which vendors are allowed to send things in."

Seattle's Prison Legal News, the nation's longest-running prison newsletter, has had its own share of troubles getting its materials—including books—sent to prisoners. After discovering that PLN wasn't on the initial list at Airway Heights, Editor Paul Wright petitioned for and received approved vendor status.

"It's probably unconstitutional," he says of the lists. "But it's going to take someone to step up to the plate and challenge it."

Theoretically, the concept of approved vendors is to provide offenders with their books in a more timely fashion. "This is good for the offenders," says Risa Klemme, Airway Heights' public information officer, adding that books no longer have to go through the second step of the package room, where items were catalogued before being distributed.

In order to compile their approved vendor list, Klemme says, workers "identified vendors our offenders commonly used. We met with the tier reps and got some agreements on what vendors we selected." She says 16 tier reps—i.e., inmate representatives—were contacted.

Yet one of McLean's pen pals at Airway Heights is a tier rep, and his complaints have thus far gone unheard. "He's trying to challenge it," says McLean. "He filled out the grievance form...but nothing."

While Washington state isn't alone in only allowing new books (Oregon also only allows books from publishers and major national distributors like Amazon.com), its adherence to the approved vendor policy has made it, according to BTP's Chan, "a pretty tough nut" compared to other states. Airway Heights' Klemme says this is a moot point, as prisoners still have access to all the reading material they'd want. "We have a library," she explains. "It's not like they don't have access to any books."

Indeed, Airway Heights' library is open 20 hours a week, but how long a library is open for and how much access inmates have aren't the same thing. "I worked at the jail library briefly, and I know they just throw stuff on a cart and everyone [clamors for] it...it's kind of sad," says McLean. "Their access to the library is very limited; both of my pen pals have complained about that. One can get access to the wood shop, or he can try to run with 30 or 50 people to the library for a half an hour. So he usually forgoes it because he hates [literally sprinting to the library] and doing that. So he just stays in the wood shop."

McLean's Buddhist pen pal sent her the approved vendor list in a letter after becoming frustrated with the restrictions placed on his desired material. "The deal is," she says, reading from his letter, "the mailroom here is extremely lazy. So to make it easier on them, they came up with the vendor list, which I enclosed. To me, it seems discriminating because I can't get books from other bookstores because it didn't make some list. Besides, don't I have a right to freedom of press or publication? The Zen Mountain Monastery can't send me free books anymore."

In order to be added to the approved vendor list, a few criteria have to be met. "We have to be sure that it's not a small business running out of a home or garage that could close overnight," says Christiansen. "It's to protect the vendor from being able to correct errors with the shipment or a problem with the product, making sure they're established enough so the company doesn't forget to fill the order, or runs out of money and possibly goes out of business. And we want to make sure that they can process any return items and money, too, so that's the basic criteria for approval."

But the entire point of BTP is that it doesn't charge the prisoners any money for the books they receive. And the books it gets the most requests for—technical manuals for inmates wishing to improve skills like repairing motors—are also the most expensive to buy. Regarding Books to Prisoners, Christiansen says, "I've never dealt with them, but I've heard they deal with used books. I don't know anything about them. If they want people to buy their books, they can request to be added to the list."

"For as long as I can remember, individuals haven't been able to send in books to their loved ones—they've either had to go to a bookstore or come to us," says BTP's Chan. "And some of [the relatives of inmates] are in financial straits and not in the position to go to Barnes & Noble, buy a new book, and pay the rates that Barnes & Noble would charge for shipping. In the more narrow sense, my major concern is a certain trend of only allowing certain specific vendors to send in books to prisons. If these other organizations don't actually send books for free, then indigent prisoners are stuck."

news@seattleweekly.com

ProLibertad/Welfare Poets: CD for the PR Prisoners

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign
ProLibertad@hotmail.com and ProLibertad.Campaign@gmail.com
http://www.ProLibertadWeb.com
ProLibertad Hotline: 718-601-4751
_______________________________________________________________________________

A CALL TO ARTISTS! Calling all Boricua/Non-Boricua Artists for a Fund
Raising CD to aid our Puerto Rican Political Prisoners!!

The Welfare Poets and The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign have come
together to collaborate on a fund-raising project to directly aid the
current Puerto Rican Political Prisoners; incarcerated for fighting
for the independence and self-determination of Puerto Rico.
Additionally, we would also want to assist past political prisoners
who have been freed and are now attempting to survive in a system
where many channels are closed to them. It is also our intention to
create a general legal fund to assist present and even possibly
future political prisoners.

We are directing this posting to local bands and world renown Puerto
Rican artists who have the eye of the music world. Depending on how
many artists come forward and who actually submit songs, there is a
po-tential for us to get funds so distribution can be created on a
larger scale.


Regarding Song Submissions:
•We have begun accepting submissions.
•All submissions and questions about submissions can be sent to:
FreedomAlbum@gmail.com
•We want all artist of all genres to be apart of this potentially
monumental album for Freedom -- Bomba, Plena, Hip Hop, Reggaeton,
Salsa, Jibaro, Regggae, Punk, Rock or any other form of music
•Songs do not need to be directly about the political prisoners and
the struggle for Puerto Rico's Indpendence, although we definitely
won't discourage you to do so. For the most part, they should be
uplifting and somehow connected to our people, island, culture and
history.


Goal:
•We hope this album serves to raise the necessary funds as outlined
above, but also to unify the Puerto Rican community on many levels.
Unifying Puerto Rican artists from NYC, Chicago, California,
Philadelphia, New Jersey and all over the Puerto Rican Diaspora, with
each other and other artists from the island – all coming together
under the banner of supporting those who have sacrificed everything
for the

•We also hope to unify organizations in an attempt to move forward on
better grounds on behalf of the companeros.

•Not only will we be spreading the word about the Puerto Rican
Political Prisoners' existence and indi-vidual cases to a wide range
of individuals open their eyes for the first time or updating those
who are already in the know, but we will also be offering the people
a way to assist, all people who support the struggle for our
companeros release, Puerto Rican and beyond.


To Organizations:
•We call on other organizations to help put this album together.
There is so much to be done and time is most precious. Collectively,
our efforts can reach the necessary millions to make a significant
impact. These are our prisoners, they remain in jail and isolated due
to our collective inaction and we can rem-edy this. To endorse thie
effort, please email us at freedomalbum@gmail.com


For information:
•About the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners and the ProLibertad
Freedom Campaign, go to: www.ProLibertadweb.com or
myspace.com/freeourpolitcalprisoners; about the Welfare Poets, go to
www.welfarepoets.com

Log on to myspace.com/freeourpolitcalprisoners for future information
regarding the project and planning meetings



The fight for Puerto Rico's Independence go as far back as indigenous
resistance to Spanish occupation. For well over 600 years, countless
and nameless individuals have fought for our islands sovereignty.
Some have paid the ultimate price with their lives.

Others have been held captive, arrested against their will, by a
court which held no jurisdiction over their cases and tramples on
their international right to fight for the lib-eration of their
homeland, our homeland, Puerto Rico. The Puerto Rican people have
been able to free many of our political prisoners. We did so because
we created unity amongst ourselves and because we welcomed the
solidarity of all our allies. This Freedom Al-bum is another example
of our creativity in building solidarity and unity amongst ourselves.

This album will educate, agitate and help further build our movement
to free our compañer@s behind the walls.
_______________________________________________________________________________

Our Political Prisoners are:

Oscar Lopez Rivera was born in San Sebastian, Puerto Rico on January
6, 1943. At the age of 12, he moved to Chi-cago with his family. He
was a well-respected community activist and a prominent independence
leader for many years prior to his arrest. Oscar was one of the
founders of the Rafael Cancel Miranda High School, now known as the
Dr. Pedro Albizu Campos High School and the Juan Antonio Corretjer
Puerto Rican Cultural Center. He was a com-munity organizer for the
Northwest Community Organization (NCO), ASSPA, ASPIRA and the 1st
Congregational Church of Chicago. He helped to found FREE, (a
half-way house for convicted drug addicts) and ALAS (an educa-tional
program for Latino prisoners at Stateville Prison in Illinois).

He was active in various community struggles, mainly in the area of
health care, employment and police brutality. He also participated in
the development of the Committee to Free the Five Puerto Rican
Nationalists. In 1975, he was forced underground, along with other
comrades. He was captured on May 29, 1981, after 5 years of being
persecuted by the FBI as one of the most feared fugitives from US
"justice". Oscar, who has a daughter named Clarissa, is currently
serving a 55-year sentence for seditious conspiracy and other
charges. He was convicted of conspiracy to escape along with Jaime
Delgado, (a veteran independence leader), Dora Garcia, (a prominent
community activist) and Kojo Bomani-Sababu, a New Afrikan political
prisoner.

Oscar was one of 13 Puerto Rican political prisoners offered some
form of leniency by the Clinton Administration in the fall of 1999.
According to the Chicago Sun Times, he "declined the president's
offer, which still would have him left with 10 years to serve on
conspiracy to escape charges. Now he faces at least 20 more years in
prison. His sister, Zenaida Lopez, said he turned the offer down
because he would be on parole. 'Accepting what they are offering him
is like prison outside of prison,' she said. Zenaida Lopez said her
brother 'was in total agreement' with the decision of the 11 others
to take the conditional clemency." Oscar is presently in prison in
Terre Haute, Indiana and his release date is 7/27/2027.


Carlos Alberto Torres was born in Ponce, Puerto Rico on September 19,
1952. His parents moved to New York, finally settling in Chicago. He
studied in the University of Illinois in Carbondale and Chicago. He
studied sociology at Southern Illinois University and the University
of Illinois at Chicago. Carlos Alberto was involved in the struggles
to recruit more Latin@s to the University, against racism, and police
abuse. Carlos was one of the founders of the Rafael Cancel Miranda
Puerto Rican High School now known as the Dr. Pedro Albizu Campos
Puerto Rican High School and participated in the Committee to Free
the 5 Nationalists. In 1976, Carlos was forced to go underground and
was on the FBI's 10 most wanted list. He was captured along with
other comrades and sentenced to 78 years on charges of seditious
conspiracy, among other charges.

