Sunday, December 31, 2006

Lawrence Anarchist Black Cross Considering End of Lit Distro

Dec. 30, 2006 news.infoshop.org

Friends and Supporters of Lawrence ABC,

In 2006, Lawrence ABC has sent over 3,000 pieces of free literature to prisoners across the country. Unfortunately, due to declining support, last spring we began to limit our distribution to male prisoners in Kansas, Missouri, Oregon, the Polunsky Unit in Texas, as well as to female prisoners in any state. Even with these cutbacks, we do not have the funds to send reading material to all of the prisoners who request it.

It has been many months since we have come to you asking for donations to run our lit distribution. In the time that we have not been actively soliciting donations, we have received only a few contributions. The number of people working to fill the requests is very small; one person does most of the work with sporadic help from a few others.

After much soul-searching, the main organizer of the lit distro has come to the conclusion that things must change if the distro is going to survive. If these changes do not happen, LABC will end the lit distro by the summer of 2007.

What does LABC need to keep the lit distro functioning?

Our greatest need is money. We either need individuals to commit to giving us a certain amount of money each month, or we need folks organizing fundraisers for us every couple of months. Of course, a combination of these two ways of raising money would also work. The members of LABC have not been able to both fill lit requests and raise the money that we need to pay for the expenses of sending the lit. We have also found it is not sustainable to try to pay for all of our expenses out of our own pockets. This project needs to be supported financially by the larger community if it is going to continue.

Less urgent but also helpful would be people who can commit to helping fill lit requests each week. We need to train one or two people who could agree to spend a couple of hours each week at a specified time on a specified day working to fill lit requests. A couple of dependable and reliable people helping fill requests could help ease the burden we now face.

Thanks to everyone who has helped with the LABC lit distro since we started it in 2002. We appreciate all the time and money that friends and supporters have put into this project. Even if the project ends, we will still consider it a success because it helped hundreds of prisoners learn and grow.

Checks and money orders made payable to Lawrence ABC and well-concealed cash can be sent to P. O. Box 1483 Lawrence, KS 66044

Donations via paypal can be sent using the email address cajungal@mutualaid.org

Questions can be sent to abclawrence@riseup.net

Best wishes,
Lawrence ABC

Thursday, December 28, 2006

2 Political Prisoners Birthdays!!


The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign

http://www.ProLibertadWeb.com
ProLibertad@Hotmail.com
ProLibertad Hotline: 718-601-4751
_______________________________________________________________________________

Download the December Edition of our newsletter El Coqui Libre by going to:
http://www.prolibertadweb.com/page10.html and download thePDF version.
_______________________________________________________________________________

Oscar Lopez Rivera and Jose Perez Gonzalez both celebrate their
birthdays on January 6th and the 14th respectively.

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign is calling on all our allies and
supporters to send both these brothers birthday cards.

Since they can’t celebrate with their families at home, let us send
them many greetings,
salutations and love over the mail.

Their addresses are listed below. If you want to send them money
review the BOP
regulations go to: http://www.prolibertadweb.com/page5.html

HAPPY BIRTHDAY OSCAR LOPEZ RIVERA AND JOSE PEREZ GONZALEZ!!

Oscar Lopez Rivera
#87651-024
U.S. Penitentiary
P.O. Box 12015
Terre Haute, IN 47801

José Pérez González
#21519-069
FCI Yazoo
City MDC
PO Box 5888
Yazoo City, MS 39194

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

SF - Grand Jury Contempt for Winstead Reversed!

from Guerrilla News Network

Nadia Winstead was notified today, Friday, December 22, that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed U.S. District Court Judge Susan Illston’s contempt order. In mid November, Winstead’s attorney, Mark

Goldrosen filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court after Judge Illston found Winstead in contempt for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury. The reason for the reversal is currently unknown, and Winstead is awaiting further details.

This is a huge victory for Winstead, but the battle is not over, as the case will likely go back before Judge Illston with the Ninth Circuit’s decision in mind.

More information about the Ninth Circuit Court’s decision will be released as it becomes available.

Please stay tuned, as future demonstrations and court dates may be announced on short notice.

Background:

In late May ‘05 Winstead and at least 10 other Bay Area activists were subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury claiming to be investigating the 2004 disappearance of Daniel Andreas Sandiego.

In August ‘05 Winstead and several other of those subpoenaed to testify filed a motion to quash the subpoenas, arguing that the subpoenas were unconstitutional. The motion was denied by Judge Illston. Several weeks later Winstead and others filed a motion for disclosure of illegal electronic surveillance. The motion was deemed premature and too broad and thus denied as well by Illston.

Winstead originally appeared before the grand jury in January ‘06 and again in August ‘06, each time asserting her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.

In September 2006, Winstead’s attorney, Mark Goldrosen, filed a second electronic surveillance motion in an attempt force the U.S. government to disclose any illegal electronic surveillance that may have influenced their decision to subpoena Winstead to the grand jury. The government argued that they did not have to reveal their reasons for subpoenaing Winstead, garnered illegally or not, and Judge Illston again denied the motion.

Three weeks later, Winstead was found in contempt by Judge Illston for asserting her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, and ordered to jail. Winstead’s attorney then appealed the decision with the Ninth Circuit Court of appeals. The Ninth Circuit granted Winstead bail pending their decision.

This grand jury is one of many, targeting activists, convened around the country. It has been identified as one part of the U.S. government’s stepped-up efforts to silence dissent among eco and animal liberationists, now widely referred to as “The Green Scare”.

For more information on grand juries and the “Green Scare”, visit www.FBIwitchHunt.com

Ahmed Saadat refuses to recognise Israeli military court

Kole | 12/21/2006 - 00:35
Leader of Palestinian left under cruel prison regime: In last summer two hearings of a Israeli military court took place at the Ofer prison facility in the West Bank to try the secretary general of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), Ahmed Saadat, the biggest left wing faction.

Saadat refused to participate in the proceedings and to recognise the legitimacy of the tribunal as part of the Zionist occupation. The next hearing was announced for Mid January 2007.

Observers of the hearings reported that Saadat was brought to the court at early morning and had to wait in a metal container for hours. One could see the signs of the shackles on his arms. In both hearings he was almost beaten by the soldiers who tried to prevent him from speaking with the press. In one of the hearings they dragged the Al Jazeera journalist out of the room. The Ofer camp is known for cruel treatment and torture.

The background

The former secretary general of the PFLP, Abu Ali Mustafa, was murdered by Israel in 2001. Abu Ali Mustafa had been the highest ranking Palestinian official fallen victim to the Israeli “extra judicial killing” so far. (Only recently the Israeli high court ruled that such murders do not violate the law.) Shortly after the assassination a commando of the PFLP killed the Israeli tourism minister Rechawam Zeevi of the ultra-Zionist Moledet party in retaliation. The party is known to promote the “transfer” of the Palestinians that means their complete forced expulsion from Palestine.

In 2002 Arafat ordered the arrest of Abu Ali Mustafa’s successor, Ahmed Sadat, under Israeli pressure. While in custody in Arafat’s Moqata the Israeli army laid siege to the president’s building. As part of the agreement to end the siege Saadat was transferred to Jericho in a Palestinian prison under the surveillance of U.S. and British soldiers.

The Palestinian constitutional court, however, ruled that Saadat’s imprisonment was illegal.

On March 14, 2006, the Israeli army besieged and stormed the Jericho detention centre kidnapping Saadat.

Israel announced that they would try Saadat for the murder of Zeevi. Despite the notorious interrogation techniques of Shabak intelligence service the attorney general Menachem Mazuz had to admit after a while that there was no evidence for an indictment in front of a criminal court for the killing of Zeevi. So Saadat’s case was transferred to a military court where he is indicted for 19 offences all revolving around his membership in the PFLP: membership in a forbidden organization, holding a post in a forbidden organization, incitement for a speech delivered after the murder of the Abu Ali Mustafa and conspiracy to kill for having encouraged people to use Molotovcocktails.

We call upon all democratic people to mobilise for the liberation of Ahmed Saadat whose only crime is to struggle against the occupation, a right to which he is entitled also according to international law. The next occasion will be the next hearing in January 2007.

Free Ahmed Saadat!

Anti-imperialist Camp
December 2007

************************************
Anti-imperialist Camp
www.antiimperialista.org
camp@antiimperialista.org

Saturday, December 23, 2006

The Bankrupt-Your-Family Calling Plan-NY Times Editorial




The Bankrupt-Your-Family Calling Plan


Studies of prison inmates clearly show that keeping them in contact with friends and family is vital to giving them a chance to create an honest life after jail instead of committing new crimes that land them right back behind bars. Yet the simple act of picking up the phone to call home can be bankrupting for inmates and their families.

The cruel and counterproductive system now in place around the country charges them as much as six times the going rate for collect calls placed from inside state prisons. The collect-call service providers keep a stranglehold on the business by paying the state prisons a legalized kickback called a “commission.”
These costs are borne by spouses, parents and other collect-call recipients who typically come from the country’s poorest families. Worse still, these families can be barred from receiving a prisoner’s collect call at all until they open costly accounts with the same companies that provide the prison phone service.

With bills that sometimes reach into the hundreds of dollars a month, families must often choose between talking to a jailed loved one and paying the rent. The lost contact is especially crushing for imprisoned parents, who make up more than half the national prison population and are often held in prisons hundreds of miles away from their children.

A bill that went nowhere in Congress this year would have mandated fair rates for interstate calls made from prison. The bill, introduced by Representative Bobby Rush, Democrat of Illinois, would also have required prisons to use both the collect-calling system and the less expensive debit-calling system. Used in federal prisons, debit calling lets inmates use computer-controlled accounts to pay for easily monitored calls to specified phone numbers.

The collect-call-only system is being challenged in court in a number of states, including New York, where a closely watched case is scheduled to be argued before the state’s highest court in early January. The suit rightly argues that the telephone markup is a hidden levy on families who already support the prison system through their taxes.


State prison officials say the money is used to pay for programs that benefit inmates. But it also gouges the poorest citizens — driving them deeper into poverty — to pay for prison services that the state is obligated to provide. It might be legal, but it is also counterproductive and morally indefensible.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/22/opinion/22fri3.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Friday, December 22, 2006

Eugene Weekly: "Flames of Dissent" part 5

FLAMES OF DISSENT:
The local spark that ignited an eco-sabotage boom — and bust
BY KERA ABRAHAM

Part V: The Ashes

More than a decade ago, a 21-year-old Lacey Phillabaum danced barefoot in a blue sundress on the downtown Federal Building lawn. A recent UO graduate, eco-radical writer and defender of the old-growth trees at Warner Creek, she jumped with other activists to the live lyrics of Casey Neil's "Dancing on the Ruins of Multinational Corporations."

Nine and a half years ago, an emboldened Phillabaum watched a truck roll within arm's length of a fellow activist during a forest defense protest on a highway near Detroit, Ore. Less than a month later, she and other Earth First! Journal editors defiantly perched in doomed downtown Eugene trees until police pepper-sprayed them down.

Seven years ago, after quitting the journal, Phillabaum joined the protests against the WTO in Seattle. As the host of Tim Lewis' documentary Breaking the Spell, she later defended the actions of the black-clad anarchists who looted and vandalized corporations they'd viewed as destroyers of the Earth.

Five and a half years ago, Phillabaum acted as the lookout during the arson of a University of Washington horticulture center — a crime she committed in concert with her new boyfriend, Stan Meyerhoff, and other activists. On the same night in Clatskanie, Ore., eco-radicals torched the offices and trucks of Jefferson Poplar Farm. The coordinated arsons, executed in the name of the Earth Liberation Front, were intended as a statement against genetic engineering.

But by the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, a combination of mounting paranoia and infighting had shattered Eugene's eco-radical scene like glass in storefront windows at the Battle of Seattle. Phillabaum and Meyerhoff moved first to Bend and later to Charlottesville, Va., where she wrote for an alternative newsweekly and he studied engineering. They appeared to be on a straight path, their criminal past left in ashes.

Until December of last year, when the FBI busted Meyerhoff for participating in nearly a dozen of 20 environmentally motivated sabotage acts across the West between 1996 and 2001. Phillabaum turned herself in soon after and began working as an unnamed cooperator with the feds. (The bust may explain why she called off a freelance assignment for EW on "sustainable" beef production last winter. "I am having some heavy family problems," she wrote in a Feb. 24 email, "and I thought they were clearing up but they are not." As recently as Autumn 2006, Phillabaum was listed as a copy editor for Eugene Magazine.)

Today, Phillabaum is facing three to five years in jail — or 25, if federal prosecutors can nail her as a terrorist — because she'd slipped, even briefly, from the Earth Day of above-ground activism into the Earth Night of underground sabotage.

Phillabaum is one of 12 defendants who have pleaded guilty to a flare of environmentally motivated arsons in the federal sting known as Operation Backfire. One targeted activist has pleaded not guilty, another committed suicide in jail, and four are fugitives. One more, the government's first informant, lives in Eugene and has not been indicted. The cooperators face recommended sentences of three to about 16 years (for Phillabaum and Meyerhoff, respectively), but federal prosecutors have said they will try to tack 20-year "terrorism enhancements" onto each sentence.

The 10 defendants before the Oregon courts are scheduled for sentencing in April. Washington defendant Briana Waters will face trial in May, and Phillabaum and Jennifer Kolar — whose plea deals may hinge on their testimonies against Waters — are to be sentenced in July.

The domino effect of the arrests and cooperation agreements have been surreal for local eco-radicals who knew the defendants. Generally speaking, second only to the community's disdain for the authorities is its disappointment with the cooperators. Most loathed is Jake Ferguson, the apparent ringleader of the eco-saboteurs and the feds' primary informant, who still walks free; U.S. Attorney Karin Immergut has said that prosecutors haven't yet decided "what to do with him."

Nearly as resented is Meyerhoff, apparently the feds' secondary informant, followed by Phillabaum and Kolar, who likely began working with authorities around spring 2006. Many local eco-radicals are likewise upset with Chelsea Gerlach, Kevin Tubbs, Kendall Tanksersley, Darren Thurston and Suzanne Savoie, who had begun cooperating by July.

Most of the community insiders who spoke with EW maintain their support for Daniel McGowan, Jonathan Paul, Nathan Block and Joyanna Zacher, who struck an unusual deal with prosecutors allowing them to confess to their own crimes without incriminating others, and Olympia resident Briana Waters, who maintains her innocence.

"What's upsetting is how quickly people are folding and how namby-pamby and weak Earth First! looks when you compare it to the Black Panthers and the American Indian Movement, where people have held out for decades without talking," said former Earth First! Journal co-editor Jim Flynn. "It just makes our movement look weak and soft and middle-class. For people like me, who have spent years in the movement, it's embarrassing. How will we recruit new people?"

But another movement veteran, former Earth First!er James Johnston, attacks not the cooperators but the people who criticize them. "It's a bunch of dimwits who talk a big talk about arson and anarchism and a bunch of other crap," he wrote by email. "Now they don't seem to have anything better to do than make up bunch of lies about the people who actually did the arsons and ARE taking responsibility for it."

Johnston, an ex-boyfriend of Phillabaum's, sat next to her at the Dec. 11 sentencing hearing in Eugene. Other activists in the courtroom avoided them both.

Eugene's eco-radical era was a fire that blazed through town for half a decade, bringing together Earth First!ers, anarchists, artists, feminists and animal advocates who rejected authority and envisioned a freer, greener world. Their flame manifested in art projects, housing cooperatives, forest defense campaigns, anti-globalization rallies, independent media and, notoriously, the flare of environmentally motivated arsons.

By mid-2001 that eco-radical fire had consumed itself, sputtering out as activists split over dogmatic differences and personality clashes. In subsequent years federal surveillance pressed down like a fog, nearly extinguishing the remnant embers.

How did this fire, and Operation Backfire, change the local activist landscape? What grew from the ashes?

It may no longer be so radical, but Eugene's environmentalist community continues to nurture seeds sown at the peak of the movement in the late '90s. Volunteers with the Northwest Ecosystem Survey Team (NEST), a group formed out of the Fall Creek forest defense campaign, still scout for red tree vole nests in an effort to battle timber sales on public lands. Cascadia Wildlands Project, a forest advocacy group founded in 1997 by James Johnston, regularly brings legal challenges to federal logging projects; Jim Flynn is CWP board president, and another former EF!J co-editor, Josh Laughlin, is director.

The eco-anarchist TV show Cascadia Alive! ended in 2004, but Tim Lewis is currently working to archive the shows for the UO library, and his documentaries of the Warner Creek blockade and the WTO riots are now available on DVD. Green Anarchy magazine, launched around 2001 by Robin Terranova and other local radicals, still publishes out of Eugene, while Earth First! Journal, which was headquartered locally from 1993 to 2001, has moved to Tuscon, Ariz. The journal struggles to stay afloat, with about one-third the subscribers it had in 1997.

In the Whiteaker neighborhood, eco-anarchist hangout Icky's Teahouse is gone, but Tiny Tavern carries on. The Ant Farm, an activist crash-pad, has folded, but the Shamrock House remains, with its "Free Wall" covered in anarchist art. The Jawbreaker gallery, founded by Warner Creek activist Stella Lee Anderson, still hosts alternative art shows, and the daffodil bulbs Kari Johnson planted in the shape of an anarchy symbol on a 4th Avenue lawn more than a decade ago still appear every spring. Food Not Lawns, the urban gardening movement founded by local activists Heather Coburn and Tobias Policha in 1999, has now gone national; Coburn recently published a book about it under the name H.C. Flores.

And though the arsonists who set fire to Willamette National Forest in 1991 have yet to be caught, the trees of Warner Creek still stand. Tim Ingalsbee, the "godfather" of the mid-1990s campaign against salvage logging, perseveres in his effort to get the site permanently protected as a research area.

Much like the Warner Creek salvage controversy, Operation Backfire illuminated two very different ways of viewing a burnt landscape: as a disaster to be cleaned up and salvaged, or as a natural cleansing, providing nutrients and light for rebirth. The bust seems to have dampened local eco-radicalism, stalled ELF actions, weakened Earth First!, and possibly even chilled progressive activism of all kinds. But Eugene remains a hub of eco-activity, and as sure as wildfires will continue to blaze through forests, stoking controversies in their wake, environmentalists will keep battling the forces of planetary destruction, their tactics evolving with the shifting political landscape.

Is eco-sabotage terrorism?

On April 10, federal prosecutors will try to convince Judge Ann Aiken that it's appropriate for them to try to tack 20-year "terrorism enhancements" onto the sentences of the 10 Operation Backfire defendants who have pleaded guilty before the federal court in Oregon. Prosecutors have indicated that, if Aiken gives them the green light, they'll try to pin each of the defendants as a terrorist during their individual sentencing hearings. They'll likely do the same before the court in western Washington, where two more have pleaded guilty and a third awaits trial.

If prosecutors succeed, Lacey Phillabaum's recommended sentence of three to five years, the shortest proposed jail term for an Operation Backfire defendant, could become 25 years. Her boyfriend Stan Meyerhoff's sentence of almost 16 years, the longest proposed term, could become 36.

James Jarboe, chief of the domestic terrorism section of the FBI, told a House subcommittee in 2002 that "The FBI defines eco-terrorism as the use or threatened use of violence of a criminal nature against innocent victims or property by an environmentally-oriented, subnational group for environmental-political reasons, or aimed at an audience beyond the target, often of a symbolic nature."

The key word in that definition is "violence." The 20 acts of eco-sabotage in the Operation Backfire case did not physically harm anyone, and evidence suggests that the saboteurs took extreme precautions to that end. "Not hurting people is such a part of every one of those people's philosophies," said Eugene activist Stella Lee Anderson, a former girlfriend of defendant Kevin Tubbs.

Yet few within the movement are willing to assert that local eco-anarchists in the mid-'90s were nonviolent by principle. "There's a lot of ways to define the words violence and nonviolence, and people couldn't get on the same page for what that meant to them," said Eugene eco-activist Cecilia Story. "Some people thought filling up a soaker gun with urine and spraying it at cops was really violent. Other people didn't. We would talk about things like that for weeks."

Prosecutor Stephen Peifer, however, suggests that the question of violence is moot in this case. Under a federal law titled "Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries," anyone who "creates a substantial risk of serious bodily injury to any other person" by damaging property within the U.S. may be subject to the terrorism sentencing enhancement. "That's what we're working with," Peifer said. "The word violence doesn't come into play."

Still, many people — including Rep. Peter DeFazio of Oregon — are reluctant to call the eco-saboteurs terrorists. "As we know terrorism today, mass murder on the scale of the trade towers and the Pentagon, perhaps it would deserve a more specific label," DeFazio said, adding that the eco-arsons were "a destructive, stupid, criminal thing to do." — Kera Abraham

Thoughts from the trenches
Eugene eco-radicals weigh in on Operation Backfire.

Did the sabotage actions have their intended effect of waking up the public to environmental issues?

Jim Flynn sees some actions, like the arson of the Cavel West horsemeat plant (which was never rebuilt) and the BLM wild horse releases, as valid. "I think sabotage is a perfectly good way to grab people's attention," he said. "Ethical monkeywrenching, if done thoughtfully, can be an effective tactic." But, he added, the general public might not make the link between eco-sabotage and its political motives. "I think sabotage has lost its meaning in this country and people see it as terrorism," he said. "This country has a big problem with arson for any reason. I don't know why that is."

Chris Calef agrees that some actions may have been somewhat effective, but he cites others as ill-conceived, such as the arsons of the Oakridge Ranger Station, which incinerated years of Tim Ingalsbee's research, and the University of Washington horticulture center. "They destroyed some endangered seeds next door," he said of the UW arson. "Nice going."

In the case of the 1998 arson of the Vail ski resort, Stella Lee Anderson said, "They public's looking at it and thinking, 'Oh my gosh, that poor ski resort.' They don't see the forest that was destroyed for the ski run. They public's just stupid and lazy and ignorant and for the most part, they just don't care."

But forest defender Shannon Wilson hangs onto the hope that the actions weren't in vain. "Maybe when people read the stories and articles about these indicted folks some of them might stop and think about why these highly educated and idealistic young people risked their freedoms and life for such things as wild lynx, wild horses, ancient forests, wilderness, and our life giving biosphere," he wrote by email. "Perhaps they will think long enough to question their 'American dream' of building a 4,000 square foot McMansion with the 600 square foot redwood deck with two SUVs in the garage parked next to their 50 foot motor-home along side their 20 feet speedboat and their two all terrain vehicles on the edge of a once wild river. I believe that this is why these folks risked everything. They attempted to wake the people out of their 'American dream' nightmare that is destroying all life on this planet."

But Jeff Hogg, who spent nearly six months in jail for refusing to testify to the federal grand jury, doubts that the eco-sabotage actions woke anyone up. "They drew the attention of people who were already paying attention, and the people who aren't think they're a bunch of crazy criminals," he said. "I think [Operation Backfire] is gonna have a pretty chilling effect on a lot of activism."

How do you feel about the primary informant, Jacob Ferguson?

Tim Ream suspects that Ferguson may have been a federal provacateur all along. "I just don't know how else you can burn millions of dollars of property and not get indicted," he said. "Especially when you're the one link that brings everything together … I just can't understand why the guy who looks to me like the ringleader smack addict is driving around in an SUV and living free."

Tim Lewis, who lived across the creek from Ferguson in Saginaw, saw him as extremely self-determined: "If he needed heroin, he could get it. If he needed a woman to live with him and pay rent, he could get it." In Lewis' view, Ferguson didn't crack out of weakness or spite, but for his kid. "That's the only thing I ever saw Jake give a shit about, was his son," he said.

Cecilia Story is still creeped out by thoughts of Ferguson during the years he was secretly recording conversations for the FBI. "Wearing a fuckin' wire into my community? That is so not OK," she said.

But Heather Coburn is willing to cut Ferguson a little slack. "He's as much a victim of the system as we all are," she said. "I still have dreams about Jake where he redeems himself. He comes back the way he used to look — he was into Aikido, he was a vegan, he was really kind and funny. What a heartbreaker." But now, local activists shun him. "When he goes walking down the street, he's like a ghoul," she said. "Jake is volatile sometimes; he's a Cancer. But he's not a violent person … I've never, ever been afraid that Jake was gonna hurt me. A lot of people try to paint him as sinister. He isn't; just maybe stupid."

Is it fair to blame the other Operation Backfire cooperators, given that they risked their freedom in an attempt to further their cause?

Shelley Cater feels upset and betrayed by the cooperators, even as she has some compassion for them. "If you can't stand by your convictions, then you shouldn't have been there in the first place," she said.

Although he's "pissed off" at some of the cooperators, Tim Lewis has a problem calling them snitches; they were the activists most willing to walk their radical talk. "I can look back at [the saboteurs] and what they did and say, 'Fuckin' A, man. They were kickin' ass.' These cats were out there in the middle of the night doing what they did … I think it's noble. I think it's very noble. I have a lot of respect for them."

James Johnston is not willing to condemn anyone, short of Ferguson, for cooperating. "I'm withholding judgement because I don't know anything about it," he said. He also worries that so-called "snitches" could face violence in jail. "Inmates don't have anything better to do than learn all they can about the people they live with," he wrote by email. "And they do routinely kill and maim other inmates justly or unjustly labeled as 'rats' and 'snitches.'"

How did the bust affect Eugene's eco-radical community?

Fire ecologist and activist Tim Ingalsbee has mixed emotions. "At this point I am dangerously ignorant of all this ELF stuff," he said. "I am aggrieved that good people are going down … I am genuinely saddened, and in deep denial." But he also feels that the saboteurs did real damage to the eco-radical movement. "This is kind of a pattern: These opportunists who think their heart is in the right place, but their brains certainly aren't," he said. "That is the danger with libertarian anarchy. It's completely unaccountable … While we [above-ground activists] are trying to educate the larger community, you [underground saboteurs] undermine the action, and you make all of the community activists targets."

Shelley Cater said the shared sense of persecution may have laid to rest old beefs that now seem petty by comparison. "Operation Backfire has gelled people in this town in a way I haven't seen them gel in a long time," she said. "The evil's so huge now that people are compelled into action … We are a battered community. Everybody's suffering some kind of grief. But it's made the strong stronger. The people who are dedicated are still in the fray… Our survival nature is coming to the fore."

Kari Johnson has drawn lessons from the peak and crash of Eugene's eco-radical scene. "I have learned to not accept other people's strategies if they aren't working," she wrote by email. "I won't let an individual jockey for a power position … I've also learned that rallies and marches and such aren't so effective at changing the minds of the rulers as they are at changing the minds of the participants." She complains that media have taken the eco-sabotage angle and made a "cowboys and [I]ndians story out of real life," leaving out the less sensational characters — the old, the young, "the weirdos and the moms," — and the positive, quirky things the local eco-radical community did, like forging art alliances and forming a Red Rover line against the riot cops. "It comes down to young white black-clad folks who destroyed property worth money," she wrote by email. "How can anyone who wasn't here make any sense of it?"

How did the bust affect the larger environmental movement?

"There is renewed activism and involvement, not only in EF!, but also in the National Lawyers Guild, grand jury education projects, prisoner support networks, indymedia, etc.," Jim Flynn wrote by email. "The movement cannot be killed simply because of the fact that the planet is being killed. Time and time again people will rise up when they realize their life support is being cut off … At the end of the last decade many enviros became involved in the anti-globalization movement which continues to this day. With the election of Bush, many enviros are also now civil rights activists, even more so after the busts."

Humboldt State sociologist Tony Silvaggio, who lived in Eugene for years and knows several of the defendants, sees the bust in the context of a larger neo-conservative attack on progressive activism. "It's destroying the institutions and communities in Eugene. The government's guilt-by-association and divide-and-conquer approach has really succeeded," he said. "They're out to crush dissent, period. They've targeted this movement because it's an easy target; Al Qaeda is fuckin' hard. They need to show results. They need to show the American people that 'There are terrorists out there, and we caught them.' … Where is the mainstream environmental movement in any of this? Where is the labor movement? If we let this go, 10, 20 years down the road, any traditional protest activity is gonna be labeled as terrorism."

"It's not hard to imagine environmental radicals coming out of this about as popular as Al-Qaeda in the mainstream press," wrote Chris Calef by email. "However, just as the factors that led up to anti-American sentiment abroad are rooted in world history and American foreign policy, so is the background to this case quite complicated and justified on both sides. The public has a right to be concerned about people who burn buildings, there's no doubt about that. But conscientious middle-class kids, like most of these were, do not just up and decide for no apparent reason to risk their freedom by engaging in clandestine political sabotage. The environmental issues that motivated these acts are very real, and as yet unresolved. If there were tens of thousands of mainstream liberals out in the streets every day demanding resolution on global warming, oil dependency, nuclear proliferation, and so on, then we probably wouldn't see these kids feeling the need to take desperate steps like the ones that got them in so much trouble. It's easy to blame the immediate culprits, but until the problems get solved, I think it's fair to expect that more and more young people might make similar choices. Calling them 'terrorists' and locking them away isn't going to solve anything."