Although the Clinton Administration offered clemency to 12 Puerto
Rican political prisoners in the fall of 1999, no leniency was
granted to Carlos Torres, whom prosecutors described as a leader of
the Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional (FALN), an underground
organization which fought for Puerto Rico's independence in the 1970s
and '80s. His release date is 2024. He is currently in prison in
Oxford, Wisconsin.


Haydee Beltran Torres was born in Arecibo, Puerto Rico on June 7,
1955. When Haydee was 12 years old, her parents moved to Chicago. At
Tuley High School, she organized a boycott that demanded the firing
of a racist principal. Haydee attended the University of Illinois
where she was an outspoken defender of Latino students’ rights.
Haydee was forced underground in 1976 and was captured April 4, 1980.
She has been sentenced to life in prison on charges including
seditious conspiracy. Haydee was the first POW to receive a life
sentence. She was kept in total isolation from the other prisoners of
war and was transferred to a special control unit which limited
visits. It was a year before she was allowed to see her family.

At the MCC in Chicago, she was classified as “no visitors allowed”.
Haydee was subject to physical abuse in interrogations for refusing
to implicate her comrades in unfounded crimes. This was done several
times by FBI and other government agents. These and other inhumane
acts by the U.S. government have led to serious injuries which prison
medical directors have misdiagnosed; also, Haydee has received
injections of unknown medications.


Jose Perez Gonzalez was born in Ponce, Puerto Rico on January 14th,
1968; he is the son of a butcher and his mother is retired government
worker. He is married with three children. He is a member of
Mayaguezano por La Salud y el Ambiente. He is well known in his
neighborhood, of Barrio Segundo in Ponce. He is a family man with
three children. He was a civil disobedient and served three months in
jail for his support activities. Jose was the only member of the
Vieques 12 who went to trial. He was found guilty and was sentenced
to five years in jail. His release is 1/17/2008.

In Iraq, sex is traded for survival

By Afif Sarhan in Baghdad Al Jazeera

When Rana Jalil, 38, lost her husband in an explosion in Baghdad last year, she could never have imagined becoming a prostitute in order to feed her children.

A mother of four, Jalil sought out employment, but job opportunities for women had decreased since the US invasion.

She begged shop owners, office workers and companies to hire her but was treated with what she calls chauvinistic discrimination.

Within weeks of her husband's death, a doctor diagnosed her children with malnutrition.

Fighting tears, she recalled the desperation which led her to the oldest profession: "In the beginning these were the worst days in my life. My husband was the first man I met and slept with, but I didn't have another option … my children were starving."

She left the house in a daze, she recalled, and walked to the nearest market to find someone who would pay her for sex.

She said: "I'm a nice-looking woman and it wasn't difficult to find a client. When we got to the bed I tried to run away … I just couldn't do it, but he hit and raped me. When he paid me afterwards, it was finished for me.

"When I came home with some food I had bought from that money and saw my children screaming of happiness, I discovered that honor is insignificant compared to the hunger of my children."

Iraqi widows desperate

Prior to the US invasion, Iraqi widows, particularly those who lost husbands during the Iran-Iraq war, were provided with compensation and free education for their children. In some cases, they were provided with free homes.

However, no such safety nets currently exist and widows have few resources at their disposal.

According to the non-governmental organization Women's Freedom in Iraq (OWFI), 15 per cent of Iraqi women widowed by the war have been desperately searching for temporary marriages or prostitution, either for financial support or protection in the midst of sectarian war.

Nuha Salim, the spokesperson for OWFI, told Al Jazeera: "Widows are one of our priorities but their situation is worsening and we are feeling ineffective to cope with this significant problem. Hundreds of women are searching for an easy way to support their loved ones as employers refuse to hire them for fear of extremists' reprisals."

She said the NGO has documented the disappearance of some 4000 women, 20 per cent of whom are under 18, since the March 2003 invasion.

OWFI believes most of the missing women were kidnapped and sold into prostitution outside Iraq.

Although few reliable statistics are available on the total number of widows in Iraq, the ministry of women's affairs says that there are at least 350,000 in Baghdad alone, with more than eight million throughout the country.

Bitter trade

As Iraqi families continue to fall on hard times, some have been forced to make the most painful of decisions – selling their daughters.

Abu Ahmed, a handicapped father of five who is himself a widower, sold his daughter Lina to an Iraqi man who came to Iraq to "shop" for sex workers. Abu Ahmed said he could not afford to buy food for his other children.

He told Al Jazeera: "I'm sure that whatever she is, at least she is having food to eat. I have three other girls and a son and what they paid me for Lina is enough to raise the remaining ones."

Abu Ahmed had been initially approached by Shada, the alias of a woman living in Baghdad, who sought young women for Iraqi gangs running prostitution rackets in neighboring Arab countries.

She told Al Jazeera that her role was to convince young women from impoverished families that a better life awaited them beyond the country's borders.

She said: "Families don't want them and we are helping the girls to survive. We offer them food and housing and about $10 a day if they have had at least two clients."

"Our priority is virgin girls; they can be sold at very expensive prices to Arab millionaires."

Shada said she sleeps in a different house every few nights as armed groups have marked her for trial and assassination.

Escape from Jordan

OWFI's Salim says cases like Lina's have become very common as poverty is increasing in Iraq and desperate families sometimes sell their daughters for less than $500 to traffickers.

But increasingly, young Iraqi women arrive in neighboring capitals to find that prostitution carries a heavy and dangerous price.

Suha Muhammad, 17, was sold to an Iraqi gang by her mother, herself a prostitute, after her father was killed.

When she arrived in Jordan, she was gang-raped by four men who told her they were teaching her the tricks of the trade.

She told Al Jazeera she had been sold to a gang that caters to VIPs in Syria and was often shuttled to Amman, the Jordanian capital, for high-profile clients.

After six months, she escaped: "I ran away and an Iraqi family helped me by driving me to the immigration department where they helped me get a passport to return to Iraq.

"My aunt is now taking care of me in Baghdad. She never imagined that my mother could sell me, but unfortunately women in Iraq are not important and respected."

Traffic

Mayada Zuhair, a spokesperson for the Baghdad-based Women's Rights Association (WRA), said Iraqi and Arab NGOs are trying to monitor the trafficking of young women from the war-ravaged country to neighboring destinations.

She told Al Jazeera: "We are trying to find out the fate of many widows and teenager girls who were trafficked. Unfortunately it is not an easy process and without international support, funding, and resources, we fear more young Iraqi women will be taken abroad to work in the sex trade."

In the meantime, however, prostitution remains the only option for Nirmeen Lattif, a 27-year-old widow who lost her husband in an attack on Shia pilgrims south of Baghdad.

When she turned to her husband's relatives for financial support, they could not afford to help her.

She says she tries not to think of the gravity of what she does or the dishonor it carries in conservative Muslim society.

"I think of my children, only my children; without money we starve in the streets."

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/36B04283-E43F-4367-90BB-E6C60CB88F76.htm

Support the Eco-Prisoners (August 2007)

Spirit of Freedom
(August 2007)
Produced by
EARTH LIBERATION PRISONERS SUPPORT NETWORK

"The whole experience has been tough, but all the kind and
strengthening words and wise thoughts from strangers made it much
easier!”
(Former Swedish Animal Rights Prisoner)

Welcome to the August 2007 edition of Spirit of Freedom. Regular
readers of Spirit of Freedom will notice that this issue of the
newsletter is slightly different to previous issues. As long-term
ELP supporters will be aware, back in 2000, after the arrests &
remandings of a group of Irish anti-road protesters ELP launched its
e-mail “Urgent ELP!” service. Over the years this service has proven
very popular with most of our supporters now receiving their news via
e-mail with very few people receiving the newsletter in its paper
version. With that in mind, ELP has decided to end its paper version
of its newsletter. And because most of the “Court Reports & Legal
Updates” news contained in Spirit of Freedom has already been
circulated via e-mail we are dropping this from our newsletter and
from now on “Spirit of Freedom” will solely be a prisoner listing
publication. However, to remind everyone of all the prisoners we do
support we will be circulating the “Spirit of Freedom” prisoner
listing on a monthly basis, to give everyone a regular reminder of
all the prisoners we support. Whilst looking through the list, if
you notice an error, please contact ELP and we will correct it
immediately. In the meantime, remember, no matter where you are in
the world, support the eco-prisoners and no compromise in defence of
Mother Earth!


ECO-DEFENCE PRISONERS

Fadalla Idris Alajaimy (address unknown). Sudan anti-dam protester
on remand accused of Waging War against the State for protesting
against the construction of a dam.

Mohamed Ahmed Alajaimy (address unknown). Sudan anti-dam protester
on remand accused of Waging War against the State for protesting
against the construction of a dam.

Tre Arrow, CS# 05850722, Vancouver Island Regional Correction Center,
4216 Wilkinson Rd., Victoria, BC, V8Z 5B2, Canada. On remand accused
of involvement with an arson on logging trucks and an arson on
vehicles owned by a sand & gravel company. Both arsons occurred in
the USA. Tre is fighting his extradition to the USA.

Grant Barnes #1533241 22, Denver County Jail, PO Box 1108, Denver, CO
80201, USA. Serving 12 years for setting fire to a number of SUV
vehicles. On one of the vehicles the letters ELF was spray-painted.

Nathan Block, #36359-086, FCI Lompoc, Federal Correctional
Institution, 3600 Guard Road, Lompoc, CA 93436, USA. Serving 7
years & 8 months for an ELF arson against a Poplar Tree Farm and an
ELF arson against an SUV dealership. Also admitted his role in an
ELF/ALF conspiracy.

Marco Camenisch, Postfach 3143, CH-8105 Regensdorf, Switzerland.
Serving 18 years. 1) Ten years for using explosives to destroy
electricity pylons leading from nuclear power stations. 2) Eight
years for the murder of a Swiss Boarder Guard whilst on the run. In
‘02 Marco completed a 12-year sentence in Italy for destroying
electricity pylons in Italy.