Article on UFF/Tom Manning/Richard Williams

A routine stop, a ruthless act, a legacy forever
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
BY MIKE FRASSINELLI
Star-Ledger Staff
Heading west on Route 80 in Warren County, just past a massive concrete viaduct not far from the state border, is one of the most ma jestic vistas in New Jersey.
To the left, the Delaware River flows freely. Watching over it are swooping bald eagles and a craggy, tree-covered mountaintop.
This picture-postcard scene is also where one of the darkest days for New Jersey law enforcement unfolded.
Here, during a routine traffic stop on the afternoon of Dec. 21, 1981, state trooper Philip J. Lamo naco was gunned down by two members of the United Freedom Front, an anti-government group that plotted bank robberies and municipal building bombings.
"He was one of the best," said David Gallant, a friend and former State Police colleague who was part of the 10-person unit that eventually collared the killers, Thomas Manning and Richard Williams, after a 3 1/2-year manhunt.
"And he gave his life for the citizens of New Jersey."
Tomorrow, the 25th anniversary of Lamonaco's death, a granite monument will be unveiled at mile marker 3.6, the spot where the shooting took place. It will be dedicated at 1 p.m. and unveiled at exactly 4:17 p.m., the time Lamonaco was shot.
Like the roadway itself, a once- desolate stretch of rural highway that today is choked with Pennsylvania commuters, New Jersey law enforcement has changed since that first day of winter in 1981.
Now, before state troopers approach a car when making a stop, they are required to call it in. And troopers today carry rapid-fire 9 mm sidearms instead of the 6-shot revolver Lamonaco had when he was outgunned.
ONE LAST STOP
On the first day of winter 1981, the shortest day of the year, darkness was already falling by 4 p.m.
Philip Lamonaco, a strapping 32-year-old state trooper whose instincts on traffic stops in rural Warren County made him the New Jersey Trooper of the Year in 1979, wanted to make just one more swoop on Route 80.
He knew the spaghetti with gravy -- his family's Italian-American term for sauce -- would be waiting when he got home. He didn't know his wife, Donna, and their three young children planned to surprise him with homemade Christmas cookies.
Trooper No. 2663 was to begin his holiday vacation the next day, and nobody at the station would have faulted him for coasting the rest of his shift.
But there he was around 4 p.m., pulling over a 1977 Chevy Nova with Connecticut plates for speeding at Route 80 mile marker 3.6.
He asked the driver for his license. Out came a fake one, for a Barry A. Eastbury.
Then the trooper saw the gun.
During a struggle and gunfight with the driver and a passenger, Lamonaco was shot in a knee, the left ring finger and the left arm. Another bullet found its way around the side of his protective vest into his heart. He was hit nine times in all, including three shots in the back of the head as he lay on the ground.
The Nova marked with blood and bullet holes peeled off.
The trooper was lying with his face in the snow when a passing motorist stopped and pushed the button on Lamonaco's police radio to report an officer down.
TWO WORLDS COLLIDE
In Tom Manning's America, too many people worked day and night and got the short end of capitalism.
Manning, a native of Boston, fought in Vietnam in 1965-66. Al most immediately after returning home, he went to prison for armed robbery.
There, he noted in his biography, "I first read Che," referring to Argentine-born Marxist revolutionary Che Guevera. Manning came to believe the only system in which ends could meet for people, and not just bosses, was socialism.
His United Freedom Front group aimed to overthrow the government through bank robberies and bombings. The ex-con soon became known to law enforcement and people who study post office bulletin boards as one of the FBI's Most Wanted.
The revolutionary and the state trooper who collided on Route 80 25 years ago were both Vietnam vets and married fathers of three in their 30s, who grew up in hard- working ethnic families in the Northeast.
But where Lamonaco's America was a land of possibility, Manning's was a land of tyranny.
After the shootout, police said, Manning and Williams headed to the nearby village of Hainesburg in Knowlton Township, and then disappeared.
The hunt for the killers was like something out of a spy novel, and it took Gallant and the rest of his unit to Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania and finally Ohio, where surveillance on a mail drop helped snare Williams on his 37th birthday in November 1984.
Manning was arrested in Virginia in April 1985.
"Sure, it was personal," said Gallant, who thought of Lamonaco as an older brother.
The captured fugitives were convicted in Somerville -- Williams on the second go-around after a hung jury. He was represented by Lynne Stewart, who last year was convicted of providing material support to Sheik Omar Abdel-Rah man, the blind cleric who helped mastermind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
Williams died in prison last year at age 58, prompting Donna Lamo naco to tell reporters, "One down."
Manning, 60, is behind bars in West Virginia.
A PROUD SON CARRIES ON
Sometimes Donna Lamonaco stops in her tracks when she sees her son stand a certain way or polish his gear at the table.
At 29, trooper Michael Lamo naco is nearly as old as his dad was when he was killed, and he bears a strong resemblance to him.
She sees the same dry sense of humor in her son as she did in her husband, who died when Michael was 4. And the same pride in the uniform and respect for people.
Michael Lamonaco doesn't have vivid memories of his father, except of one time cutting wood with him -- Michael with his plastic Fisher- Price saw -- and traveling in the family pickup.
But he has come to know his dad through the stories of others who frequently refer to Philip La monaco as being fair and a "troop er's trooper" who watched out like a big brother for colleagues.
"Phil would be rather proud," Gallant said. "I know young Mike, and I think he's a great trooper."
Donna Lamonaco remembers her son at age 8 asking her to put a yellow stripe down the side of his blue Christian school pants so he could be a New Jersey state trooper for Halloween.
"I was just like, here we go," the mother said.
So when she saw the signs, did she try to steer her son to a safer profession?
"See, I was very proud of what Phil did," she said. "He did his job well. He was a good guy. God and I have a lot of talks ... But you can't prevent (Michael) from doing what he wants to do, no matter what it is.
"I want him to remember what his dad stood for, rather than how his dad died," she said. "He's a smart kid, and he knows his stuff, so I can sleep at night."
Mike Frassinelli may be reached at mfrassinelli@starledger.com or (908) 475-1218.

Sagada backpackers released!

Some fantastic news just in..... the eco-anarchist backpackers who
were arrested in the Phillipines earlier this year accused of being
mebers of an armed left-wing revolutionary group (as apposed to a
bunch of lentil eating vegetarians pacifist tree-huggers) have been
released from prison!!!

For all the background info on this case check out www.brightonabc.org.uk

> To: a-manila@lists.riseup.net
> Subject: [a-manila] Sagada backpackers released!
> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006
>
> Just an important announcement:
>
> THE 9 REMAINING BACKPACKER DETAINEES HAVE BEEN RELEASED! FREED BY
> THEIR TORMENTORS! More info in a couple of hours...

> a-manila.org is down.
> that will be until for the rest of the year,
> unless anyone out there would help out!

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Holiday Gift Idea? Certain Days Political Prisoner Calendar!

Dear friends,

I'm writing to tell you about an important and exciting project – Certain Days: The 2007 Freedom for Political Prisoners Calendar. You can order Certain Days online at
http://www.certaindays.org

Order Certain Days 2007!


Please help support this project by ordering Certain Days and forwarding this message to your friends.

Thank you.

* * *

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT CERTAIN DAYS: THE 2007 FREEDOM FOR POLITICAL PRISONERS CALENDAR

This year's Certain Days looks amazing - 12 full color images and pages of writing created by and about former and current political prisoners and prisoners of war. This calendar is the sixth of its kind to be produced annually by a collective of organizers living in Montreal, in collaboration with three long-term political prisoners being held in New York for their actions as part of anti-imperialist and anti-racist struggles: Herman Bell, Robert Seth Hayes and David Gilbert.

The website (www.certaindays.org) has all the info you need to order Certain Days, and also has info about the history of Certain Days, the political prisoners who started it, and the organizations your donation will go to.

Besides looking great in your home or office, the calendars make a great gift -- a gift of political education to your friends and family, and a financial gift of support for social justice struggles.

Please do visit the Certain Days website, and pass this email on to spread the word about this great piece of political education.
http://www.certaindays.org

Thank you!

Sunday, December 17, 2006

Testing the Limits of Dissent and Repression in the Green Scare

a modified version of this article appears in the December 2006 issue of Z Magazine

By Dan Berger


One of the biggest post-9/11 criminal cases involves the prosecution of fourteen radical environmentalists on a slew of charges for property destruction, mainly arson, and conspiracy. The actions for which they are accused occurred date back as far as 1996 and include the multi-million dollar destruction of a Vail ski lodge expansion in 1998. No one was hurt in any of the actions, which were claimed by the Earth Liberation Front, the Animal Liberation Front, or jointly by the equally shadowy and decentralized groups.

The FBI swooped up the defendants in December 2005 in multi-state raids the government dubbed “Operation Backfire.” This massive operation targeting the awkwardly named phenomenon of “eco-terrorism”--but which environmentalists and civil libertarians are dubbing “the Green Scare”--is at the centerpiece of the Bush administration’s assault on domestic dissent under the auspices of fighting terrorism. The “terrorism” these defendants are accused of, like other eco-militants arrested in recent years, has targeted the property of large corporations to the tune of more than $100 million--done intentionally without harming anyone.

Yet because the T-word is attached to the case, people are facing more severe punishments than they might otherwise face for property destruction--including the possibility of life in prison. Indeed, six of the fourteen pled guilty shortly after their arrest in exchange for reduced--but still lengthy--sentences. Part of their plea agreement, however, mandates that the half-dozen eco-militants cooperate with the state in ongoing investigations against radical environmentalists for the rest of their lives.

The case has been built on informants: the government’s star witness who helped build the initial case is, by his own admission in a gossipy article in the August Rolling Stone, a longtime drug addict who says he took part in several of the arsons yet who faces no charges himself. After the FBI starting applying significant pressure in the Pacific Northwest through grand juries and home visits, other activists also began cooperating as the government expanded the number of people indicted to 18. Some remained defiant; Jeff Hogg spent six months in jail for refusing to cooperate with a grand jury.

Of the remaining eight defendants from the initial arrest, one person, Bill Rodgers, committed suicide in his cell shortly after being arrested in December. Three people remain at large, and four people--Nathan Block, Daniel McGowan, Jonathan Paul, and Joyanna Zacher--changed their pleas to guilty in November, after months of negotiation. As a condition of their plea, however, these four defendants remain non-cooperative with the state. As a result, prosecutors will seek a “terrorism enhancement” charge in their case, attempting to add up to 20 years to the reduced plea sentence.

Many progressives haven’t paid much, if any, attention to the trial of these eco-militants--feeling distanced, perhaps, from a movement that has not only utilized illegal tactics but has generally done too little to incorporate itself into a broader social justice initiatives and whose militant sectors have earned the wrath of the FBI as the “number-one domestic terrorist threat,” according to FBI deputy assistant director John Lewis last year.

But the ramifications of this case are too large to ignore, and not just because it is likely that such militant actions will increase in number as the earth’s destruction becomes more severe.

One of the defendants is Daniel McGowan, an activist who has devoted significant attention to exactly the kind of bridge building that the environmental movement is in desperate need of. As with radical attorney Lynne Stewart and incendiary professor Ward Churchill, the government has gone after seemingly extreme radicals in the hope of cleaving off any significant support from the left for people whose tactics or politics prove controversial, even among progressive circles. Unlike Stewart and Churchill, however, many of these eco-activists face up to life in prison as a result of illegal activities and an investigation bolstered by informants and surveillance.

It is a strategy that has been used before, with some degree of success: go after the apparent margins of the left as a way to limit the parameters of dissent more generally. The targeting of clandestine anti-imperialist militants and jailhouse activists of the 1980s with experimental control unit prisons led to the more widespread use of such draconian institutions. This includes the “supermax” prisons in Florence , Colorado , and Marion , Illinois , as well as the other entire control unit prisons, and the “special housing units” within most prisons, which function as exceptionally austere prisons within existing prisons. In both cases, according to groups like Human Rights Watch, prisoners are separated from any human contact except the guards and confined to tiny cells for 23 hours a day. Numerous psychologists have criticized such institutions for the mental illnesses they engender in those incarcerated.

This case is also one where the worst of PATRIOT ACT surveillance and its related snitch culture are being tested. The six who plead guilty in the spring and summer are required to cooperate with prosecutors in testifying against other defendants, numerous people have been hauled before grand juries to testify about environmental activism in the northwest (resulting in the incarceration of several people for refusing to comply with the invasive and undemocratic subpoenas), and it appears that the initial arrests were made on the basis of
voluminous surveillance data. Besides informants, the case is evidently built off the National Security Agency’s domestic spying program.

According to a September story in the Eugene Weekly, the government has handed over “some 28,000 pages of documents, 71 CDs (likely recordings made by snitches with wires), four DVDs and three videotapes. But they hedged the request [from the defense] for information obtained by NSA surveillance.” Since a federal judge in Detroit ruled domestic NSA surveillance illegal for violating the Fourth Amendment, revelation of warrantless wiretapping used in building a case against these radical environmentalists could have rendered the government’s case null and void. The judge presiding over the case ordered the prosecution to “find out whether warrantless wiretapping was used to build a case against the
defendants,” the Weekly reported.

Ultimately, however, the defense agreed to drop this motion when the four defendants opted to plead guilty (presumably in exchange for lower sentences). Still, these proceedings and the case overall mark an important turning point in the existence of radical opposition within the United States : can resistance movements develop and maintain consciousness about non-cooperation with the repressive aims of the state? And will the rights of people to oppose the government and corporate agenda beat back the current Orwellian strategies of control?

Check out http://www.greenscare.org or http://www.supportdaniel.org for updates.

Dan Berger is a writer, activist and graduate student in Philadelphia . He is the co-editor of Letters From Young Activists: Today’s Rebels Speak Out (Nation Books, 2005) and author of

Outlaws of America: The Weather Underground and the Politics of Solidarity (AK Press, 2006).

__________________________________________________

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Florida, California suspend executions


By RON WORD, Associated Press Writer Dec 15, 2006

OCALA, Fla. - Gov. Jeb Bush suspended all executions in Florida after
a medical examiner said Friday that prison officials botched the
insertion of the needles when a convicted killer was put to death
earlier this week.

Separately, a federal judge in California extended a moratorium on
executions in the nation's most populous state, declaring that the
state's method of lethal injection violates the constitutional ban on
cruel and unusual punishment.

U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled in San Jose that California's
"implementation of lethal injection is broken, but it can be fixed."

In Florida, medical examiner Dr. William Hamilton said Wednesday's
execution of Angel Nieves Diaz took 34 minutes — twice as long as
usual — and required a rare second dose of lethal chemicals because
the needles were inserted clear through his veins and into the flesh
in his arms. The chemicals are supposed to go into the veins.

Hamilton, who performed the autopsy, refused to say whether he
thought Diaz died a painful death.

"I am going to defer answers about pain and suffering until the
autopsy is complete," he said. He said the results were preliminary
and other tests may take several weeks.

Missing a vein when administering the injections would cause "both
psychological and physical discomfort — probably pretty severe," said
Dr. J. Kent Garman, an emeritus professor of anesthesia at the
Stanford School of Medicine in California.

"All the drugs would be much slower to affect the body because
they're not going into a blood vessel. They're going under the skin.
They take a long time to be absorbed by the body," said Garman, who
said he was ethically opposed to lethal injection.

An inmate would remain conscious for a longer period of time and
would likely be aware of increased difficulty breathing and pain
caused by angina, the interruption of blood flow to the heart, he
said.

Jonathan Groner, associate professor of surgery at Ohio State
University, said the injection would cause excruciating pain "like
your arms are on fire."

Bush created a commission to examine the state's lethal injection
process in light of Diaz's case, and he halted the signing of any
more death warrants until the panel completes its final report by
March 1.

The governor said he wants to ensure the process does not constitute
cruel and unusual punishment, as some death penalty foes argued
bitterly after Diaz's execution. Florida has 374 people on death row;
it has carried out four executions this year.

Governor elect-Charlie Crist planned to continue the moratorium when
he takes office in January, spokeswoman Vivian Myrtetus said.

Fogel said the California case raised the question of whether the
three execution drugs administered by the San Quentin State Prison
are so painful that they "offend" the ban on cruel and unusual
punishment. Fogel said he was compelled "to answer that question in
the affirmative."

California has been under a capital punishment moratorium since
February, when Fogel called off the execution of rapist and murderer
Michael Morales amid concerns that condemned inmates might suffer
excruciating deaths.

Fogel found substantial evidence that the last six men executed at
San Quentin might have been conscious and still breathing when lethal
drugs were administered.

Lethal injection is the preferred execution method in 37 states. Last
month, a federal judge declared unconstitutional Missouri's injection
method, which is similar to California's.

The
U.S. Supreme Court has upheld executions — by lethal injection,
hanging, firing squad, electric chair and gas chamber — despite the
pain they might cause, but has left unsettled the issue of whether
the pain is unconstitutionally excessive.

Diaz, 55, was put to death for murdering the manager of a Miami
topless bar during a holdup in 1979.

The medical examiner's findings contradicted the explanation given by
prison officials, who said Diaz needed the second dose because liver
disease caused him to metabolize the lethal drugs more slowly.
Hamilton said that although there were records that Diaz had
hepatitis, his liver appeared normal.

Executions in Florida normally take no more than about 15 minutes,
with the inmate rendered unconscious and motionless within three to
five minutes. But Diaz appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the
first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and
appearing to mouth words.

As a result of the chemicals going into Diaz's arms around the elbow,
he had an 12-inch chemical burn on his right arm and an 11-inch
chemical burn on his left arm, Hamilton said.

Florida Corrections Secretary James McDonough said the execution team
did not see any swelling of the arms, which would have been an
indication that the chemicals were going into tissues and not veins.

Diaz's attorney, Suzanne Myers Keffler, reacted angrily to the findings.

"This is complete negligence on the part of the state," she said.
"When he was still moving after the first shot of chemicals, they
should have known there was a problem and they shouldn't have
continued. This shows a complete disregard for Mr. Diaz. This is
disgusting."

Earlier, in a court hearing in Ocala, she had won an assurance from
the attorney general's office that she could have access to all
findings and evidence from the autopsy. She withdrew a request for an
independent autopsy.

David Elliot, spokesman for the National Coalition to Abolish the
Death Penalty, said experts his group had contacted suspected that
liver disease was not the explanation for the problem.

"Florida has certainly deservedly earned a reputation for being a
state that conducts botched executions, whether its electrocution or
lethal injection," Elliot said. "We just think the Florida death
penalty system is broken from start to finish."

Florida got rid of the electric chair after two inmates' heads caught
fire during executions in the 1990s and another suffered a severe
nosebleed in 2000. Lethal injection was portrayed as a more humane
and more reliable process.

Twenty people have been executed by lethal injection in Florida since
the state switched from the electric chair in 2000.

___

Associated Press writers David Kravets and Marcus Wohlsen contributed
to this report from San Francisco.

HIP HOP ACTIVISTS TAKE A STAND AGAINST POLICE BRUTALITY -



LIVE FROM A HOOD NEAR YOU: THE 'ORGANIZE DA HOOD TOUR' JUST ANNOUNCED


Los Angeles, California -- (December 11, 2006) - Announced today, the 'Organize Da Hood Tour', featuring performances and lectures by a number of hip hop's socially conscious heavy hitters, will be kicking off in Atlanta, GA early 2007.

Sponsored by the FTP Movement (www.ftpmovement.tk), Guerilla Nation, O.U.T.R.A.G.E. and Contraband PR, the 'Organize Da Hood Tour' is set to stop in 7 cities and several locations yet to be announced, early next year.

Hosted by the hip hop group A-Alikes (RBG Family), Kalonji Jama Changa (FTP Movement), Rough (Abandoned Nation), Wise Intelligent (Poor Righteous Teachers) and other special guests, the tour will tackle issues such as Police Brutality/Terrorism, Poverty/Homelessness, Political Prisoners, Street Codes and more.

A mix of political activism with a heavy streetz flavor, tour organizers are calling it a form of "edu"tainment necessary in times like these, when one need only turn on the news to find examples of the growing disparity between "the haves and the have nots". The attempt will be to appeal to the hood, (where much of this disparity is experienced), local universities and everywhere in between, in an effort to open up the dialogue to a greater social problem.

In addition to a number of hip hop artists, numerous grassroots and community organizations are also expected to be in attendance. Due to the fact that each stop of the tour will feature daily lectures and panel discussions, as well as nightly hip hop performances, it is expected that the tour will attract a wide array of attendees, both loyal to the hip hop community and to the hip hop political movement itself.


For more information please contact:

contraband_pr@yahoo.com or info@ftpmovement.tk

Friday, December 15, 2006

Sign the Cuban 5 Petition


The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5
http://www.freethecuban5.com
freethecubanfive@hotmail.com and freethecuban5@gmail.com
Free the Cuban 5 Hotline: 718-601-4751
_______________________________________________________________________________

Sign the petition to demand that the NYTimes publiosh an arti le on
the Cuban 5!! FORWARD THIS EMAIL AND PETITION LINK!! WE WANT TO
PRESENT A PETITION TO THE NYTIMES WITH A THOUSAND SIGNATURES!!

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/846703346
_______________________________________________________________________________

WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 20TH, 2006 AT 5PM PICKET THE NEW YORK TIMES!!
The New York Times 229 West 43rd St.
(btwn. Broadway and 8th Ave.)

For more info. contact The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5:
718-601-4751 or freethecubanfive@hotmail.com

The New York Times still has not published an article on the Cuban 5!! WE
HAVE TO GO BACK AND DEMAND THAT THE ARTICLE BE WRITTEN!!

For over a month, the New York Times ignored our letter writing campaign
demanding that they publish an article on the Cuban 5; after no response, we
picketed at the their door and they continued to ignore us!!

President Ricardo Alarcon, of the Cuban Parliament, has called for December
12th-27th to be another period of time to raise awareness for the Cuban 5.

We have to go back!! We CANNOT allow them to ignore the Cuban 5. If the
Washington Post, USA Today, The LA Times and the Daily News can cover the
Cuban 5, then so can the New York Times!!

BRING YOUR FLAGS, PLACARD AND NOISEMAKERS!!
______________________________________________________________________________

CELEBRATING FREEDOM AND JUSTICE: Three Kings Party for the Cuban 5
Saturday January 13th, 2007 at 7pm
Martin Luther King Jr. Labor Center
310 W 43rd St. (btwn. 8-9th Aves)

Join us for a night of MUSIC,POETRY, and DANCING!! Dedicated to our brothers
the Cuban 5; five U.S. held Political Prisoners incarcerated for fighting
against terrorism in Cuba!!

PROGRAM:
Speaker from the Cuban Mission to the United Nations

Solidarity Statements from the Cuban 5 and their families

Two Short films; Ivette, a 9 minute film on Rene Gonzalez’s Daughter, and
the new 12 minute film entitled, “The Cuban 5”

The evening will include food, literature tables, drinks, displays/exhibits.
Holiday silk-screen cards will be available for participants to sign to be
sent to the Cuban 5. Donations at the door and for dinner are welcome!!

January 13th Organizing Committee: The Popular Education Project to Free the
Cuban 5, Venceremos Brigade, International Action Center,Workers World
Party, Party for Socialism and Liberation, Socialist Workers Party,
ProLibertad, Casa de las Américas, Frente Socialista de Puerto Rico – Comité
de Nueva York, New York CityJericho, Fuerzas de la Revolución Dominicana,
San Romero de las Americas-UCC/Cuba SolidarityMinistry, the National
Committee to Free the Cuban 5, Latin@s for Mumia, ANSWER, Cuba Solidarity
New York, IFCO/Pastors for Peace, New York Committee to Free the Cuban Five–
List In Formation

Some Guantanamo detainees freed elsewhere

By ANDREW O. SELSKY, Associated Press Writer Dec. 15, 2006

The Pentagon called them "among the most dangerous, best-trained,
vicious killers on the face of the earth," sweeping them up after
Sept. 11 and hauling them in chains to a U.S. military prison in
southeastern Cuba.

Since then, hundreds of the men have been transferred from Guantanamo
Bay to other countries, many of them for "continued detention."

And then set free.

Decisions by more than a dozen countries in the Middle East, Europe
and South Asia to release the former Guantanamo detainees raise
questions about whether they were really as dangerous as the United
States claimed, or whether some of America's staunchest allies have
set terrorists and militants free.

The United States does not systematically track what happens to
detainees once they leave Guantanamo, the U.S. State Department says.
Defense lawyers and human rights groups say they know of no
centralized database, although one group is attempting to compile one.

When the Pentagon announces a detainee has been moved from
Guantanamo, it gives his nationality but not his name, making it
difficult to track the roughly 360 men released since the detention
center opened in January 2002. The Pentagon says detainees have been
sent to 26 countries.

But through interviews with justice and police officials, detainees
and their families, and using reports from human rights groups and
local media, The Associated Press was able to track 245 of those
formerly held at Guantanamo. The investigation, which spanned 17
countries, found:

_Once the detainees arrived in other countries, 205 of the 245 were
either freed without being charged or were cleared of charges related
to their detention at Guantanamo. Forty either stand charged with
crimes or continue to be detained.

_Only a tiny fraction of transferred detainees have been put on
trial. The AP identified 14 trials, in which eight men were acquitted
and six are awaiting verdicts. Two of the cases involving acquittals
— one in Kuwait, one in Spain — initially resulted in convictions
that were overturned on appeal.

_The Afghan government has freed every one of the more than 83
Afghans sent home. Lawmaker Sibghatullah Mujaddedi, the head of
Afghanistan's reconciliation commission, said many were innocent and
wound up at Guantanamo because of tribal or personal rivalries.

_At least 67 of 70 repatriated Pakistanis are free after spending a
year in Adiala Jail. A senior Pakistani Interior Ministry official
said investigators determined that most had been "sold" for bounties
to U.S. forces by Afghan warlords who invented links between the men
and al-Qaida. "We consider them innocent," said the official, who
declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue.

_All 29 detainees who were repatriated to Britain, Spain, Germany,
Russia, Australia, Turkey, Denmark, Bahrain and the Maldives were
freed, some within hours after being sent home for "continued
detention."

Some former detainees say they never intended to harm the United
States and are bitter.

"I can't wash the three long years of pain, trouble and humiliation
from my memory," said Badarzaman Badar, an Afghan who was freed in
Pakistan. "It is like a cancer in my mind that makes me disturbed
every time I think of those terrible days."

Overall, about 165 Guantanamo detainees have been transferred from
Guantanamo for "continued detention," while about 200 were designated
for immediate release. Some 420 detainees remain at the U.S. base in
Cuba.

Clive Stafford Smith, a British-American attorney representing
several detainees, said the AP's findings indicate that innocent men
were jailed and that the term "continued detention" is part of "a
politically motivated farce."

"The Bush Administration wants to be able to say that these are
dangerous terrorists who are going to be confined upon their release
... although there is no evidence against many of them," he said.

When four Britons were sent home from Guantanamo in January 2005,
Britain said it would detain and investigate them — then released
them after only 18 hours. Five Britons repatriated earlier were also
rapidly released with no charges.

Murat Kurnaz, a German-born Turkish citizen, was also quickly freed
when he was flown to Germany in August, bound hand and foot, after
more than four years at Guantanamo.

U.S. officials maintained he was a member of al-Qaida, based on what
they said was secret evidence. But his New Jersey-based lawyer, Baher
Azmy, said he was shown the classified evidence and was shocked to
find how unpersuasive it was.

"It contains five or six statements exonerating him," Azmy said.

In October German prosecutors said they found no evidence that Kurnaz
had links to Islamic radicals in Pakistan or Afghanistan and formally
dropped their investigation.

The United States insists that the fact that so many of the former
detainees have been freed by other countries doesn't mean they
weren't dangerous.

"They were part of Taliban, al-Qaida, or associated forces that are
engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition
partners," said Navy Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon, a Pentagon spokesman.

But Joshua Colangelo-Bryan, a lawyer representing several detainees,
says the fact that hundreds of men have been released into freedom
belies their characterization by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
as "among the most dangerous, best-trained, vicious killers on the
face of the earth."

"After all, it would simply be incredible to suggest that the United
States has voluntarily released such 'vicious killers' or that such
men had been miraculously reformed at Guantanamo," Colangelo-Bryan
said.

Mohammed Aman, a 49-year-old Afghan who describes himself as a former
low-level member of the Taliban, said he initially wasn't worried
when U.S. troops detained him.

"I was relaxed because I was innocent," he said. "I was sure I would
be freed. I was always thinking that today or tomorrow I will be
free."

He spent three years at Guantanamo until he was finally put on a
plane at the base, blindfolded and with headphones covering his ears.
When he made it back to his home in Malaik Khail, Afghanistan,
villagers streamed out to greet him, many weeping.

Detainees are held at Guantanamo Bay because a military panel
classifies them as an "enemy combatant," which refers not only to
armed fighters but to anyone who aids enemy forces. Every year, each
gets a hearing to determine whether he remains a security threat to
the United States or has intelligence value.

Using those hearings as guidance, Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon
England decides whether to keep the detainee at Guantanamo, release
him, or send him to another country for detention.

This year, through Nov. 20, he had ruled on 149 prisoners. He decided
that 106 should be held, 43 should be transferred to custody of other
countries and none should be released outright.

Azmy, the New Jersey lawyer, said the distinction between release and
transfer is largely a fiction because recipient countries are under
no obligation to imprison the returnees. The United States doesn't
even ask them to.

A senior U.S. State Department official acknowledged that "We do not
ask countries to detain them on our behalf, so when a decision is
made by a country to move forward with an investigation for
prosecution, that is something they have decided to do pursuant to
their own domestic law."

Requesting anonymity because she is not authorized to speak on the
record, she said about 15 former detainees returned to the
battlefield after being freed. The Pentagon was unable to provide
details.

"That's the risk that goes along with transferring people out of
Guantanamo," she said. "It's not foolproof."

Some former detainees still face the justice systems of Saudi Arabia,
Kuwait and France.

Six Kuwaitis returned from Guantanamo stood trial on terror-related
charges. Five were acquitted, and on Dec. 5 an appeals court
overturned the conviction of the sixth, Nasser al-Mutairi.

In France, the trial of six transferred Guantanamo detainees has
focused as much on the U.S. prison camp as on their prosecution on
charges of "criminal association with a terrorist enterprise."

Prosecutor Sonya Djemni-Wagner has requested light sentences, saying
she took into account the defendants' "arbitrary detention ... at a
facility outside all legal frameworks."

She is seeking one year in prison plus suspended sentences for five
suspects and no sentence for the sixth, all of whom are currently
free.

Their time already served behind bars in France should be counted
toward their sentences, she said, meaning that even if convicted,
none would be locked up.

___

Andrew Selsky oversees AP's coverage of Guantanamo Bay from his base
in San Juan, Puerto Rico, and periodically visits there. Among AP
correspondents who contributed to this story are Jason Straziuso in
Kabul, Afghanistan; Munir Ahmad in Islamabad, Pakistan; Riaz Khan in
Peshawar, Pakistan; Angela Doland in Paris and Diana Elias in Kuwait
City. The AP's News Research Center in New York also contributed.

PETA objects to felons processing poultry

I would recommend that list members who are active in the animal rights struggle contact PETA and object to their vilification of prisoners. I spoke with their media rep and pointed out the bigger issue is prisoners being used for unsafe work at slave wages. He tried equating jail work release prisoners with serial killers.

Paul Wright, Editor

Prison Legal News

972 Putney Rd. # 251

Brattleboro, VT 05301

802-257-1342

pwright@prisonlegalnews.org

www.prisonlegalnews.og

Seattle Office:

Prison Legal News

2400 NW 80th St. # 148

Seattle, WA 98117

206-246-1022

http://www.peta.org/mc/NewsItem.asp?id=9308

PlantsTypically Steeped in Animal AbuseWrong Place for Violent Criminals, Says Group

For Immediate Release:
December 7, 2006

Contact:
Matt Prescott 757-622-7382

Stillmore, Ga. This morning, PETA sent an urgent letter to Macon Diversion Center Superintendent William Powell urging him to halt a program that busses convicted felons to the Crider Poultry slaughterhouse in Stillmore. PETA points out that chicken slaughterhouses are notorious for animal abuse and that staffing the plant with violent criminals is begging for violations of Georgia's cruelty-to-animals laws.

Recent PETA investigations have documented widespread cruelty to animals in poultry slaughterhouseseven by normal work forcesincluding the following:

· Workers at a Pilgrim's Pride plant in Moorefield, W.Va., tore live birds' heads off, spit tobacco into their eyes, and spray-painted their faces.

· Workers at a Tyson slaughterhouse in Heflin, Ala., ripped the heads off live birds and let live birds drown in tanks of scalding-hot water.

· Workers at a Butterball slaughterhouse in Ozark, Ark., stomped on live birds, sat on them, and used them as punching bags, and one worker even sexually assaulted a bird.