Ibai Ederra, Carcel de Pamplona, C/San Roque. Apdo. 250, 31080 -
Iruñez – Pamplona, Navarra (España), Spain. Serving just under 5
years for sabotaging machinery at the controversial Itoiz dam
construction site.

Betty Krawczyk, Alouette Correctional Centre for Women, P.O. Box
1000, Maple Ridge, BC, V2X 3K4, Canada. Serving 10-months for
protesting against the development of the Winter Olympics site on
traditional Squamish territory

Jeffrey Luers, #13797671, OSP, 2605 State St. Salem, OR 97310, USA.
Serving 22 years & 8 months for arson on a SUV dealership & the
attempted arson of an oil truck.

Ali Mohamed Alhassen Massad (address unknown). Sudan anti-dam
protester on remand accused of Waging War against the State for
protesting against the construction of a dam.

Eric McDavid X-2972521 4E 231A, Sacramento County Main Jail, 651 "I"
Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA. On Remand accused of planning to
destroy the property of the U.S. Forestry Service, mobile phone masts
and power plants.

Daniel McGowan, #63794-053, MDC Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention
Center, PO Box 329002, Brooklyn, NY 11232, USA. Serving 7 years
for an ELF arson against a Poplar Tree Farm and an ELF arson against
a lumber company. Also admitted his role in an ELF/ALF conspiracy.

Jonathan Paul – See details in Animal Liberation Prisoners List.

Costantino Ragusa, Casa Circondariale, Via Prati Nuovi 7, 27058
Voghera (PV), Italy. Il Silvestre activist serving 2½ years. 1)
18-months for burgling and firebombing a multinational company. 2)
12-months for organising an anti-GM protest. Costanino is also
awaiting trial accused of using explosives to damage an electricity
pylon in protest at nuclear energy.

Joyanna Zacher, #0707300576, San Bernardino CDC, 630 E. Rialto Ave.,
San Bernardino, CA 92415, USA. Serving 7 years & 8 months for an ELF
arson against a Poplar Tree Farm and an ELF arson against an SUV
dealership. Also admitted her role in an ELF/ALF conspiracy.

ANIMAL LIBERATION PRISONERS

Jon Ablewhite TB4885, HMP Lowdham Grange, Lowdham, Nottingham, NG14
7DA, England. Serving 12 years for attempting to blackmail a farmer
who supplied guinea pigs for vivisection.

Gregg Avery TA7450, HMP Winchester, Romsey Road, Winchester SO22 5DF,
England. On remand accused of conspiracy to blackmail, in relation
to his involvement with the SHAC campaign.

Natasha Avery NR8987, HMP Bronzefield, Woodthorpe Road, Ashford,
Middx. TW15 3JZ, England. Jailed for breaching her parole conditions
imposed on her for telling a fox hunting murdering scum what she
thought of them. Also awaiting trial accused of conspiracy to
blackmail, in relation to her involvement with the SHAC campaign.

Nathan Block – See details in Eco Defence Prisoners List.

Jacob Conroy #93501-011, FCI Victorville Medium I Federal
Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 5300, Adelanto, CA 92301, USA.
Serving 48 months imprisonment for helping organise the SHAC-USA
campaign.

Donald Currie TN4593, HMP Whitemoor, Longhill Road, March, Cambs,
PE15 OPR, England. Serving an Indeterminate Sentence, of not less
than six actual years, for carrying out arsons against targets
associated the vivisection industry including HLS.

Darius Fullmer #26397-050, FCI Fort Dix Satellite Camp, P.O. Box
1000, Fort Dix, NJ 08640 USA. Serving 12 months for helping organise
the SHAC-USA campaign.

Lauren Gazzola #93497-011, FCI Danbury, Federal Correctional
Institution, Route #37Danbury, CT 06811, USA. Serving 54 months
imprisonment for helping organise the SHAC-USA campaign.

Sarah Gisborne, LT5393, HMP Cookham Wood, Rochester, Kent, ME1 3LU,
England. Serving 5½ years for conspiracy to cause criminal damage
following the damaging of 8 vehicles owned by people linked to
Huntingdon Life Science.

Joshua Harper #29429-086, FCI Sheridan Federal Correctional
Institution, P.O. Box 5000, Sheridan, OR 97378 USA. Serving 36
months imprisonment for helping organise the SHAC-USA campaign.

Joseph Harris TN5728, HMP Bullingdon, Patrick Haugh Road, Arncott,
Nr. Bicester, Oxon, OX25 1WD, England. Serving 2 years for damaging
the property of people associated with Huntingdon Life Sciences.

Kevin Kjonaas #93502-011, FCI Sandstone, PO Box 1000, Sandstone, MN
55072 USA. Serving 72 months imprisonment for helping organise the
SHAC-USA campaign.

Josephine Mayo PR6508, HMP Drake Hall, Eccleshall, Staffs, ST21 6LQ,
England. Serving 4 years for attempting to blackmail a farmer who
supplied guinea pigs for vivisection.

Daniel McGowan – See details in Eco Defence Prisoners List.

Heather Nicholson VM4859, HMP Bronzefield, Woodthorpe Road, Ashford,
Middx. TW15 3JZ, England. On remand accused of conspiracy to
blackmail, in relation to her involvement with the SHAC campaign.

Jonathan Paul, c/o Friends of Jonathan Paul, PMB 267, 2305 Ashland
St., Ste. C, Ashland, OR 97520, USA. Sentenced to 51 months for an
ALF arson on a horse meat plant. Also admitted his role in an
ELF/ALF conspiracy.

John Smith TB4887, HMP Lowdham Grange, Lowdham, Nottingham, NG14 7DA,
England. Serving 12 years for attempting to blackmail a farmer who
supplied guinea pigs for vivisection.

Andrew Stepanian #26399-050, FCI Butner Medium II Federal
Correctional Institution, PO Box 1500, Butner, NC 27509 USA. Serving
36 months for helping organise the SHAC-USA campaign.

Mark Taylor TT6636, HMP YOI Onley, Rugby, Warkwickshire, CV23 8AP,
England. Serving four years for organising loud demonstrations
outside the offices of companies with links to HLS.

Suzanne Taylor, TM7154, HMP Foston Hall, Foston, Derby, Derbyshire,
DE65 5DN, England. Serving two and a half years for helping organise
loud demonstrations outside the offices of companies with links to
HLS.

Kerry Whitburn TB4886, HMP Lowdham Grange, Lowdham, Nottingham, NG14
7DA, England. Serving 12 years for attempting to blackmail a farmer
who supplied guinea pigs for vivisection.

Joyanna Zacher – See details in Eco Defence Prisoners List.

PLOUGHSHARES PRISONERS

Helen Woodson, 03231-045, FMC Carswell - Admin. Max. Unit, POB 27137,
Ft. Worth, TX 76127, USA. Serving 8 years 10 months for actions
that focused on the interrelationship of war & the destruction of the
natural world. The actions included pouring red paint over the
security desk of a federal court and making threatening
communications. Previously Helen had served 20½ years for: 1) Using
a hammer to disarm a nuclear missile silo. 2) Burning $25,000 on the
floor of a bank whilst denouncing war, environmental destruction &
economic injustice. 3) Mailing warning letters with bullets attached
to Government & corporate officials.

OTHER ANTI-WAR PRISONERS

Brendan Walsh 12473-052, FCI/FSL Elkton, PO Box 10, Lisbon, OH 44432
USA. Serving 5 years for an arson on an army recruitment office in
protest at the War on Iraq.

THE LECCE FIVE
The Lecce Five have been charged with “subversive association”
accused of damaging Esso petrol pumps to oppose the War on Iraq;
sabotaging the cash machines of a bank which funds an immigration
centre; and targeting the multinational company Benetton in support
of Mapuche land rights activists in Chile. All of the defendants are
currently either under house arrest or released on bail.

ANTIFA PRISONERS

Lasandra Burwell W063658, Ohio Reformatory for Women, 1479 Collins
Ave. Marysville, OH 43040, USA. Serving 5 years for taking part in
an anti-fascist demonstration which turned into a riot.

Vahtang Devitlidze, ul. Libbedova 42, UO 68/2, otryad 14, brigada
142, g. Hagyshensk, Krasnodarskiy Kray, 352680 Russia. Serving 2½
years for stabbing a neo-nazi in the leg whilst defending himself
from attack.

Augustin Kraus, Vazebni veznice, PP-1, Litomerice, 41 201, Czech
Republic. Serving 14 months for his participation in attacks against
local neo-nazis. His charge was "bodily harm". He speaks Czech,
Slovak and Polish. You can also write him short postcards in English.

Christian Sümmermann, BNR: 727/07/7, JVA Tegel, Seidelstr. 39, 13507
Berlin, Germany. Serving 40 months for breaching the peace whilst
serving a suspended sentence issued for anti-fascist activities.

Tomasz Wiloszewski, Zaklad Karny, Orzechowa 5, 98-200 Sieradz,
Poland. Serving 15 years for accidentally killing a neo-nazi whilst
defending himself.

OTHER PRISONERS

Oscar Santa Maria Caro, CERESO, Miahuatlan de Porfirio Diaz, Oaxaca
en Hall B, Cell 5., Mexico. On remand. The exact charges against
Oscar are unknown but Oscar is a member of RATA, a known animal
rights group.

Sacramento Delfino Cano Hernandez, CERESO, Miahuatlan de Porfirio
Diaz, Oaxaca en Hall B, Cell 5., Mexico. On remand. Co-defendant of
Oscar Santa Maria Caro.

Olga Aleksandrovna Nevskaya, UU163/5, 7 Otryad, pos. Dzerzhinskiy,
Mozhaysk 140090 Moskovskaya oblast, Russia. Eco-activist serving 6
years for arson, criminal damage and causing explosions in protest at
the war in Chechnya. Due for release in 2009.

Fran Thompson, #1090915 HU 1C, WERDCC, PO Box 300, Vandalia, MO
63382, USA. Serving Life for killing, in self-defence, a stalker who
had broken into her home. Before her imprisonment Fran was an eco,
animal & anti-nuke campaigner.

MOVE
MOVE is an eco-revolutionary group who carried out protests in
defence of all life. There are currently eight MOVE activists in
prison each serving 100 years after been framed for the murder of a
cop in 1979. 9th defendant, Merle Africa, died in prison in 1998.

Debbie Simms Africa (006307), Janet Holloway Africa (006308) and
Janine Philips Africa (006309) all at: SCI Cambridge Springs, 451
Fullerton Ave, Cambridge Springs, PA 16403-1238, USA.

Michael Davis Africa (AM4973) and Charles Simms Africa (AM4975) both
at SCI Grateford, PO Box 244, Grateford, PA 19426-0244, USA.

Edward Goodman Africa (AM4974), 301 Morea Rd, Frackville, PA 17932, USA.
William Philips Africa (AM4984) and Delbert Orr Africa (AM4985) both
at SCI Dallas Drawer K, Dallas, PA 18612, USA.

Mumia Abu Jamal, (AM8335), SCI Greene, 175 Progress Drive, Waynesburg
PA 15370, USA. In 1981 Mumia, former Black Panther and vocal
supporter of MOVE, was framed for the murder of a cop. He was
originally sentenced to death but is currently awaiting re-sentencing
following a court hearing in 2001.

STATEMENT ON VIOLENCE
Some people listed in this newsletter have carried out violent
actions. ‘Spirit of Freedom’ does not condone violence. But we are
also against censorship & believe people can decide for themselves
who they wish to support.

ABOUT E.L.P. SUPPORT NETWORK
ELP is an international eco-prisoner support network founded, in
Britain, in 1993 to support jailed eco-activists. We support the
prisoners by producing various regular prisoner lists:

Spirit of Freedom is ELP’s international monthly prisoner listing
which is circulated by e-mail.

Urgent ELP! Bulletin is an e-mail service that distributes the names
of any new eco-prisoner as soon as ELP gets their details. For more
info e-mail ELP4321@hotmail.com

On-Line Newsletters – ELP has a number of websites that provide news,
prisoner lists and additional info about ELP & the prisoners.

English language ELP Website
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

North American ELP Website
www.ecoprisoners.org

Turkish language ELP Website
www.geocities.com/yesilanarsi/elp.htm

ELP Extra is an e-mail group that circulates the details of political
prisoners, ELP learns about, who do not fall within the remit for
support by ELP. To subscribe to the list e-mail ELP4321@Hotmail.com

Belgium ELP.SN is our Belgium contact. For more info e-mail
elp_bel@hotmail.com

German ELP.SN is a prisoner led initiative run by eco-prisoner Marco
Camenisch. For more info contact Marco Camenisch, Postfach 3143,
CH-8105 Regensdorf, Switzerland.

North American ELP is our North American contact. For more
information e-mail naelpsn@mutualaid.org

Turkey ELP.SN is our Turkish contact. For more info e-mail
yesilanarsi@yahoo.com

North American ELP Prisoner Fund. The North American ELP group has
set up a fund where people can pay money, for North American
Eco-Defence and Animal Rights prisoners, which will then be
distributed to the North American prisoners. For information about
the Fund and how to make a donation please contact
naelpsn@mutualaid.org

DEDICATION
This Edition of Spirit of Freedom is dedicated to Bill ‘Avalon’
Rodgers, the American ‘Oregon Defendant’ who ended his own life in
December 2005 whilst on Remand.

Vicious Police Attack on IWW Solidarity March in Providence, Rhode Island

Submitted by intexile iww.org on Wed, 08/15/2007 - 3:04pm.

On Saturday, August 11, 2007, the Providence wobblies organized a march on Jackie's Galaxy, which is a restaurant chain that is being supplied by HWH in New York City, a supplier who is notorious for its slave labor conditions of up to 110 hours per week without basic labor rights (minimum wage and overtime).

Roughly 30-40 wobblies and supporters (including Providence and Boston SDSers) were marching towards Jackie's Galaxy in North Providence when the police began following them en mass. They told the marches to move to the sidewalk, while this was initially ignored, the marchers listened to the police and began slowly moving to the sidewalk.

The police then surrounded the marchers in their squad cars and began getting out. With the police in full force, they began attacking the marchers, one fellow worker, Alex Svoboda, was pinned down by the police during her arrest and suffered a broken and dislocated leg and ruptured blood vessel in the knee. These injuries will require at least two surgeries and extensive rehab and even then may not completely repair the damage. Jason, another wob, was arrested during the police' attack. Ashley, a supporter from Boston, was also severely maced during the attack, suffered chemical burns and required medical treatment.

Despite this, the marchers continued on to Jackie's Galaxy and eventually spoke with the owner who at first promised he had switched suppliers and now denies doing business with HWH although he has no documentation to prove either claim. Business at Jackie's Galaxy ceased completely during the duration of the action and most bystanders were outraged that Jackie's would support the crimes of HWH/Dragonland.

The Providence wobblies and other supporters of workers' rights will continue their pressure on Jackies Galaxy until they stop doing business with the slave labor shop HWH/Dragonland or until basic rights, including the right to organize, are instated at HWH/Dragonland.

In the meantime they need your support! Alex Svoboda is charged with 3 felony counts of assaulting a police officer as well as two misdemeanors and will be unable to work for a significant period time as a result of her injuries. Money will be needed to provide Alex and Jason with legal support and also to help with the medical bills and loss of income Alex will suffer as a result of the brutality of the North Providence Police. Please send in any donation that you, or your organization can afford to the Providence General Membership Branch (address below) or contact Mark Bray at 201-669-0714 or Billy Randel at 646-645-6284.

You can also do your part at pressuring the Mayor and Police Chief of North Providence (contact info below) to at the very least, formally apologizing to the marchers, dropping all baseless charges and paying for the injuries and lose of income that were unjustly caused.

Photos of the action and the brutal assault can be found here:

Saturday, August 11, 2007

Independence Movement Demands FBI leave Puerto Rico

NYC Indymedia
Por Francisco Quiñones/El Nuevo Dia, 10 de Agosto 2007

The widow of the late machetero leader Filiberto Ojeda Rios
reappeared today to demand that the FBI leave Puerto Rico.

The expressions of Elma Beatriz Rosado Barbosa, who accompanied Ojeda
Rios for more than a decade in clandestinity, were part of a press
conference called by the independence supporting organization La
Nueva Escuela, during which they denounced that they are target of
alleged harassment on the part of federal authorities.

"The FBI will not take a step backwards. Every time the FBI dares to
make a move to touch, or even to look at a fellow independence
supporter, we need to all be willing, we all need to be there
available to defend that person 'tooth and nail.'

"[The people] should prevent, whichever way they can, the FBI from
conducting searches and raids against our independence comrades, or
from conducting attempts against their person. They assassinated
Filiberto, the FBI assassinated him, the US Government assassinated
him. They will not touch any other Puerto Rican comrade, no matter
what the cost. They will leave here", stated Rosado Barbosa during
the press conference during which La Nueva Escuela denounced an
illegal search/seizure by federal agents against biologist Roberto
Viqeira Rios last Tuesday.


According to Martin Gonzalez, Viqueira Rios' lawyer, on Tuesday
morning, his client was stopped by the Police of Puerto Rico, after
which a contigent of federal agents took him out of his car,
handcuffed him, and searched his car without showing him a search
warrant. After this act, the agents seized and kept his cell phone
and his work planner and left him there.

This is not the first incident Viqueira Rios has experienced with FBI
agents. The independence supporter indicated that on one occasion
the federal agents visited his job, demanded information about him,
and interrogated several of his co-workers. Viqueira also noted that
he has noticed several occasions where agents are prowling around
the area where he lives.

Michael Gonzalez, a leader of that independence group, assures that
Viqueira is not the only member of La Nueva Escuela who has been
subject to unwarranted searches by federal agents and advised that in
due time, they will take the necessary actions against federal
authorities. These actions may include the filing of formal
complaints against agents, civil litigation in federal court, and
even civil disobedience.

Aside from Ojeda Rios' widow, there were other people present who
joined the demands of the independence organization, such as former
political prisoners Rafael Cancel Miranda, Luis Rosa, and the well
known independence leader Norberto Cintron Fiallo, whose residence
was searched and raided by the FBI a few months after the operation
that resulted in the death of the alleged leader of the Boricua
Popular Army.

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

SF8 Hearing and Update

Please support Richard Brown and the SF 8 by attending Wednesday’s 
bail reduction hearings starting at 9 am, 850 Bryant St, SF in
Department 23 (on the third floor). The hearing will likely adjourn
at about noon and will then resume at 2pm.

Update for Tuesday, August 7th

Only 2 brothers in court again!

Court opened with all defense lawyers arguing that all defendants be
present for all legal proceedings. The Attorney General argued that
there was no legal requirement given that bail motions were not about
legal evidence, rather are about individuals addressing individual
bail issues. Judge Moscone ruled that because of a “lack of
furniture” to accommodate all eight defendants and because he
basically agreed that there were no mutual issues and that counsel
representing the absent defendants were present, that only Ray
Boudreaux and Richard O’Neal would attend today’s (and Monday’s) bail
hearings.
Strenuous objections were made by the defense attorneys.

James Bustamante, Richard O’Neal’s attorney presented arguments in
favor of a reasonable and attainable bail. He, like Michael Burt,
Ray’s attorney, argued that the only evidence linking Richard to the
case were statements made by Ruben Scott whose testimony was proven
to be perjurious by 2 courts in the past, who recanted cooperative
testimony by explaining that he was tortured in New Orleans in 1973
along with other Black activists, and who was given complete immunity
by a 2004 grand jury in San Francisco for any role he might have
played in 1971 connecting him to the death of a SF Police Officer at
the Ingleside Station – this in exchange for further cooperative
statements.

This key government witness and other matters in evidence are
consistently being challenged – and this is why other attorneys want
the brothers to be in court.

Extensive statements were submitted regarding Richard O’Neal’s ties
to work, community and family. Many members of his family and friends
were present. Testimony was given by a long-time friend, Fannie
Sanders, who has known Richard since childhood. Despite being
challenged by the Attorney General, Fannie was eloquent and
unflappable in her attesting to Richard O’Neal’s important role in
the community and to his family.