Many violent felons have histories of abusing animals, and 19 states prohibit some convicted felons from possessing animals. In PETA's letterwhich was also sent to Emanuel County Sheriff J. Tyson Stephens, District Attorney Steve Askew, and Georgia Department of Agriculture Commissioner Tommy Irvinthe group recommends that, at the very least, law enforcement authorities should conduct unannounced inspections at the plant.

"Placing animals in the care of convicts with violent histories is like putting children in the care of child molesters," says PETA Vice President Bruce Friedrich. "When you mix violent criminals with horrible working conditions and hundreds of thousands of animals, it is a foregone conclusion that Georgia's laws against cruelty to animals are going to be violated. Mr. Powell needs to do the right thing and stop this program."

PETA's letter is available upon request. For more information, please visit PETA's Web sites ButterballCruelty.com, TorturedByTyson.com, and www.peta.org/feat/moorefield/ .

HOLIDAY EBAY AUCTION FOR OUR PRISONERS!

In prisons across the country, sit brave men and women who have been jailed to silence thier cries for our earth and for the animals that are being pillaged and destroyed even as I write this.
To support a prisoner this holiday season, consider sending a donation to our holiday ebay auction. Our first ebay auction yielded an outpouring of donations and kindness from people the world over including five compassionate companies who sent product donations and an astonishing amount of funds were raised, nearing 1400 dollars which was sent to the SHAC and Peter Young support funds.
Through January 1st, we will be collecting donations to place on ebay to raise funds for support groups across the country for our prisoners of this war. Already, in our local community, donations of clothing, dvds, collectors items and money have come in- in a show of support for our comrades.
Items that can be sold on ebay include:
collectors items
electronics
dvds
clothes (including animal rights attire)
books
records
musical equipment
old cell phones
etc.
If you have an item that you are not sure of or just need an address to ship your donations to, then please contact Dezeray at heatrbangin@yahoo.com
Happy Holidays!

Letters to the Judge for Daniel reminder


Hello,
We wanted to send out a reminder about getting those letters in to Daniel's lawyers in the next couple of weeks. While the deadline may seem far off, these things are best done sooner rather than later. A letter to the Judge concerning Daniel's potential sentence is one of the most important things you can do to help Daniel at this point. Please take some time to send a letter in.
thank you,
Family and Friends of Daniel McGowan

PS-the rally for Daniel on December 7th went really well. Check out photos here here, and here.

Guidelines for Letters to Judge Aiken in Support of Daniel McGowan
Daniel McGowan will be sentenced by Judge Ann Aiken probably sometime early next year. Daniel’s lawyers will submit a detailed memorandum prior to sentencing, along with letters from family members, friends, colleagues, and other supporters. Please refer to these guidelines if you are writing a letter to Judge Aiken on Daniel’s behalf. Send it to his lawyers at the address below.

Examples of Things to Write About – Choose Only What is Right for You
  • How you met Daniel and how you know him (through school, work, mutual friends, prisoner support work, etc.); how long you have known Daniel.
  • What you know about Daniel’s character, his reputation in the community; personal experiences you have had with him that illustrate important aspects of his character.
  • What you know about Daniel’s relationship with his family, his wife, and his close friends – the people who will be his personal support when he is in prison and when he is released. Describe for the judge how these people will assist him through these difficult times.
  • How you personally will be able to help Daniel get back to a normal life when he is released from prison, whether it is through helping him to pursue his education, remain employed, or establish a home.
  • Examples, from your personal knowledge, of what Daniel has done in his life to help others, whether it is through activist work, charitable work, work for non-profit organizations, or personally helping you or someone you know with something. Specific examples of Daniel’s contributions to charitable, community, and non-profit organizations are helpful.
  • Examples, from your personal knowledge, of how Daniel demonstrates what he believes in, whether it is by arranging Really, Really Free Markets, collecting electronic gear to recycle, or volunteering for causes he supports.
  • The Judge may consider whether Daniel is likely to commit another crime. If you have specific reasons to share with the Judge to demonstrate why you believe that Daniel is unlikely to commit another crime, please explain those in your letter.
  • The Judge may consider whether Daniel has shown that, after the crimes were committed, his conduct demonstrated rehabilitation. If you have specific examples of his conduct, between July of 2001 and December 2005 that you feel the Judge should know about that show Daniel has engaged in significant rehabilitation from the time he committed the crimes, please explain those in your letter.
  • The Judge may consider whether to sentence Daniel as a “terrorist” under certain provisions of federal law and sentencing guidelines. While this is largely a technical legal issue that the lawyers will write about, you may wish to write to the Judge about how Daniel’s case compares to other crimes and incidents that you are personally aware of that either have or have not been treated as “terrorist” incidents.
There may be other things you may wish to say to the judge as well. Our suggestions are just that – suggestions. Please make sure you write in a polite, respectful manner to the Judge.

What Not to Write About
Some topics are simply not helpful subjects of discussion in a letter to the Court related to sentencing. We ask that you not justify or rationalize the incidents. We ask that you not compare Daniel to others who have entered pleas and who are also facing sentencing or to those who have not been arrested or are fugitives.

Address Your Letter To:
Judge Ann Aiken
U.S. District Court
Eugene, Oregon

MAIL YOUR LETTER TO:

Andrea Crabtree
Schroeter Goldmark & Bender
810 Third Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98104

Please, do NOT mail your letter to Judge Aiken. After you have signed the letter, MAIL IT TO THE LAWYERS' office. They will deliver all of the correspondence to the Judge at one time, along with other sentencing materials. DEADLINE: Please get letters to the lawyers no later than January 30, 2007.

Questions? Call or e-mail Amanda Lee at (206) 622-8000 or lee@sgb-law.com

-----
Daniel is an environmental and social justice activist. He was charged in federal court on many counts of arson, property destruction and conspiracy, all relating to two incidents in Oregon in 2001. Until recently, Daniel was offered two choices by the government: cooperate by informing on other people, or go to trial and face life in prison. His only real option was to plead not guilty until he could reach a resolution of the case that permitted him to honor his principles. Now, as a result of months of litigation and negotiation, Daniel was able to admit to his role in these two incidents, while not implicating or identifying any other people who might have been involved. The government will seek a sentence of eight years, while Daniel's lawyers will seek a sentence of no more than 63 months.

http://www.supportdaniel.org
POB 106, NY, NY 10156

Sentencing dates set for "eco-sabotage" defendants

Civil Rights Outreach Committee

For Immediate Release: December 14, 2006
Contact: Lauren Regan, Civil Liberties Defense Center, Eugene, OR, 541-687-9180

Sentencing Dates Set for “Eco-Sabotage” Defendants

Government will Seek Terrorism Enhancement

Today, in the federal courthouse in Eugene, Oregon, Judge Ann Aiken set sentencing dates for ten individuals who earlier this year pled guilty to charges stemming from the FBI’s “Operation Backfire” prosecutions.
The 2007 dates are: Stanislas Meyerhoff, April 10; Kevin Tubbs, April 17; Chelsea Gerlach, April 18; Darren Thurston, April 19; Suzanne Savoie and Kendall Tankersley, April 20; Nathan Block and Joyanna Zacher, April 25; Daniel McGowan, April 26; and Jonathan Paul, April 30.
Despite the fact than none of the defendants in the case were ever charged with the crime of terrorism, federal prosecutors have announced that they will seek terrorism sentence enhancements of up to 20 years at the time of sentencing for all the defendants, despite the fact that they pled guilty to crimes of property damage. (It has never been alleged that any defendant injured another human or animal as a result of their politically motivated acts of sabotage.) A discussion of the overarching issues regarding the constitutionality of the proposed terrorism enhancement, as it applies to all defendants, will tentatively take place during Meyerhoff’s hearing. Other sentencing hearings may be pushed back as a result. An additional status hearing was set on March 2 to check-in with the court and parties to determine if the dates set will still be viable.
Beyond additional time in federal prison, any terrorism enhancement would have potentially Draconian consequences for defendants upon release. Such a finding by the courts may prohibit them from being able to travel outside the U.S., open a bank account, or otherwise successfully reintegrate into society.
“The sentencing provision at issue, entitled ‘Acts of Terrorism Transcending National Boundaries,’ simply does not apply to the facts of this case and is a blatant attempt by the government to label citizens as terrorists for political gain and to manipulate and exploit Americans’ concerns after 9/11 – which was a true act of terrorism,” stated Lauren Regan, executive director of the Civil Liberties Defense Center. “In a case where only property damage occurs, and where citizens took illegal action to stop environmental destruction and animal suffering within the U.S., this federal law was not meant to apply and is unconstitutionally applied to these defendants.”
Copies of a press packet with a synopsis of the prosecution, related articles, background information, historical examples of sabotage in the U.S., and a history of FBI repression of political activism, are available upon request.

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Army Targets Truthout for Subpoenas in Watada Case


By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Wednesday 13 December 2006

In a case that cuts right to the heart of the First Amendment, a US Army prosecutor has indicated he intends to subpoena Truthout Executive Director Marc Ash, a Truthout reporter, and two of the nonprofit news organization's regular contributors, to authenticate news reports they produced and edited earlier this year that quoted an Army officer criticizing President Bush and the White House's rationale for the Iraq War.

Captain Dan Kuecker, the Fort Lewis, Washington-based Army prosecutor, has stated his intent to compel Ash, Truthout reporter Sari Gelzer, and contributors Dahr Jamail and Sarah Olson to testify at the court-martial of First Lieutenant Ehren Watada. Kuecker is actively seeking the journalists' testimony so he can prove that Watada engaged in conduct unbecoming an officer, directly related to disparaging statements the Army claims Watada made about the legality of the Iraq War during interviews with Truthout and his hometown newspaper, the Honolulu Star-Bulletin, in June.

At a hearing earlier this year, a military court determined there was sufficient evidence to charge Watada with intentionally missing his deployment, contemptuous speech toward officials, and conduct unbecoming an officer, and proceed with a general court-martial. In September, those charges were amended to include an additional count of conduct unbecoming an officer. The contempt charges were dropped in November. Watada faces a maximum six-year prison sentence if he is convicted. The trial is expected to begin in February.

Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, who for years has been arguing in favor of a shield law to protect journalists from testifying against their sources, said what's distressing about the Watada case is that the government is trying to use a reporter to build its case.

"The last thing a reporter wants to be identified as is an investigative arm of the government." Dalglish said.

In his aggressive attempt to haul members of Truthout's editorial staff into court, Kuecker bypassed corresponding with the organization's attorney and sent Ash a series of emails - one of which was sent late Sunday evening, December 10 - insisting that Ash provide him with information about the reporters so Kuecker can prepare his case against Watada.

"This information is required as a part of an ongoing criminal investigation and prosecution," Kuecker wrote in that December 10 email to Ash. "Please respond as soon as possible."

Ash said he repeatedly referred Kuecker to Truthout attorney Bill Simpich. Ash said in an interview that he is determined to resist any attempt by the US Army to compel him to testify against Watada or to provide the Army with any physical evidence it may seek.

"We view this action as retaliatory, both toward Lieutenant Watada and toward our organization that reported his courageous stand," Ash said. "Since the day the US invaded Iraq, Truthout has tried to educate the American people about the true reasons for the military action and, more importantly, not only the suffering of the Iraqi people, but the painful and often unnecessary sacrifices of America's servicemen and women. Opposing the United States Army, even in a courtroom, is a daunting prospect. However, we will not shrink from the task."

In general, military courts are not bound by the same procedures as federal prosecutors in seeking journalists' materials, and therefore do not have to obtain approval from the US attorney general before subpoenaing journalists. A US attorney in a US district court could prosecute civilian witnesses who fail to respond to a military subpoena without a valid reason.

It is likely that Kuecker wants Gelzer to discuss a short news report she filmed over the summer. In that report, Watada, at the Veterans for Peace annual conference, said the Iraq War was based on lies and remarked that US soldiers could refuse to fight. According to Bill Simpich, Truthout's attorney, the military is clearly interested in having Gelzer confirm the authenticity of the film and the statements Watada made that were caught on tape.

Watada was a member of the Army's First Stryker Brigade Combat Team at Fort Lewis when, on June 22, he became the first commissioned officer to refuse assignment with the unit to Iraq. He has since been reassigned to an administrative position.

Redacted documents outlining the charges against Watada cite reports by Olson and by the Star- Bulletin's Gregg Kakesako, in which Watada was quoted as saying that President Bush lied about the reasons the US went to war in Iraq.

"As I read about the level of deception the Bush administration used to initiate and process this war, I was shocked. I became ashamed of wearing the uniform," Watada said in an interview by Olson that was published on Truthout June 7.

Watada's attorney, Eric Seitz, contends his client's comments are protected free speech, and he was shocked that Watada was charged with anything other than missing a troop movement.

It's widely understood that the military can limit the speech of its officers. The question is did Lieutenant Watada exceed the realm of permissible speech? That's what the court-martial intends to answer.

Watada's mother, Carolyn Ho, told Democracy Now! on Monday that she has been actively lobbying members of Congress to support her effort to get the Army to drop the charges against her son and allow him to resign.

"I have gone through the halls of Congress; I was told in some places that I should be confident that the military will mete out justice and that the Congress should not be interfering with a military court - that there are laws that govern the separation of powers," Ho told Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman. "And we were attempting to explore ways that the Congress could support. It's obvious that our executive branch has not abided by the Constitution, which my son has sworn to uphold, and that oversight needs to occur. And I have asked that the Congress at least consider a sign-on letter that would call for dismissal of the charges and for the military to accept his resignation. But I was told that that was not really something that [Congress] can actually do."

Ho said she recently met with Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), chair of the Out of Iraq Caucus, who promised Ho she would try to assist her "on the kinds of strategies we can pursue" to get the Army to drop the charges against Watada.

Waters was unavailable for comment.

The charges filed against Watada marked the first time in 41 years that the military has used the charge of conduct unbecoming an officer to prosecute an officer's public statements. Usually, a conduct-unbecoming case involves more serious crimes, such as rape or sexual harassment, or manslaughter. The last time a military officer was charged with public dissent was in 1965, when Lieutenant Henry Howe criticized US foreign policy during the Vietnam War.

Moreover, the Watada case is significant - and to some degree historic - because it is the first time the Army is actively seeking the testimony of professional journalists to prove one of its own officers violated military law by publicly questioning the rationale for war. Other cases involving the military and the media have, for the most part, involved the military's desire to subpoena unpublished material from reporters.

The lack of legal precedent, however, in this case could make Truthout attorney Bill Simpich's job more difficult, according to several experts in military law.

"There is little (if any) binding precedent for a media lawyer to cite to a military judge in responding to a subpoena in a court- martial," wrote Steven D. Zansberg, Matthew S. Freedus, and Eugene R. Fidell in a fall 2005 article for Communications Lawyer. "Unreported decisions from prior courts-martial exist, however, and provide strong, persuasive authority for recognizing and applying a qualified privilege for the press. At least two military judges at the trial level have recognized and applied a First Amendment-based privilege to shield a journalist's non-confidential but unreported information (video interview outtakes) from compelled production. In both cases, the judges quashed subpoenas issued to television news organizations to produce non-broadcast video footage, on the grounds that the party on whose behalf the subpoenas had been issued had failed to make the showing required to overcome the privilege."

In 2004, Miles Moffeit, a reporter for the Denver Post, was subpoenaed by the defense attorney representing an Air Force officer for notes Moffeit took about an alleged gang rape of an 18-year-old woman at an Air Force base. In January 1999, Rolling Stone magazine and CBS's "60 Minutes" were subpoenaed by military prosecutors, who demanded unpublished and unbroadcast information the news organizations had obtained during interviews with US Marines about an incident in the Italian Alps when a military jet severed a ski- gondola cable, killing 20 people. Both cases involved courts-martial.

At the time, Rolling Stone and "60 Minutes" attacked the constitutionality of the military prosecutor's demand. The news agencies argued that the subpoenas infringed upon the First Amendment's protection of a free press and urged a military court to strike down the subpoenas, because it had demanded materials protected by a qualified privilege under the First Amendment and because disclosure would be "unreasonably oppressive" under court- martial rules. The judge in the case granted "60 Minutes" and Rolling Stone's motion to quash subpoenas. In the Air Force proceeding, the sexual-harassment case was eventually dropped when the victim decided not to proceed with the case. On February 2, 2005, the Air Force's acting judge advocate general, Major General Jack Rives, sent a memorandum to the Air Force JAG Corps, requesting that they first consult with senior attorneys at the headquarters level and enter into negotiations with media organizations before serving reporters with subpoenas.

Rives's memo emphasized the importance of striving for "the proper balance between the public's interest in the free dissemination of ideas and information and the public's interest in effective law enforcement."

The Committee to Protect Journalists reported last week that the number of journalists jailed worldwide has increased for the second year in a row. The committee said the United States had imprisoned two journalists without charge or trial - Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein, who now has been incarcerated for eight months in Iraq, and Al Jazeera cameraman Sami al-Haj, imprisoned for five years at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Joshua Wolf, a freelance blogger, was jailed for refusing to turn over a video of a 2005 protest to a US federal grand jury.

In the case of Gelzer, the Truthout reporter, Simpich said, it is "wrongheaded and wholly mistaken" for the military to seek her testimony, because it would force Gelzer "to collaborate with the US military and help the government submit into evidence the very videotape that could expose Watada to additional years in prison."

Simpich said if the military wants Gelzer to testify, "they're in for a big fight."

"What they're essentially doing is asking the Fourth Estate to collaborate with the military as a co-partner in terms of prosecutions," Simpich said in an interview. "That turns the Fourth Estate upside down."

Simpich added that it was premature to discuss legal strategy, but if Gelzer is subpoenaed, then "we will file a motion to quash."

Jamail hired his own attorney to represent him in the case. He was unavailable for comment.

David Greene, the attorney defending Olson, the Truthout contributor who wrote several of the Watada stories in question, confirmed that the military has already "indicated an intent to subpoena the reporters and they have put that process in motion."

In an interview, Olson said she is concerned that the Watada case could drastically impact her career as a journalist.

"Being asked to testify on the Army's behalf could limit my job as a journalist," Olson said. "What conscientious objector would be willing to speak to me if they knew I was on the Army's radar? "

Olson said she objects to being used by the Army in such a way that it would help the military to send her source to jail. That could have an enormous impact on the media's ability to report the news.

"I am being forced into a position where I would potentially function as the investigative arm of the military," Olson said. "That is a position that is absolutely antithetical to a free and functioning press. When the press becomes the eyes and ears of the government, then it creates a profound chilling effect for people who may be willing to speak to journalists. The Army's attempt to subpoena journalists in the case of Lieutenant Watada could help to eliminate the voices of dissent, and it sends a message to all members of the military that if you decide to speak about your opposition to the Iraq War we're going to throw the book at you and we're going to do that by using journalists to testify against you."

Lieutenant Joe Piek, a military spokesman who is stationed at Fort Lewis, Washington, where Watada is based, would not comment on any aspect of the Watada case, nor would he discuss the reasons the military is trying to secure testimony from the media.

"Our overarching concern is due process," Piek said. "We want to ensure Watada has a fair court martial. That is the primary reason the Army prosecutor will not discuss the case."

Seitz, Watada's attorney, said he is "somewhat perplexed that the Army wants to get involved in this," adding that he is disturbed that the Army is attempting to drag reporters into court to help the military prosecute Watada.




Norman Solomon, a longtime media expert and frequent contributor to Truthout, said the Watada case could set a "chilling" precedent if the Truthout journalists are forced to testify.

"Journalists need to have assurance that they can promise and follow through on confidentiality with sources," Solomon told Free Speech Radio News in July. "If you don't publicly use material, you can't be subpoenaed or dragged into court and forced to testify or have your own notes or tapes utilized as testimony against those you've interviewed. The implication should be clear that if the courts, the military, [and] the government authorities are able to force journalists to turn over their notes or tapes or videos or whatever, then that has not just a chilling effect, but a really freezing effect potentially, on those who have things to say who trust journalists who may provide information not for full disclosure but on background or any other number of reasons that are useful for the public's right to know."

Simpich agreed. He said the Watada case is extraordinary because the military, as a branch of the federal government, is pouncing on the Constitution and using the free press to try to send someone to jail. Moreover, the military is threatening to send the reporters to jail if they are subpoenaed and fail to testify on behalf of the government.

"What I consider beyond idiotic is that the military is now turning to these reporters and saying we want you to help lock this man up and throw away the key," Simpich said. "It's precisely why you should not be calling reporters in civil or criminal proceedings."

Grand jury subpoenas the ACLU


ACLU Challenges Government Attempt to Seize "Secret"
Document (12/13/2006)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org

Unprecedented Grand Jury Subpoena Seeks to Confiscate
Document; ACLU Files Motion to Quash in New York Court

NEW YORK - The American Civil Liberties Union today
announced that it has asked a federal judge to quash a
grand jury subpoena demanding that it turn over to the
FBI "any and all copies" of a December 2005 government
document in its possession.

The ACLU called the subpoena, served on November 20 by
the U.S. Attorney's office in New York, a transparent
attempt to intimidate government critics and suppress
informed criticism and reporting.

"The government's attempt to suppress information
using the grand jury process is truly chilling and is
unprecedented in law and in the ACLU's history," said
ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero. "This
subpoena serves no legitimate investigative purpose
and tramples on fundamental First Amendment rights.
We recognize this maneuver for what it is: a patent
attempt to intimidate and impede the work of human
rights advocates like the ACLU who seek to expose
government wrongdoing."

The three-and-a-half page document, issued in December
2005, is marked "Secret" and apparently is classified.
The ACLU received the document, unsolicited, on
October 23, 2006.

In legal papers, the ACLU said that while release of
the document might be "mildly embarrassing" to the
government, the ACLU's possession of it is legal and
its release could in no way threaten national
security. To the contrary, the ACLU said, the
designation of the generally unremarkable document as
"Secret" "appears to be a striking, yet typical,
example of overclassification."

According to the ACLU's papers, the document concerns
matters of public interest that "relate to issues of
longstanding concern to the ACLU and on which the ACLU
is actively engaged in ongoing public advocacy." Until
the court rules on the release of the document, the
ACLU has agreed not to release it or disclose its
contents.

"No official secrets act has yet been signed into law,
and the grand jury's subpoena power cannot be used to
create one," said ACLU Legal Director Steven R.
Shapiro. "The most significant thing about this case
is not the content of the document but the
government's unprecedented effort to suppress it."

If the government can enforce a subpoena in this way,
Shapiro explained, "it could just as easily have
subpoenaed the Pentagon Papers from The New York Times
and Washington Post. The effect of the subpoena is no
different than a prior restraint and it is equally
unconstitutional."

In the landmark Pentagon Papers case, the Supreme
Court said that the government cannot seek to bar
newspapers from publishing classified documents - an
unconstitutional legal tactic known as prior restraint
- unless the information would cause "direct,
immediate and irreparable harm to our Nation and its
people."

As the ACLU noted in its brief, which was filed under
seal on Monday and unsealed by court order today:
"Many of the most important news articles of the past
year (such as those concerning NSA eavesdropping,
rendition of foreign prisoners of our nation to other
nations, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's views on the
deteriorating situation in Iraq, National Security
Advisor Hadley's assessment of Iraqi Prime Minister
Maliki, and the report on the Iraq insurgency's
funding sources) have been based on classified
documents leaked to reporters, which could not be
prepared and published as they have been were the
government allowed to use subpoenas to confiscate 'any
and all' copies of classified documents it learns are
in the hands of journalists and other public advocates
and critics."

Although the subpoena refers to the Espionage Act, the
ACLU has been told that it is not a target of the
investigation. "The ACLU is not a target for
investigation because we have done nothing wrong,"
said the ACLU's Romero. "It is the government that is
in the wrong when it abuses its power and attempts to
silence its critics."

The case is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on the
ACLU, filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York before presiding Judge
Jed S. Rakoff. The ACLU is represented by Shapiro of
the ACLU, Charles S. Sims and Emily Stern of Proskauer
Rose LLP and Joshua L. Dratel and Erik B. Levin, of
Joshua L. Dratel, P.C., all of New York.

The ACLU’s Motion to Quash is online at:
www.aclu.org/safefree/27648lgl20061211.html

The grand jury subpoena that was issued to the ACLU is
at:
www.aclu.org/safefree/torture/27652lgl20061120.html

Declarations regarding facts in the case were also
filed by ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero at
www.aclu.org/safefree/torture/27649lgl20061211.html,
ACLU Senior Corporate Counsel Terence Dougherty at
www.aclu.org/safefree/torture/27651lgl20061211.html
and attorney Joshua Dratel. They are online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/torture/27650lgl20061211.html

killradio benefit


The Central Second Collective
(wwwddmyspaceddcom/thecentralsecond) presents a KILLRADIODDORG
Fundraiser featuring:
The Transmissions
Death to Anders
One Trick Pony
Anchors for Architects
Die Rockers Die
Thurs Jan 18 starting at 8:30p
At The Echo 1822 W. Sunset Blvd.
18 plus
cover is $5
We will have a merch table in the club and will offer t-shirts and
stickers as premiums from KR. Other KR promo items are welcome. We
are also volunteering to help sell Central Second merch for the
bands. A few KR members have volunteered to help and more are
welcome.

Security cameras raise rights worry in NY: report


Wed Dec 13, 6:17 PM ET

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The security cameras are watching, a New York
rights group warned on Wednesday.

Security cameras have increased fivefold in parts of New York City
and have become so pervasive that they threaten the rights of
privacy, speech and association, the New York Civil Liberties Union,
or NYCLU, said in a report.

Moreover, there was no evidence the cameras deterred crime, the group said.

In 2005 there were 4,176 cameras in three districts of southern
Manhattan, up from 769 cameras in a 1998 survey, the report said.

"Unregulated video surveillance technology has already led to abuses
in New York City, including the police department's creation of
visual dossiers on people engaged in lawful street demonstrations and
the voyeuristic videotaping of individuals' private and intimate
conduct," the group said.

Police did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A 1998 study conducted by the NYCLU found 2,397 video surveillance
cameras visible from street level in Manhattan. The report said that
same number of cameras can be now found in the neighborhoods of
Greenwich Village and Soho alone.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Ghost of Christmas Future "Takes Aim at Development Billboards"

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE12/13/2006

A series of billboards advertising housing developments became targets for an anonymous "Ghost of Christmas Future" armed with paint balls and spray cans this morning.

The mysterious vandal issued the following statement:

To: Those Who Are Destroying Our Mountain Homes
From: The Ghost of Christmas Future, of the Appalachian Mountains

On the morning of December 13, in the holiday spirit of love for home and community, I, the Ghost of Christmas Future, took aim at the property of the developers who are destroying our mountain landscape, and defaced the following billboards.

-- I wrote "Stay Out" and "Yuppies Get Out of Our Mountains" on Reynolds Mountain and The Cliffs billboards on Merrimon Avenue.

-- I hit a billboard advertising a ski lodge on I-240 West, and another development billboard on the Smokey Park Highway with paint balls.

-- I defaced three development "for sale" signs on Tunnel Road in Swannanoa.

-- On Hendersonville Rd., I splattered two billboards with paint (for The Cliffs at Walnut Cove, and for the Ramble in Biltmore Forest that is "Inspired by Nature").

-- The billboard for Firefly Cove on Hendersonville Rd. was enscrawled with "Stop Development".

-- The Cliffs at Walnut Cove billboard on Sweatencreek Rd. near Gerber Rd. was also targeted.

The signs were targeted specifically for what they symbolize; namely, the abject destruction of nature for profit, the eradication of wild creatures and the systematic annihilation of mountain communities.

My deepest holiday wish is that our society will awaken from its stupor of greed and arrogance and begin to recognize the intrinsic value of wild land and creatures, and work toward building a world based on those values.

Warmest wishes to all in the hope that all living beings have a place to call home for the holidays.

For the Earth,

The Ghost of Christmas Future

Photos:

http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/1.jpg3jnry9.jpg
http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/2.jpgqmc7bz.jpg
http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/3.jpgyd2foy.jpg
http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/4.jpg1hhoro.jpg
http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/5.jpgqccm9n.jpg
http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/6.jpgjb260d.jpg
http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/7.jpggvrh2d.jpg
http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/8.jpgul8383.jpg
http://www.chapelhill.indymedia.org/uploads/9.jpgcm2you.jpg

Kevorkian to be paroled in June


By KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN, Associated Press
LANSING, Mich. - Assisted suicide advocate Jack Kevorkian will be paroled in June, state Corrections spokesman Leo Lalonde said Wednesday.
Kevorkian, who claimed to have assisted in at least 130 deaths in the 1990s, was imprisoned in 1999 for his role in the last of the deaths.
The ailing former pathologist has promised he would not assist in a suicide if he was released from prison. He is 78.

WILLIAM SINGLETARY SAYS ABU-JAMAL DID NOT KILL FAULKNER



Philly Daily News
Witness: Abu-Jamal didn't do it
By VALERIE RUSS
Dec. 08, 2006

William Singletary has lived with the Mumia Abu-Jamal case from the beginning.

"I just want the truth to be heard," he said yesterday. "For 25 years, it's something that's rested on my mind heavily."

Singletary was there, at 13th and Locust, when Police Officer Daniel Faulkner was killed in the early morning hours of Dec. 9, 1981.

That is perhaps the only fact on which he and the Philadelphia police agree.

"Mumia Abu-Jamal didn't shoot Daniel Faulkner," Singletary said.

"The passenger in the right-hand side of the Volkswagen [that Faulkner had stopped] got out of the car and shot him," Singletary said.

Singletary was a Philadelphia bar owner and gas-station operator at the time. He now lives in North Carolina.

Singletary said Abu-Jamal came running up minutes after Faulkner was shot. He said the passenger ran away.

"When Mumia came on the scene, we [Singletary and another man] were on the police radio trying to radio for help," Singletary said.

He told the Daily News that he's willing to take a lie-detector test to prove he is telling the truth.

"But I'm not coming to Philadelphia unless y'all got Wells Fargo and Lords of London" for protection, he said.

Although Singletary signed a police statement saying he saw Abu-Jamal shoot Faulkner, he now claims police "coerced me" to sign it.

He alleged that in the months leading up to the trial, men he believed to be police officers visited his gas stations to tell him to get out of town."

He said he did.

He went to North Carolina during the trial and didn't return until it was over. He never testified at Abu-Jamal's first trial.

But Singletary's story has been criticized by police. "He said the same thing that three other witnesses said that night," Robert Eddis, president of Lodge 5 of the Fraternal Order of Police, said yesterday.

"Now, after all these years," Eddis said, it's strange that Singletary is saying otherwise.

As for Singletary's claims that he was intimidated, Eddis said he could have asked for the witness- protection program or filed a complaint and his charges would have been investigated.

"It just seems that it doesn't add up," Eddis said.

In 1981, Singletary was a part-owner of the Bombay Lounge, a bar and hotel at 1504 Catharine St.