Similar testimony had been heard last month and this week for Ray
Boudreaux. Today’s hearing included the State prosecutor’s argument
to increase bail for Ray from $3 million to $5 million.

The crux of the State’s arguments and case about bail rests on:
statements made by and hearsay attributed to Ruben Scott by police
investigators
the creating of a perception of their danger to the community if
released which remains unsubstantiated
government statements about DNA – reports have never materialized
from recent samples that tie any of the brothers to any forensic
evidence – the state has never produced any test results (from tests
done over a year ago), creating the impression that the results are
exculpatory

Arguments made by the State Attorney General claim that the main
activities of the eight men was to be part of a “gang” that conspired
to attack police officers and that the nature of the government’s
allegations were sufficient to deny attainable bail. No arguments
were made to support claims that Ray Boudreaux or Richard O’Neal
would be flights risks, no substantial arguments were made to support
innuendo that they are a danger to the community today.

The most egregious argument of the prosecutor likened this case to
the recent old-case prosecutions of crimes against Black communities
and civil rights leaders in the South. Prosecutor Dave Druliner
stated that they (the prosecutors) were just like the guys
prosecuting these civil rights cases. But Ray Boudreaux’s attorney,
Michael Burt, sharply rebutted such claims by clearly contradicting
these claims explaining that the difference in these Southern cases
was that these prosecutions were prevented by institutional racism –
by prosecutors’ refusal to pursue white supremacists who targeted
Blacks. “Institutional racism didn’t prevent this (the SF 8)
prosecution for 35 years…what has changed is not the evidence but the
will to proceed,” said Burt. The FBI has been “dogging all these
men with hundreds of agents, pursuing this conspiracy in the hopes
that somebody would turn, and they haven’t.” (and not to speak of
COINTELPRO's targeting of the Black liberation movement and its
activists)

Michael Burt concluded that the case raises issues of unjustified
delays because the State prosecutors have proffered no new evidence,
and are relying mainly on statements by and attributed to Ruben Scott
who is not only a victim of torture himself, but has offered
contradictory and false statements for years to prosecutors and now
serves their purposes once more.

Judge Moscone has yet to make any decisions regarding bail, and
arguments resume Wednesday for bail reduction for Richard Brown.

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

Prisoner Updates!

contents . . .

--Happy Birthday, Freedom Fighers!
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8TH--Andy Stepanian
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8TH--Dr. Mutulu Shakur

--Daniel McGowan still in MDC Brooklyn and still in need of letters.

--William "Lefty" Gilday has health problems and needs letters.

--Stop the Execution of Kenneth Foster!


————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Happy Birthday, Andy! (August 8th!)

Wish Andy a happy birthday by supporting him and his friend Malik! Please
help fulfill their wishlists! And send Andy a birthday letter today! Write
Malik too!

Malik's wishlist can be found by pasting this link into your web
browser:

Malik Lamarr #04099-084
FCI Butner Medium II
Federal Correctional Institution
PO Box 1500
Butner, NC 27509
USA


Andy's wishlist can be found by pasting this link into your web browser:

Andy Stepanian #26399-050
FCI Butner Medium II
Federal Correctional Institution
PO Box 1500
Butner, NC 27509
USA
—————————————————————————————————————————————————

Happy Birthday to Dr. Mutulu Shakur! (August 8th!)

You can write to Mutulu at:

Dr. Mutulu Shakur #83205-012
USP FLORENCE ADMAX
U.S. PENITENTIARY, PO BOX 8500
FLORENCE, CO 81226

Dear Dr. Mutulu Shakur Supporter,

Dr. Shakur's "A 2Pac Tribute: Dare 2 Struggle" charitable CD can now be
ordered at:


Please continue mailing or faxing the "Free Mutulu" flyer to media in your
area and handing out to stores:


And please continue posting Dr. Shakur's "Video Mixtape" in web site
forums or forwarding to your friends:




Dr. Shakur's case and projects haven't raised significant donations or
received attention in any mainstream or hip-hop print, TV or radio media
in almost ten years - but thanks to your continued help we will make it
happen!

Stiff Resistance,

MutuluShakur.com
DareToStruggle.org


——————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Hi all,

Well, it's August and Daniel is still in Brooklyn. He may be there for
another 2 weeks or so as he (literally) may have 'missed the bus' last
month. Who knows for sure.

In any case, he loves getting your letters and can't wait til he settles
into his long term facility and can write everyone back!

Until then...

DANIEL McGOWAN
#63794-053
MDC BROOKLYN
METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER
P.O. BOX 329002
BROOKLYN, NY 11232

Guidelines can be found at supportdaniel.org

Thanks for your support,
Family & Friends of Daniel McGowan

————————————————————————————————————————————

Political Prisoner has health problems.

William "Lefty" Gilday, who has been incarcerated since 1970, is having
severe heart problems. He has had problems in the past with his "ticker"
and now the problems have escalated. Lefty needs money and most of all
support, he is getting old in prison and this has had a profound effect on
him. Very few people even know of Lefty's existence as a Political
Prisoner and he doesn't get much mail. In a recent letter from Big Left,
he expressed his that his heart is really acting up and he needs help,
REAL HELP!
Please pick up a pen and write Lefty.

WILLIAM GILDAY
# W33537
P.O. Box 1218
Shirley, MA 01464-1218
MCI Shirley

William "Lefty" Gilday is a 60's radical sentenced to death for his
involvement in bank expropriation while attempting to finance the anti-war
movement during the Vietnam war. Gilday is a former minor league baseball
player from Amesbury, Massachusetts, who, while in his early to
mid-thirties, was arrested and imprisoned on robbery charges.

For more info check out:
————————————————————————————————————————————————————

STOP THE EXECUTION OF KENNETH FOSTER!

The Campaign to End the Death Penalty is calling for activists to support
Kenneth Foster, on death row in Texas and scheduled to be executed Aug.
30, 2007. Texas sentenced Kenneth to death, under Texas’ twisted “Law of
Parties,” where being a “party” to a murder is punishable by death. No
other state has this hugely unjust law (see attached fact sheet). In
prison, Kenneth has become a leader in the DRIVE movement, engaging in
non-violent activism to improve conditions in the notorious Polunsky Unit.

All eyes must be on Texas to let them know that they cannot get away with
such blatant disregard for human life and dignity. Contact the governor’s
office:

Tel.: (512) 463-1782
Fax: (512) 463-1849

To email: send message from the website:

Sign the online petition at

Go to www.freekenneth.com to get involved with the struggle.

A Call to Action from the Welfare Poets: Kenneth Haramia Foster is set to
be executed on August 30th, 2007 for driving a car!!!!

Kenneth Haramia Foster is one of four brothers who first contacted The
Welfare Poets in 2004 and asked for assistance with their individual cases
and with abolishing the death penalty in general. The three other brothers
are Tony Eguna Ford, Randy Arroyo (whose death sentence was commuted to
life) and the late Hasan Shakur.

Kenneth Haraminia Foster is our brother/comrade in the most revolutionary
sense of the word. He is an artist, writer, thinker and organizer behind
the walls who has fought to change conditions not only for himself but for
everyone else who yearns for true justice. His initial contact to the
Welfare Poets (along with the three other brothers) led to the creation of
our Hip-Hop Compilation/fund-raiser CD against the death penalty "Cruel
and Unusual Punishment,” officially released Feb. 1st 2007.

Beyond corresponding by mail and discussing everything from politics to
music, we have made the trip to Texas and actually met with the brother in
person a few times, speaking for hours. He is a soldier for the people,
and it is exactly for this reason they are trying to kill him so swiftly
and unjustly. But soldiers do not go quietly.

This execution date is a planned political assassination. Kenneth Haramia
Foster is one of our most endangered political prisoners -- they are
trying to execute his actions and ideas.

Do all you must to learn about the man and his situation! Go to
www.freekenneth.com. Learn about the DRIVE Movement. Learn

also about Texas’s heinous "Law of Parties" -- it is beyond ridiculous.
(Check our blog on the Law of Parties at myspace.com/thewelfarepoets).
Sign both petitions to stop this execution and to tend the Law of Parties
and then get on the move with regards to this planned lynching.

Functions and actions are being planned in NYC, Texas and in other places
around the country and world. We must force them to five attention to a
freedom fighter who is guilty of killing no one.

By Lee W nyc@nodeathpenalty.org http://www.nodeathpenalty.org

FREE THE CUBAN FIVE MONTH" SEPT. 12TH-OCT. 12TH

ENDORSE AND ORGANIZE FOR THE "FREE THE CUBAN FIVE MONTH" SEPT. 12TH-OCT. 12TH

Initial Endorsers: The New York Free the Five Committee, The
International Action Center, The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign, and
Frente Socialista-Comite de Nueva York.

"Ours may be one of the most ridiculous accusations of espionage in
the history of this country"

-Gerardo Hernandez Nordelo, The Cuban 5

This September 12th, 2007 will mark the 9 th year anniversary of the
arrest of the Cuban 5; five US held Cuban political prisoners
incarcerated for protecting Cuba from U.S. sponsored terrorist
actions.

Last year, President Ricardo Alarcon, of the Cuban Parliament,
declared Sept. 12th through October 6th to be a period of time to
raise awareness on the case of the Cuban 5. The Popular Education
Project to Free the Cuban 5 took this proclamation as a call to
action. By publishing this call through various list serves and
community mediums, we were able to motivate organizations,
individuals, teachers, clergy and students to organize a series of
events throughout the U.S., Latin America and the Caribbean.

The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5 is committed to
building an international movement for the Cuban 5 by making Sept.
12th-October 12th "Free the Cuban 5 Month." We have extended the
period of time in commemoration of the 40th anniversary of Ernest
"Che" Guevara's assassination by the Bolivian army, under the
direction of the CIA.

We are asking organizations in New York City to endorse "Free the
Cuban 5 Month" and to organize an event dedicated to the Cuban 5
within your community or for your constituency. Our goal is to
organize a calendar of events throughout New York City and
internationally that can be circulated through colleges, communities,
unions, and churches. Our goal is to educate, organize and mobilize
as many people as possible to support the work to free the Cuban 5.

In order to endorse, email the Project at:
freethecubanfive@hotmail.com and let us know which date within the
month you will organize your event.

The Project will be organizing a special "Free the Cuban 5 Month"
Kickoff event on Wednesday September 12 th, 2007 at 7pm tentatively
scheduled at St. Mary's Church in Harlem. It will be a
forum/reception with a small panel of invited speakers and a
delicious Latino dinner. All proceeds from the reception/forum will
go the Cuban 5's commissary funds.

Join us in building the worldwide movement to free the Cuban 5. Cuba
is calling for our support and solidarity; we cannot stand by and let
this period of time go by without action, education and fund-raising.

Email us with your endorsement and your activity as soon as you possible.


FREE THE CUBAN 5!!
Benjamin Ramos,
Frank Velgara,
The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Judge reduces arson sentence

By Bill Bishop
Published: Saturday, August 4, 2007

More than any legal argument, the human element motivated a federal judge on Friday to cut five months off of the prison term of Kendall Tankersley, one of 10 defendants convicted in Eugene for conspiring to use arson to promote their environmental views.

Tankersley, 30, was sentenced in late May to three years and 10 months in prison for conspiracy, arson and attempted arson for a fire that destroyed the U.S. Forest Industries office in Medford in late 1998.

She asked for reconsideration, claiming the judge improperly increased her sentence and treated her more harshly than others with similar involvement.

However, U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken rejected the legal arguments. Instead, in reducing the sentence, Aiken cited Tankersley's extraordinary effort to turn away from criminal activism after she left the conspiracy after a relatively short involvement.

The decision nearly wraps up the largest ever investigation of arson and sabotage by environmental extremists, an investigation dubbed Operation Backfire by the local, state and federal agencies who conducted it over a nine-year period.

"If this case proves anything, it is that the FBI and its partners on the Joint Terrorism Task Force and in other law enforcement agencies are absolutely committed to defeating terrorism in this country," Acting Special Agent in Charge Daniel Nielsen said Friday. "We will not let those who inspire fear and commit criminal acts with the intent of changing the policies of our government or her people succeed. Whether a case takes one day or ten years, we will pursue it."

The case generated concern among civil liberties groups who criticized prosecutors for using the federal terrorism statute to label defendants as "terrorists" when their targets were government properties or their communiques defied government policies.

The terrorism law provides a significant increase in prison time when certain crimes are committed to influence government policies. However, Aiken decided early in the sentencing process to use her judicial power to increase sentences to the same extent when a defendant's crime involved only private property.

She reasoned that the conspirators attacked private properties to instill fear in individuals and businesses as an indirect assault on government forest or wildlife management policies related to the private targets.

In every case, Aiken then reduced potentially long terms to honor plea bargains. Then, again using her power, she further reduced all but one sentence by one or two steps in the federal sentencing guidelines process.

Tankersley's lawyer, Lee Foreman of Denver, argued the sentence increase was improper because Tankersley's target was private property. He also argued that other defendants who, like Tankersley, cooperated with investigators got larger sentence cuts.

Tankersley, who was on the verge of entering medical school when she was arrested in 2005, led an exemplary life after leaving the conspiracy in 1999, according to evidence in the case. Aiken noted Tankersley already has begun to pay more than $900,000 in restitution for the fire.

Aiken said Tankersley exemplifies the personal and societal loss that results when intelligent people make poor choices that derail their lives and damage communities.

"None of us will ever truly understand what swept everyone into thinking this was the way to go," Aiken said in court. "You have a lot to make up. I believe you and a number of defendants I have sentenced in this case will do that."

The joint investigation involved the FBI; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Oregon Department of Justice; Eugene Police; Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Forest Service; Oregon State Police and Lane County Sheriff's Office.

Three more cases are filed in Washington state. Four defendants are fugitives. A key figure who cooperated in the probe, Jacob Jeremiah Ferguson, remains to be sentenced.

The Feds' War on the Animal Rights Movement

The Casualties of Green Scare

www.counterpunch.org
August 3, 2007

By KELLY OVERTON
Late last year President Bush signed the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA) into law days after six young Americans began serving federal prison sentences on charges they caused economic damage to Huntington Animal Sciences, an animal-testing corporation. Sadly, jailing activists is the American way.
The imprisonment of the group, known as SHAC 7, is nothing more than history repeating itself. Those who first called for an end to slavery were imprisoned. Those who believed women should vote went to jail. Civil rights activists, supporters of gay and lesbian rights, and now animal rights activists have all been jailed. The only thing sadder than the imprisonment of animal rights activists is that they are fighting for a losing cause; for we now live in a society that slaps the wrist of a person who harms the neighbor’s dog yet subsidizes the systematic annual killing of billions of other animals for food, clothing, research and sport.

The recent allegations of both illegal wire-tapping and politically motivated firings of U.S. Attorneys by the Bush administration should set off an alarm regarding the legality of the green scare; the administration’s monitoring and imprisonment of environmental and animal welfare activists. – and AETA isn’t the only new tool corporations have to eliminate pesky activism.
The NYSE’s recent decision to trade Life Sciences Research (an animal testing corporation) on the ARCA exchange—an electronic platform that provides market makers anonymity—signals that financial markets have also joined the war against social activism. With help from the Bush administration and the NYSE, we may be nearing a day when all of our country’s flora, fauna, and public land will exist as little more than raw materials for corporate profit.

The reason nonhuman animals lack protection is simply due to the economic repercussions that would accompany such protection(s). Compassionately caring for animals is expensive and by demanding corporations treat food and research animals humanely activists are asking nothing less than a fundamental reworking of the world economy.
Sadly, any further success activists achieve at home will only expedite sending corporations that mistreat animals offshore where animal welfare regulations and activism can be made non-factors.

We no longer live in a society, we live in an economy where right and wrong is determined not by fairness, but by profitability – and where the law no longer dictates corporate behavior, but corporate behavior dictates the law.
AETA, Three Strike Laws and toothless environmental regulations protect profits – not people (or animals). A society would care if animal protection activists (including the SHAC 7) were right about corporate mistreatment of animals – but in an economy only the financial cost of activism matters.

The truth is that nonhuman animals don’t need rights or legal standing Such rights have done little to improve the lives of the majority of the world’s people. For it is not just nonhuman animals that are losing their habitats and their ability to live with dignity - the majority of the planet’s humans now live truly desperate lives.
Today it is not legal, but economic standing that protects a life - and it is not a lack of rights (human, civil or animal) but a lack of empathy that is the problem; a problem that promises lives of misery and despair for an overwhelming majority of the earth’s creatures. Instead of fighting to establish rights for animals, maybe activists should work to instill compassion in humans.
As a society we need to imagine others’ horrors as our own. What if the sex worker was our child? The homeless woman our mother? The research dog our family pet? The unjustly imprisoned activist our child?
Only when we decide the pain and humiliation of others is not worth economic gain will the need for rights, human and animal, disappear.
Kelly Overton is Executive Director of People Protecting Animals & Their Habitats

Friday, August 03, 2007

ProLibertad/MOVE 9

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign
http://www.ProLibertadWeb.com
ProLibertad@hotmail.com/ProLibertad.Campaign@gmail.com
ProLibertad Hotline: 718-601-4751
_______________________________________________________________________________

Join NYC Jericho, ProLibertad, Latin@s por Mumia and Friends and take our
Freedom Van to Philly on August 11th to demand parole for the MOVE 9.

Van will be leaving from in front of 1199 SEIU (43rd Street between 8th
and 9th Aves.) at 10 a.m. sharp! Only $20 roundtrip (including Philly car
caravan!). Call 718-601-4751 or email: frankvelgara@hotmail.com or
mateare@att.net to reserve your tickets now!

NO EXCUSES!
NOW IS THE TIME TO PAROLE THE MOVE 9!

Saturday, August 11, 2007

45th & Kingsessing Ave. at Noon

The MOVE 9 complete their minimum sentence of 30 years in Aug. of 2008 and
become eligible for parole. They will be interviewed by the parole board
in a few months. We intend to do everything possible to insure that they
are in fact paroled, so this Aug. 11th we are doing a car caravan through
Philadelphia neighborhoods.

We want to inform people of the current status of The MOVE 9 and gather
support to pressure the parole board to release innocent MOVE people. We
want as many cars and people as possible. If you want to participate but
don't have a car, contact us at 215-387-4107 and we will try to get you
into one of the participating cars.

We will assemble at 45th & Kingsessing Ave. at 12:00 pm. Join us for a day
in the community and working for the release of The MOVE 9. This year's
activity is more important than ever because of the upcoming parole
hearings.

This is not simply a commemoration of the Aug. 8, 1978 police attack on
MOVE, but it is the launching of our campaign for the parole of innocent
MOVE people. Join us in the fight for freedom!

ONA MOVE—Ramona Africa

Letter from Andy Stepanian and Malik Lamarr

author: Support Andy!

Letter from Andy Stepanian and Malik Lamarr as Andy's Birthday
approaches (August 8th!). Please help fulfill their wishlists!
Malik's wishlist can be found at http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/
wishlist/17RX31S9HAETM/

Andy's wishlist is at http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/
1H7ARVHMZ78KG/

————————————————————————————————————————————

Dear Friends,

Here in prison, every day is filled with its ups and down, some more
up than the day previous, some so down that you wonder if you can
possibly tolerate another... I can think of days where I saw a
magnificent sunset and felt my slate washed clean, feeling that
despite my current living arrangement I am alive and part of
something beautiful. I get that feeling when I think of our movement
and its momentum, how despite their efforts to squash the momentum,
HLS has encumbered $100 million dollars of new debt, I get that
feeling when I receive a letter at mail call, read a moving piece of
literature, or see my partner's smiling face as I walk in to the
jail's visiting room. Her smiling face always heals me, and lifts me
up out of the murk of my current situation.