His family also operated a couple of gas stations, one in North Philadelphia, at Broad and Thompson, the other in West Philadelphia. And they ran Aldale Towing.

Singletary had driven from his bar to the Whispers night club, at 13th and Locust, some time after 3 a.m.

"Business at my place was slow," he said.

"Everybody was leaving my bar and going to Whispers. I wanted to know what was going on there." When he got to Whispers, Singletary said the person at the door wouldn't let him in.

Singletary started walking south on 13th street toward his car when Cynthia White, the prostitute who would later testify against Abu-Jamal, approached and said, "Hey, how you doing? It's cold out here."

As he approached his car, "a brand-new Cadillac Eldorado, 1982 model," White said, "Wow, that's a great car!"

"Then she said, 'You ain't that bad-looking either. But I don't date black guys.' "

Singletary said he returned: "And I don't date prostitutes."

It was almost 4 in the morning.

White walked off. And that's when Singletary said he heard the noisy sound of a Volkswagen being driven the wrong way down 13th Street.

"There was a cop right behind it, following bumper to bumper. Sirens blaring," he said.

"So I said to myself, 'Maybe I can get me a tow out of this.' "

He said he heard the officer yelling at the driver, "a little short guy" who turned out to be Billy Cook that " 'This car has no inspections, no tags, no insurance.' "

He said the officer put Cook up against the wall and started to handcuff him when Cook's passenger got out of the car and shot Faulkner twice.

Singletary said Abu-Jamal came running up minutes later and said: "Hey, that's my brother's car. Where's my brother?" Then he approached Faulkner.

When Singletary went to the Police Administration Building, at 8th and Race streets, he said police were angry because he had first refused to sign a statement that he had seen Abu-Jamal shoot Faulkner.

He said Cynthia White, who had walked down the street, didn't actually see the shooting.

"I walked in there as a witness," Singletary said. "I thought I was doing the right thing. I am a Vietnam veteran. I have a Purple Heart. I pay my taxes and I served on jury duty.

"But they were going to get a prostitute who was locked up 38 times and use her word against mine," Singletary told the Daily News.

When he finally signed a statement that Abu-Jamal had shot Faulkner, it was under duress, he said.

"That's what they made me say," he said. "I stayed in there from 4:30 to 9:30 a.m. and when I left, I felt like I had been raped."

Later that afternoon, Singletary said plain-clothes police officers came into his Broad and Thompson gas station with guns drawn.

"They made everybody lay down on the floor," he said, saying they had a report of a burglary. "They said they had a call that there was a burglary taking place."

Singletary testified in 1995 that police stopped by often, checking motorists' inspection stickers, licenses and insurance cards so often that business dropped off.

Eventually, he couldn't pay the rent and had to close the station.

Business soured so much that he left Philadelphia and moved to North Carolina 10 years ago.

But all this time, he said: "My story hasn't changed in 25 years, and it won't change in the next 25 years, if I'm alive."

Support Our Prisoners This Holiday!

Dear SHAC 7 Supporters,
The SHAC 7 days of Xmas is underway now--from December 11th-December 17th
we are asking people to do one or two things to help support Jake, Kevin,
Lauren, Josh, Andrew, and Darius this holiday season. We've come up with
7 ways to help, which are discussed below.

What we are really hoping is that everyone can take a few minutes to send
a holiday card or letter and consider including some photographs. And if
you want to put a little something in their stockings, please consider
donating to the support fund. Money from the support fund is sent to them
regularly so they can purchase the necessities while in prison. To
donate, go to shac7.com and click on the donate button.

This is the first holiday they will all spend behind bars--please do what
you can to make it a special one. And don't forget about all the other
animal liberation prisoners behind bars--they need your support too!

Thank you for your continued support!

****
It’s holiday time…. time to remember our friends in prison during the SHAC
7 Days of Christmas!

There’s nothing like being a prisoner during the holidays. While we’re
stocking up on Tofurkeys with all the trimmings, buying and making gifts,
and spending time with loved ones, the SHAC 7 are behind bars and unable
to participate in any of the festivities we get to enjoy. Let’s let them
know that they’re not forgotten!

That SHAC 7 Support Committee invites everyone to participate in a festive
SHAC 7 Days of Christmas Celebration. From Monday December 11th through
Sunday December 17th, we’ll count down with you the days leading into
Christmas week, with daily suggestions of small ways you can help Jake,
Darius, Lauren, Josh, Kevin, and Andy feel a little less lonely this
holiday season. We’ll post updates and resources on SHAC7.com to keep
everyone in the loop, and to keep it FUN!

It goes like this….

December 11- On the first day of Christmas, the SHAC 7 said to me, “It’d
be great to get pictures- nice, inspiring, or funny!”

December 12- On the second day of Christmas, the SHAC 7 said to you,
“Would you please send us a card or two?”

December 13- On the third day of Christmas, the SHAC 7 said to me,
“Getting a book or magazine would make us so happy!” (note: please check
with us before sending a book or magazine--each of them has a limit on how
many they can have)

December 14- On the fourth day of Christmas, the SHAC 7 really meant,
“Please have a donation to our support fund sent!”

December 15- On the first day of Christmas, the SHAC 7 said to me,
“Organize a letter-writing party!” (get their addresses here or print up
and photocopy this flier!)

December 16- On the sixth day of Christmas, the SHAC 7’d like to hear,
“Organize an event, kick injustice in the rear!”

December 17- On the seventh day of Christmas, the SHAC 7 gave a clue,
“Keep fighting and send some good news!”

In layman’s terms (for all you non-xmas-song types),

Day 1- Mail the SHAC 7 folks a picture or two to brighten their holiday.
No polaroids, but usually computer prints and normal size photos are
acceptable (tip- write their name and prisoner ID# on the back so they
don’t get lost).

Day 2- Buy or make cards for the SHAC 7. Add a note inside and get ‘em in
the mail (don’t forget not to send anything with glue, stickers, or
gel-pen).

Day 3- Check out the wishlists or contact info@shac7.com for info about
what magazine or book the SHAC 7 prisoners would like.

Day 4- Donate to the SHAC 7 fund (www.shac7.com for details). Try to
collect a few dollars from everyone you know, add in what you can afford,
and send it off to help the SHAC 7 buy the necessities while in
prison--stamps, phone cards, soap, vegan snacks, etc.

Day 5- Organize a letter-writing party. Consider the upcoming weekend-
easy enough to gather some folks and get letters out in time for Xmas!
(you can download and photocopy a flier to hand out with their addresses
here.) If you'd like us to advertise your letter writing party on the
website, please send us an email.

Day 6- Get active! Perhaps organize a protest or outreach event in your
area. Nothing helps support the SHAC 7 more than the use of our rights to
speech and demonstration.

Day 7- Don’t back down- keep on rolling with support and protest efforts
for the SHAC 7, all political prisoners, and especially for the animals.
Update the SHAC 7 about interesting and positive things going on around
the world- we are their only good news source!

Your support is the best and only gift the SHAC 7 can receive this year,
so let’s make it great!

For ideas, more info, and updates please visit www.SHAC7.com now and often.

And don't forget about the many activist prisoners this holiday. Make sure
to include them in your holiday card sending!

Thanks and Happy Holidays,
The SHAC7 Support Committee

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Call for submissions- writing and art- "Fear of the Green Menace"

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS
(Writing and Art)
December 01, 2006
³Fear of the Green Menace²
Wanted: responses to the ³Green Scare²
Response-based feature magazine article
To be published in The Bear Deluxe Magazine
Issue #24, spring 2007
PLEASE FORWARD FAR AND WIDE

EXAMINATION

Eleven environmentalists. Seventeen separate incidents in three states. A
65-count indictment from the FBI and U.S. Attorney General in 2006.

It is simply the largest attempt by government authorities to crack down on
environmentalists who allegedly participate in direct actions against what
they see as an American status quo of ecological degradation and profit.

Today, the American government views segments of the environmental movement
as one of the most dangerous domestic terrorist threats, yet no deaths have
been attributed to any of those whom the justice system has sought or
prosecuted. The amount of damage attributed to these activities in the last
fifteen years is reported to be $110 million, or about what it costs to fund
fifteen hours of war in Iraq.

Penalties for eco-related crimes have become historically high in recent
years‹from 23-year-old Jeffrey Luers receiving 22+ years in prison for
setting three SUV tires on fire in 2001, to potential life sentences for
activists arrested under Patriot Act allowances.

Some environmentalists call recent developments the ³Green Scare,²
referencing government pressure in the 1940s and ¹50s against any and all
things communist, when a culture of fear permeated communities who held
different beliefs from those in power.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

The Bear Deluxe Magazine has reserved space in its next issue (spring
2007) for readers¹ responses to the ³Green Scare,² and personal reflections
on the future of environmental activism. Short prose, poems, info graphics,
cartoons and illustrations will be accepted. Ideas are not limited in scope,
degree or geographical representation. Submissions should be EMAILED to
bear@orlo.org, subject line ³Call and Response.²

Or mail to:
P.O. Box 10342, Portland, Oregon, 97296
Deadline: January 15, 2007

ALL SUBMISSIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR PUBLICATION. SUBMISSIONS FROM ALL
PARTS OF THE WORLD AND POLITICAL SPECTRUM WELCOME.

No submission fee.

³Fear of the Green Menace² is the fourth in a series of response-based
features by The Bear Deluxe Magazine. To be added to future calls, email
bear@orlo.org.

What will happen to submissions: Representative submissions will be
published in print in issue #24 of The Bear Deluxe Magazine. Depending on
the volume of submissions, a complete listing will be posted on-line at
www.orlo.org.

Word Length: Short prose preferred. 200-word limit. Indicate any special
text formatting.

Submission Deadline: January 10(early submissions accepted)

Publication Dates: March 15 (print), April 15 (web)

Submission Formats: Writing: Send as email text along with attached
Microsoft Word doc for Mac if available. Do not send attachment only. Art:
PDF format highly preferred. Do not send any images over 1 mb. If image is
too large to send high-res, send low-res and be available for other.

NO FAXES.

What else to include: Full name, contact phone number, city/state/country of
residence; affiliation/personal description/age (optional).

Editing: The Bear Deluxe reserves the right to edit written material for
clarity and length. We will not crop or otherwise manipulate artwork without
the permission of the artist.

Copyright: Upon receipt, The Bear Deluxe will assume one-time publishing
rights as well as rights to include work on our web site for a period of
three months after publication. This usage extends only to writing and art
chosen for print or web publication in issue #24.
Compensation to published work: Publication credit and complimentary issue.

EXAMPLES: Above all, we are looking for specific, personal exchanges or
stories (negative or positive) to the government¹s assertion that
eco-activists pose the greatest domestic terrorism threat. Perhaps you or
someone you know has altered their behavior due to recent pressures of law
enforcement on the environmental movement. Perhaps the ³Green Scare² has
emboldened you to do more to help the planet. Perhaps environmental
activists should all be burned at the stake in your opinion. We want to hear
from you!

LINKS:
www.greenscare.org < http://www.greenscare.org/>
http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress02/jarboe021202.htm
www.cldc.org < http://www.cldc.org/>
http://www.fbi.gov/page2/jan06/elf012006.htm
www.freefreenow.org < http://www.freefree.org/>

Picket the NYTimes for the Cuban 5


The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5
http://www.freethecuban5.com
freethecubanfive@hotmail.com and freethecuban5@gmail.com
Free the Cuban 5 Hotline: 718-601-4751
_______________________________________________________________________________

Sign the NYTimes petition for the Cuban 5; demand an article be published on
the cuban 5: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/846703346

WE WANT A THOUSAND SIGNATURES BY NEXT WEEK!! GET THE PETITION OUT TO
EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!
_______________________________________________________________________________

WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 20TH, 2006 AT 5PM PICKET THE NEW YORK TIMES!!
The New York Times 229 West 43rd St.
(btwn. Broadway and 8th Ave.)

For more info. contact The Popular Education Project to Free the Cuban 5:
718-601-4751 or freethecubanfive@hotmail.com

The New York Times still has not published an article on the Cuban 5!! WE
HAVE TO GO BACK AND DEMAND THAT THE ARTICLE BE WRITTEN!!

For over a month, the New York Times ignored our letter writing campaign
demanding that they publish an article on the Cuban 5; after no response, we
picketed at the
their door and they continued to ignore us!!

President Ricardo Alarcon, of the Cuban Parliament, has called for December
12th-27th to be another period of time to raise awareness for the Cuban 5.

We have to go back!! We CANNOT allow them to ignore the Cuban 5. If the
Washington Post, USA Today, The LA Times and the Daily News can cover the
Cuban 5, then so can the New York Times!!

BRING YOUR FLAGS, PLACARD AND NOISEMAKERS!!
______________________________________________________________________________

CELEBRATING FREEDOM AND JUSTICE: Three Kings Party for the Cuban 5
Saturday January 13th, 2007 at 7pm
Martin Luther King Jr. Labor Center
310 W 43rd St. (btwn. 8-9th Aves)

Join us for a night of MUSIC,POETRY, and DANCING!! Dedicated to our brothers
the Cuban 5; five U.S. held Political Prisoners incarcerated for fighting
against terrorism in Cuba!!

PROGRAM:
Speaker from the Cuban Mission to the United Nations

Solidarity Statements from the Cuban 5 and their families

Two Short films; Ivette, a 9 minute film on Rene Gonzalez’s Daughter, and
the new 12 minute film entitled, “The Cuban 5”

The evening will include food, literature tables, drinks, displays/exhibits.
Holiday silk-screen cards will be available for participants to sign to be
sent to the Cuban 5. Donations at the door and for dinner are welcome!!

January 13th Organizing Committee: The Popular Education Project to Free the
Cuban 5, Venceremos Brigade, International Action Center,Workers World
Party, Party for Socialism and Liberation, Socialist Workers Party,
ProLibertad, Casa de las Américas, Frente Socialista de Puerto Rico – Comité
de Nueva York, New York CityJericho, Fuerzas de la Revolución Dominicana,
San Romero de las Americas-UCC/Cuba SolidarityMinistry, the National
Committee to Free the Cuban 5, Latin@s for Mumia, ANSWER, Cuba Solidarity
New York, IFCO/Pastors for Peace, New York Committee to Free the Cuban Five–
List In Formation
_______________________________________________________________________________

The Cuban Five and U.S. Terrorism
By Michael Parenti and Alicia Jrapko
December 12, 2006

December 2006 marks five years since the Cuban Five were sentenced to
prison. In 2001, Fernando González, Gerardo Hernández, Antonio Guerrero,
Ramón Labañino and René González were unjustly convicted of engaging in
“espionage conspiracy” and other charges, and sentenced to terms ranging
from 15 years to double-life. In fact, they committed no act of espionage
against the United States. What they were doing was monitoring Cuban exile
terrorist groups in the USA in an attempt to track and prevent terrorist
attacks against Cuba.

It has been eighth years since the five men were arrested. And through all
that time “anti-Castro” right-wing terrorist groups have continued to
operate with impunity in this country. And the corporate media continue to
hail them as “anti-Castro militants” and “freedom fighters,” while
leaving their nefarious deeds unreported.

Since 1959 Cuba has been subjected to threats, sanctions, invasion,
sabotage, and terrorist attacks upon its soil resulting in 3,478
deaths—all organized from within the United States by terrorist groups
that are financed, organized, and sheltered by the U.S. national security
state.

The U.S. government arrested the Cuban Five for sending to Havana
information about terrorist plots and actions being planned against Cuba.
Needless to say, the United States government wanted these groups to remain
anonymous, free to continue their campaigns of destruction.

The Judge who convicted the Five actually admitted the existence of these
terror groups. On December 14th, 2001, when Judge Lenard sentenced René
González to 15 years in prison, she stated: “As a further special
condition of supervised release the defendant is prohibited from associating
with or visiting specific places where individuals or groups such as
terrorists, members of organizations advocating violence, and organized
crime figures are known to be or frequent.” Acknowledging that the
terrorist groups were part of the established political landscape in
Florida, Judge Lenard did not seem to see a problem. The problem was
Gonzalez’s gathering information on them.

Since December 2001, voices demanding the immediate freedom of the Cuban
Five have been multiplying around the world. The growing international
movement for the freedom of the Five was recently described by Gerardo
Hernández, in a message sent by him to solidarity groups around the world
that were commemorating the eight anniversary of their arrests.

Gerardo, who was sentenced to an outrageous two terms of life-in-prison plus
15 years, wrote in his message, “When I remember back on what happened
that September 12th, the first thing that comes to my mind are the words of
the FBI agent, who in the middle of his efforts to try to turn us into
traitors, said: “Cuba will do nothing for you. Nobody will do anything for
you” How far off were he and his fellow officials to imagine what has
developed over these years in the struggle to free the Five (to be honest,
not even we, the Five, could have imagined!)… I will not have enough time
to tell him about all the examples of support and affection that come to us
from the Cuban people and from all our compañeros from around the world”

In defense of this cause, today there are 288 committees in 97 countries. In
addition, on May 27th, 2005, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention of the
United Nation Human Right Commission declared the detentions of the five
Cubans to be arbitrary and urged the U.S. government to take immediate
measures to resolve this situation.

On August 30, 2005, six thousand worldwide personalities including 9 Nobel
Prize winners sent an open letter to the United States Attorney General
demanding immediate freedom for the prisoners.

On January 11th, 2006, Amnesty International sent a letter to the government
of the United States stating that the denial to grant visas to Olga
Salanueva and Adriana Pérez, wives of René González and Gerardo
Hernández, was an additional punishment, contrary to proper treatment of
prisoners and their families. The letter also raised questions about the
guarantee of due process in the Miami trial.

Meanwhile, the White House continues to tolerate the existence of anti-Cuban
terrorists on U.S. soil. In March 2005, the well-known dangerous terrorist
of Cuban origin, Luis Posada Carriles, entered the United States illegally.
Today he is detained in El Paso, Texas, not because of the crimes he
committed in several countries, including the United States itself, but only
because of his illegal entry. Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch, another
terrorist who today freely walks the streets of Miami, are responsible for
the 1976 bombing of the Cuban commercial airliner that killed 73 innocent
people.

In November 2005, Santiago Álvarez and Osvaldo Mitat two confederates of
Posada Carriles who helped him enter the U.S. by boat were arrested. Their
arrest was not for aiding and abetting a terrorist (as it should have been)
but for the lesser charge of illegal possession of weapons.

In June 2006, another scandal came to light in Miami when José Antonio
Llama, a former director of the Cuban American National Foundation (CANF)
threatened several of his former criminal accomplices with legal action,
accusing them of defrauding him. In an open statement to the Miami media,
Llama revealed that in a secret meeting in 1993 in Naples, Florida, the CANF
created a paramilitary group. He accused the group of failing to pay him
back a loan of almost $2 million. The loan was to buy eight ships, one
helicopter, a high-speed motorboat, and ten planes for terrorist acts
against Cuba. Even after revealing this, Llama was not questioned by U.S.
authorities.

In April 2006, Cuban born Roberto Ferro was arrested for illegal possession
of an arsenal of 1,571 weapons at his house in Upland, California. In his
statements Ferro confessed to being a member of the anti-Cuban terrorist
organization Alpha 66. Yet U.S. authorities did nothing to find out why and
for what purpose Ferro had this arsenal in his home. And no investigation
was made of his links to any terrorist organization.

In January 2002, a few months after the September 11 attacks, Bush announced
in his State of the Union address, “First, we will shut down terrorist
camps, disrupt terrorist plans, and bring terrorists to justice. . . My hope
is that all nations will heed our call, and eliminate the terrorist
parasites who threaten their countries and our own.” If the White House
were really interested in fighting terrorism, it would shut down the
anti-Cuban terrorist camps in South Florida and bring Posada Carriles and
his accomplices to justice for the murders they have committed.

Instead the Cuban Five, who have broken no U.S. law, who possessed no
weapons, and who committed no act of terror, sabotage or espionage, are
languishing in prison for defending their homeland by attempting to monitor
U.S. sponsored terrorism.

Jan 5th: Le Sous-sol Presents MDC Unplugged with BPP Speaker Floyd Cruse


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

MDC has penned
some of the most memorable anthems in punk history. 'John Wayne is a Nazi' sparked
controversy while Dave was earning his Master's at the University of Texas.
"I want people to wake up and think about who they're celebrating as their
heroes,' said Dave. 'If they look good on film, it doesn't mean they're true
blue. And that goes for the many people celebrating war.""Radioactive
Chocolate," blasts the nuclear power plant meltdown in Hershey, PA, "Bye-Bye
Ronnie" was played at the giant Rock against Reagan rally in DC with the
Dead Kennedy's and DRI, and "Chicken Squawk" is first-ever vegetarian
punk song.

'Dave will be playing many of his old songs, John Wayne Was
A Nazi, Corporate Deathburger, My Fanilt Is A Little Weird, Chicken Squawk as
well as new songs Let's Kill All The Cops and Going Nowhere Faster Than You

RIOT COP Little Beirut's
Urban Political Street-Fighting Outfit, Is A Surf Punk Trio Straight Out Of
Old Town District In PDX. Riot Cop First Began About 7 Years Ago, Pre WTO In
Seattle. Each Member Is Highly Involved In The Radical Community Beyond Being
In A Band (Organizing Anarchist Gatherings And Benefit Shows, Reclaiming The
Streets, Creating Revolutionary Propaganda, Etc). Members Of Riot Cop have Included
Former A.L.F. & E.L.F. (Animal Liberation Front / Earth Liberation Front) Press
Officer Craig Rosebraugh , Pro-Skater Ethan Fowler ( Our Interview In Thrasher
Magazine) , And Our Current Drummer Who Is Formerly Of Destestation Riot
Cop Supports Human, Earth, And Animal Liberation--A Movement To End All Oppression.
As A Result, The Band Has Gained A Strong Reputation (Especially Among Local
Punks, Activists, And Police) For Walking Its Talk.

Floyd Cruse is a well known diversity
trainer throughout the West having worked extensively with the Department of
Agriculture and the Oregon Department of Human Services. His consulting group,
Cruse and Associates, continues to provide diversity training and development
for regional non-profits, school districts and government agencies throughout
the state. Mr. Cruse's knowledge of the topic and his engaging style offers
a non-threatening way to move participants to a quick understanding of communication
that offers immediate resolution to conflicts in the work place. His general
premise is that diversity is more than an issue of race and gender. Once the
Minister of Information for the Portland chapter of the Black Panther Party,
Floyd is currently at work on a user friendly book about his theory of diversity
and communication. He also is active in the local music scene as well as writing
and directing plays.

HAPPY BASTARDS formed
as a disjointed trio in the summer of 2003. Sean Schock and Christy Chatfield
originated the idea of a hardcore but old-style punk band and the search for
other band mates began. Sean met Saxon Wood at a Melt Banana show. He was English,
intelligent, and said he played the bass so that was good enough for us. After
learning some covers from Conflict, Rudimentary Peni, and Dirt, Happy Bastards
wrote their first song Run With The Sheep. The trio really clicked but it was
apparent we were missing something Enter Shade. Shade was a roommate of ours
that we barely conversed with let alone knew he played guitar. Not only did
he prove that he could learn fast and play our covers, Shade proved to be the
rocking Hendrix to our Jimmy Experience, done up in a punk way, of course. First
challenge to Shade and the rest of us was to cover 24 songs by Rudimentary Peni
for the Halloween show only a month away. Two practices a week, approximately
4 songs a practice, and four weeks later Happy Bastards pulled it off. We succeeded
in coving the 24 songs and quickly realized that if we could accomplish that
feat, we just might have a good thing going.




Currently Happy Bastards have a new c.d. out on "Profane
Existence Records
", ( 1,000 C.d.s )(Cover art by Marald) And a split
7" with U.K. legends Kismet H.C. to be released on the French label "Fight
For Your Mind Records
"

( 1,000 7"s ) (a few hundred on colored wax!.) This September Happy Bastards
left for a 3 Week tour with Southern Rockers THE
COOTERS
and a European tour is being discussed for fALL 2008
.


Le Sous
Sol
(MAP)

Is located at 375 River Rd Eugene Oregon, It is a basement venue and the rules
of the house must be respected.

Soccer on Chile's Killing Field


This article is on the Op-Ed page of today's LA Times.

Soccer on Chile's Killing Field
By Dave Zirin

IN 1995, I went to Chile's National Stadium to watch a
soccer match. Soccer was something I neither enjoyed
nor understood, but the game was hardly on my mind;
instead, it was the arena.

I was 20 years old and had come to Chile to study. I
also hoped to meet some of the surviving allies of
leftist President Salvador Allende, who had been
toppled in the 1973 coup by Gen. Augusto Pinochet. I
didn't care that the team Colo Colo was playing
Universidad de Chile, a squad affiliated with the
college until 1980. I didn't understand why security
police were everywhere, or why someone threw a flaming
brick at me as I walked to the cheering section for La
U, as the Universidad team is also known.

All I could think of was: My God! This is National
Stadium, where the bleachers were once filled with
dissidents of every stripe after the coup, a mass
waiting room for those about to be executed or
tortured. This is where women were raped for the crime
of wearing pants.

And it was at nearby Chile Stadium where the great
Victor Jara — the Bob Dylan of Chile and a political
activist (or was Dylan the Victor Jara of the U.S.?) —
was murdered by the Pinochet regime. Jara's fingers
were mutilated in front of thousands of other
prisoners. He attempted to sing songs of resistance,
his hands bloody stumps, only to be gunned down as
people in the stands tried to join him in chorus.

I didn't want to be near these places any more than I
would want to watch a baseball game at Auschwitz.

But a friend saw the pained look on my face and
started to explain some of the history behind this
rivalry. I learned that Pinochet called himself
"President of Colo Colo" during his rule. My friend, a
former student at the university, told me that the
school had been the center of radical ferment, which
Pinochet crushed. He told me about the students
tortured, murdered, disappeared or, if they were
lucky, expelled — not from the school but from the
country. He told me of the students who remained,
forced to study in the gray conformity of
dictatorship. He told me of programs called limpieza
cabezas (head cleaning) in which students were forced
to listen to lectures on neoliberal economics.

All of a sudden it made sense to me why the tension in
the stadium — five years after Pinochet had stepped
down — was so palpable, with separate seating for La U
and Colo Colo fans.

By 1995, Chile had existed uneasily as a nominal
democracy for four years. Yet there had been no
reconciliation and no reckoning for the victims of the
Pinochet era. Pinochet's rule led to the deaths or
disappearances of nearly 3,200 people and the torture
of thousands more. Yet no one had answered for these
crimes. The general, as a condition for stepping down
from power, had been allowed to rewrite the
constitution to make him and his cohorts immune from
prosecution. And he was also still in charge of the
army.

In such a climate, I realized why this was so much
more than a game. It was a place of catharsis. In a
country where emotive _expressions are frowned upon, it
was a place to scream to the heavens, to howl at
injustice and to take a symbolic pound of flesh
against your enemies — under the guise of a soccer
match.

It was also the place where I saw my first live soccer
match. It was where I finally got it. The insane
endurance on the field; the powerful fakes, twists and
turns; the explosion with every goal. As a basketball
junkie, I saw why this — and not hoops — was the
beautiful game. Basketball, at its best, is about
teamwork and acting in concert with others. But too
often, it's one guy making a move while four stand
around.

That day, I didn't see anyone — players or spectators
— just standing around. There I was, dancing in the
aisles as La U and its fans avenged 20 years of pain
and defeat. It felt good to imagine Pinochet hearing
about this game and gnashing his capped teeth.

Of course, neither I nor anyone in my section were
fooling ourselves that this was somehow an actual
"victory," with the fates of so many victims
unresolved. It was symbolism, pure and simple. But it
was also an _expression of humanity, of resilience and
release.

Now Pinochet is dead, never forced to take residence
in the cage he so richly deserved. But as a Chilean
friend e-mailed me after Pinochet's death: "In Chile,
we have always known the truth about this evil man. It
does my heart well that jail was his immediate future,
and that he knew it." This is right. Any public
humiliation Pinochet received at the end was the
result of a movement of ordinary folks who never gave
up. If the cheers for La U back in 1995 offered even a
shard of support to those who felt their cause was
just, then it was worth every last exquisite shout.


[Dave Zirin is the author of "'What's My Name Fool?':
Sports and Resistance in the United States" (Haymarket
Books) You can receive his column Edge of Sports,
every week by e-mailing edgeofsports-subscribe@zirin.com.
Contact him at dave@edgeofsports.com]

link to article

Monday, December 11, 2006

Holiday Political Prisoner Support News from NY

1) SHAC7 Days of Xmas Banners

2) Support Daniel McGowan shirts make great stocking stuffers!

3) Benefit CD for Green Scare Indictees

4) 11th Annual Dinner Tribute to Families of Political Prisoners (NYC)

5) Jericho Movement Calls for Hearings on COINTELPRO


—————————————————————————————————————————————————
SHAC 7 Days of Xmas Banners now available at shac7.com/xmas.htm
4 to choose from. Show your love!

—————————————————————————————————————————————————

We just got a batch of Support Daniel shirts back from the printer. You can see the beautiful image designed by Kristine Virsis

We have the image printed on sweatshop-free American Apparel shirts. [Yeah, we know they suck and we are looking for alternatives]. The black, pink, and olive green shirts are 100% cotton and the heather lake blue shirt is a 50/50 cotton/polyester blend. We have them in sizes XS - XL. The S to XL are unisex shirts which run slightly small for men and slightly large for women. The shirts are $15 plus shipping/handling and orders over 10 shirts get a bulk discount. You can order via PayPal on our website or find out how to order by mail by emailing us at friendsofdanielmcg@yahoo.com Please also contact us if you are ordering internationally.

All proceeds from the sale of these shirts go to Daniel's legal defense fund. If you live in NYC, you can get shirts from our friends at the following locations:

-bluestockings books, 172 Allen Street (between Stanton & Rivington Street), Lower East Side, New York.
-Mayday Books: 155 First Avenue (in the Theater for the New City between 9th & 10th Street), New York.
-Moo Shoes: 152 Allen Street (between Stanton & Rivington Street), Lower East Side, New York

Thanks for your support!
Family and Friends of Daniel McGowan
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Benefit CD for Green Scare defendants


Filastine “Burn It” Benefit CD


On December 7, 2005, the despicable lackeys of the FBI initiated “operation backfire,” a roundup of accused arsonists intended to intimidate all associated with ecologically oriented direct action. Most of the defendants in this witch-hunt eventually accepted plea bargains—some honorably, some dishonorably.

On December 7, 2006, the CrimethInc. Workers’ Collective released Filastine’s Burn It CD as a fundraiser to support the defendants who refused to become police informants. Filastine, a former member of ¡Tchkung! and founding participant in the Infernal Noise Brigade , has been drawing on musical traditions from all around the globe to compose incendiary anarchist music for well over a decade now. Burn It, a wide-ranging mélange of driving rhythms, electronic layering, on-site sampling, and multilingual vocals, has already been released in Europe to great acclaim. These 16 tracks successfully integrate analog and digital, political and party, experiment and entertainment—not to mention artistic traditions from Brooklyn to Indonesia.