Every day is full of these moments, and I have made it sort of a
routine to not let myself drown in this murk, but to keep an eye open
for these moments often in plain sight and always be thankful for
them. A good friend of mine from Austin used to walk around eyes
always scanning between those she was walking with and the grass
below her feet, she'd literatly pause kneel down and hand us four
leafed clovers. I think I have only found one in my life as a little
kid and it was a really big deal, she however hands them out like
business cards. When I asked her how she does it she relied with "you
just got to look". I thought to myself...

"The political education and empowerment of the masses is now
recognized as a historical necessity. Progressive, organized
guidance, inspired by effective leadership place in the hands of the
masses is key! It's key to reconstruct a social reality that is
better suited to provide for and preserve our political, social,
educational, and environmental needs. An informed masses equals
effective leadership from those masses. Without either of these all
that is producaed is a carnival and circus of emotional outbursts and
powerful yet impotent speeches. The deconstruction of our liberties
and environment may be caused by a few, but the reclaiming and
rebuilding is the responsibility of us all."

When I heard this in the prison law library my ears perked up, and I
discovered my first four leafed clover on the compound, this time
without the help of Ms. Austin. Malik was a brother who expressed
concern for the lack of social consciousness on the compound, and a
growing trend of self appointed apathy amidst not only prisoners but
everyone. This would be the first time I got to talk to brother Malik
and I realized that day that meeting him could very well have been
one of those moments that turn a bad day good. In the days and months
that followed I thought to myself . "I'm glad I was looking."

I firmly believe that all prisonsers are "Political Prisoners,"
because it is policy that shapes and governs our prisons, decided who
goes to them and under what pretext, drafts the predicate laws to
supply a prison with population, and it's policy like the 13th
amendment to our constitution that determines that slavery is illegal
except within these walls. Although I could rant for miles on the
prison industrial complex, and produce a politically charged run-on
sentence big enough to fill the yellow pages volumes 1-8, I stick
with saying all prisoners are political and hence we should view them
as such. Now, even though all prisoners are "political" prisoners,
not every prisoner is a "conscious" prisoner. Brother Malik is indeed
just that; conscious. Moreover, brother Malik is one of those
diamonds in the rough, breaths of fresh air, flowers tha crack
through dark seas of pavement.

It seems like folks have been joking around here about my upcoming
birthday, August 8th. The say things like, "hey veggie boy whacha
want for your birthday?" or "we were gonna make you one of our cheese
cakes but we couldn't figure out how to make it our of dirt." I
laugh along patiently, but it seems like a lot of the folks who
write me ask me what they can send me for my birthday. I thought to
myself and turned up nothing, until I saw brother Malik flipping
through the pakes of the AK press cataloque. I thought one thing
that prison has taken away from me has been my ability to give and
share with the people that I care about. I thought we could share
some consciousness, so I'm awsking all of my supporter to please try
to fulfill this book with list for brother Malik and I. We are
asking that you send Malik's wish list to Malik's address at the
prison, and mine to my own. We do so because there are limits
imposed by the prison on how many books we can receive at once. We
also emphasize that hey be sent from a major publisher/distributor
like Amazon.com or BarnesandNobel.com and not from one of the
smaller publilshers we all know and love. So this year's birthday I
am going to politely decline all of your offers for
"file-in-vegan-chocolate-cake" and instead ask for what I would like
to have back most next to my freedom, my ability to share with the
people I car about.

This is Malik's book wish list. Please fulfill his list first and
then mine. The books can be mailed to Malik's address below. Form the
bottom of our hearts Malik and I think you!

[http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/17RX31S9HAETM/]

Malik Lamarr #04099-084
FCI Butner Medium II
Federal Correctional Institution
PO Box 1500
Butner, NC 27509
USA


Healing the Errors of Living by Ra Un Nefer Amen, isbn#1877662-11-9
I write what I like by Stephen Biko
The Wisdom of Mao by Mao tse-Tung
African Psychology: Towards it's Reclamations,Reascension and
Revitalization by Wade Nobles
Steve Biko: Black Consciousness in South Africa by Stephen Biko
Stokely Speaks by Stokely Carmichael
Blueprint for Blackpower: A moral, political & economic Imperitive
for the 21st Century by Amos Wilson
Beyond Black and White: Rethinking Race in America by M. Marable
How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black America by M. Marable
The Complete Idiots Guide to Grammar & Style, isbn#1592571158
Tree of Life Meditation Systemu by Ra Un Nefer Amen, isbn#18877662-07-0
This is my book wishlist. Most of it is for my own personal research,
although Foier and the Godzilla stuff is pure entertainment. Again,
I think you from the bottom of my heart!

Andy Stepanian #26399-050
FCI Butner Medium II
Federal Correctional Institution
PO Box 1500
Butner, NC 27509
USA

[http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/1H7ARVHMZ78KG/ ]

Beneath the Paving Stones: Situationist oand the Beach, May 68 by The
Dark Star Collective
Blood in My Eye by George Jackson
The Dead Emcee Scrolls by Saul Williams
Forbidden Fruit: Lover Stories From the Underground Railroad by Bey Deramus
Conspiracy in the Streets: The Extraordinary Trial of the Chicago
Eight by Jon Weiner
The Gruesome Acts of Capitalism by David Lester
Days of War Nights of Love by CrimethInc Ex-Workers Collective
Vegan: The New Ethics of Eating by Eric Marcus
Everything is Illuminated by Jonathan Safran Foier
Situationist International Anthology by Ken Knabb

I would also like to receive books on the Exxon Valdez spill in
Alaska, any pictorial accounts and historic accounts, dates numbers
etc. lastly I would love it if people can find any books on the
history of Godzilla, yes Godzilla, the making of Godzilla movies, the
eco-feminist theories associated with the story of Godzilla and
books with cool photos of Godzilla. (I'm not sure if that qualifies
as "conscious" material, but hey I will be pleasantly surprised to
open a package of Godzilla related materials.)

Love and Liberation,

Andy Stepanian and Malik Lamarr

Thursday, August 02, 2007

Court Notes from Jonathan Paul’s Second Sentencing Hearing, 8/1

Court Notes from Jonathan Paul’s Second Sentencing Hearing, 8/1
Author: flies on the wall

Jonathan Paul was sentenced today in Eugene federal court to 51 months, plus three years supervised release. The terrorism enhancement was not applied. This second sentencing hearing for Paul took place as Paul’s attorney had objected to the sentence Paul had received (51 months) on June 5. That sentence was then held in abeyance until today’s hearing, which produced exactly the same sentence length.

Federal court started with a bang today as Judge Ann Aiken read off a list of materials she had consulted related to Jonathan Paul’s sentencing, and became immediately annoyed when Paul’s attorney asked for clarification on the documents. Stephen Peifer for the federal government made no opening arguments save to say that he stood by the memorandum they had filed. Then Marc Blackman (Paul’s atty.) addressed the court, first by thanking the judge for accommodating the defense’s request for a delay of sentencing due to the illness of Paul’s wife Tami. He also told the judge that Paul had a response to present to the judge concerning her comments at the previous June 5th sentencing. Aiken once again got surly as Blackman asked for clarification for the record on one matter of documents received.

Blackman began his presentation. He stated that the starting point for sentencing was the proper application of the advisory guidelines. “Respectfully, the court did not do that.” On June 5th, Aiken calculated a 51-month sentence in two different ways. Blackman dealt with each of them in turn. He said that, if the court believes the starting point for sentencing calculations is the mandatory minimum, departure must go down three levels once the minimum has been lifted, which would bring the sentence down to 37 months. Alternately, leaving mandatory minimums by the wayside, the court must show a basis for its upward departure. The Cavel West communiqué cannot be used as this basis, because it cannot be attributed to Paul. Blackman said that Tubbs wrote the communiqué (by his own admission) and did not consult or inform Paul about it before its release, that there is no factual basis for an upward departure, and that the judge should review her earlier analysis. Peifer responded that the communiqué is not the only basis the court has for departure. He said Paul was clearly motivated by intent to put Cavel West out of business. He said the crime of arson is listed as one of the predicate crimes for the terrorism enhancement [although Peifer was not arguing for the terrorism enhancement itself, just a comparable upward departure]. Peifer then did sentencing calculations recommending a twelve level upward departure under 5K2.0, for aggravating circumstances not set forth under the guidelines. Peifer recommended a sentence of 57 months, but ceded that if the judge intended to downward depart to a sentence of 51 months, the government would not object.

Blackman stated that the court has announced numerous times that the communiqué was the basis for the upward departure in others’ sentencings. He said that the guidelines are an inductive fact-based system, not deductive. He asked the court to “start at the beginning, not the end” in calculations. “It’s simply not proper, not permissible, not right to do otherwise, “ he said. He said the court should sentence at level 18, and 37 months is at the high end of the range.

The judge called on Mr. Walker, who was standing in for Purdue from probation. Walker stated that in his experience there are three reasons for criminal conduct: desperation, disillusionment, and desire. He said that because Paul had means at his disposal, that desperation was not a factor. He said we had to look at Paul’s desire to commit the crime as his motivation. He then said that arson is a crime of violence that scares and angers people, citing his experience as a firefighter for the Youth Conservation Corps as a teen. He said he views Paul as a violent offender and, as a public safety issue, recommended a higher sentence.

Paul then read a statement responding to Aiken’s sermon on June 5th, in which she challenged Paul to denounce arson as a tactic and to use his notoriety as an activist to encourage youth to participate in “positive action”. Paul said that he took Aiken’s challenge to heart, and that he had worked hard on his statement, but that when he heard of the Charleston, SC fire which had taken the lives of nine firefighters recently, his statement had seemed trivial and egocentric in the gravity of that situation. Paul said he wants people to hear and believe him when he says that arson is incredibly dangerous. He said that anyone who says they can control a fire they’ve set is deceiving himself or herself. He said that he now believes arson goes against the movement’s code of non-violence, and that if anyone got hurt or killed, as they had in Charleston (although he did not know the cause of that fire), he could not live with himself.

Aiken stated that “before imposing sentence for the THIRD TIME” she would address counsel’s arguments that the court cannot impose a twelve level upward departure, as it violates the ex post facto clause. She said that the Booker ruling (in the Supreme Court) gives her the discretion to upward “or, I might add, downward” depart. She said, “All the defendants should thank their lucky stars that they were offered plea deals.” She said that Paul’s sentence was crafted with the sentences of the other nine defendants in mind. Again, “thank your lucky stars…” She said Blackman’s assertions are “patently incorrect” and, “To make it CRYSTAL CLEAR, I will depart upward” as if Paul had qualified for 3A1.4, the terrorism enhancement, even though the enhancement does not apply, per se. She said she cannot reward defendants simply because they did not target government, and that all the defendants should be treated similarly. The only question, she said, is to what degree she will depart downward. She mentioned case law justifying the legality of her decision, and cited 5K2.0 as the basis for her twelve level upward departure. She said that even if Paul did not write or have knowledge of the Cavel West communiqué, he was responsible for its contents. The issuing of a communiqué was the foreseeable action of a co-conspirator. Furthermore, Paul’s intent was to retaliate against Cavel West and put it out of business. She said Paul’s intent is further evidenced by his actions at UC Davis, the University of Arizona and his numerous animal releases, and that these constitute clear and convincing evidence of intent. To the extent that she frames her decision in terms of upward or downward departures, she stated that she has discretion, as long as the sentence is “reasonable”. For Cavel West, she had only departed upward one level in Tubbs’ sentence, because she had already factored in the terrorism enhancement for his other acts. She said that Paul is not being treated more severely than the others. Although the applicable guidelines do not explicitly discuss attempts to intimidate private individuals and businesses, it would be unreasonable to not impose a similar upward departure to that of the terrorism enhancement.

Aiken stated that she had read from books at each sentencing hearing, because defendants had organized as a “Book Club” to conspire. Aiken then spent what felt like ten minutes or even longer describing the book Three Cups of Tea by Greg Mortenson and David Oliver Relin, a heartwarming story to be sure. Paul was ordered as part of his sentence to read the book and write a book report, to be turned in before his self-surrender. The central message of this true story seems to be that the importance of non-violent service to the less privileged, and that education is “important to world peace.” “You will read that book.” Aiken has already sent this book to Chelsea Gerlach and Stanislas Meyerhoff.

Aiken then said that sentencings are about accountability and hope, not dehumanizing events and calculations. They have to be about giving people a chance to be held accountable and to come back and be productive members of society. Aiken stated that she will watch very carefully how Paul performs in prison, “One person at a time is how we change people.” To illustrate how people can change, she then read a personal letter from Stanislas Meyerhoff, with whom she has been corresponding. This lengthy letter, beginning with “Thank you for your mercy,” and ending with a bizarre reminder about driving safely, described Meyerhoff’s efforts teaching English as a Second Language as well as Spanish, plus his involvement with “therapeutic” Bible studies in prison.

Aiken stated that she took the time to read this letter because she believes that sentencing today is just the beginning. “It is your return to the community that I care about.” She attended a Ninth Circuit Court conference last year, and was reminded that at sentencing “You do the right thing.” With that, she sentenced Paul, giving a 12-level upward departure, as the terrorism enhancement per se did not apply. Three years supervised release as well. Same conditions as with other defendants (except no restitution, see below.)

Blackman then requested that Paul be sentenced to Sheridan work camp, or if not to the low-security facility in Lompoc, CA. Walker (from probation) stated that Paul was involved in a crime of violence and did not qualify for the Sheridan camp. Peifer agreed. No restitution was demanded of Paul, as he had settled out of court with Cavel West’s insurance company. Marc Blackman then emphatically reminded Aiken that Paul had not been involved in the “Book Club,” which came into existence years after the Cavel West arson, and that Judge Aiken’s pointed mention of the club was mistaken. Aiken interjected that the Book Club IN NO WAY factored into her sentencing of Paul. She will write a letter suggesting that Paul serve his sentence at Lompoc.

Blackman made a final query about Paul being prohibited from contact with people who “had”—past tense—been involved with illegal activism, stating that Paul does not have the ability to know what is or is not in everyone’s past. Aiken stated that she’d be closely watching, that’s all. Paul must self-surrender in 60 days, once the Bureau of Prisons assigns him to a facility.

After stating that court was in recess, Aiken jumped up, waving her arms to get everyone’s attention, and announce that Three Cups of Tea is on sale at a ten percent discount at a local Eugene bookseller. (How’s that for publicity, Smith Family!?)

A press conference followed the hearing, with Alejandro Queral of the Northwest Constitutional Rights Center making a statement about the political nature of these prosecutions, and Jonathan Paul then reading a statement, similar to what he said in court, about the dangerous nature of arson. Paul then stated that he would continue to fight in defense of the earth and its animals for the rest of his life, because it was in his DNA. We must stand up to the government and the captains of industry to make a change, Paul said.

ELF hits Rio Tinto Alcan in Essex in solidarity with Saving Iceland

In the early hours of 30/07/07, saboteurs struck at Smurfit Kappa, a plastics factory owned by Rio Tinto Alcan in Chelmsford, Essex. The gates were locked shut, office doors and loading bays were sabotaged with glue and a message left painted on the wall. Vehicles belonging to Rio Tinto were also sabotaged.

Rio Tinto, who have recently acquired the business have arguably the worse record of any corporation for abuse of the earth and its people. Whether they're sponsoring and training paramilitaries committing genocide in the South Pacific, removing entire mountain tops in Africa or strip mining virgin rainforest that belongs to indigenous tribes, they must be stopped.

Rio Tinto's recent acquisition of Alcan makes them party to the greatest ecological crime currently being committed in Europe. They are looking to turn Iceland's great wildernesses into a series of monolithic power stations to power aluminium smelters; one of the most polluting and energy intensive industries in the world. Rio Tinto bring repression wherever they go, in Bouganville in the South Pacific they hired mercenaries to rape and murder all who opposed their massive copper mine, Panguna. Their invasion into Iceland is no different and protests against heavy industry are being met with police violence and activists are fitted up and subject to state sponsored slander.

It's necessary to hit Rio Tinto where it hurts, on the bottom line, the balance sheet. Where it matters.

EARTH LIBERATION FRONT

Final Sentencing in Oregon Eco-Sabotage Cases

Civil Rights Outreach Committee

For Immediate Release: August 1, 2007


Contacts:
Alejandro Queral, NW Constitutional Rights Center, Portland, OR, 503-295-6400, 503-490-7333

Final Sentencing in Oregon Eco-Sabotage Cases
Politically motivated prosecution continues as federal judge reconsiders Jonathan Paul’s sentence


Eugene, OR – Judge Ann Aiken today will revisit the sentencing of Jonathan Paul, an animal liberationist whose 51-month sentence was disputed during his initial June 5 sentencing hearing. Paul was the last of ten grand jury-indictees within the District of Oregon who were sentenced as a part of the government’s “Operation Backfire” prosecution. Paul was one of only three defendants who did not receive a “terrorism” enhancement to their sentences. U.S. District Court Judge Ann Aiken declined to follow the government’s recommendations with regards to Paul but concluded that most of the other young activists convicted should be branded and punished as terrorists, potentially restricting their communication and visitation privileges while serving prison sentences ranging from three to 13 years, even though none of the arsons resulted in any injuries or loss of life.

In a general opinion concerning all defendants, Judge Aiken argued that a “federal crime of terrorism does not require a substantial risk of injury.” The terrorism enhancement provision of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines was then applied to most defendants. Prosecutors have complete discretion to utilize this enhancement, choosing to label environmental defendants as “terrorists.” The Department of Justice, however, appears to have a different standard for right-wing crimes, and has failed to label numerous murders of doctors who perform abortions by right wing zealots as acts of terrorism. Judge Aiken interpreted the enhancement broadly, cobbling together connections among government agencies and the targets of the vandalism, primarily private businesses. None of the acts of property damage injured anyone.

“The imposition of terrorism enhancements on sentences of these activists sets a dangerous precedent that could result in additional politically motivated prosecutions branding activists as ‘terrorists,’ said Alejandro Queral, executive director of the Portland-based Northwest Constitutional Rights Center. “This precedent could also be exploited by the federal government to seek greater prison time for political activists engaged in traditional acts of civil disobedience.”

The government and the court both repeatedly tried to convince the public that the use of the terrorism enhancement was neither ‘political’ nor intended to label these defendants as ‘terrorists.’ Neither statement could be farther from reality. The government has consistently tried to punish these crimes differently for political reasons at a significant cost to our civil liberties and constitutional protections.

Public statements by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales are evidence of the political motivations behind Operation Backfire. Soon after Jonathan Paul’s arrest and a new indictment reflecting additional charges and defendants (the first round of “Backfire” arrests took place a month earlier in December 2005) Gonzales held a high profile press conference with FBI head Robert Mueller to announce the fruits of the FBI round-up. More recently, the Department of Justice released a press statement by the Attorney General wherein he accused the Oregon defendants as carrying out a campaign of “domestic terrorism,” and praised the lengthy sentences as “notice to others.”

“Gonzales’ statements come at a time when his actions interfering with other prosecutions have politicized the Department of Justice, bringing into question the motivation behind Gonzales’ decisions,” said Queral.

Former U.S. Attorney for New Mexico, David Iglesias, told the Eugene Weekly that he thought the Oregon prosecutions appeared to be politically motivated. About the environmentally motivated property damage that injured no one, Iglesias said: "It seems to me what happened here should not fit my traditional definition of what terrorism is."

In what can only be seen as a politically self-serving statement, Attorney General Gonzales and the FBI identified a group of people who have never harmed a living thing as the ‘number one domestic terrorist threat’ to this country. That characterization tends to belittle acts of mass murder like the Oklahoma City bombing and the World Trade Center attacks, and is insulting to victims of those horrific events. Prosecuting acts of property destruction as “terrorism” gives Attorney General Gonzales a justification for the Bush Administration’s intrusive domestic spying programs and to continue the harassment, investigations and prosecution of dissenting voices. Anyone concerned with civil liberties should be scrutinizing the government’s motivations in this case.