A full $5 from every CD sale will go to the defendants, who face long stretches of prison time and massive debts. The extensive packaging, in which no plastic is used save that in the CD itself, includes a 12-page booklet providing a full background and commentary on their cases (download a PDF of the booklet here).

"The record's long list of singers, MCs, and musicians brings the songs to endlessly surprising and rich places, as well. Filastine layers artists from distant genres and locales with great architectural sense, and while at times the extremity of the juxtapositions borders on hilarious, the music always feels heroically well designed and strong in conception. On "Palmares," disaffected French oration is overlaid with clouds of gypsy-brass ennui, while party-starter "Judas Goat" lets the rhaita, one of the wailing horns of the Master Musicians, loose over beats that wouldn't be out of place propelling an Aaliyah cut. On some songs, Filastine's constructions are reminiscent of the murky drama of Ninja Tuners like Amon Tobin and DJ Food, and throughout the album the lines between live performed contributions and meticulously contextualized samples is slurred and burnt. The most emotional and fully realized pair of songs come about two-thirds in: "Boca de Ouro" alternates dizzy rhymes with a fuzzily cinematic chorus, and "Autology" is a slow-burning adaptation of an Indonesian song in which the intoxicatingly mournful singing of Jessika Skeletalia Kenney sails over a bed of screeching bowed bass and quicksand-sinking drum patterns.

"Overall, Burn It is a stunningly successful integration of varied international musical styles into the polyglot schemes of its maker; way beyond most "electronic world music" in both its conception and execution. Not unlike the Infernal Noise Brigade, Filastine absorbs music from all over the world and bends it (with all due respect) to his own designs. And, like the INB, he veers wildly between pointed polemic discourse and bacchanalian party embrace. In this way the album has more of a personal stamp and feeling of its creator than a lot of electronic music, as it deals—whether consciously or unconsciously—with these essential imperfections and warring forces in the dude that is Filastine."
-Sam Mickens
The Stranger
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

11th Annual Dinner Tribute to Families of Political Prisoner
Body: Contact Person: Herman Ferguson
Telephone: 718-949-5153


On Sunday January 21, 2007, The Malcolm X Commemoration Committee will host its 11th annual dinner tribute to the families of our political prisoners. This event will take place at the Bedford-Stuyvesant Restoration Plaza at 1368 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, N.Y.

The dinner provides an opportunity for our community to show its support for our political prisoners and at the same time it demonstrates our solidarity with their families who have been forced to suffer the long painful absence of a member of their household.

Sundiata Acoli, Herman Bell, The Move 9, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Bashir Hameed, Abdul Majid, Marshall Eddie Conway , Russell Shoatz, Mutulu Shakur, Herman Bell and Robert Seth Hayes have been proudly represented by their families at this annual event Eventually, we hope the combined efforts of our communities and the political prisoner families will grow strong enough to force the prison system to finally release our freedom fighters.

This is why we are asking the community to come out in great numbers to show their support and empathy with the imprisoned brothers and their long suffering family members. The proceeds from this affair are divided equally among the commissary accounts of all the political prisoners who have a family member at the dinner to represent them.

The featured speaker will be Fred Hampton, Jr. who is the son of our beloved hero Fred Hampton, Sr., brutally assassinated by the FBI and the Chicago police in a cowardly plot back in the 60's...Joining Fred in the program will be cultural workers: A_Alikes, Karen Taylor, Kahlil Almustafa, Peggy Washington, Talibah Iman, “Nat Turner”, Sala Cyril, Desiree Gordon and others.

Our usual sumptuous dinner will be served between 3 p.m. - 4 p.m. The cultural tribute begins promptly at 4:15 .p.m. Tickets are $35. All proceeds go to the commissary accounts of the political prisoners represented at the dinner. For advance reservations complete the form below and mail with money order to:
Malcolm X Commemoration Committee
P.O. Box 340084
Jamaica, NY 11434-3104


11th Annual Dinner Tribute
To the Families of Our Political Prisoners
& Prisoners of War
Sunday, January 21, 2007
Bed-Stuy Restoration Plaza
1368 Fulton Street, Brooklyn
3-7PM
Tickets $35.00
Please reserve ______ Tickets @$35.00 each for the above event.
I enclose a money order for ____________.
Signature _______________________________________

Date______________________

Make money order payable to:
MALCOLM X COMMEMORATION COMMITTEE

Mail with completed form to:
MXCC
P.O. Box 340084
Jamaica, NY 11434-3104



Jericho Movement calls for hearings on COINTELPRO
————————————————————————————————————————————————

Sunday, December 10, 2006
Call for hearings on COINTELPRO

Dear Sisters and Brothers,

In January 2007, Congressman John Conyers will become the new chair of the United States House of Representative Committee on the Judiciary. The House Committee on the Judiciary jurisdiction includes the following areas: (1) the judiciary and judicial proceedings, civil and criminal; (2) civil liberties; (3) claims against the United States; (4) national penitentiaries and (5) Revision and codification of the Statutes of the United States.

Herman Ferguson, on behalf of The Jericho Movement, has written a letter to Congressman Conyers requesting that he schedule hearings on "COINTELPRO: Its Legacy and Continuing Impact."� A copy of Herman's letter is below. It is our hope that these hearings, if held, will not only further expose the FBI and local law enforcement crimes against the Black Liberation Movement and many of those involved it, but also result in legislation addressing some of these injustices.

Of particular concern to the Jericho Movement is the release and treatment of our political prisoners. Though the United States steadfastly denies it, presently there are many political prisoners in the United States, the majority of them Black/New Africans who were targets of the COINTELPRO "Black Nationalist Hate Groups"� program. Many of these brothers and sisters have been incarcerated for decades.

For example, Jalil Abdul Muntaquin, has been incarcerated since 1971; Sundiata Acoli and Herman Bell since 1973. It is critical that the human rights and constitutional violations surrounding their arrests, trials, sentencing, conditions of their confinement and continuing incarceration because of their political histories--all were members of the Black Panther Party--and continuing commitment to the liberation of Black/New Afrikan be brought to the wider attention of the public. Sundiata Acoli, now 70 and with an near exemplary record, has twice been denied parole.

If nothing else, congressional hearings on "COINTELPRO: Its Legacy and Continuing Impact"� would go along way towards achieving this result.

To this end, we are calling on all supporters of political prisoners--defense committees; revolutionary nationalist, radical, and progressive organizations, elected officials, community, religious, spiritual leaders, etc.--to write, fax, or call Congressman Conyers to urge that schedule hearings on COINTELPRO. Congressman Conyers' address is as follows:

The Honorable John Conyers
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5126
(202) 225-0072 Fax

Your support of Jericho's call will help ensure that it becomes a reality. Forward, download, copy and distribute this letter and Jericho's call to as many people as possible. Please mail or email copies of your letters to Herman Ferguson at the following address:

National Jericho Movement
P.O. Box 340084
Jamaica, NY 11434

Thank you in advance for your support of this effort. For more information about The Jericho Movement and Political Prisoners in the United States, visit The Jericho Movement website www.the jerichomovement.com. Please also do not hesitate to contact Herman or us if you have any questions about this campaign.

In solidarity,

Joan P. Gibbs, Esq. (718) 270-6296 OR 1-718-757-4093
Mani Gilyard, Chair, Malcolm X Commemoration Committee

The Jericho Movement
For Recognition and Amnesty for Political Prisoners
P.O. Box 340084
Jamaica, New York 11434-3104
Tel: 718. 949.5153

December 7, 2006

The Honorable John Conyers
Ranking Member
Committee on the Judiciary
U.S. House of Representatives
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Conyers:

Congratulations on your pending ascendancy to the chair of the House Committee on the Judiciary. We write to request that you schedule hearings on "COINTELPRO: Its Legacy and Continuing Impact."� For more than a decade, many of us have been requesting hearings on COINTELPRO, and hopefully, legislation that begins to address some of the injustices committed against the Black movement and activists as result of COINTELPRO. We hope that one of your acts as the new chair of the Judiciary Committee will be to schedule these hearings.

As I am sure you are aware, COINTELPRO is an acronym for a series of FBI counterintelligence programs against, inter alia, the Communist party, and so-called "Black Nationalist Hate Groups."� The August 1967 FBI memorandum announcing the Black Nationalist Hate Group program describes its goals as:

1. Prevent a coalition of militant black nationalist groups;
2. Prevent the rise of a messiah who could unify and electrify the militant nationalist movement;
3. Prevent violence on the part of the black nationalist groups;
4. Prevent militant black nationalist groups and leaders from gaining respectability by discrediting them;
5. Prevent the long range growth of militant black nationalist organizations especially among youth.

The targets of the Black Nationalist Hate Group program included a wide array of Black organizations and individuals, among them the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), the Revolutionary Action Movement, the Republic of New Akrika, Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., Kwame Toure, formerly known as Stokely Carmichael, and countless others.

Though the Black Panther (BPP) was not among the original targets of the program, in September 1968, then FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover labeled the BPP "the greatest threat to the internal security of the country."� Thereafter the BPP became the primary focus of the program, and was ultimately the target of 233 of the believed total authorized "Black Nationalist"� COINTELPRO actions.

As the Final Report of the 1976 Select Committee To Study Government Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activists states: "Although the claimed purpose of the Bureau's COINTELPRO tactics was to prevent violence, some of the FBI's tactics against the BPP were clearly intended to foster violence, and many others could reasonably have been expected to cause violence."

In its pursuit of the BPP, the FBI, often together with local law enforcement officials, knew no bounds. BPP members and supporters were not only spied on and harassed but, in blatant violation of the both the United States Constitution and International law, falsely accused of crimes that they had not committed. Many were wounded and murdered by police and FBI.

December 4, 2006, marked the thirty-eighth anniversary of the assassination of Fred Hampton, one of the leaders of the Chicago chapter of the BPP, by local Chicago police thanks to information from an FBI informant, while he slept in his bed. Hampton was shot twice in the head, once in the arm and shoulder; while three other people sleeping in the same bed escaped unharmed. Mark Clark, sleeping in a living room chair, was also murdered while asleep. Hampton's wife, who was eight months pregnant, was also shot but survived. Four Panthers sleeping in the apartment were also wounded, while one escaped injury. Fred Hampton was 21 years old when he was assassinated; Mark Clark was 17.

While the true impact of the COINTELPRO Black Nationalist Hate Group Program on the Black Liberation Movement will probably never be known because the FBI never recorded all of its activities, has destroyed many of its files, and many of the architects and participants are now deceased, it is crucial that the impact and continuing legacy of this program be investigated and remedies developed to repair the damage it has done. This is particularly true with respect to the many members of the Black Panther party, the Republic of New Afrika and other organizations that today languish in jail as a result of their having been targeted by the FBI and local law enforcement officials as part of the counterintelligence programs.

We urgently request that you schedule hearings on "COINTELPRO: Its Legacy and Continuing Impact"� in the near future. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention this matter. We expect that you will give our request the serious attention that it deserves.

Yours Truly.

Herman Ferguson, Co-Founder, The Jericho Movement

--
FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS!
www.thejerichomovement.com

Italian & British news

ELP Information Bulletin (11th December 2006)

Dear friends

ELP has three lots of news for you today.

1) (Italian) Il Silvestre anti-GM crop trial Court of Appeal conclusions
2) (British) AR prisoner, Don Currie, sentenced
2) (Italian) Lecce Defendants update

1) No one can ever accuse the Italian legal system of being fast
moving! A few years ago ELP reported the arrests of 26 people
following an anti-GM protest in October 2000. The protest was
organised by Il Silvestre and involved people protesting outside the
offices of companies linked to GM crops. We also believe a small
amount of anti-GM graffiti may of been sprayed onto the walls of the
buildings.

The protest was a two day event and on the second day the police
tried to prevent the protesters from marching down their intended
rout. The protesters tried to negotiate with the police but the
police baton charged the protesters.

Forced to defend themselves with their placards, the protesters where
chased through the streets of Florence.

As we said, 26 people were arrested but by the time the case got to
court, in 2004, the 26 defendants had been reduced to 13. In 2004,
following their trial 11 people where convicted of various offences,
however all 11 appealed against their sentences and in December 2006
(over six years later) the Court of Appeal ruled on the sentences.

Out of the 11 who were convicted, one person had their conviction
overturned and was aquitted of all the charges against him. Eight
saw their sentences reduced by half and were given 8 months suspended
sentenced. Whilst the final two also saw their prison sentences
halved and were ordered to serve 1 year imprisonment each.

One of the people who has been sentenced to 1 year imprisonment is
now appealing against that sentence and is now under house arrest
pending their next appeal (as we said, no one can accuse the Italian
legal system of being fast moving).

The other person, who has been sentenced to 1 year imprisonment, is
current Il Silvestre prisoner Costantino Ragusa.

Costantino was accused of being an organiser of the anti-GM protest
and hence his 1 year sentence. In a separate trial, Costantino has
also been sentenced to 18 months imprisonment for allegedly burgling
and firebombing a multinational organisation. Plus he is serving
five years for his alleged role in the COR actions. In addition to
this, he is also awaiting trial accused of involvement in the
destruction of electricty pylons which were carrying nuclear power.

Costantino supporters are confident that when he appeals against his
sentences he will see either some clemancy or a reduction in his
sentence. But for now, he is serving 7.5 years imprisonment for all
his various alleged activity.

Please send letters of support to:

Costantino Ragusa
Casa Circondariale
Via Prati Nuovi 7
27058 Voghera (PV)
Italy.

2) A couple of days ago, British Animal Rights activist, Don Currie,
was given a 12-year prison sentence having previously pleaded guilty
to placing incendairy devices at various locations linked to animal
abuse including people connected to Huntingdon Life Sciences.

Please send letters of support to:

Donald Currie TN 4593
HMP Woodhill
Tattenhoe Street
Milton Keynes
MK4 4DA
England.

3) And finally, supporters of the Italian Lecce Defendants have sent
ELP the following update...

Update Nottetempo

The hearing held on November 23 finished much earlier than expected.
The judge was very disappointed that the public prosecutor failed to
bring his final witnesses to court, so he postponed the hearing to
January 18.

A request for permission to work presented by Salvatore’s lawyer was
rejected. The comrade, however, read a declaration, which was also
signed by some other co-defendants.

Declaration made by the Lecce anarchists in court

We have decided to make a short declaration to clarify a few
questions and to refute the lies that priest Cesare Lodeserto told in
this court at the last hearing.

First of all, we want to give words back their real meaning, which
carries a precise content; but where there is the intent to conceal
reality, the first step is to call it by different names and twist it
until it loses any relationship with the truth. This is a very common
practice these days, where neo-language is largely employed, making
wars become ‘peace missions’ or ‘humanitarian operations’ and
detention centres for immigrants ‘welcome centres’. Similarly, father
Cesare calls the prisoners in the Regina Pacis camp ‘guests’ and
talks about a system of ‘passive surveillance’. It is rather strange
that these ‘guests’ were watched by a system of video-surveillance,
that ‘police had to intervene in the camp’ (to quote Lodeserto),
‘arrests were carried out in the structure’ and ‘the people in the
camp were registered according to the regulations normally in use in
such structures’. In fact the immigrants were registered and listed
like goods. Prisoners are also registered, and deportees in Nazi
concentration camps were listed and registered too.

To move on, both father Cesare and the inquisitors claimed that the
revolts in the Regina Pacis camp broke out when anarchists
demonstrated outside that hideous place. We are not interested in
hearing that we are capable of such; on the contrary, as anarchists
we try to find any instrument that is useful to intervene in a
reality that we find intolerable.

The point is quite different and also, let’s say, banal: revolts
break out spontaneously where dignity is crushed and life is
offended. This simple truth is widely demonstrated by the story of
totalitarian institutions in general and the Regina Pacis camp in
particular, as proved by a very long list of episodes. It is
therefore the self-determination of individuals and not anarchists’
ability that brings about all individual and collective revolts.

Finally, we want to clarify what father Cesare claimed, referring to
an event that occurred on August 10 2004, following which a Rumanian
in his late twenties, Vasile Costantin, has remained totally
paralysed. We will not discuss whether what this man stated is true
(that he was beaten up by the cops while lying on the ground after
falling from the fence; we know such gentle police practices all too
well), we only want to make it clear that never ever has father
Cesare or anyone else working in the Regina Pacis camp ‘helped this
man in any possible way’, as the latter declared. On the contrary,
the young Rumanian was totally abandoned by the operators of the camp
who simply informed his wife in Rumania that he was dying, without
further getting in touch with her. Vasile, known as Vali, was visited
in the hospital in Lecce by a few comrades who warmed him with love
and affection, according to authentic solidarity, which is extraneous
to economic and personal interests. These comrades and other
sensitive people managed to get Vali into a specialised clinic for
spinal rehabilitation in Imola where he stayed for a few months,
without unfortunately recovering much. The same people continue to
support Vali now that he is back in Rumania. We are not saying that
because we want to be considered as charitable people or because we
want to be honoured with medals that we despise, but because we want
to establish the truth and tear away father Cesare’s veil of lies.
The latter paid one and only one visit to Vali in hospital after he
learned that others had already been, as he wanted to know who these
people were.

Rudolf Hoss, a commander in Auschwitz concentration camp, wrote in
his memories while detained in prison in Poland awaiting execution:
‘I never became insensitive to human suffering: I have always seen it
and suffered for it. I had to crush it because I was not allowed to
be soft’. He also boasted that he had never personally beaten up any
prisoner in the camp. Father Cesare, on the contrary, cannot even say
that.

That’s all.


==================

British Earth Liberation Prisoners Support Network
BM Box 2407
London
WC1N 3XX
England
www.spiritoffreedom.org.uk

Italian ELP
c/o ELP4321@Hotmail.com

Mexico Week In Review: 12.04-12.10

[from Committee of Indigenous Solidarity (CIS). Thanks!]

* * *
1. OAXACA UPDATE I: LEADER ARRESTED IN MEXICO CITY
2. OAXACA UPDATE II: SECOND MEETING WITH GOV'T ENDS IN FAILURE
3. LA OTRA UPDATE: TOUR ENDS BACK IN MEXICO CITY
4. CALDERON PRESENTS BUDGET
5. BORDER NEWS: OAS NAMES U.S. GOVERNOR AS MIGRATION ENVOY
6. TWO ARRESTED IN JOURNALIST'S DEATH
* * *


OAXACA UPDATE I: LEADER ARRESTED IN MEXICO CITY

Federal police in Mexico City arrested Flavio Sosa, 42, and three other leaders of the six-month protest late Monday. The men had traveled to the Mexican capital to hold talks with officials of the federal Interior Ministry. The talks began with other protest leaders. Sosa faces a variety of charges, including kidnapping, arson, vandalism and assault. "This is a bad sign," Zemen Bravo, the elected leader of the protesters, told reporters shortly before entering the Interior Ministry building. "They are hostages. But there is a social movement that will know what lesson to draw and continue protesting."

Some human rights activists said that the arrests indicated how Mexico's new interior minister - Francisco Ramirez, who took office with President Felipe Calderon - will deal with dissenters. "He's an enemy of human rights," said Adrian Ramirez, president of the Mexican League for the Defense of Human Rights, a Mexico City group involved in Oaxaca. "He's proving it through his first actions just four days after taking office," said Ramirez, no relation to the interior minister.

The Interior Ministry said that it would give priority to talks to find a solution to the Oaxaca standoff. Referring to Sosa's arrest, the ministry's statement said the government is committed "to the firm application of the law and to our existing legal framework."
In other Oaxaca news, assailants shot dead an Indian activist police said. It was not clear if the killing was related to months of political violence in which at least nine other people have died. The bullet-ridden corpse of Raul Marcial Perez was found Friday (12/08) on a road near the Mixtec Indian community of Agua Fria about 120 miles north of Oaxaca City, state police said in a news release. He had been shot earlier in the day, it said. Marcial Perez had been involved in disputes involving two rival Triqui Indian rights groups, but it was not clear if that was related to his slaying.

Sources: Houston Chronicle: 12/06; Associated Press: 12/10
====

OAXACA UPDATE II: SECOND MEETING WITH GOV'T ENDS IN FAILURE

A second meeting between the Popular Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca (APPO) and the present Mexican administration concluded without agreements on the conflict in that Mexican state. In the meeting the APPO demanded the release of 138 individuals charged of committing violent acts on November 25 in the capital of that demarcation.

The government limited itself to receiving protests issued by the organization as the meeting was agreed to have dialogue character and a possible stage for the negotiation of any solution. The APPO confirmed it would carry out the peaceful march set for December 10 and intended to demand the release of the arrested individuals. With that objective, they said, all preventive measures will be taken. Representatives of the Executive and APPO leaders agreed to meet on December 12 again to analyze the denunciations on human rights violations issued on Friday.

Source: Prensa Latina: 12/09
====

LA OTRA UPDATE: TOUR ENDS BACK IN MEXICO CITY

After a long journey into the forgotten corners of the country of Mexico, the Zapatista Other Campaign tour begun on January 1st finally came to an end" and a new beginning. To celebrate, adherents of the Other Campaign met together Mexico City to compare notes and shed light onto some of the results of the tour. The theme, the Other Campaign and the Anti-Capitalist Struggle, brought together eight panelists who addressed these topics to a full house, not a single chair left empty. Four of the panelists were the first four delegates of the Sixth Commission of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN, in its Spanish initials): Delegado Zero, Subcomandante Insurgente Marcos; Delegada Una, Comandanta Grabiela; Delegado Dos, Comandante Zebedeo; and Delegada Tres, Comandanta Miriam. Other representatives as follows: Rosario Hernandez, of the Independent Francisco Villa Front, Luis Alfonso Vargas of the Party of Mexican Communists, Sergio Rodríguez of Rebeldia magazine y Lucas Alvarez of Socialist Worker Unity.

The panelists each identified capitalism as the overriding cause of the problems that the Mexican people and environment are suffering today; the grievances heard over the past year by Delegate Zero on his nationwide listening tour. Vargas mentioned how since the end of the Cold War, capitalism has been presented to the world as the only natural and inevitable option. Since this system, according to Vargas, is based in exploitation and the sale of merchandise, it causes the destruction of natural resources and an even greater class struggle. He proposed that the only way out of this situation will be the destruction of the capitalist system, and described how the protests are growing around the world. "Now not only poor people are standing up against it, but people of all classes and especially indigenous people, immigrants, human rights organizations and more." The movement against capitalism, Vargas said, is beginning to take the offensive.

Next Rosario Hernandez remembered that in the year 1810 Mexico fought for its Independence from Spain, and one hundred years later in 1910, came the Mexican Revolution against another dictatorship. Now, as 2010 approaches, the Other Campaign is laying the groundwork to vindicate those victories. "We have hit the limit of the disappearance of people, of land, and of culture, and every day the riches of the country are held in fewer and fewer hands." She declared capitalism to be like a cancer that destroys all of the natural wealth that is Mexico. "Capitalism has converted everything into merchandise: education, politics, even man himself. It is a crucial element of this system to destroy anything that is different, especially anything rebellious, and within this, to erase the past itself. Ignorance, by way of historical amnesia, serves as one of the principal weapons that allows for the continuation of this system. Erasing the history of centuries of humiliation, of people forced to sell their land and of people killed in the struggle, makes the current destruction appear isolated and alone. Another weapon is the institutional violence that causes anyone who acts out against the system to be followed, jailed, disappeared, or assassinated." But in spite of all of this systematic oppression, Hernandez points out a search for the real past that is still exists, even if underground. "We are learning today from The Other Campaign how many silent struggles are going on across the country, that don't appear in the official data. We are recognizing the honest struggles, and these people are not alone". Today we are constructing a new form of politics, of uniting our strengths, together."

Alvarez followed this notion of the formation of a new politics, from the Zapatista uprising in 1994, and the subsequent struggles over international trade policies. "Free trade served to deepen the political struggle against capitalism." He mentioned the fact that students, now upon graduating, have no place to go to find a job, no place to create a better condition of life for this country, and for the defense of the mother earth. "Now what we have to do is find the links, the connections between all of these different struggles we have seen in this tour around Mexico. The left has to unite within itself against capitalism, to join together all of the different positions within the leftist movement."

Rodríguez of Rebeldia talked about the importance of defining what it means to be anti-capitalist, and in this way defining exactly what is capitalism and neo-liberalism. "Today we are living a global offense of exploitation, of being kicked off of our lands, and of a development of politics that will destroy us." The politicians, he continues, are now the "worst" or the "not as bad", and either way they continue taking everything from us, little by little. "The only way that we can confront this is by struggling for the impossible or in other words, the necessary." Rodríguez also talked about how the only politics that exist now in Mexico are the politics that give everything over to the great capital, making this country subordinate to the United States. Every time the demands are more and more intense, now creating a cultural crisis. The tenets of the Other Campaign, to unite those from below and to the left, are the destination of those searching out an alternative. "The possibility does exist, when we are able to join together all of our efforts."

Delegada Tres, Comandanta Miriam, spoke on behalf of the Zapatista Sixth Commission. She said the EZLN is on alert for all of the political prisoners of Atenco, and all of the women raped there. "We see how the government has not been able to find a solution to the demands. We are not going to leave them alone. We must continue to organize ourselves. We also are organizing against the capitalistic system, which for us means only pain, hunger, oblivion and inequality." Comandanta Miriam also focused on how important it is to fight for the lands, and for fair salaries, even if it does provoke repression. "They are trying to finish off our culture and our collective way of working, through privatization of our natural resources, by giving us transgenetic seeds, all from those rich countries, the capitalists. Every time the prices rise for things we need, and our salaries are lower and lower. They are making our youth learn English and the ways of individualism, this is what they put in the minds through the educational system." She spoke to the need to understand the collective way of working, as a method within the struggle. "The politicians talk about democracy, freedom and truth, but we know this is nothing more than talk and a manipulation of information. They want to fool us once again. We have to show them our ways, which don't depend on institutions or on individuals. Our future is up to us, it depends on how we want it to be." Miriam ended her speech by saying- "Keep heart! Don't ever stop struggling. Soon this capitalist system will fall."

Subcomandante Marcos spoke next, introduced by Miriam as "the person we have put in charge of the work of the Other Campaign." Marcos began by addressing the situation in Oaxaca, the hundreds of people who have been illegally tortured, beaten and jailed, young, old, children and grandparents. "Brothers and Sisters," he called out to the crowd, "this attack against Oaxaca cannot be forgotten, EZLN calls on all people to initiate the following demands: One, the presentation of all of the disappeared peoples, alive. Two, freedom for all of the political prisoners. Three, the immediate exit of Ulises Ruiz Ortiz. And four, the recognition of all the wrong doing that has happened to the people of Oaxaca. Oaxaca is not alone."

Next he referred to the entire journey of the Other Campaign, over 45,000 kilometers, in land that we now can call "from below". Marcos talked about how this force is growing so much that it can't even be contained by the country of Mexico, that to the North of the Rio Bravo there exists another Mexico, "one that we are not going to lose." He continued: "We cannot continue resisting separately, each person from their own place. We must unite ourselves." He talked about how in each of the different eight corners of Mexico they saw people from below, criminalized for fishing, for taking care of the land, for struggling to maintain their territory. He talked about how the great machine of the north is making everything into merchandise, into property, into banks, malls- and all of the profits go to the foreigners. "We have returned to where we were in the 1900s, with the destruction of our land, our culture, our collective way of working, the destruction of our women, the lack of appreciation of our elders, and the merchandising of the youth. All of this, including the lack of maintenance of our educational system and the social security system, is for the benefit of the grand capital extranjero." Delegate Zero finished his speech by saying how it was more common in the North to find women as the bosses, but that this strong indigenous woman of the North, and her struggle for indigenous rights, was not created by the Zapatista Sixth Declaration of the Lacandon Jungle that began the Other Campaign, but, rather, that the Sexta serves simply as a call to get to know each other, to unite ourselves and to respond to the following questions. "Who are we", Where are we", How does it look" What do we want" How are we going to get it"" He called upon all to meet this Monday, December 4th to begin to discuss the answers to these questions. He also called upon the importance of creating a movement within the Other Campaign focused upon the following issues: 1) the high costs of electricity around the country. 2) the state and care of the environment, and, 3) the importance supporting small businesses instead of multinational corporations. "The hour has come," announced Marcos. "It is time to wake up. It is difficult to distinguish between day and night when everything appears to be a pre-dawn, but now is the time to recuperate our shadows. We have to awaken."

Delegado Dos, Zebedeo, rose to invite everyone to the meeting with the Zapatista communities and with countries from around the world, in Oventic, the heart in the center of the Zapatista territory, December 30 to January 2. "So you all can get to know us directly, but it will not be just to get to know people, but also to see how we work: Our good health, our autonomous education, our basic alimentation, and our healthy justice. This is a new practice of government, a healthy government. It's our new form of politics, our new way. Never will it be through the current political system, with big business. We are witnesses to the lies. We are sure that now is the time to plant the seeds, to create anew. We will make the rich people shake in their boots. Then we will see each other also in July of 2006, for the Intergalactic again in the Zapatista communities. We will be waiting for you all with open arms."

Finally, the last Delegate stood to speak, with an obvious smile not well hidden behind her black mask. Delegada Una, Grabiela said "We are here because we have completed our work. El Compa, Marcos, has now finished his tour. Now we get to return, but you all will not remain alone. Other compañeros will come. Do not fear the government. We will continue advancing in our struggle. We must give our whole heart to this struggle. Now we can return happy to our communities." She caused the entire audience to laugh by admitting that she was going to say other things, but she forgot it all. "It doesn't matter", she proclaims, "I am just so happy with you all and for this reason we can now go home. Redouble your efforts, friends, and stay optimistic."

Source: NarcoNews.com: 12/03
====

CALDERON PRESENTS BUDGET

Mexican President Felipe Calderon - under pressure to promote the social programs his leftist rival championed - presented an austere budget that increases spending for social programs to help the country's poorest. The $205 billion budget includes a 10 percent reduction in Calderon's salary and that of other top government officials. The salary cuts would free up about $2.5 billion in the next year, or enough to build about 2,500 schools. Calderon also promised to send a government spending bill to Congress that builds long-term savings. "I'm committed to transparency and accountability," he said.

Former presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who lost the July 2 election by less than one percentage point and is leading opposition to Calderon's administration, made slashing government salaries a central theme of his campaign, along with increased spending on social programs for the elderly and the poor.

Calderon, who took office from outgoing President Vicente Fox, wants to increase spending on education by 4.2 percent and on health programs by 9.3 percent, in part to fund the expansion of a program that offers insurance to the poor. Other areas that will receive more money in the budget are housing and public safety. Calderon has promised to crack down on corrupt police and rampant kidnappings and drug murders, and to increase the salaries of the lowest-paid members of the police, army and navy. Calderon called for combating tax evasion and said the budget supports the creation of small and medium businesses to create jobs. The budget anticipates 3 percent inflation and 3.6 percent growth in gross domestic product. Calderon said his proposed budget, which represents a 9.4 percent increase over the 2006 budget, was realistic in the context of international finances, including a projected decrease in the U.S. economy's growth as well as a drop in oil prices and in Mexico's oil production capacity next year.

Lopez Obrador, who pledged that as president he would cut top government salaries by half, called Calderon's proposed 10 percent cut a "farce," noting that even after the reduction, the new president would still earn three times more than the president of Chile and nearly twice as much as the prime minister of Spain. Calderon's salary has still not been announced, but Fox earned about $245,000 this year. After a 10 percent cut, that would be $220,500. By contrast, Chilean President Michelle Bachelet will earn $72,000 this year, while Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero will make $117,000. President Bush makes $400,000 annually.

Calderon, who campaigned on promises to aid the poor through job creation, has come under pressure to focus more heavily on social spending in an effort to steal some of Lopez Obrador's thunder and earn the support of the 14.7 million Mexicans who voted for the former Mexico City mayor. Regardless of whether the budget cuts produce the savings Calderon anticipates, they are unlikely to have a major impact on the rest of the government's economic activity, said Mario Correa, an economist at Scotia Casa de Bolsa in Mexico City. "I think it's more likely a clear message about the social objectives that President Calderon is trying to meet," he said. "And in that sense, it is a positive message that he is very conscious that Mexico is a country that still has a lot of needs and setbacks and that he is going to focus on attending to those."

Source: Associated Press: 12/05
====

BORDER NEWS: OAS NAMES U.S. GOVERNOR AS MIGRATION ENVOY

New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, a former UN ambassador, was named as the Organization of American States' special envoy on migration in an effort to improve US-Latin American dialogue. The appointment came amid heated debate in the United States over illegal immigration, as US lawmakers consider proposals to deal with the 11.5 million undocumented workers, mostly Latin Americans, living in America.

"The migration issue is key to improving relations (between Latin America and the United States," Richardson, 59, said at a news conference alongside OAS Secretary General Jose Miguel Insulza. "Dialogue and democracy are very important and I hope to help the secretary general with advice and trips to countries to improve dialogue," he said in Spanish. Richardson said he was ready to visit leaders who have been critical of the United States in hopes of improving relations. "I know president (elect of Nicaragua Daniel) Ortega, I know (Venezuelan) President (Hugo) Chavez, and I will go to any country," said Richardson, whose mother is Mexican.

Richardson, whose state borders Mexico, rejected plans backed by President George W. Bush to build a huge fence along the US-Mexico border to stop the flow of illegal immigration. Instead, he called for comprehensive reform to regularize undocumented workers. "Two things must take place. One, a plan to legalize the 12 million (illegal) immigrants in the United States, and I think that it is important to improve border security," he said, pointing to the need for increased patrols and more cooperation with Mexico. Richardson was a UN ambassador and energy secretary under former president Bill Clinton. The Democrat has not ruled out running for his party's nomination in the 2008 presidential election.

Source: AFP: 12/07
====

2 ARRESTED IN JOURNALIST'S DEATH

A journalist killed last week apparently was not the main target of the attack, authorities said. A preliminary investigation indicated that two suspects arrested were not after 32-year-old reporter Adolfo Sanchez Guzman, but the second victim, said Jaime Pizano of the district attorney's office. The bodies of Sanchez Guzman and Cesar Martinez Lopez were discovered near Ciudad Mendoza, 75 miles west of the port city of Veracruz. Sanchez Guzman's abandoned car had been found two days earlier.

Sanchez Guzman worked for the Veracruz affiliate of the Televisa television network and reported for a radio station and an Internet news site. Initially there was some speculation that his killing might have been related to his work. Since 2004, at least 13 journalists have met violent deaths in Mexico, presumably as revenge for unfavorable reports on criminals, drug traffickers and corrupt government officials.

Police arrested Juan Carlos Palestino, 30, and Julian Rosas Palestino, 34, after witnesses said the two brothers had been looking for Martinez, Pizano said. The brothers had accused Martinez of stealing their truck, Pizano said. Investigators believe Sanchez Guzman had been giving Martinez a ride to a car repair shop. Sanchez Guzman was shot twice in the back of the head at close range, and Martinez was shot once in the head, police said. Both had been tortured before they died, Pizano said.

Source: Associated Press: 12/05

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Call for hearings on COINTELPRO


Dear Sisters and Brothers,

In January 2007, Congressman John Conyers will become the new chair of the United States House of Representative Committee on the Judiciary. The House Committee on the Judiciary jurisdiction includes the following areas: (1) the judiciary and judicial proceedings, civil and criminal; (2) civil liberties; (3) claims against the United States; (4) national penitentiaries and (5) Revision and codification of the Statutes of the United States.

Herman Ferguson, on behalf of The Jericho Movement, has written a letter to Congressman Conyers requesting that he schedule hearings on "COINTELPRO: Its Legacy and Continuing Impact." A copy of Herman's letter is below. It is our hope that these hearings, if held, will not only further expose the FBI and local law enforcement crimes against the Black Liberation Movement and many of those involved it, but also result in legislation addressing some of these injustices.

Of particular concern to the Jericho Movement is the release and treatment of our political prisoners. Though the United States steadfastly denies it, presently there are many political prisoners in the United States, the majority of them Black/New Africans who were targets of the COINTELPRO "Black Nationalist Hate Groups" program. Many of these brothers and sisters have been incarcerated for decades.

For example, Jalil Abdul Muntaquin, has been incarcerated since 1971; Sundiata Acoli and Herman Bell since 1973. It is critical that the human rights and constitutional violations surrounding their arrests, trials, sentencing, conditions of their confinement and continuing incarceration because of their political histories--all were members of the Black Panther Party--and continuing commitment to the liberation of Black/New Afrikan be brought to the wider attention of the public. Sundiata Acoli, now 70 and with an near exemplary record, has twice been denied parole.

If nothing else, congressional hearings on "COINTELPRO: Its Legacy and Continuing Impact" would go along way towards achieving this result.

To this end, we are calling on all supporters of political prisoners--defense committees; revolutionary nationalist, radical, and progressive organizations, elected officials, community, religious, spiritual leaders, etc.--to write, fax, or call Congressman Conyers to urge that schedule hearings on COINTELPRO. Congressman Conyers' address is as follows:

The Honorable John Conyers
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5126
(202) 225-0072 Fax

Your support of Jericho's call will help ensure that it becomes a reality. Forward, download, copy and distribute this letter and Jericho's call to as many people as possible. Please mail or email copies of your letters to Herman Ferguson at the following address:

National Jericho Movement
P.O. Box 340084
Jamaica, NY 11434
Iyaluua@aol.com

Thank you in advance for your support of this effort. For more information about The Jericho Movement and Political Prisoners in the United States, visit The Jericho Movement website www.the jerichomovement.com. Please also do not hesitate to contact Herman or us if you have any questions about this campaign.

In solidarity,

Joan P. Gibbs, Esq. (718) 270-6296 OR 1-718-757-4093
Mani Gilyard, Chair, Malcolm X Commemoration Committee

The Jericho Movement
For Recognition and Amnesty for Political Prisoners
P.O. Box 340084
Jamaica, New York 11434-3104
Tel: 718. 949.5153

December 7, 2006

The Honorable John Conyers
Ranking Member
Committee on the Judiciary
U.S. House of Representatives
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Conyers:

Congratulations on your pending ascendancy to the chair of the House Committee on the Judiciary. We write to request that you schedule hearings on "COINTELPRO: Its Legacy and Continuing Impact." For more than a decade, many of us have been requesting hearings on COINTELPRO, and hopefully, legislation that begins to address some of the injustices committed against the Black movement and activists as result of COINTELPRO. We hope that one of your acts as the new chair of the Judiciary Committee will be to schedule these hearings.

As I am sure you are aware, COINTELPRO is an acronym for a series of FBI counterintelligence programs against, inter alia, the Communist party, and so-called "Black Nationalist Hate Groups." The August 1967 FBI memorandum announcing the Black Nationalist Hate Group program describes its goals as:

1. Prevent a coalition of militant black nationalist groups;
2. Prevent the rise of a messiah who could unify and electrify the militant nationalist movement;
3. Prevent violence on the part of the black nationalist groups;
4. Prevent militant black nationalist groups and leaders from gaining respectability by discrediting them;
5. Prevent the long range growth of militant black nationalist organizations especially among youth.

The targets of the Black Nationalist Hate Group program included a wide array of Black organizations and individuals, among them the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), the Revolutionary Action Movement, the Republic of New Akrika, Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., Kwame Toure, formerly known as Stokely Carmichael, and countless others.

Though the Black Panther (BPP) was not among the original targets of the program, in September 1968, then FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover labeled the BPP "the greatest threat to the internal security of the country." Thereafter the BPP became the primary focus of the program, and was ultimately the target of 233 of the believed total authorized "Black Nationalist" COINTELPRO actions.

As the Final Report of the 1976 Select Committee To Study Government Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activists states: "Although the claimed purpose of the Bureau's COINTELPRO tactics was to prevent violence, some of the FBI's tactics against the BPP were clearly intended to foster violence, and many others could reasonably have been expected to cause violence."

In its pursuit of the BPP, the FBI, often together with local law enforcement officials, knew no bounds. BPP members and supporters were not only spied on and harassed but, in blatant violation of the both the United States Constitution and International law, falsely accused of crimes that they had not committed. Many were wounded and murdered by police and FBI.

December 4, 2006, marked the thirty-eighth anniversary of the assassination of Fred Hampton, one of the leaders of the Chicago chapter of the BPP, by local Chicago police thanks to information from an FBI informant, while he slept in his bed. Hampton was shot twice in the head, once in the arm and shoulder; while three other people sleeping in the same bed escaped unharmed. Mark Clark, sleeping in a living room chair, was also murdered while asleep. Hampton's wife, who was eight months pregnant, was also shot but survived. Four Panthers sleeping in the apartment were also wounded, while one escaped injury. Fred Hampton was 21 years old when he was assassinated; Mark Clark was 17.

While the true impact of the COINTELPRO Black Nationalist Hate Group Program on the Black Liberation Movement will probably never be known because the FBI never recorded all of its activities, has destroyed many of its files, and many of the architects and participants are now deceased, it is crucial that the impact and continuing legacy of this program be investigated and remedies developed to repair the damage it has done. This is particularly true with respect to the many members of the Black Panther party, the Republic of New Afrika and other organizations that today languish in jail as a result of their having been targeted by the FBI and local law enforcement officials as part of the counterintelligence programs.

We urgently request that you schedule hearings on "COINTELPRO: Its Legacy and Continuing Impact" in the near future. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention this matter. We expect that you will give our request the serious attention that it deserves.

Yours Truly.

Herman Ferguson, Co-Founder, The Jericho Movement

--
FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS!
national_jericho@riseup.net
www.thejerichomovement.com

April 7th-March for the PR PPs

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign
http://www.ProLibertadWeb.com
ProLibertad@Hotmail.com
ProLibertad Hotline: 718-601-4751
_______________________________________________________________________________

The ProLibertad Freedom Campaign is proud to circulate this SAVE THE
DATE; on Saturday April 7th ProLibertad is organizing a MARCH AND
RALLY for our Puerto Rican Political Prisoners in commemoration of
the 27th anniversary of the arrests of our political prisoners.

It has been a long time since we have marched in solidarity with our
brothers and sisters behind the walls. We cannot forget them!! We
must demand their freedom. They are independentista freedom
fighters, revolutionaries fighting for the independence and
self-determination of Puerto Rico, not terrorists.

To learn more and get involved go to: http://www.ProLibertadWeb.com


April7th.JPG, 700 x 256

Mumia Supporters Rally In Philadelphia


December 9, 2006

Pennsylvania

Mumia Supporters Rally In Philadelphia

Associated Press

PHILADELPHIA Several hundred people who support celebrated death-row inmate
Mumia Abu-Jamal are demonstrating in Philadelphia today, the 25th
anniversary of the death of slain police officer Daniel Faulkner.

Some marchers say Abu-Jamal, who was convicted of killing Faulkner, did not
get a fair trial. Others oppose the death penalty, or say it's applied in a
racist manner.

Karl Swinehart, a 30-year-old graduate student, says he believes Abu-Jamal
was targetted because he was an outspoken black radio personality.

The demonstration comes a day after widow Maureen Faulkner gathered with
prosecutors and other supporters to mark the anniversary.

Abu-Jamal was convicted of shooting the 25-year-old Faulkner after the white
police officer pulled over Abu-Jamal's brother in 1981.

In 2001, a judge overturned the death sentence but not the conviction. Both
sides are appealing, with arguments expected early next year.

---

Source : The Associated Press

http://cbs3.com/topstories/local_story_343171532.html

Jeff Hogg & the Liberation of Dissent


Jeff Hogg
Jeff Hogg
The IWW union hall in North Portland was filled to capacity at the Liberating Dissent Ant-Green Scare event last night as Grand Jury resister Jeff Hogg shared his six month ordeal as a Green Scare political prisoner.

Until his release from the Josephine County Jail on November 11 of this year, Jeff found himself caught in the snare of the government war on dissent. His speaking presentation occurred as part of an international call to mark the weekend of December 7 as a display of unity and opposition to government repression. It was on December 7, 2005, that the FBI's "Operation Backfire" began with it's broad sweep of harassment, intimidation and persecution of eco and animal rights activists. The ensuing investigation with Grand Jury subpoenas and arrests has come to be known as the Green Scare.

Targeted because of prior eco-activism and activist associations in the Eugene area including work with the Earth First! Journal, Hogg was served with a subpoena in May of this year to testify before the grand jury in regard to a supposed ELF arson that caused property damage. His experience was one of intimidation from the beginning.

"OBVIOUSLY, THE GRAND JURY SYSTEM DOES NOT WORK"

Hogg began his presentation with an overview of the Grand Jury system and it's unlimited and unchecked misuse of investigative power. He began by offering statistics regarding the federal government's misguided crime fighting priorities.

"A couple of years ago the FBI announced that ELF and ALF were the number one terrorist threat in the country. They received funding to go out to harass and intimidate the activist communities. They are not really interested in going out to fight violent crime that terrorizes human beings. Their own statistics state that in 2003 there were 7,400 hate crimes committed that were motivated [to attack] one's race, ethnicity, religion or gender. That year there were also 450 crimes against the environment committed by corporate industries who violated the clean air and water acts and practiced illegal waste dumping. Their [FBI] priorities are somewhat eschewed. They are using the word 'terrorism' to play on our fear."

He went on to explain how the Grand Jury power of subpoena is used to gather information while counting on an individual's lack of knowledge about their constitutional rights. Many who have been subpoenaed have gone on to testify, feeling protected by the fact that as they have no information and therefore have nothing to disclose. What Hogg wants people to know is that Grand Jury subpoenas are used broadly as major fishing expeditions and that even the most seemingly insignificant information can and will be distorted and used against the radical community. With this, the decision is made as to what activity calls for surveillance, illegal wiretapping and where and when best to plant provocateurs. This kind of extra legal activity was widely used to derail the social justice movements of the sixties and seventies, and, this history is repeating itself before us again with Operation Backfire.

"60-100 people have been subpoenaed as part of the Green Scare since 2000. The vast majority were law abiding citizens called in to talk about co-workers, friends and neighbors in violation of the 1st Amendment right to free speech and association. Grand Juries are not entitled to ask for records of group membership, how money in organizations is used, who attends meetings, who your friends are or who you associate with. There was someone who went to a volunteer work party for the EF! Journal. They didn't need to offer that information. They could have gone to their lawyer to learn this."

One is not given the right to remain silent before a Grand Jury. You can still be compelled to testify. The government gets around this by giving you immunity. This means that one is guaranteed that your testimony will not be used against you and you therefore no longer have any legal ground to remain silent. Grand Juries are secretive and controlled by government prosecutors with no judge present. Jurors only look at evidence that the government chooses to present. Grand Juries are manipulated in this way.

"The purpose of the Grand Jury as stated in the Constitution is to protect people from prosecution that runs rampant and to keep the misuse of government power in check," said Hogg. "You have no right to an attorney in the Grand Jury room. Obviously, the Grand Jury system does not work."

SUSPENSION OF CONTSITUTIONAL RIGHTS

It was last May that Hogg was approached by an FBI agent and Eugene police officer as he was leaving his nursing school class.

"They told me that I was not in trouble, that they had questions and wanted me to testify against an arsonist. They implied that if I did not cooperate I might be charged with something. 'We'd hate to see you behind the defendant's desk' they said. I told them that I wasn't going to say anything until I got a lawyer."

In his search for legal representation, Hogg learned that the public defenders in Lane County were already tied up with Green Scare clients. His search led him to Portland attorney Paul Loney. One week after being asked to testify, Hogg was served with a subpoena. He refused to cooperate at the hearing by pleading the 5th.

"They walked me over to the court room. There a judge granted me immunity and said that now I had to testify. I was taken back before the Grand Jury and said I wouldn't testify and that this whole prosecution was in violation of my 1st, 5th and 6th Amendment rights. They walked me back to the court room where I was charged with civil contempt. Then I was taken to a chamber below the court room and was told, 'Well you have a few hours to reconsider your decision.'" He reconsidered nothing and was taken to jail in chains. He served 6 months in the Josephine County Jail in Grants Pass. This meant that his partner CiCi and had a 5 hour round trip to take for visits. His attorney would have an eight hour plus drive to consult with his client.

"This was challenging, especially not knowing how long the Grand Jury would be in session. The Jury is usually impaneled for 18 months, this one only had about 5 months left. They decided to extend it for another 6 months. They told my attorney that they still wanted me to testify. It was really depressing, thinking that I would not get out until March sometime. And then, I was suddenly released a week later."

By this time, Jeff had lost his job and his spot in nursing school. His grandfather also died and he was not able to attend the funeral.

"I want to thank everyone for their support. I don't think I could have gotten through this without it. The support was amazing. People from around the country wrote me letters, I had free legal representation, my friends and supporters did fundraisers, gave firewood, let my partner borrow their car when ours broke down, people came and did yard work—people came together in solidarity. That is something that you should all be proud of. I don't know if I could have done that [jail time] without all of that support. I see it as a statement from the radical community saying 'Fuck you! Your campaign of harassment and intimidation is not dividing this community. ' Thanks for even the smallest role of support. It was important not only for me but for everyone to make that statement, not just to lift my spirit but so that we can all experience that solidarity. Not only to help my partner pay our bills but for everyone's own faith and strength in the face of government repression. So that you know that if you are in my shoes, we have your back. Perhaps it was the lack of faith in support that that contributed to the breaking [of activists] under the threat of life sentences and to become informants. It's really sad, because the support is there."

PRISONER SUPPORT

Before leaving the microphone, Jeff touched on the dire importance of prisoner support. He stated that before he went to jail, he didn't much write to prisoners because he did not feel that he had anything interesting to say.

"Now, I have to say: when you're in jail *anything* is interesting." This brought great laughter from the event attendees. He went on to encourage folks to be creative and write about a hike you took, a work project, something of great beauty that you might have seen.

"Anything is always interesting when you're in a concrete box. So... please, continue to write to prisoners, keep up the solidarity. And, thanks." With this, this slight, soft spoken young man went back to tabling for Portland Books to Prisoners.

I caught up with Jeff a little later to ask if there was anything else that he felt was important to include in this article. He obviously has not had an easy time and with the attack on the right to dissent, he might have more hardship to endure. Did he have anything to say to activists who may feel the need to walk away from movement organizing out of fear of government retaliation?

He paused for a moment and then said, "I would say, just stay strong and have faith in your community. Keep working on building that community. And support our prisoners."

Donations to Jeff Hogg may be sent to:
Friends of Jeff Hogg / PO Box 12271 / Eugene OR 97440

Support other incarcerated Grand Jury Resisters:
Nathan Block #1663667 / Lane County Jail / 101 W 5th Ave. / Eugene OR 97401
Joyanna Zacher #1662550 / Lane County Jail /101 W 5th Ave. Eugene OR 97401

Support group for Nathan and Joyanna Zacher:
supportersofnathan andjoyanna@gmail.com

Daniel McGowan-out on bail:
FriendsofDanielMcG@yahoo.com; www.supportdaniel.org

Jonathan Paul-out on bail:
Support group: friendsofjonathanpaul@yahoo.com

Non-cooperating defendant, Washington County Indictments:
Briana Waters-out on court ordered electronic monitoring
Support group: www.supportbriana.org

!@@@SUPPORT POLITICAL PRISONERS@@@!
homepage: homepage: http://molotovmojada.blogspot.com

Audio from the Green Scare Event in Portland

http://portland.indymedia.org/media/media/2006/12/350501.mp3

Featuring:

- A Background on the current "Green Scare"

- Talk by Jeff Hogg, Grand Jury resister, about solidarity, knowing
your rights in front of a Grand Jury and the importance of political
prisoner letter writing.

- Ester from Eberhardt Press talks about the harsh picture of global
warming, the concept of the "tipping point" of irreversible global
ecological damage and the government's attempt to silence concern for
the environment.

We will not be silenced!

35 mins 6.9 mb at 24k
Recorded at Liberty Hall Dec. 9th, 2006

The Coup's Bus Crashes! (everyone's ok)


Friday, December 08, 2006

The Crash
So,
we got on the bus after doing a show at The House of Blues San Diego as part of The Coup/Mr. Lif tour. As the bus took off, I thought that I would go lay in my bunk, listen to my Ipod, and write. But then Zhara, Mr. Lif's friend and the tour's merchandise seller, announced that she had "Anchorman" on DVD. Oh Shit. Will Ferrell or writing? Hot 16s would have to wait tonight...Good Night San Diego! So I stayed up in the front lounge of the bus and, even though I've seen this movie twice, commenced to laugh my ass off. Almost literally, because of what happened next. Shortly after the acapella singing of "Afternoon Delight" by Ferrell et al., a big bump, then another, then plummeting down as we tipped over to the left. I was sitting in the diner-like booth that many of these buses have in the front. I held on to the table with one hand and tried to guard my head with the other, all the while thinking that I was probably about to die. I don't remember seeing everyone flying and flipping around me as it was happening, but Carter's (the road manager) and Wiz's face were covered in blood, and everybody seemed to be laying around hurt. The bus was on it's side, with the entrance door up. I called for people to say there names so we could get a head count of who was conscious or not. Silk E, Q (drums), Riccol (bass), and Metro (Lif's hype man) were trapped in the back lounge because the doors connecting the front and back lounges to the bunks were electrically powered and didn't move with no power on. They ended up ripping and squeezing their way out of a tiny little window and jumped down off the bus as the rest of us got out the front. If anyone had been sleeping in the bunks, they would not have been able to get out. I was the third person to jump off the front of the bus, as I hung down to make the jump shorter, I saw that the front of the bus was on fire. I yelled to everyone, saying to get off the bus immediately because the bus was on fire and it could blow up. We all did. No one was killed. The bus was totally engulfed in flames. For a while no one stopped to help, supposedly because the thought we were "illegal aliens" crossing the border. Eventually some great folks stopped and helped. Silk E has two broken ribs and a punctured lung. Wiz has a broken nose, two deep lacerations to the head, and a shattered knee. Zhara has injuries to her hand and had to undergo surgery. Carter had to get stitches to his head and lip. The driver, Glenn, has a broken jaw. All the first three will be in need of follow-up treatments. We all have aching backs, legs, heads etc. Many of us are on pain killers.

We lost everything in that crash and fire. We were packed to live and do shows on that bus for a month. Most of us had every stitch of clothing we owned on there. We lost clothes, computers, recording equipment, cameras, IDs, phones, keys to cars and homes. We lost cash.We lost all our damn instruments and equipment to perform with. We were and are happy to walk away with our lives. But now we're home. Most of the band touring with The Coup has kids, rent that won't quit, bills, and holiday expenses coming. We need money, because like I said the band doesn't have the tools that they make a living with. Not only did we lose cash and material things on the bus, but we also were depending on this tour for money to make it through. It may take a year for us to see any money from the insurance company.

I have set up a Paypal account so people can make donations for The Coup. The money will be split between Me (Boots Riley), Silk E, Q, Steve Wyreman (guitar), and Riccol. Mr. Lif is setting one up on his site and when I have that info, we'll let you know.

To make a donation, hit button in the "about" section on the front page of this profile, right below the paragraph and above the "We Are The Ones" video. This allows you to donate even without a paypal account.
If you have an account, ours is thecoupbuscrash@gmail.com.
Thank you in advance to anyone who does this, this is a really crazy situation. I never thought I would would be doing something like this. I also never thought that we would almost die like like that.
We're grateful for anything you can do.
Thank you,
Boots Riley
P.S. Thank you for the messages of love and warmth we've been receiving. It makes a difference.

Friday, December 08, 2006

Dec. 9 Anti-"Green Scare" Benefit in Portland, OR



The Portland event on Saturday ought to be a lot of fun. I highly recommend that friends in the Pacific Northwest travel to Portland for the event
In accord with the international day of solidarity with Green Scare Indictees, Detainees and Political Prisoners, friends of Green Scare defendants present the following event,

Liberating Dissent: Refusing to be Silenced

A benefit for Green Scare defendants and Grand Jury Resistance

When? Saturday Dec 9th, 6-11pm
Where? Liberty Hall, 311 N Ivy Portland OR
How Much? $7-$100 suggested donation to benefit non-cooperating "Green Scare" defendants and grand jury resistance

Presentations by:
Jeff Hogg - Grand jury resister imprisoned from May to November of 2006 for refusing to cooperate with a federal grand jury related to the green scare.
Paul Loney - Attorney to grand jury resister Jeff Hogg
Updates and information on the Green Scare, the Shac 7 and grand jury resistance

Performances by:
The Rag and Bone Men - oldtimey dance tunes from the middle ages
Shickey Gnarowitz - Discordant dancy three piece klezmer
Tandemnation - melodic, screamy queer-core
Drunken Boat - raw energetic pop punk
Nux Vomica - energetic fusion of metal/punk/crust

Also:
Vegan food for sale
Vegan bake sale

The "Green Scare" refers to the federal government's expanding prosecution efforts against animal liberation and ecological activists, which is strikingly similar to the "Red Scare" of the 1950s. The "Green Scare" includes the cases from the "Operation Backfire" indictments, and the cases of the SHAC7 (shac7.com), Eric McDavid (supporteric.org), Rod Coronado (supportrod.org), Jeff Hogg, Josh Wolf and several recent federal grand jury subpoenas.

For More Information on the Green Scare:
www.greenscare.org
www.fbiwitchhunt.com www.cldc.org


WTO 'Battle in Seattle' being filmed here this weekend

(They're making a movie

about the "Battle of Seattle"
and doing areenactment! LOL)

WTO 'Battle in Seattle' being filmed here this weekend

By SCOTT GUTIERREZ
P-I REPORTER

There will be no curfew zones. No National Guard troops patrolling downtown, and no storefronts boarded up the next day from vandalism and looting.


PHOTO GALLERIES

Police officer fires rubber bullets
Images from the 1999 WTO protests

But some downtown streets this weekend could eerily resemble the chaos that erupted during the 1999 World Trade Organization protests as a film crew shoots scenes for an upcoming film based on what became known as the "Battle in Seattle," also the film's title.

Tens of thousands of demonstrators from around the world converged on Seattle to interfere with the first WTO ministerial meeting on U.S. soil. More than 500 people were arrested and Mayor Paul Schell declared a state of emergency, which led to National Guard troops being summoned to help outnumbered police officers gain control.

The movie re-enactment, however, is expected to cause a few inconveniences with street closures Saturday and Sunday. The movie stars Charlize Theron and Woody Harrelson.

"I don't know if we'll see the stars at all, but there will be some action downtown," said Gregg Hirakawa, spokesman for the Seattle Department of Transportation. "Whatever happened during the WTO is going to happen."

Most of Saturday's scenes will be near the Paramount Theatre. Between 5 and 11 a.m., Ninth Avenue will shut down between Olive Way and Pike Street. Pine also will be closed from Boren Avenue to Eighth Avenue during the same period, Hirakawa said.

After 11 a.m., one lane of traffic will open on both streets, with police officers on hand to direct traffic, he said.

On Sunday, crews will move to Belltown, where they'll film near Tillicum Place Park. Starting at 6 a.m., Fourth Avenue will close between Wall and Denny Way; and Cedar Street will close between Third and Fifth avenues, Hirakawa said.

Film crews also will be set up at the Washington State Convention and Trade Center on Saturday, he said.

The film, which has a modest budget of $10 million, is written and directed by Stuart Townsend, who also is Theron's beau.

Despite the title and locale of the actual events, most of the film was shot in Vancouver, B.C., which is home to the production company, Insight Film Studios.

Some comments posted online have been skeptical of how Hollywood will portray the actions of protesters and Seattle police. Protesters accused police of brutality for using tear gas and rubber bullets to crack down on the masses. Meanwhile, some anarchist groups used the protests as cover to taunt police and smash up stores and loot.

According to Insight's Web site, the script tells the story from the perspective of protestors, police and politicians and is careful not to take sides.

Missing from the script is Schell, who lost his re-election bid in 2001 largely because of criticism over how the WTO protests were handled. Police Chief Norm Stamper resigned in the aftermath.

In the movie, Schell is replaced by fictional Mayor Jim Tobin, played by Ray Liotta.

Schell said Thursday from his second home in Palm Springs, Calif., that he's happy he's not depicted in the movie. But, he's disappointed that no one involved with the film contacted him for his recollections.

"No one called, and I think if they really were going to do their research, they would have called," he said. "It's probably a movie from a point of view, based on what they read and never saw. But who knows?"

His neighbor in Palm Springs is an actress who was offered a role in the movie, he said. She told him she turned it down because it was a "bad script," Schell said.

He said he's asked to see her copy of the script, but he's not interested in seeing the movie. "I probably won't even go to see it. I saw the real deal," he said.

P-I reporter Scott Gutierrez can be reached at 206-448-8334 or scottgutierrez@seattlepi.com.

DEMAND A STOP TO ETHNIC CLEANSING IN THE NAQAB


ACTION ALERT

DEMAND A STOP TO ETHNIC CLEANSING IN THE NAQAB

For Immediate Release
December 7, 2006

According to recent reports, Israeli interior minister, Roni Bar-On,
declared that his ministry has planned the demolition of more than 42,000
Palestinian homes in the Naqab (Negev) region of Palestine, inside the
borders of present-day Israel. Reports this morning indicate that the
village of Twail Abu-Jarwal has been demolished by the Zionist occupation.
This barbaric escalation against the Palestinians of the Naqab region is a
continuation of the ongoing Zionist project to remove from Palestine its
indigenous inhabitants, and that Israel has practiced since its inception
since 1948.

The Palestinians in the Naqab region carry "Israeli citizenship". This
latest act of destruction once again shows that, like their fellow
Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and the over six million
exiled from their homeland and denied their right to return, Palestinians
inside Israel who carry "Israeli citizenship" remain less than second-class
citizens, subject to the same policies of ethnic cleansing.

Al-Awda, the Palestine Right to Return Coalition, calls on its members,
supporters and all people of conscience to protest the ongoing
home demolitions and ethnic cleansing of Palestinian civilians at the hands
of the Israeli occupation forces by:

1. Organizing demonstrations in front of Israeli embassies and consulates.

2. Staging street theatre in major cities and towns dramatizing house
demolitions.

3. Organizing protests in front of the offices of the Caterpillar
Corporation and demanding that Caterpillar immediately stop
supplying Israel bulldozers it uses to demolish Palestinian homes. See
http://www.caterpillar.com/ for information on company locations throughout
North America.

4. Writing your Representatives and Senators to stop immediately all funding
and military supplies and shipments to Israel. Remind them that ethnic
cleansing is a war crime and constitutes a grave violation of international
law. For contact information, go to
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/ .

5. Writing to the media. Go to http://newslink.org/ for contact information.

6. Making a donation to help the people whose homes have been demolished by
Israel in the Naqab. To do so please go to
http://www.al-awda.org/donate.html and simply follow the instructions.
Please indicate that your donation is for Al-Awda's Naqab Emergency Fund.


Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition
PO Box 131352
Carlsbad, CA 92013, USA
Tel: 760-685-3243
Fax: 360-933-3568
E-mail: info@al-awda.org
WWW: http://al-awda.org

Thursday, December 07, 2006

Civil Rights Outreach Committee: Dec. 7 Statement and Eco-Sabotage Cases Overview

The “Green Scare” One Year and Beyond:
Looking Back, Moving Forward
Civil Rights Outreach Committee, 12/7/06
One year ago, a nationwide sweep of arrests revealed the FBI’s “Operation Backfire,” a vast investigation and persecution of environmental and animal advocacy. Today, in cities throughout the world, events will mark this anniversary with displays of unity and firm opposition to government repression, Operation Backfire and the broader “Green Scare.”
Those arrested on December 7, 2005, and subsequent sweeps, were accused of property destruction intended to preserve the environment and animal life. Despite the fact that none of the arrestees were accused of injury to any human or animal, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and the corporate-dominated Bush administration described the accused as being the nation’s number-one domestic terrorist threat. Several of those arrested entered plea deals in the District of Oregon to avoid sentences in excess of 1,000 years. Briana Waters, the mother of a young child and violin instructor, still faces trial in Washington federal court and asserts her innocence on all counts. Several individuals are currently being sought by federal law enforcement and are believed to be out of the country. One of the accused died of an apparent suicide late last year while being held in an Arizona jail. The government asserts that this witch hunt is ongoing and has no end in sight.
Operation Backfire arrests are the capstone of a broader “Green Scare” which is strikingly similar to the Red Scare of the 1940s and ‘50s. The phrase “Green Scare” has been used to include not just the cases from the Operation Backfire indictments, but also the cases of Tre Arrow, the SHAC7, the Auburn 3, and Rodney Coronado, as well as recent legislation such as the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, which identifies non-violent activism as acts of terrorism if it reduces the profitability of exploitive corporations.
Responding to this repression, supporters designated today, December 7, as an International Day of Solidarity with Green Scare Indictees, Detainees, and Political Prisoners. Forty-four events in eight different countries have now been scheduled to take place on or around this day.
An Overview of the Eco-Sabotage Cases
On December 7, 2005, one of the largest roundups of environmental and animal liberation activists in American history began. Using the code name “Operation Backfire,” the FBI arrested seven people in four different states. Chelsea Gerlach, Darren Thurston, William Rodgers, Kendall Tankersley (Sarah Kendall Harvey), Kevin Tubbs, Daniel McGowan and Stanislas Meyerhoff were arrested for allegedly taking part in a wide variety of actions the government attributes to the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and the Animal Liberation Front (ALF). On that very same day, several people across the Pacific Northwest were subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury to be convened in Eugene, Oregon. One of those taken into custody, Darren Thurston (a Canadian citizen), was served with a subpoena and later indicted in U.S. District Court with federal conspiracy charges and charges related to the arson of a horse corral near Susanville, California. Within days of the first arrests it was revealed that a paid informant, Jacob Ferguson, admitted to participating in several arsons and given federal investigators and prosecutors information which allegedly supported the indictments. It was also revealed that Meyerhoff had agreed to be a federal cooperating witness almost immediately upon arrest and interrogation.
On December 22, William Rodgers was found dead in his jail cell in Flagstaff, Arizona, from an apparent suicide. Rodgers worked at the Catalyst Bookstore and Infoshop in Prescott, Arizona, and was involved in ecological struggles for many years in different parts of the United States.
On January 20, 2006, federal prosecutors and U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announced a sweeping 65-count indictment, including two conspiracy charges, against 11 individuals relating to 17 different incidents in Oregon, Washington, Wyoming, Colorado and California. The indictment alleged that the accused were members of a fictional network, referred to in the indictments as “The Family,” and that they had conspired to commit several acts of arson. The indictment charged various defendants with arson, attempted arson, and using and carrying a destructive device. The destructive device charge, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), carries a 30-year mandatory sentence, with a mandatory life sentence for a second conviction of this charge. The government used this charge and the conspiracy charge to coerce individuals to become informants by threatening them with multiple life sentences for acts of uninhabited property destruction. In addition to the six people arrested on December 7, the Oregon indictment also named Jonathan Paul, Suzanne Savoie, Joseph Dibee, Rebecca Rubin (Canadian citizen) and Josephine Overaker. Paul was arrested in Oregon a few days before the indictment was announced, and Savoie turned herself in soon after Paul’s arrest. Dibee, Rubin and Overaker are believed to be out of the country.
In the weeks that followed, the government coerced and intimidated the defendants with various threats -- primarily, life in prison. Five individuals were then revealed as “confidential sources” for the government’s case. Subsequently, on February 23, Nathan Fraser Block and Joyanna L. Zacher were arrested in Olympia, Washington. The government issued a new indictment on March 15 which included Block and Zacher who were held in custody and facing life plus 1,115 years in prison for their minor roles in two separate arsons.
On June 28, the government arraigned non-cooperating defendants Block, Zacher, McGowan and Paul on yet another 65-count superseding indictment.
On July 20 and 21, Thurston, Tubbs, Tankersley, Meyerhoff, Gerlach and Savoie pled guilty to a variety of conspiracy, arson and attempted arson charges in U.S. District Court in Eugene. Federal prosecutors recommended that Thurston be sentenced to 37 months imprisonment; Tubbs, 168 months; Tankersley, 51 months; Meyerhoff, 188 months; Gerlach, 120 months; and Savoie, 63 months. All remaining charges against these defendants will be waived, and no additional charges will be brought against them in other districts if they fully and completely cooperate with the government’s terms of cooperation. The presiding judge granted motions by the cooperating defendants’ attorneys to seal all plea petitions, cooperation agreements, and the transcripts of the public court hearings, thus making them unavailable for public scrutiny. On August 22, upon the motion of the non-cooperating defendants, this judge granted a motion to unseal these documents but for the paragraphs regarding cooperation.
During the two days of plea deal hearings, the government announced that it would pursue upward enhancement of sentences for the six taking pleas, arguing that the federal anti-terrorism enhancement guidelines apply to their sentences as well. At the request of the federal government, Gerlach made an unusual statement at the conclusion of her plea proceeding, denouncing her actions. At the hearings of Gerlach and Meyerhoff, the government disclosed new allegations indicating additional arson incidents alleged to have occurred in Phoenix, Arizona, and the eastern district of Michigan, though neither was charged with these incidents at this time.
Several months earlier, Daniel McGowan’s attorneys filed a motion on behalf of the non-cooperating defendants compelling the government to disclose whether the National Security Agency (NSA) had conducted illegal surveillance and monitoring during the investigation. The government acknowledged that it did not know whether such surveillance existed, and the Court ordered the government to file a response to the motion.
On November 9, the remaining District of Oregon defendants Joyanna Zacher, Nathan Block, Daniel McGowan and Jonathan Paul entered a global resolution plea deal. (Note: Briana Waters is not indicted in Oregon. She is the only non-cooperating defendant in the Washington indictment and vigorously asserts her innocence.) Prior to their formal plea hearings, the four defendants withdrew their NSA motion, [Briana Waters’ defense team continues to pursue a similar NSA motion in her District of Washington case. No court hearings or rulings have been issued at this time.] In the non-cooperation plea agreements, the four defendants agreed to accept responsibility for their own roles in environmentally motivated property crimes, but do not agree to provide information or testify against anyone now or in the future. Complete, non-redacted plea agreements for these four defendants are publicly available.
During the November 9 plea hearing, Joyanna Zacher and Nathan Block each pled to one count of conspiracy, attempted arson, plus multiple arson charges from actions at the Joe Romania Chevrolet car dealership in Eugene and the Jefferson Poplar tree farm. Daniel McGowan entered a plea to one conspiracy charge plus multiple charges of arson relating to sabotage at Superior Lumber and Jefferson Poplar. The government is recommending that these three be sentenced to 96 months in federal prison. Jonathan Paul pled to one count of conspiracy and one count of arson for his minor role in the property destruction at the Cavel West horse slaughterhouse. He received a suggested sentence of 60 months in prison. During the hearing, McGowan made a statement to the court that “this plea agreement is very important to me because it allows me to accept full responsibility for my actions and at the same time remain true to my strongly held beliefs.” Outside the courthouse, Jonathan Paul’s sister Alexandra Paul read a statement that her brother “will continue to be a person deeply committed to the betterment of our society and the elimination of animal and human suffering.”
As with the other defendants, the government has indicated it will seek the “terrorism” enhancement at sentencing, which could result in up to 20 additional years of imprisonment. A status hearing to determine sentencing dates for all of the Oregon defendants will take place in Eugene on December 14 at 9:45 a.m. Just before that, at 9 a.m., Gerlach and Meyerhoff are scheduled to enter guilty pleas to additional out-of-state prosecutions.
Savoie, Tankersley, McGowan, and Paul are all out on release pending their sentencing. All other persons indicted in the District of Oregon who have been located are currently in custody.
On October 4, two informants, Jennifer Kolar and Lacey Phillabaum, pled guilty to felony charges of conspiracy, arson, and use of a destructive device during a violent act, all in relation to the University of Washington fires. They also agreed to be responsible for paying restitution to UW and victims, if any, with the specific amounts of which yet to be determined. Kolar’s recommended sentence is 5-7 years for her role in multiple arsons. Phillabaum’s recommended sentence is 3-5 year for her role in UW arson. Both women have been cooperating with the FBI extensively and are free until their sentencing dates.
The case was originally started not by law enforcement efforts, but solely by a single informant, Jacob Ferguson, a heroin addict and life-long arsonist and petty criminal. The indictments were a result of statements provided to the FBI by Ferguson, Stanislas Meyerhoff and others were coerced into making similar statements upon capture and interrogation. Ferguson and Meyerhoff have admitted to their participation in most of the alleged arsons and have admitted leadership roles. The National Lawyers Guild recently came out in strong opposition to the unconstitutional life sentences for property crimes threatened in these cases, and stated that the “government is misusing destructive device charges and engaging in selective prosecution.”
***
Misuse of Grand Juries
On March 21, Camilo Stephenson was subpoenaed to a Denver, Colorado, grand jury and questioned about the 1998 Vail ski resort fire. He denied any knowledge of any of the incidents.
Jeff Hogg and Burke Morris were subpoenaed to testify in front of federal grand juries on May 18, Hogg in Eugene, and Morris in Denver. Hogg refused to testify before the Eugene grand jury, and was held in contempt by Judge Michael Hogan and sent to jail. Hogg was then placed in custody, without having being charged with any crime. The unlawful grand jury was scheduled to expire on September 29, 2006. However, days before Jeff was to regain his freedom, the federal government extended this grand jury for six more months.
After more than six months and following the global resolution of the remaining District of Oregon cases on November 9, the government finally agreed to free Hogg. On November 15, Hogg was released from the Josephine County jail in Grant's Pass, Oregon, rejoining his partner and community. Hogg commented shortly after release: “I'm happy to be free and not to have compromised my principles in the face of the abusive grand jury system.” The government continues to threaten Hogg with another subpoena and more jail time.
In Colorado on May 28, Burke Morris answered limited questions asked by the Denver grand jury about his personal life, but denied any knowledge of other incidents he was questioned about. Morris later issued a statement: “I have the utmost respect for Jeff Hogg and hope all will support him during his incarceration for refusing to answer grand jury questions.”
On June 27, Jim Dawson of Olympia, WA, received a subpoena to appear before a grand jury at the Federal District Courthouse in Seattle, WA. This subpoena most likely came about as a result of his partner, Heather Moore, who had been contacted by the FBI a few months earlier. His appearance has been postponed because he consented to be questioned by the FBI in lieu of his scheduled grand jury appearance. The extent of his disclosure to the government is unknown at this time. As a result of this voluntary cooperation, additional subpoenas are possible.
The federal government for now has called off Craig Rosebraugh’s grand jury subpoena.
Grand juries by law are authorized only to decide whether or not to bring new indictments. In this case, grand juries are being used to gather evidence to prepare for trial, an illegal use of the grand jury as defined by law. This runaway grand jury has been convened around the country regarding this case and the larger environmental movement since 2000.
California Indictments
On April 6, California issued its indictments in connection with the 2001 horse corral fire near Susanville, CA. Justin Solondz was charged by the federal court in Sacramento, but is not in custody. Also indicted for the corral fire were Darren Thurston (whose plea on this charge was integrated into his general District of Oregon deal as a result of cooperation), Joseph Dibee and Rebecca Rubin.
Colorado Indictments
On May 18, a federal grand jury indicted Chelsea Dawn Gerlach, Stanislas Meyerhoff, Josephine Overaker and Rebecca Rubin for alleged involvement in the 1998 arson of the Vail ski resort. The Colorado federal court agreed to transfer these charges to Oregon where Gerlach and Meyerhoff have District of Oregon plea deals that incorporate their Colorado charges. On September 29, Gerlach and Meyerhoff entered guilty pleas during their District of Oregon arraignment for Vail-related charges; neither Meyerhoff nor Gerlach are expected to serve additional time in prison as a consequence of these pleas. Meyerhoff and Gerlach swore in court that Bill Rodgers was solely responsible for this alleged arson.
Washington Indictments
On March 30, Briana Waters was arrested in Seattle, WA, in connection with an alleged arson at the University of Washington Center for Urban Horticulture in 2001. Waters, a California resident, is a violin teacher and mother of a young child. Waters was released from custody on March 31 and has a court date set for May 7, 2007. She staunchly maintains her innocence to all charges.
On May 10, Washington issued a superseding indictment. This indictment includes the destructive device charge, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), a 30-year mandatory sentence, for Waters. The indictment also added Tubbs and Solondz as defendants (with Bill Rodgers’ alleged participation) for the UW arson. Tubbs’ Washington charges are waived as a result of his plea deal.
Other informants in this case include Jennifer Kolar, of Seattle, WA, and Lacey Phillabaum of Spokane, WA. On October 4, both Kolar and Phillabaum entered plea deals in the Western Washington U.S. District Court, pleading guilty to conspiracy, arson and destructive device charges in relation to the Urban Horticulture property damage. In addition, Kolar pled guilty to charges relating to an attempted arson against the Wray Gun Club, sponsors of a turkey shoot, whose Colorado business allegedly had incendiary devices placed nearby (the alleged devices failed to ignite) -- Kolar’s Colorado charges were transferred to the Western Washington District before the hearing. Charges against Kolar in relation to an alleged arson in Redmond, Oregon against a horse-meat processing plant, will also be transferred to Washington federal court soon. During the hearing, Kolar received a suggested sentence of 5-7 years in federal prison despite facing a mandatory life sentence, Phillabaum, 3-5 years. Formal sentencing for Kolar and Phillabaum is currently scheduled for January 5, 2007. Both Kolar and Phillabaum were released without bail following their pleas. Both have been provided significant reductions in their recommended sentences as a result of extensive cooperation with the federal government against the remaining non-cooperating defendants

Charges Against Rod Coronado

In a related but separate case, federal prosecutors in San Diego unsealed an indictment in February 2006, charging environmental and Native American activist Rodney Coronado with demonstrating how to use an incendiary device. After a lecture in 2003, Coronado, 39, of Tucson, Arizona, answered a question about how he made an incendiary device used in an action that he had spent four years in federal prison for several years ago. Coronado was charged with distribution of information relating to explosives, destructive devices and weapons of mass destruction. On November 2, Coronado’s lawyer argued that the statute under which Coronado was charged violates the First and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. On November 15, the judge denied this motion, stating that this statute is not unconstitutional in all its applications. However, arguments as to whether the statute as applied to Coronado himself is illegal will be heard at trial. Coronado is currently in federal custody as a result of a federal conviction regarding his attempt to stop a mountain lion hunt by the federal government.
Support the Operation Backfire Defendants and Grand Jury Resistance!

District of Oregon

Daniel McGowan, Jonathan Paul, Nathan Block and Joyanna Zacher have taken plea deals that do not involve informing against others. Joyanna and Nathan remain in jail pre-sentencing. Please continue to support these four, before and after formal sentencing :
Nathan Block #1663667 / Lane County Jail / 101 W 5th Ave. / Eugene, OR 97401
Joyanna Zacher #1662550 / Lane County Jail / 101 W 5th Ave / Eugene, OR 97401
Support group for Nathan and Joyanna: supportersofnathanandjoyanna@gmail.com
Daniel McGowan (Released on bail!)
Support group: FriendsofDanielMcG@yahoo.com; www.supportdaniel.org
Jonathan Paul (Released on bail!)
Support group: friendsofjonathanpaul@yahoo.com

Non-cooperating Defendant, Washington Indictments

Briana Waters (Released on court-ordered electronic monitoring)
Support group: www.supportbriana.org

Grand Jury Resistance

Donations to help Jeff Hogg post-release may be sent to:
Friends of Jeff Hogg / PO Box 12271 / Eugene, OR 97440
One good information resource on grand juries and resistance to them is at: www.fbiwitchhunt.com. This page also features information on Bay Area grand juries.

Stay Informed – Information Resources

For more information, see cldc.org, greenscare.org and http://portland.indymedia.org/en/topic/greenscare/

Benefit CD for Operation Backfire Defendants


http://www.crimethinc.com/a/filastine/

Filastine “Burn It” Benefit CD
(click here to buy CD)
On December 7, 2005, the despicable lackeys of the FBI initiated “operation backfire,” a roundup of accused arsonists intended to intimidate all associated with ecologically oriented direct action. Most of the defendants in this witch-hunt eventually accepted plea bargains—some honorably, some dishonorably.
On December 7, 2006, the CrimethInc. Workers’ Collective released Filastine’s Burn It CD as a fundraiser to support the defendants who refused to become police informants. Filastine, a former member of ¡Tchkung! and founding participant in the Infernal Noise Brigade , has been drawing on musical traditions from all around the globe to compose incendiary anarchist music for well over a decade now. Burn It, a wide-ranging mélange of driving rhythms, electronic layering, on-site sampling, and multilingual vocals, has already been released in Europe to great acclaim. These 16 tracks successfully integrate analog and digital, political and party, experiment and entertainment—not to mention artistic traditions from Brooklyn to Indonesia.
A full $5 from every CD sale will go to the defendants, who face long stretches of prison time and massive debts. The extensive packaging, in which no plastic is used save that in the CD itself, includes a 12-page booklet providing a full background and commentary on their cases (download a PDF of the booklet here). Read more about Operation Backfire and the Green Scare at:
"The record's long list of singers, MCs, and musicians brings the songs to endlessly surprising and rich places, as well. Filastine layers artists from distant genres and locales with great architectural sense, and while at times the extremity of the juxtapositions borders on hilarious, the music always feels heroically well designed and strong in conception. On "Palmares," disaffected French oration is overlaid with clouds of gypsy-brass ennui, while party-starter "Judas Goat" lets the rhaita, one of the wailing horns of the Master Musicians, loose over beats that wouldn't be out of place propelling an Aaliyah cut. On some songs, Filastine's constructions are reminiscent of the murky drama of Ninja Tuners like Amon Tobin and DJ Food, and throughout the album the lines between live performed contributions and meticulously contextualized samples is slurred and burnt. The most emotional and fully realized pair of songs come about two-thirds in: "Boca de Ouro" alternates dizzy rhymes with a fuzzily cinematic chorus, and "Autology" is a slow-burning adaptation of an Indonesian song in which the intoxicatingly mournful singing of Jessika Skeletalia Kenney sails over a bed of screeching bowed bass and quicksand-sinking drum patterns.
"Overall, Burn It is a stunningly successful integration of varied international musical styles into the polyglot schemes of its maker; way beyond most "electronic world music" in both its conception and execution. Not unlike the Infernal Noise Brigade, Filastine absorbs music from all over the world and bends it (with all due respect) to his own designs. And, like the INB, he veers wildly between pointed polemic discourse and bacchanalian party embrace. In this way the album has more of a personal stamp and feeling of its creator than a lot of electronic music, as it deals—whether consciously or unconsciously—with these essential imperfections and warring forces in the dude that is Filastine."
-Sam Mickens
The Stranger

Abu-Jamal Case Goes to Third Circuit


December 7, 2006 (2 articles)

Abu-Jamal Case Goes to Third Circuit; Prosecutor Admits Jamal Had No "True
Defense"

Pennsylvania

by Dave Lindorff, BuzzFlash

It's been 25 years now since Philadelphia Police Officer Daniel Faulkner was
shot dead in a Center City, Philadelphia red-light district. Since then,
Faulkner has become a rallying point for the nation's death penalty
advocates. It's been 25 years, too, since the man convicted of killing
Faulkner, Philadelphia radio journalist and former Black Panther Mumia
Abu-Jamal, was arrested for the crime at the scene. Since July 1982,
Abu-Jamal has been in solitary confinement on Philadelphia's death row, from
which lonely spot he has become a world-famous prison journalist, and a
rallying point for those opposed to capital punishment.

The debates over Abu-Jamal's guilt or innocence have raged now for an
astonishing quarter of a century, through the presidencies of Ronald Reagan,
George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. Battles have raged, too,
within the loose-knit group of people who have backed Abu-Jamal, between
those who argue that he is an innocent man, a political prisoner condemned
for his politics, and those who simply argue that he never received a fair
trial. Politicians at the local, state and even federal level, many without
any real knowledge about this complex case, have prostituted themselves by
pressing for Abu-Jamal's execution, while others, sometimes equally ignorant
of the facts, have lionized him and honored him with honorary citizenships
and street names.

Whatever one's views on this case, however, the reality is that it for the
first time in 25 years, Abu-Jamal is finally going to get a chance in the
second highest court in the land to make the case that his 1982 trial was
fatally tainted by unconstitutional error, judicial bias, race-based jury
selection and prosecutorial misconduct. The reality also is that the Third
Circuit Court of Appeals, which will be hearing arguments on Abu-Jamal's
appeal early next year (barring any unanticipated delays), could conceivably
end up ordering a new trial for Abu-Jamal -- a trial that, because of better
defense counsel, a changed political climate, shifting demographics, the
deaths of some witnesses, and the likelihood of new defense witnesses, would
most likely end up setting him free, or having him released for time served.
At the same time, the same three-judge panel hearing this appeal will also
be considering a counter appeal by the Philadelphia District Attorney's
office, which seeks to overturn a lower Federal District Court decision
which five years ago tossed out Abu-Jamal's death sentence. So at the same
time that the Third Circuit could end up giving Abu-Jamal a new chance to
prove his innocence, or at least to leave prison a free man, it could
ironically also end up sending him back onto death row and to a date with
the needle.

Let's look at the DA's appeal first, since it's fairly simple.

In 2001, Judge William Yohn, a former Montgomery County state judge
appointed to the federal bench by the first President Bush, found that
Abu-Jamal's death sentence had been constitutionally tainted. He ruled that
the instructions of the trial judge, the late Albert Sabo, and the jury
polling form used by Sabo, were both confusing and could have led jurors to
mistakenly assume that they could not consider any mitigating circumstances
(which might argue against a death sentence) unless all 12 members of the
jury agreed that such a mitigating factor existed. In fact, as Judge Yohn
noted in his decision, the law allows any one juror who finds such a
mitigating factor (for example, being a devoted father to a young child, or
having a difficult childhood) to consider that factor in deciding whether or
not to vote for a death penalty. Since the law requires a unanimous vote for
death in order for a capital sentence to be imposed, this means that any one
juror should be able to take execution off the table if she or he thinks
there is a sufficiently mitigating factor.

If the DA can convince at least two of the three appellate judges that Yohn
was wrong in his ruling, Abu-Jamal would be put back on death row, with his
only remaining hope of avoiding execution being the US Supreme Court -- or a
reversal of his conviction itself. Even if the Third Circuit panel supports
Yohn's overturning of the death sentence, however, Abu-Jamal could still end
up facing execution. This is because once an Appeals Court decision is
rendered, the DA will have 180 days to decide whether to seek a new trial on
the sentence alone. If that were to happen, a new jury would have to be
impaneled to hear arguments for and against execution, with the alternative
being life in prison without possibility of parole.

Yohn's vacating of Abu-Jamal's death sentence was well-reasoned, and it
seems unlikely that the higher court would reverse it, but this case has
been full of surprises from the start -- with most of them going against
Abu-Jamal -- so it cannot be ruled out.

Meanwhile, however, this past year there was a surprise ruling by the Third
Circuit that went Abu-Jamal's way and that improved his chances of winning a
new trial by 200 percent. That surprise came in the form of an announcement
that Abu-Jamal would be allowed to add two additional grounds for appeal of
his conviction to the one, which Judge Yohn had already certified for
appeal.

Under existing law and federal court rules, a capital defendant is only
guaranteed the right to appeal to the federal appellate court a ruling that
a lower federal district judge has "certified" for appeal. Petitions to
consider other issues may be made to appellate judges, but those appeals
judges have no obligation to grant a hearing on them. In Abu-Jamal's case,
Judge Yohn rejected all 20 of his appeals of his conviction. But on one of
those claims -- the argument that his jury had been systematically stripped
of qualified black jurors by the prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges
(challenges for which no reason has to be given) -- the judge seemed
troubled enough by the evidence presented that he certified an appeal to the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

Abu-Jamal's appellate attorney, Robert R. Bryan of San Francisco, went ahead
and pursued several other rejected grounds for appeal, though, and was
rewarded last December with a decision by the Third Circuit to hear appeals
arguments on two other grounds. One of these was the claim that prosecutor
Joseph McGill, near the trial's end during his summation to the jury, had
improperly led jurors to believe they needn't worry about the possibility of
wrongfully convicting the defendant. Turning the basic requirement that
jurors may only convict if they feel a case has been proven "beyond a
reasonable doubt," McGill instead urged Abu-Jamal's jury to go ahead and
vote guilty because their verdict would not be the last word. McGill, a
veteran prosecutor who clearly knew what he was doing, improperly assured
them, without any objection from the judge, that there would be "appeal
after appeal" of their verdict, which he argued therefore "may not be
final."

Federal courts have generally found unconstitutional such attempts to remove
jurors' sense of responsibility for the gravity of their decision. It is
hard to imagine how fair-minded appellate judges could allow such a blatant
undermining of the law to stand, and yet, there have been many examples of
appeals courts doing just this, and the Abu-Jamal case is a very politically
charged issue.

The other ground for appeal which the Third Circuit invited an appeal filing
on was the charge that Judge Sabo had been unconstitutionally biased against
the defendant both at the original trial and during the 1995 post-conviction
relief act (PCRA) hearing. A few years back, Abu-Jamal's defense team
discovered a court stenographer, Terri Maurer Carter, who said that in the
opening days of Abu-Jamal's trial, she, in the company of her own judge,
Richard Klein (currently a state Superior Court Judge), had overheard Sabo
say he would "help them fry the nigger." The alleged incident reportedly
occurred at the end of the day as Sabo was exiting the courtroom along with
his court clerk through the private "robing room" exit, just as Judge Klein,
then a civil court judge who was planning to borrow Sabo's courtroom for
evening hearings, and his stenographer, were entering the room.

Common Pleas Judge Pamela Dembe, in 2001, ruled that it wouldn't matter if
Sabo had uttered those words, "since this was a jury trial." Hers was a
bizarre decision, since even if jurors, not judges, render the verdict,
judges clearly do make critical decisions about the admissibility of
evidence, about the questions that may be asked of witnesses, and about how
trials are to be conducted, and it's common sense that a biased judge could
easily skew a trial against a defendant. But in any event, in a PCRA
hearing, where there is no jury, it is the judge alone who determines
whether new evidence is significant, what questioning will be allowed of
witnesses, and what subpoenas will be issued on behalf of the defendant.
Sabo's astonishing one-sidedness at that hearing was so blatant that it led
the Philadelphia Inquirer to editorialize at the time: "The behavior of the
judge in the case was disturbing the first time around -- and in hearings
last week he did not give the impression ... of fair-mindedness. Instead, he
gave the impression ... of undue haste and hostility toward the defense's
case."

Should at least two of the three appeals court judges considering this
argument find evidence of unconstitutional judicial bias, it would not lead
to an overturning of Abu-Jamal's conviction, but rather would more likely
lead to a new round of evidentiary hearings before a federal judge -- most
likely Judge Yohn. At such a hearing, Abu-Jamal would likely be given a
chance to recall and re-question witnesses whose testimony had either been
disallowed or interfered with by Judge Sabo. Abu-Jamal would probably also
be able to call new witnesses who have been discovered more recently, whose
testimony might undermine some of the earlier prosecution witnesses in the
case. It is possible there could also be recantations from some key
prosecution trial witnesses. (For example, there were reports back in 1995
that one of the prosecution's key eye-witnesses to the Faulkner shooting,
the cab driver Robert Chobert, had recanted his trial testimony, in which he
had testified that his cab directly behind Faulkner's parked squad car,
making him a direct witness to the shooting, and was instead saying that he
had been parked on another street, facing away from the incident. Sabo had
prevented this damaging line of questioning by the defense at the PCRA.)
Clearly such a federal court evidentiary hearing could pave the way for the
ordering of a new trial.

The third avenue of appeal of Abu-Jamal's conviction -- the one certified
for appeal by Judge Yohn in 2001 -- is perhaps his best shot at an
overturning of his conviction. This is the claim of racial bias in jury
selection -- an issue that even the current conservative Supreme Court has
been very sensitive to.

In Abu-Jamal's case, it is clear from the record that prosecutor McGill used
11 of his allotted 15 "peremptory" challenges to remove from consideration
11 black jurors who had met the standard of agreeing that that could vote
for a death penalty. (In capital cases, jurors must be questioned by defense
and prosecution, or by the judge, and any juror who states that she or he
could never vote for a death sentence may be summarily dismissed "for
cause," since such a juror, if impaneled, would be able to veto any death
sentence.) In the end, when jury selection was completed, Abu-Jamal wound up
with just three black and nine white jurors (ultimately reduced to two
blacks when one black juror was removed by the judge under questionable
circumstances). This in a city that was 44 percent black, and in a case that
involved the slaying of a white police officer by a black defendant, making
race a critical issue. While McGill has insisted that his reasons for
rejecting all those qualified black jurors had nothing to do with their
race, in fact both his own record and the record of the prosecutor's office
under then DA Ed Rendell (now Pennsylvania's governor), suggest otherwise.

Consider that between 1977 and 1986, McGill used peremptory challenges to
strike 74 percent of qualified African-American jurors from trials he
prosecuted, compared to only 25 percent of whites. Consider further that
under DA Rendell, the Philadelphia prosecutor's office overall, over the
same eight-year period, struck black jurors 58 percent of the time, while
striking white jurors only 22 percent of the time. This is on its face
damning evidence of a systematic policy of illegal race-based jury selection
on the part of both McGill and of the DA's office. Moreover, under existing
Supreme Court precedent, a defendant, to prove unconstitutional race-based
jury selection, does not even need to prove that there is a pattern of
discrimination -- only that there is evidence that race was a factor in his
specific trial. McGill's line of questioning during jury selection for this
trial makes it evident that such was likely the case. For example, black
jurors who were dismissed, not "for cause" but peremptorily, were frequently
asked by McGill if they had "listened to black radio," while white jurors
were never asked such a question. At one point, McGill also interrupted
Judge Sabo to observe that a black judge had entered the courtroom and
seated himself on the side of the visitor's seating area where Abu-Jamal's
supporters were. McGill said to the judge, "If the court pleases, the two
black jurors may know him." Since it was just as likely that the ten white
jurors might have known Judge Calvin Wilson, this was clear evidence that
McGill saw black jurors as being fundamentally different from white jurors."

Judge Sabo, it should be noted, studiously ignored McGill's outburst --
perhaps aware of how damaging they could be.

Although the above statistical evidence was submitted to Judge Yohn by
Abu-Jamal's defense team, the judge never even considered it, because he
confused and conflated several studies submitted by the defense, and
incorrectly concluded that neither the McGill jury statistics nor the
Rendell jury statistics covered the period of Abu-Jamal's trial. Because
Yohn rejected that evidence out of hand, he did not bother to review other
evidence of race-based jury selection specific to the trial. Yet in fact,
not only did the period of both those studies cover the period of
Abu-Jamal's 1982 trial; his trial was in fact a part of those statistics.

Should at least two of the three judges hearing the Third Circuit appeal
conclude that there was an attempt at racial exclusion underlying McGill's
peremptory challenges, they would have no alternative but to order a new
trial for Abu-Jamal. An alternative would be for the Third Circuit to send
the issue back to Judge Yohn, with instructions that he reconsider, based
upon all of the evidence submitted by the defense. Given that evidence,
there is a very good chance that in the end, Abu-Jamal could get a new
trial, with a jury that, in today's Philadelphia, would likely have four to
six African-American jurors on it instead of only two.

It seems clear that the coming hearing of Abu-Jamal's appeal before the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals, at which there will be oral arguments
presented by both sides, will be dramatic and possibly explosive. And since
any decision by the appeals court will lead, at a minimum, to a whole new
round of appeals, while some could lead to new hearings or to a new trial,
or penalty trial, it seems equally clear that this 25-year-old death penalty
case will be around for some time to come, as will the man who has spent
those 25 years -- including the last five during which his sentence has
technically been lifted -- in solitary confinement on Pennsylvania's grim
death row.

Meanwhile, those who continue to lobby tirelessly for Abu-Jamal's execution
-- especially Faulkner's widow Maureen and the Pennsylvania Fraternal Order
of Police, as well as Governor Rendell himself -- should take note of an
astonishing statement made by Abu-Jamal prosecutor McGill in a December 3
article in the Inquirer. McGill, now retired and a private attorney, who had
assured me in an interview for my book on the case (Killing Time), that it
had been "the strongest case" he'd ever handled, told the Inquirer reporter
that Abu-Jamal "could have been convicted of a lesser offense" had he waged
a "true defense."

It is well known that the Philadelphia District Attorney's office has had a
long history, stretching back at least to Rendell's two terms as DA, of
deliberately overcharging defendants in hopes of winning plea bargains, and
of deliberately seeking the death penalty even when it is inappropriate, in
order to be able to "death qualify" and screen out jurors who are opposed to
capital punishment (many academic studies have documented that pro-execution
jurors tend to be more pro-government and more inclined to convict than
jurors who object philosophically or on religious grounds to capital
punishment). Indeed many jurisdictions in Pennsylvania consider this tactic
-- still practiced under DA Lynne Abraham -- to be unethical.

McGill's statement suggests that this tactic may have been applied in
Abu-Jamal's case. It is also an admission by McGill that Abu-Jamal never had
a "true defense."

Now I know McGill claims that this is because Abu-Jamal himself screwed up
by insisting on being able to defend himself, but the truth is more
complicated. In fact, Abu-Jamal had hired an attorney, Anthony Jackson, whom
he thought was up to the task, but who in fact had never handled a death
penalty case, and who moreover had a drug habit (he was subsequently
disbarred for financial improprieties, allegedly related to drugs). When
Jackson began messing up, Abu-Jamal tried to get rid of him, but was not
allowed to do so by Judge Sabo, who seemed to relish the discord that he was
encouraging between the defendant and his counsel. What Abu-Jamal ended up
with was the worse of all possible worlds: an incompetent defense counsel,
but no right to represent himself either.

In America, the right to a fair trial is sacred. Is this the kind of
situation -- a defendant who did not have a "true defense" -- one that
anybody, including McGill, would want to see lead to a man's conviction and
execution?

---

Source : BuzzFlash (Philadelphia area journalist Dave Lindorff is the author
of "Killing Time: An Investigation into the Death Penalty Case of Mumia
Abu-Jamal," (Common Courage Press, 2003). His latest book, co-authored with
Barbara Olshansky, is "The Case for Impeachment," published in June by St.
Martin's Press)

http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/611

***

December 6, 2006

Pennsylvania

House debates resolution on French street name

By KIMBERLY HEFLING, Associated Press

House members debated a resolution Wednesday that would denounce a French
city for naming a street in honor of Mumia Abu-Jamal, who was sentenced to
death for shooting a Philadelphia police officer.

"We must stand together as one and send a strong message to the world that
cop-killers deserve to be punished, not to be celebrated," said Rep. Mike
Fitzpatrick, a Philadelphia-area congressman who authored the resolution.

The debate came a few days shy of the 25th anniversary of the shooting of
Daniel Faulkner, a 25-year-old officer shot after he pulled over Abu-Jamal's
brother on Dec. 9, 1981. Abu-Jamal, a one-time radio reporter and former
Black Panther, was convicted in 1982 and sentenced to death.

Abu-Jamal's writings and taped speeches on the justice system have made him
a cause celebre among Hollywood activists, foreign politicians and some
death-penalty opponents who believe he was the victim of a racist justice
system.

In December 2001, a federal judge overturned Abu-Jamal's death sentence but
upheld his conviction. Both sides have appealed that ruling, and Abu-Jamal
remains on death row in western Pennsylvania. Last year, the 3rd Circuit of
Appeals agreed to consider Abu-Jamal's appeal of his conviction.

In April, a street in St. Denis, a suburb in France just north of Paris, was
named after Abu-Jamal.

The bill would ask the French government to step in to change the street
name if St. Denis opted not to. A vote was expected on the resolution later
Wednesday.

Reps. John Conyers, D-Mich., and Bobby Scott, D-Va., said Congress should
focus on other issues.

"Let's agree to let the French government focus on the needs of its people
while we focus on the needs of hard working people here in America," Conyers
said.

Pennsylvania Reps. Allyson Schwartz, a Democrat, and Charles Dent, a
Republican, also spoke in favor of the resolution.

The police union in Philadelphia sent a representative to Washington on
Wednesday and was watching the vote closely, especially that of Rep. Chaka
Fattah, a candidate for Philadelphia mayor. The union promised to work
against Fattah in the 2007 Democratic primary, because he supports giving
Abu-Jamal a new trial.

---

Source : Associated Press

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=17558105&BRD=2212&amp;PAG=461&dept_id=
465812&rfi=6
“Today’s terrorist is tomorrow’s freedom fighter.”
— SHAC leader Kevin Kjonaas, at the Animal Rights 2002 convention

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stateyourcause/


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StopNightmareDogIndustries/


http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/hlssucks


"If you have come here to help me, then you are wasting your time…But if you have come because your liberation is bound up with mine, then let us work together."
--Lila Watson

"Live in peace with the animals. Animals bring love
to our hearts, and warmth to our souls" -Colleen Klaum


"Secret prisons, secret flights, the CIA tramples human rights; reverse hanging, what gives? If that's not torture, what the fuck is?"

James Kilgore


Bro. James Kilgore is now in the California prison system after finishing his federal time.

#V-15088
CSP High Desert
PO Box 3030 B/2/141
Susanville, CA 96127-3030

December 7th Message from Supporters of Nathan and Joyanna


Dear Friends and Supporters,
Today, and throughout the week, those of you organizing for, and
participating in this International Day of Solidarity with Green
Scare Indictees, Detainees, and Political Prisoners have our deepest
gratitude. Ongoing education, continuing to build awareness and keep
the issues forefront, as well as your financial support is critical to
helping Nathan and Joyanna endure this nightmare.

A part of a story... from The Forest People, by Colin Turnbull:

"...the forest is a father and mother to us,' he said, 'and like a
father and mother it gives us everything we need---food, clothing,
shelter, warmth...and affection. Normally, everything goes well,
because the forest is good to it's children, but when things go wrong
there must be a reason.

I wondered what he would say now, because I knew that the village
people, in times of crisis, believe that they have been cursed either
by some evil spirit or by a witch or sorcerer. But not the Pygmies;
their logic is simpler and their faith stronger, because their world
is kinder.

Moke showed me this when he said, 'Normally everything goes well in
our world. But at night when we are sleeping, sometimes things go
wrong, because we are not awake to stop them from going wrong. Army
ants invade the cam; leopards may come in and steal a hunting dog or
even a child. If we were awake these things would not happen. So
when something big goes wrong, like illness or bad hunting or death,
it must be because the forest is slepping and not looking after its
children. So what do we do? We wake it up. We wake it up by singing
to it, and we do this because we want it to awaken happy. Then
everything will be well and good again. So when our world is going
well then we also sing to the forest because we want it to share our
happiness.

All this I had heard before, but I had not realized quite so clearly
that this was what the molimo was all about. It was as though the
nightly chorus were an intimate communion between a people and their
god, the forest. Moke even talked about this, but when he did so he
stopped working on his bow and turned his wrinkled old face to stare
at me wiith his deep, brown, smiling eyes. He told me how all Pygmies
have different names for their god, but how they all know that it is
really the same one. Just what it is, of course, they don't know, and
that is why the name really does not matter very much. 'How can we
know?' he asked. 'We can't see him; perhaps only when we die will we
know and then we can't tell anyone. So how can we say what it is like
or what his name is? But he must be good to give us so many things.
He must be of the forest. So when we sing, we sing to the forest.'

The complete faith of the Pygmies in the goodness of their forest
world is perhaps best of all expressed in one of their great molimo
songs, one of the songs that is sung fully only when someone has died.
At no time do their songs ask for this or that to be done, for the
hunt to be made better or for someone's illness to be cured; it is not
necessary. All that is needed is to awaken the forest, and everything
will come right. But suppose it does not, suppose that someone dies,
then what? The men sit around their evening fire, as I had been doing
with them for the past month, and they sing songs of devotion, songs
of praise, to wake up the forest and rejoice it, to make it happy
again. Of the disaster that has befallen them they sing, in this one
great song, ...

'There is darkness all around us; but if darkness is, and darkness is
of the forest, then darkness must be good."

Thanks to all.
Be well.

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

Urgent: Final call for solidarity with political prisoner Jalil Muntaqim to protest denial of parole


In a November 22nd letter from former Black Panther and political prisoner Jalil Muntaqim, he writes:
“I hope in some way you will be able to persuade folks to initiate the phone/fax campaign to the Division of Parole and demand they reverse the denial of my parole and grant my immediate release on parole. Also, I ask that you put the call out on the Internet urging folks to call and fax often and repeatedly. The Division of Parole have until December 10, 2006 to make a decision on the administrative appeal, so if folks do what is requested they will have put sufficient pressure on them to get a decision on time.”
For more information see: http://www.freejalil.com/paroleappeal1.html
Contact the New York State Division of Parole at 518-473-9400 and http://parole.state.ny.us/CONTACT.asp
Background:
A Political Prisoner’s Journey in the U.S. Prison System
By A. Jalil Bottom
(2005)
After the illegal NYC Newkill conviction of killing two police officers in 1975, I was transferred back to San Quentin prison in California to complete the sentence for which I was originally captured on August 28, 1971, in shoot-out with San Francisco police (it was alleged that my co-defendant, Albert “Nuh” Washington, and I attempted to assassinate a police sergeant in retaliation for the August 21, 1971 assassination of comrade George Jackson). Once again held in the infamous S. Q. Adjustment Center, locked in a cell between Brother Ruchell Magee and Charles Manson, I received a leaflet from Sister Yuri Kochiyama of the National Committee in Defense of Political Prisoners (NCDPP) informing me of an initiative to build international support for U.S. political prisoners. In response, I wrote an outline to petition the United Nations in support of U.S. political prisoners. I gave the outline to Ruchell who thought it was very good, and then passed it along to Geronimo Ji Jaga (Pratt), who also approved. I then rewrote the outline into a proposal and sent it to Yuri for consideration. Unfortunately, NCDPP did not act on the proposal. Then in late 1976, I met a white guy named Commie Mike, and he introduced me to the United Prisoners Union (UPU). He explained that UPU may be willing to implement my proposal to petition the U.N. in support of U.S. political prisoners. A young UPU activist white woman named Pat Singer came to visit me and brought my proposal to the group, which eventually agreed to support this national campaign. The campaign in early 1977 had grown beyond what UPU could handle alone, and the Prairie Fire Organizing Committee (PFOC) joined in the campaign, which was facilitated by China Brotsky. A young lawyer from Amnesty International was recruited to represent the petition at the United Nations, while at the same time, UPU and PFOC organized a signature petition gathering 2500 signatures from prisoners across the country. In fact, we had affiliate cadres in state and federal prisons in 25 U.S. states, with communications with prisoners in parts of Europe.

In 1977, the attorney presented our petition to a special subcommittee of the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. This was the very first time U.S. political prisoners had a petition submitted and recorded at a United Nations subcommittee pertaining to racism and the conditions of political prisoners in the U.S. penal system. (See: U.N. document E/CN.4/Sub.2/NGO/75). As the petition campaign was being organized, Comrade Sundiata Acoli in New Jersey agreed to assist with organizing a march in support of the petition to the United Nations. The march and demonstration was held in front of the Harlem State Office Building, an initiative that Sister Bibi Angola ensured would be successful. This campaign was responsible for former U.N. Ambassador Andrew Young being fired from his post at the U.N. by then President Jimmy Carter. What happened was that PFOC informed me that they knew a reporter that would be in Paris, France, when Andrew Young would be visiting, and asked what he could do in support of our campaign. I suggested the reporter ask Ambassador Andrew Young the single question “are there political prisoners in the United States?” When Andrew Young answered, “perhaps thousands,” right-wing political forces and the media had a field day rebuking and attacking him, resulting in him being fired from his U.N. post.

This campaign was so successful that UPU and PFOC had communications in prisons across the country. We organized the first demonstration in front of San Quentin on August 21, 1977, initiating the first of what would become a Black August tradition. By September 19, 1977, I was paroled and transferred from San Quentin back to NYC and held in isolation at Rikers Island for 58 days. I was held in isolation because I was supposed to have been transferred to federal authorities in accordance with the stipulations for parole from San Quentin, but instead I was taken to NYC. When NYC/S officials recognized their error, they decided to keep me in NYS, or otherwise possibly lose future custody of me. Eventually, I was transferred to Sing-Sing, enroute to Clinton Correctional Facility for orientation. I stayed at Clinton until December 29, 1977, and was then transferred to Attica.

In the 11 months I stayed at Attica, I eventually inherited the position of chairman of the Lifers’ Committee, an inmate organization working to win lifers’ “good time” off the minimum sentence for good behavior as is given to all other class of prisoners in NYS. At a community forum sponsored by the Attica Lifers’ Committee, former U.S. Attorney Ramsey Clark attended and made a presentation. I originally met Ramsey Clark when waiting on trial in the Tombs Correctional Facility; he and his father came on a tour and I made it a point to speak to both of them. One of the things I said to Mr. Clark was to be sure to tell the people the truth about what is happening in this government. At any rate, at the forum in Attica, he remembered that brief conversation and told people attending that he would help me get out of prison. Unfortunately that has not happened, but he has been a staunch advocate of human rights around the world. After the 1971 insurrection in Attica, prison guards were still treating prisoners abusively, as they do now, and eventually I was accused of organizing what had been called “The Attica Brigade”, a group of prisoners allegedly prepared to retaliate against prison guards’ brutality. I was held for 60 days in the Special Housing Unit (SHU), accused of being the leader of the Attica Brigade. The Attica prison administrators sought to keep me in Administrative Segregation after the 60 days was terminated, but when that failed, I was transferred to Auburn. My nine month stay at Auburn in 1979 was uneventful until there was a fight between two prisoners in the Mosque. The prison authorities decided to take the Mosque from the Muslims and make them conduct their Friday prayer in the Christian chapel. The Muslims rebelled and decided to conduct their Friday prayers in the exercise yard. At the time, praying in the yard was against the rules, and for that act several prisoners were transferred out of Auburn. Again, I was accused of being a ringleader of the Muslims, but was not officially charged with a disciplinary report.

I was transferred to Green Haven Correctional Facility from Auburn in July 1980. Green Haven was found to be one of the most corrupt prisons in New York State. At Green Haven, I became the Executive Director of the inmate organization Creative Communications Committee (CCC). Essentially, the CCC operated as a lifers’ group seeking to influence and change state penal and prison laws. Initiatives were being organized to win lifers’ “good time”. Also, under my direction, CCC sponsored a class action lawsuit challenging the clause in the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that held prisoners are slaves of the state. The lawsuit was supported by a petition that was submitted to the United Nations arguing that the 13th Amendment was in violation of International laws governing human rights. The CCC sponsored community forums inviting NYS legislators, community representatives, and other notable to discuss issues of penal reform. However, in the three year period from 1977-1980, there had been three escapes from Green Haven; drugs, prisoner rapes, and extortion were rampant in the prison. Members of CCC sought to curtail a number of these activities, especially in terms of preventing gang violence due to drugs and extortions. There was a growing base of support and respect from the prisoners for CCC commitment and work. This was noted in Albany when the chairman of the CCC, Ralph “Ratton” Hall, was permitted to give a presentation to a Legislative Assembly Committee.

When the last escape occurred from the visiting room at Green Haven, the authorities decided to revamp and restrict visiting. The series of new regulations were implemented to restrict visiting and prisoners’ movement in the prison. In response, the various prisoners’ organizations, including the Inmate Liason Committee (ILC) and Inmate Grievance Resolution Committee (IGRC), which had been officially created as a result of the demands from the 1971 Attica insurrection, met to discuss a prisoner response. At the meeting, it was decided to gauge the extent of prisoners’ support for any future action by conducting a one day hunger strike. If the prison population supported the strike, then other decisions would be made to ensure prisoners’ concerns were heard and considered by the prison authorities.

When 98% of the entire prison population did not attend any meals in the mess hall, the next day prisoners met to discuss what issues would be brought to the prison administrators and how they would be delivered. The prison administration and Commissioners from Albany wanted to meet with the prison representatives, first calling the ILC and IGRC reps to discuss the problems. However, the ILC and IGRC members informed the prison administrators that they did not represent the population in the hunger strike, claiming that the various inmate organizations must meet and elect representatives to discuss the issues with the prison administrators. Of course, the ILC and IGRC members had been previously instructed on what to say when called by the administrators, several of them being CCC members. The prison administrators permitted the leaders of the inmate organizations to meet, and it was decided that 40 prisoners would meet with the prison authorities, and I would be the spokesperson for the group.

The 40 prisoners met with the Green Haven executive team and Commissioners from Albany, and I presented the prisoners’ grievances. Essentially I informed them that corruption in the prison administration was the cause for the trouble in the prison, and the restrictions being implemented would cause further upheaval. When the meeting began, we asked that it be recorded and that the tape be played on the institutional radio so the entire population could hear what happened, and know they had been adequately represented. At first the prison administrators refused to record the meeting. I then turned to face the prisoners who were seated behind me. They stood in unison, prepared to exist the meeting. At that point, the administrators relented and recorded the entire meeting; it was played back that evening on the institutional radio. At the conclusion of the meeting, it was negotiated and agreed that there would be no retaliation or transfers for those prisoners who had attended the meeting, especially since the prison administrators had asked for the meeting in the first place.

The next day, the Superintendent of Green Haven was transferred, the prison was placed on total lock down for a general shake-down search, and they began transferring prisoners. Three days after transfers began, guards came to my cell claiming I was being transferred. However, I was assaulted by the 6 guards after I had been stripped naked. After a struggle, I was handcuffed, and they put my pants on. Barefooted and bare-chested, I was moved to another housing block and beaten along the way. Then I was transferred to Down State Correctional Facility where I was placed in the SHU and given a disciplinary report that I assaulted one of the guards who came to escort me to be transferred.

At the preliminary disciplinary hearing conducted at Down State, I refuted the charges, and the Lt. conducting the hearing changed the charges in order to defeat my defense against the bogus charge of assault. The next day, I was handcuffed and transferred to Comstock Correctional Facility, roughed-up, and placed in the SHU. There I was put in a cell that was completely enclosed with a quarter-inch sheet of plexi-glass covering the front bars. The sheet of plexi-glass has small holes drilled at the bottom to permit air inside the cell. I was kept in that cell for nearly two weeks. In the day time, the temperature in the cell reached 100 degrees in the middle of July. I would have to lie on the ground for hours to get fresh air and breathe. Today plexi-glass covered cells are being used throughout NYS SHU’s.

In Comstock, they completed the disciplinary hearing, in violation of all their rules governing such hearings, and gave me 6 months in the SHU, losing all privileges. I appealed the decision to the Director of SHU in Albany, who summarily affirmed all charges and sanctions. I then filed an Article 78 petition with the courts, and within a month of filing the petition, Albany reversed all charges, making the petition before the court a moot point, and I was released into the general population at Comstock. However, prior to being released to the general population, I was taken out of the plexi-glass cell in the SHU and placed in a regular cell in the SHU. Many of the prisoners were being abused in the SHU, and the guards permitted a snitch trustee to spray a high-powered fire hose on several prisoners. One in particular was a close friend who was crippled as a result of a stab wound he suffered in Green Haven. To protest the abuse, several prisoners decided to go on a hunger strike. After the 5th day, only 5 of us stood strong, and on the 7th day we were escorted to the hospital. In the hospital, guards tried to intimidate one of the younger hunger strikers, and a more seasoned prisoner, the only white guy in the group, jumped in the officer’s face and took the beat-down for this young, Black kid. We were then placed in isolation cells in the hospital, and after the 11th day living on nothing but water, the prison administrators relented, got rid of the trustee, and assured us changes would be made in the SHU. We were then escorted back to the SHU and given a meal with no disciplinary report for the protest. I had spent nearly 4 months in the SHU for having been assaulted by Green Haven prison guards and having been lied to by prison administrators that there would be no retaliation for meeting with them. Subsequently, the 40 prisoners that were transferred filed and won a lawsuit against Green Haven and NYS Department of Correctional Services; a suit called the “Green Haven 40”.

During the Green Haven lawsuit, then DOCS Commissioner Thomas A. Coughlin testified that I was the leader of a prison take-over at Green Haven, that CCC had become a Black Liberation Army front operation, and that I had established BLA cadres throughout the prison engaged in drug sales, extortion, and intimidation to control the prison. Of course, the jury in the Green Haven 40 lawsuit refuted the Commissioner’s allegations, especially after the tape from the meeting, which we had prisoners in the radio room make a copy and send to a lawyer in the streets for safekeeping, was brought to court and played. This happened right after the Commissioner testified he knew nothing about a tape having ever been made.

While in Comstock, I was able to prevent a riot in the mess hall and was given a commendation. But within the 4 months in Comstock general population, I saw that prisoners were regularly being brutalized by prison guards. This eventually led to a sit-down strike in the prison yard, and, once again, I was accused of being the organizer and ring-leader. I was then transferred back to Auburn, placed in the SHU, and charges with various rule violations. Again, after 4 months in SHU, all charges were dismissed after filing an Article 78 petition in the Court. I was then released to the general population at Auburn, where I stayed for 3 years without incident until transferred in the middle of the day to Clinton Correctional Facility general population. Subsequently, it was later learned that I was transferred because someone claimed I was planning an escape from Auburn, which proved untrue. After a 3 year stay at Clinton without incident, I was transferred back to Green Haven, where I stayed for 4 years, becoming the chairman of Project Build prisoners’ organization. During this time at Green Haven, I received another commendation for preventing a riot in the auditorium, and received awards from various prisoners’ organizations for my participation and leadership in programs. Also during the period, I drafted a legislative bill to win lifers good time. The bill was submitted by NYS Assembly representatives, and was adopted by then Assemblyman Arthur O. Eve, and submitted to the Committee on Corrections. I taught Black history, trained boxers in the gym, and initiated research for the filing of a lawsuit to win prisoners the right to vote. After 4 years in Green Haven, and before I could complete my research for the lawsuit, I was transferred to Eastern Correctional Facility. But I only stayed 8 months because my co-defendant, Herman Bell, wanted to enter the college master program at Eastern, and DOCS would not permit us to be held in the same prison. So, DOCS made a switch, and he was brought to Eastern from Shawangunk, and I was taken to Shawangunk.

At Shawangunk, I continued to teach Black/African studies, as I had done while at Green Haven. I also established the first Men’s Group in a prison in the entire country. I completed a double-major degree, receiving a Bachelor of Science in Psychology and Bachelor of Arts in Sociology, summa cum laud. At the same time, I completed the research on the prisoners’ right to vote and in 1994, I filed the lawsuit in the federal Northern District Court. Yet, Shawangunk also proved to be a prison where guards rigidly exercised their authority, regularly abusing prisoners. Originally, Shawangunk was constructed to be a maxi-max prison to hold the most incorrigible NYS prisoners. Many of the guards maintained that kind of attitude despite the prison operating as a regular maximum security institution. While there, I worked as the clerk in the grievance office, and was able to get a good feel of the atmosphere and sentiments of the prison population. Again, unrest eventually reached a nodal point, and prisoners started a work strike in response to a number of restrictions being arbitrarily implemented after an attempted escape. Once again, I was transferred, this time back to Attica and held in the SHU for 11 days, when charges of leading the strike were down-graded to simply participating in the strike.

While at Attica in 1996, I became the Inman of the Muslim community. Soon into my 6 month stay, DOCS began to implement a statewide policy of double-bunking a number of prisoners due to overcrowding in the sytem. Across NYS prisoners protested this policy, and in Attica, prisoners locked themselves in their cells on a work strike. The work strike, in my opinion, was poorly organized. Because Attica is dived into four sections, with little interaction between prisoners in the different housing areas, it was difficult to organize the strike. Unfortunately, due to the lack of proper communications, some members of gangs supporting the strike would retaliate against prisoners who went to the mess hall to eat, not staying in their cells. This was not a hunger strike, and it could not be expected that prisoners without food in their cells would stay in their cells and not eat. As the Inman of the Muslims, I asked for several representatives of groups to come to the yard to resolve this problem, essentially to stop the prisoner on prisoner violence. The position of the Muslims were that we would support anything that the majority of prisoners decided to do to protest the double-bunking policy, but we were not going to engage in prisoner on prisoner violence to enforce the strike.

In the prison yard, with a number of prisoners, I explained that no one could prevent a prisoner from going to the mess hall to eat, unless they intend to feed those hungry prisoners. Because I was vocal and adamant about this position, prison guards in the gun towers took it upon themselves to interpret that I was instructing prisoners on how to conduct the strike. Once again, I was taken to the SHU and given a disciplinary report of leading a prison strike. At the hearing, I was found guilty, and given 2 years in the SHU. I appealed the sanctions to Albany, which modified them to 9 months, and I was transferred to Elmira Correctional Facility SHU.

Elmira SHU is essentially a sensory deprivation cell block, where for 23 hours a say a prisoner is held in a cell completely enclosed by concrete walls for the exception of a small door opening facing a wall. The only time a prisoner sees another person is when he is going to 1 hour recreation or to and back from a shower 3 times a week. Food is served through a tray opening in the door. Speaking to another prisoner has to be through a crack at the bottom of the door; however yelling to other prisoners is not permitted, and if caught doing so it could result in additional time in the SHU. During the 9 months spent in SHU, I was able to complete the editing of my book, We Are Our Own Liberators!, with the assistance of Bonnie Kerness. I also worked with Herman Ferguson and the New African Liberation Front (NALF) lobbying the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) to reopen COINTELPRO hearings. After 9 months in SHU, the Deputy Superintendent of Security personally gave me an ultimatum: either go into a double-bunk cell in the general population or remain in the SHU. I laughed at him, but he told me to give him my answer the next day. After consulting a very close friend of mine who was in the SHU (he was permitted to sweep and mop during the day), I was advised that the policy had been fully implemented, and many prisoners were asking to go into double-bunk with their friends. He explained that I needed to get back in direct communications with family and friends on the streets, and that my own isolation in SHU would be for nothing. I agreed to be released, and after one week in Elmira general population, one morning at 3 a.m. I was awakened by guards and transferred back to Eastern Correctional Facility.

I stayed at Eastern this time for 3 years, teaching prisoners computer literacy, and in 1997, with the support of Herman Ferguson and my dear comrade Sister Safiya Bukhari, founded and initiated the Jericho ’98 March on the White House. This campaign brought over 6,000 activists and supporters of U.S. political prisoners to Washington, D.C., of which forged into existence the Jericho Amnesty Movement. The time spent in Eastern was without incident, and on May 6, 1999 at 4 a.m., I was awakened and transferred back to Auburn. No reason was given, but within 6 months at Auburn I was placed in the SHU subject to confidential informants statements that I was organizing a strike. Originally, I was being held in administrative segregation pending charges, and when the confidential informant’s statements proved unreliable, my personal property was searched. Hence, they found some literature pertaining to explosives that had been sent to me in the mail while I was in Eastern and was permitted to receive. In fact,